throbber
Exhibit B
`
`PHILIP GREEN
`
`POSITION
`
`EDUCATION
`
`Principal of Hoffman Alvary & Company LI ,C
`
`B.A., History, 1984 — Rutgers College
`M.B.A,, Accounting, 1987 - Rutgers Graduate School of
`Management
`
`PROFESSIONAL AND
`BUSINESS HISTORY
`
`1996 — Present: Principal Hoffman Alvary & Company LLC,
`Newton, MA
`
`
`
`1994 — 1996: Price Waterhouse LLP, Manager/Senior Manager,
`Dispute Analysis and Corporate Recovery Services, New York
`
`1988 — 1994: Executive Consultant, Peterson Consulting Limited
`Partnership, New York
`
`1987 - 1988: Staff Accountant, Ernst & Whinney, New York
`
`1984 - 1985: Paralegal, Anderson, Russell, Kill & Olick,
`Washington, DC. and New York
`
`Dispute Analysis Consulting - Accounting and financial analysis
`assistance in connection with litigation matters focusing on
`intellectual property infringements, contract breaches, business
`interruption and construction delay claims. Work has included the
`calculation of lost profits and other economic damages, forensic
`and investigative accounting and evaluation of royalties. This
`assistance has been provided to a broad range of industries
`including: computer software, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical,
`steel and other manufacturers as well as service organizations.
`Served as expert witness on damages and accounting related
`issues.
`
`Other Consulting ~ Engagements related to intangibles have
`included preparation of valuations in connection with purchases,
`sales and donations, royalty auditing and development of patent
`and intellectual property licensing strategies. Other consulting
`assistance has included business valuations, evaluations of real
`estate appraisals, and implementation of accounting systems and
`assistance with the operation and management of bankrupt or
`troubled companies.
`
`Certified Public Accountant — Registered to Practice by the State
`of New York
`Certified Management Accountant
`Accredited in Business Valuation by the AICPA
`Accredited Senior Appraiser — Business Valuation
`Member, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
`Member, New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants
`Member, Institute of Certified Management Accountants
`Member, American Society of Appraisers
`Member, Licensing Executive Society
`
`PROFESSIONAL AND
`BUSINESS
`AFFILIATIONS
`
`DMC Exhibit 2067_OO1
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Exhibit B
`
`Philip Green
`
`Testimony ~ January 2010 — Present
`
`*Lightlab Imaging, Inc. v. Axsun Technologies, Inc. and Volcano Corporation — Superior Court, Suffolk
`County Massachusetts — Deposition
`
`*Certain Digital Television and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Samp,_1nv. No.
`337-TA-6I7 Enforcement Proceeding — International Trade Commission — Deposition and Trial before
`Judge Charneski
`
`*Zamora LLC v. CBS Radio, Inc, Pandora, Inc., Real Networks, Inc. et a1. — Federal Court — District of
`Florida — Deposition
`
`McNamee v. McNamee — Probate and Family Court, Suffolk County Massachusetts — Deposition and Trial
`before Judge Moriarity
`
`*Ceitain Video Display, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv. 337-TA-687 -
`International Trade Commission — Deposition
`
`*Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Tradfig, Inc., et al. — Federal Court, Southern District of New York -
`Deposition
`
`*ePIus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.. — Federal Court, Eastern District of Virginia — Deposition
`
`Transched Systems Limited v. Versyss Transit Systems et a1. — Superior Court, New Castle County
`Delaware ~ Deposition and Trial before Judge Carpenter
`
`Wayne Spiegel V. Fort Point Commercial Company, Inc. — Superior Court, Suffolk County Massachusetts ~
`Deposition
`
`
`*Certain Large Scale Integrated Circuit Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing the Same Inv. No.
