throbber
(unaudited)
`
`Net income (loss), as reported
`Add: goodwill impairment expense, net of tax
`Adjusted net income (loss), before goodwill impairment expense
`Add: stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
`Add: restructuring and other charges. net oftax
`Add: loss on cxtinguishmcnt of dcbt, not of tax
`Adjusted net income, before goodwill impairment expense, stock-based
`compensation expense, restructuring and other charges, and loss on
`extinguishrnent of debt
`Net income (loss) per share—Diluted, as reported
`Average shares outstanding Diluted, as reported (1)
`Adjustcd nct income (loss) per sharc—Dilutcd, bcforc goodwill impairmcnt cxpcnsc
`Average shares outsta11ding—Diluted (1)
`Adjusted net income per share—Diluted, before goodwill impairment expense,
`stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other charges. and loss
`on cxtinguishrncnt of dcbt
`Average shares outstanding—Dil11ted
`
`2012
`
`$19,372
`—
`19,372
`1,472
`
`14
`
`$20,858
`$
`1.46
`13,267
`1.46
`13,267
`
`SE
`
`Year Ended September 302
`2010
`2009
`
`2011
`
`$22988
`—
`22,988
`1,467
`120
`23
`
`$24,598
`$
`1.75
`13,120
`1.75
`13,120
`
`$
`
`$16829
`—
`16,829
`1,210
`3,514
`32
`
`$21,585
`$
`1.33
`12,691
`1.33
`12691
`
`$
`
`$(40,682)
`50,389
`9,707
`1,253
`968
`76
`
`$ 12,004
`$
`13.39)
`11,985
`0.80
`12,135
`
`SE
`
`2008
`
`$(1,389)
`—
`(1,389)
`1,430
`2,171
`61
`
`$ 2,273
`$ (0.12)
`11.849
`$ (0.12)
`11,849
`
`$
`
`1.57
`13,267
`
`$
`
`1.87
`13,120
`
`$
`
`1.70
`12,691
`
`$
`
`0.99
`12,135
`
`$
`
`0.19
`12,096
`
`(1)
`
`For fiscal years with net loss or adjusted net loss, diluted shares reflect the elimination of the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options
`and restricted stock.
`
`37
`
`Item 7.
`Overview
`
`Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
`
`The following discussion should be read ir1 conjunction with the consolidated fir1ar1cial statements and their related notes included
`elsewhere i11 this report.
`Wc arc thc lcading dcsigncr a11d rctailcr ofmatcrnity apparcl in thc Unitcd Statcs with 2,008 rctail locations, including 625 stores in all 50
`states, Puerto Rico and Canada, and 1,383 leased departments located within department stores and baby specialty stores throughout the United
`States a11d Puerto Rico. We are also tl1e exclusive provider ofmaternity apparel to Kohl’s, which operates approximately 1,146 stores throughout
`the United States. We operate our stores under the Motherhood Maternity, A Pea in the Pod and Destination Maternity retail nameplates. We are
`the exclusive maternity apparel provider in each of our leased department relationships. We have expanded internationally and have entered into
`cxclusivc storc franchisc and product supply rclationships in thc Middle East, India and South Korea. As of Scptcmbcr 30, 2012. wc have 119
`international franchised locations, conrprised of 16 stand-alone stores in the Middle East, South Korea and India operated under one of o11r retail
`narneplates, and 103 shop-i11-shop locations in India and South Korea in which we have a Company branded department operated under retail
`narneplates owned by our franchise partners. Finally, we also sell merchandise on the Internet, primarily through DestinationMatemity.com and
`our various brand—specific websites. We design and contract manufacture over 90% of the merchandise we sell using sewing factories located
`throughout thc world, predominantly outside of thc Unitcd Statcs. Substantially all of thc mcrchandisc produccd outside of thc Lnitcd Statcs is
`paid for in United States dollars.
`In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of operational a11d financial measures. The key measures for determining
`how our business is performing are net income determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP net income”) and
`the corresponding net income (or earnings) per share (diluted), 11et income before stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other
`charges, and loss on extinguislmient of debt (“.\Ion-GAAP adjusted net income”) and the corresponding earnings per share (diluted), Adjusted
`EBITDA, net sales, and comparable sales (which consists of comparable store sales and Internet sales). Adjusted EBITDA represents operating
`income before deduction for the following non—cash charges: (i) depreciation and amortization expense; (ii) loss on impairment of tangible and
`intangible assets: (iii) loss on disposal ofassets; and (iv) stock-based compensation expense.
`Following is a summary ofour fiscal 2012 results with regard to each of the key measures noted above:
`
`Source: Destnnation ivlaternity Corp, 10~’v<, 1271/V2012 | Powered by Intelllgize
`
`
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_O86
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Fiscal 2012 Fimmciul Results
`

`

`


`

`
`GAAP 11et income for fiscal 2012 was $19.4 million, a 1 % decrease compared to GAAP net income of $23.0 million for fiscal 2011. GAAP
`.
`diluted earnings per share for fiscal 201 2 was $1 .46, a 17% decrease compared to GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1 .75 for fiscal 201 l
`Non—GAAP adjusted net income for fiscal 2012 was $20.9 million, a 15% decrease compared to comparably adjusted Non—GAAP net income
`of $24.6 million for fiscal 2011. Non—GAAP diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2012 was $1.57, a 16% decrease compared to Non—GAAP
`diluted earnings per share of$1.87 for fiscal 2011.
`Adjusted EBITDA was $49.9 million for fiscal 2012, an 8% decrease compared to $54.4 million of Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2011.
`Net sales for fiscal 2012 decreased 0.7% to S541.5 million from $545.4 million for fiscal 2011.
`
`Comparable sales for fiscal 2012 decreased 0.3% versus a comparable sales increase of 0.1% for fiscal 2011.
`38
`
`Results of Operations
`The following table sets forth certain operating data from our consolidated statements ofincome as a percentage of net sales and as a
`percentage change for t11e periods indicated:
`
`Net sales
`Cost of goods sold (2)
`Gross profit
`Selling. general and administrative expenses (3)
`Storc closing, asset impairment and asset disposal cxpenscs
`Restructuring and other charges
`Operating income
`Interest expense, net
`Loss on extinguishment of debt
`Income before income taxes
`Income tax provision
`Net i11Co111e
`
`% ofNet Sales (1)
`
`Year Ended September 30:
`
`2012
`
`100.0%
`E
`53.7
`47.2
`0.4
`i
`6.1
`0.2
`w
`5.9
`2.3
`3.6%
`
`2011
`
`100.0%
`45.6
`54.4
`47.2
`0.2
`0.0
`7 0
`0 4
`0 0
`6.6
`2 4
`4.2%
`
`2010
`
`100.0%
`45.2
`54.8
`47.4
`0.4
`1.1
`5.9
`0.6
`0.0
`5.3
`2.1
`3.2%
`
`% Period to Period
`Favorable (ynfavorahle)
`Year Ended September
`30:
`2012
`2011
`VS.
`VS.
`2011
`2010
`
`(0.7)%
`(0.9)
`(2.1)
`0.7
`(90.9)
`100.0
`(13.4)
`45.6
`40.5
`(11.4)
`3.8
`(1 5.7)%
`
`2.7%
`(3.5)
`2.0
`(2.3)
`54.5
`96.6
`21.7
`32.3
`27.5
`28.1
`(15.4)
`36.6%
`
`( 1)
`(2)
`
`Components may not add to total due to rounding.
`The “cost of goods sold” line item includes: merchandise costs (including customs duty expenses), expenses related to inventory shrinkage,
`
`Source: Destination ivlaternity Corp, 10~K, 12/14!2Q12.
`
`| Powered by Intelllgize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_O87
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`(3)
`
`product-related corporate expenses (including expenses related to our payroll, benefit costs and operating expenses of our buying
`departnrents), inventory reserves (including lower‘ of cost or rrrarket reserves), inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs,
`inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs, and the other costs of our distribution network.
`The “selling, general and administrativc cxpcnscs” linc item includes: advertising and marketing cxpcnscs, corporatc administrativc
`expenses, store expenses (including store payroll and store occupancy expenses), and store opening expenses.
`The following tables set forth certain information regarding the number of our retail locations and international franchised locations, for the
`fiscal years indicated. Retail locations include stores and leased maternity apparel departments and exclude locations where Kohl’s sells our
`products under an exclusive product and license agreement and international franchised locations.
`
`Retail Locations (1)
`Beginning of period
`Opened
`Closed
`End ofperiod
`
`2012
`
`Leased
`Departments
`1,694
`13
`(324)
`1,383
`
`Total
`Retail
`Locations
`2,352
`21
`(365)
`2,008
`
`Stores
`658
`8
`(41)
`625
`
`Year Ended September 30:
`2011
`Total
`Retail
`Locations
`1,725
`706
`(79)
`2,352
`
`Leased
`Departments
`1,027
`694
`(27)
`1,694
`
`Stores
`698
`12
`(52)
`658
`
`2010
`
`Leased
`Departments
`360
`680
`(13)
`1,027
`
`Total
`Retail
`Locations
`1.084
`691
`(50)
`1.725
`
`Stores
`724
`11
`(37)
`698
`
`( 1)
`
`Excludes (i) locations where Kohl’s sells our products under an exclusive product and license agreement, and (ii) international franchised
`locations.
`
`39
`
`2012
`
`Stores
`
`Shop-in-Shop
`Locations
`
`Total
`International
`Franchised
`Locations
`
`Year Ended September 30,
`2011
`
`Stores
`
`Shop-in-Shop
`Locations
`
`Total
`International
`Franchised
`Locations
`
`2010
`
`Stores
`
`Shop-in-Shop
`Locations
`
`15
`2
`(1)
`16
`
`51
`54
`(2)
`103
`
`66
`56
`(3)
`119
`
`8
`7
`—
`15
`
`B
`29
`(1)
`51
`
`31
`36
`(1)
`66
`
`1
`7
`—
`8
`
`7
`16
`—
`Z3
`
`Total
`International
`Franchised
`Locations
`
`8
`23
`—
`31
`
`International
`Franchised Locations
`
`Beginning of period
`Opened
`Closed
`End ofperiod
`
`In fiscal 2012 we also operated leased departments in Babies“R”Us stores. However, in connection with our new broad—based partnership
`with Bed Bath & Bcyond Inc. and its subsidiary, Buy Buy Baby, 1nc., (which we announced in May 2012) we discontinucd operation of our 124
`remaining leased departments ir1 Babies“R”Us 111 late October 2012 and opened leased departments in select buybuy BABY stores. As of
`November 30, 2012 we operate 10 leased departments in buybuy BABY stores. As 0fAugust 25, 2012, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. had 71 buybuy
`BABY stores. Over time, we expect to significantly increase the number of buybuy BABY stores in which we have a maternity apparel leased
`department.
`
`Year Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2011
`Net Sales. Our net sales for fiscal 2012 decreased by 0.7% or $3.9 million. to $541.5 million from $545 .4 million for fiscal 2011. Comparable
`sales decreased 0.3% during fiscal 2012 versus a comparable sales increase of0. l % during fiscal 201 l
`. The decrease in total reported sales for
`fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 resulted primarily from decreased sales related to our continued efforts to close underperforming stores and
`
`1'
`Source: Destination iv1ater'nity Corp, 10-K, 12/1~’%!2-
`
`:12
`
`I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_O88
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`decreased sales from our licensed relationship, partially offset by increased sales due to the full-year impact of the expansion of our maternity
`apparel leased department relationship with Macy’s in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
`As of September 30, 2012, we operated a total of 625 stores and 2,008 total retail locations: 507 Motherhood Maternity stores (including 84
`Motherhood Maternity Outlet stores), 36 A Pea in thc 1’od stores, 82 Destination Maternity stores, and 1,383 leased matcrnity apparel
`departments, of which 515 were in Sears stores under the Two Hearts Maternity brand and the balance were in other department stores and baby
`specialty stores, primarily under the Motherhood brand. In addition, our Oh Baby by Motherhood collection is available at Kohl’s stores
`throughout the United States. In comparison, as of September 30, 2011, we operated a total of 658 stores and 2,352 total retail locations: 535
`Motherhood Maternity stores (including 85 Motherhood Maternity Outlet stores), 43 A Pea in the Pod stores, 80 Destination Maternity stores,
`and 1,694 leased maternity apparel departments. The decrease in leased department locations at September 30, 2012 versus September 30, 2011
`predominantly reflects the closing of our remaining 29] Kmart leased department locations in October 201 l . As of September 30, 2012, our store
`total included 82 Destination Maternity nrulti-brand stores, including 50 Destination Maternity corrrbo stores and 32 Destination Maternity
`superstores. In comparison, as of September 30, 2011, we operated 80 Destination Maternity multi-brarrd stores, including 52 Destination Maternity
`combo stores and 28 Destination Maternity superstores. During fiscal 2012, we opened eight stores, including six Destination Maternity stores,
`and closed 41 stores, with 12 of these store closings related to Dcstination Maternity store openings. In addition, during fiscal 2012, we opened 13
`leased department locations and closed 324 leased department locations, reflecting the closing of our remaining 291 Kmart leased department
`locations in October 201 1 .
`
`Gross Profit. Our gross profit for fiscal 2012 decreased by 2.1%, or $6.2 million, to $290.7 million compared to $296.9 million for fiscal 2011,
`and our gross profit as a percentage of net sales (gross margin) for fiscal 2012 was 53.7% compared to 54.4% for fiscal 2011. The decrease in gross
`profit for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 was due primarily to our lower gross rrrargin, and to a lesser extent, lower gross profit due to our
`decreased sales. The decrease in gross margin for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 was primarily due to lower
`40
`
`merchandise margin driven by higher product costs and somewhat higher levels of promotional activity and markdowns.
`Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2012 decreased by 0.7%, or $1.8
`million, to $255.6 million from $257.4 million for fiscal 2011. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses was 47.2% for
`both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011. 'lhe slight decrease in expense for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 resulted primarily from lower expenses
`related to our continued efforts to close nnderperforming stores (primarily payroll and occupancy costs), our continued tight expense controls,
`and lower‘ variable incentive compensation expense, substantially offset by higher expenses related to the operation of our additional Maey’s
`leased department locations (primarily payroll and employee benefit costs, and percentage of net sales occupancy payments to Macy’s) and
`higher advertising and marketing expenses.
`Store Clori/zg, ,4 met Impairment and/lmet Di.xp(7.x'a1Evcperzser. Our store closing, asset impairment and asset disposal expenses for fiscal
`2012 increased by approximately S1.0 million, to $2.0 million from $1.0 million for fiscal 2011, which primarily reflected higher impairment charges for
`write-downs oflong-lived assets.
`Restructuring and Other Charges. In fiscal 2011, we incurred pretax expense of $0.2 million for relocation costs in connection with the hiring
`of our new President. We did not incur any restructuring and other charges in fiscal 2012.
`Operating Income. Our operating income for fiscal 2012 decreased by 13.4%, or $5.1 million, to $33.1 million from $38.2 million for fiscal 2011.
`r\.m«..+:..,. :..,m...,\ /\/V /\ v\/\w</\/\v\fnI\'r\ /\"‘il\'\" /Vnl/\N +‘.w +‘.m...1 "NH '3 /I/\I\w</'\nNr\/*1 +n L 10/. Fww...
`'1 no/. Par +‘.m...l ’)I\1 1
`'I'l..,\ /lr\/\v~«\nrV/\ :94 n.m.~..+:..,. :94/I/\v\n'\ M“!
`
`Source: Destination Maternity Corp, 10—K, 12/14/2012 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_O89
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`/.U"/0 1UI 1lSU'(l1 LU1 1. 1116 LICK/'I'C'(lSCl lIl UIJC1"(ll1Ilg lIlCUIIlE! '(lIlLl
`lJpCI"(lllIlg 1IlUUIIlC3 ‘(IS ‘(I PCIK/'CIll'(lgC U1 Iltil 521165 101' 1150211 1.'U1L LIUUICHSCLI IU 0.1“/D 1I'UIIl
`operating income percentage was primarily due to our lower gross profit and lower gross margin.
`Interest Expense, Net. Our net interest expense for fiscal 2012 decreased by 45.6%, or $1.0 million, to $1.2 million from $2.2 million in fiscal
`201 1 . This decrease was due to our lower debt level, primarily as a result of the $1 5.0 million of Term Loan prepayments we made in fiscal 2012 and
`the $12.6 million of Te1n1 Loan prepayments we 111ade in fiscal 2011, a11d to a lesser extent, lower interest rates. Duri11g fiscal 2012 a11d 2011, we did
`not have any direct borrowings under our credit facility and we did not have any direct borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2012.
`Loss on Extirzguishmezzt 0fDebt. During fiscal 2012, wc prcpaid $15.0 million principal amount of our outstanding Tcrm Loan, which rcsultcd
`in pretax charges of $22,000, representing the write-off ofunamortized deferred financing costs. During fiscal 201 1, we prepaid $12.6 million
`principal amount of our outstanding Term Loan, which resulted in pretax charges totaling $37,000.
`Income Taxes. For fiscal 2012, our effective tax rate was 39.2% compared to 36.1% for fiscal 2011. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2012 was
`higher than the statutory federal tax rate of35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes, net of federal tax benefit, and to a lesser extent,
`additional income tax expense (including interest a11d penalties) recognized as required by the acco11nti11g standard for uncertain i11co111e tax
`positions. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was slightly higher than the statutory federal tax rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state
`income taxes, net of federal benefit, on our pretax income for fiscal 2011, partially offset by reductions of state income tax expense, net of federal
`expense, of $0.9 million recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, which were related to settlements of uncertain income tax positions. See Note
`15 ofthc Notes to Consolidated Financial Statcmcnts, includcd clscwhcrc in this rcport, for the reconciliation of thc statutory fcdcral income tax
`rate to our effective tax rate.
`
`Net Income. Net income for fiscal 2012 decreased by 15.7%, to $19.4 million from $23.0 million for fiscal 2011. Net income per sl1are (diluted)
`for fiscal 2012 dccrcascd by 16.6%, to $1.46 per share from $1.75 per share in fiscal 2011. Net income for fiscal 2012 i11c1udcs (11ct of tax) stock-bascd
`compensation expense of$l .5 million and loss on extinguishment of debt of $14,000. Net income for fiscal 201 1 includes (net oftax) stock—based
`compensation expense of $1.5 million, restructuring and other charges of $0.1 million, a11d loss on exti11g11islm1e11t of debt of $23,000. Before stock-
`based con1pensatio11 expense, restructuring and other charges,
`
`41
`
`and loss on extinguishment of debt, our fiscal 201 2 net income was $20 .9 million or $1 .57 per share (diluted) compared to $24.6 million or $1 .87 per
`share (diluted) for fiscal 2011.
`Our average diluted shares outstanding of 13.3 million for fiscal 2012 was 1.1% higher than the 13.1 million average diluted shares
`outstanding for fiscal 2011. The increase in average shares outstanding reflects the higher shares outstanding i11 fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal
`201 1, primarily as a result of the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock, slightly offset by lower dilutive impact ofoutstanding
`stock options a11d restricted stock for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.
`Following is a reconciliation of net income and net income per share (diluted) (“Diluted EPS”) to net income and Diluted EPS before stock-
`based compensation expense, restructuring and other charges, and loss on extinguishment of debt for the years ended September 30, 201 2 and
`2011 (i11 thousands, except per share a111o1111ts):
`
`As reported
`Add: stock—based compensation expense, net of tax
`Add: restructuring and otl1cr chargcs, net of tax
`Add: loss on extinguishment of debt, net oftax
`As adjusted before stock—based compensation expense, restructuring and other
`charges, and loss on extinguishment of debt
`
`Year Ended
`September 30. 2012
`Net
`Diluted
`Diluted
`Income
`Shares
`EPS
`
`Year Ended
`September 30. 2011
`Net
`Diluted
`Diluted
`Income
`Shares
`EPS
`
`$ 1.46
`
`$19,372
`1,472
`—
`14
`
`13,267
`—
`—
`—
`
`$ 1.75
`
`$22,988
`1,467
`120
`Z3
`
`13,120
`—
`—
`—
`
`$20,858
`
`13,267
`
`$ 1.57
`
`$24,598
`
`13,120
`
`$ 1.87
`
`Source: Destination ivlaternity Corp, 10~’v<, 12,/14!20:l2.
`
`| Powered by Intelllgize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_O90
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Year Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2010
`Net Sales. Our net sales for fiscal 2011 increased by 2.7% or S14.2 million, to $545 .4 million from $531.2 million for fiscal 2010. Comparable
`sales increased 0.1% during fiscal 2011 versus a comparable sales decrease of 3.4% during fiscal 2010. The increase in total reported sales for fiscal
`2011 compared to fiscal 2010 resulted primarily from increased sales due to the expansion of our maternity apparel leased department relationship
`with Macy’s, partially offset by decreased sales related to our continued efforts to close underperforming stores.
`As of September 30, 2011, we operated a total of 658 stores and 2,352 total retail locations: 535 Motherhood Maternity stores (including 85
`Motherhood Maternity Outlet stores), 43 A Pea in the Pod stores, 80 Destination Maternity stores, and 1,694 leased maternity apparel
`departments, of which 821 were in Sears and Kmart stores under the Two Ilearts Maternity brand and the balance were in other department stores
`and baby specialty stores, primarily under the Motherhood brand. In addition, our O11 Baby by Motherhood collection is available at Kohl’s stores
`throughout the United States. In comparison, as of September 30, 2010, we operated a total of 698 stores and 1,027 total retail locations: 567
`Motherhood Maternity stores (including 84 Motherhood Matemity Outlet stores), 56 A Pea in the Pod stores, 75 Destination Maternity stores,
`and 1,027 leased maternity apparel departments. The increase in leased department locations at September 30, 201 1 versus September 30, 2010
`predominantly reflects the opening of 5 16 leased department locations in January and February 2011 for our Macy’s expansion, and an additional
`168 Sears and Kmart leased department locations in October 2010. As of September 30, 201 1, our store total included 80 Destination Maternity
`multi-brand stores, including 52 Destination Maternity combo stores and 28 Destination Maternity superstores. In comparison, as of September 30,
`2010, we operated 75 Destination Maternity multi-brand stores, including 49 Destination Maternity combo stores and 26 Destination Maternity
`superstores. During fiscal 2011, we opened 12 stores, including 7 Destination Maternity stores, and closed 52 stores, with 11 of these store
`closings related to Destination Maternity store openings. In addition. during fiscal 2011, we opened 694 leased department locations and closed 27
`leased department locations.
`Gross Profit. Our gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased by 2.0%, or $5.9 million, to $296.9 million compared to $291.0 million for fiscal 2010. and
`our gross profit as a percentage of net sales (gross margin) for
`
`42
`
`fiscal 2011 was 54.4% compared to 54.8% for fiscal 2010. The increase in gross profit for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 was primarily due to our
`increased sales, partially offset by the slightly lower gross margin, which resulted primarily from higher promotional activity and markdowns, and
`to a much lesser extent, from higher product costs for Fall 2011 merchandise.
`Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2011 increased by 2.3%, or
`approximately $5.7 million, to $257.4 million from S251.7 million for fiscal 2010. As a percentage ofnet sales, selling, general and administrative
`expenses for fiscal 2011 decreased to 47.2% compared to 47.4% for fiscal 2010. The increase in expense for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010
`resulted primarily from higher expenses related to the launch and operation of our additional Macy’s