`337 —TA-71 6, International Trade Commission — Deposition
`
`*Hon Hai Precision Industry Company, Ltd. v. TPV Technology Ltd., et a1. — Federal Court — Eastern
`District of Texas — Deposition
`
`*Mondis Technology Limited v. TPV Technology Ltd. et a1. Federal Court — Eastern District of Texas -
`Deposition
`
`*Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. LaRue Tactical, Inc. — Federal Court — District of
`Massachusetts — Deposition
`
`SMH Fine Foods v. Boston Baking, Inc., et a1 — Superior Court, Suffolk County Massachusetts —
`Deposition
`
`*comScore v. The Nielsen Companies — Federal Court — Eastern District of Virginia — Deposition
`
`*Coo er Notification Inc. v. Federal Si nal Cor . et. a1. »—District of Delaware —Deposition
`
`INC Research Holdings, Inc. V Shareholder Representative Services, LLC — Court of Chancery of the State
`of Delaware — Deposition
`
`*Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation — Federal Court — District of Rhode Island — Deposition and
`Trial Before Judge Young
`
`DMC Exhibit 2067_002
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530,
`
`531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Exhibit B
`
`*Lee Valley Tools, et. al. V. Industrial Blade Company, et. al. ~ Federal Court — Western District of New
`York ~ Deposition
`
`*Certain Universal Serial Bus Portable Storage Devices, Including USB Flash Drives and Components
`Thereof Inv. N0. 337-TA—788 — International Trade Commission - Deposition
`
`*Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Troy Industries, Inc. et, al. — Federal Court — District of
`Massachusetts — Deposition
`
`*Ambato Media LLC v. Garmin International Inc., et al. — Federal Court — Eastern District of Texas —
`Deposition and Trial before Judge Gilstrap
`
`ital Televisions and Com onents Thereof ,—In . N0. 337—TA—789 — International Trade
`*Certain Di
`Commission — Deposition
`
`*Pacifrc Coast Marine Windshields Incor orated V. Malibu Boats Inc. — Federal Court — Middle District of
`Florida - Deposition
`
`*AIA En ineerin Limited. v. Ma otteaux Intc. et al. —- Federal Court — Middle District of Tennessee —
`Trial before Judge Haynes
`
`*Certain Digital Photo Frames and Image Display Devices and Components Thereof — Inv. No. 337-TA-
`807 — International Trade Commission ~ Deposition
`
`*Certain Silicon Microphone Packages And Products Containing_Same — Inv. No. 337-TA-825 ~
`International Trade Commission — Deposition and Trial Before Judge Pender
`
`Thomas Bochnowski and Edward Muhlner v. Global Rescue Corp. — JAMS Arbitration — Hearing before
`Judge Van Gestel
`
`*Realtime DataLLLC d/b/a IXO v. Bloomberg_L_LP, et al. ~ Federal Court — Southern District ofNew York
`- Deposition
`
`*Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same — Inv. No. 337-TA-836
`a International Trade Commission — Deposition
`
`,
`E ,
`Inc. et al v. MWAi Inc. — Chancery Court of the State of Delaware — Deposition and Trial before
`Ci
`Judge Parsons
`
`*EdiSync Systems, LLC v. Saba Software, Inc., ~ Federal Court — District of Colorado — Deposition
`
`*Mondis Technology Limited v. TPV Technology Ltd. et al. w JAMS Arbitration — Hearing before Judge
`Daniel Weinstein
`
`*Keurigfiorppration v. Sturm Foods. Inc. — Federal Court — District of Delaware ~ Deposition
`
`*Blake v. PCGS et al. » Federal Court — District of Massachusetts — Trial before Judge Young
`
`*Smartphone Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc. and LG Electronics, Inc. — Federal Court - Eastern District of
`Texas — Deposition
`
`*Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Federal Court — District of Delaware —
`Deposition
`,
`
`DMC Exhibit 2067_OO3
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`IPR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Exhibit B
`
`*Galderma Laboratories Inc. et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al.— Federal Court - District of
`Delaware ~ Deposition
`
`*Ventria Bioscience V. Daichang Yang - Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento
`~ Deposition
`
`*In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Tablet
`Computers. Media Players. and Televisions, and Components Thereof,
`Investigation No. 337—TA-862,
`international Trade Commission — Deposition and Trial before Judge Shaw
`
`*Alcon Pharmaceuticals LTD et al v. Apotex Inc. et al., Federal Court — District of Delaware, Deposition
`
`*GeoTag, Inc. v. Frontier Communications Corp. et. a1., Federal Court — Eastern District of Texas A
`Deposition
`
`Paige Landscape Company, Inc. v. Apple D’Or Maintenance, Inc. ~ Superior Court ~ Worcester County
`Massachusetts - Trial
`
`*Certain Wireless Communication Base Stations and Components Thereof ~ Investigation No. 337—TA—871
`International Trade Commission — Deposition
`
`*Google, Inc. v. GeoTag, Inc. —Federal Court — District of Delaware - Deposition
`
`*Ethox Chemicals LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company — Federal Court — District of South Carolina —
`Deposition
`
`*Columbia Data Products, Inc. v. Autonomy Corporation Limited et a1. — Federal Court — District of
`Massachusetts - Deposition
`
`*Mass Engineered, Inc. v. Humanscale, Inc. —— Federal Court — Eastern District of Virginia — Deposition
`
`*Ascion LLB, et al v. Rouey Lflg, Inc. et a1. — Federal Court — District of Massachusetts 7 Trial before
`Judge O’Toole
`
`*Cheese Systems Inc. v. Tetra Pak Cheese & Powder Sys., Inc., et. al.. — Federal Court ~ Western District
`of Wisconsin 7 Trial before Judge Crabb
`
`Publications Within the Past Ten Years
`
`“Evaluating Reasonable Royalties After ResQNet,” Philip Green and Rachel C. Hughey, IP Law 360,
`October 14, 2010
`
`“The 25% Rule is Dead - Now What?” Philip Green and Creighton G. Hoffman, IP Law 360, January 26,
`201 1
`
`DMC Exhibit 2067_OO4
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530,
`
`531, 532, 533
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket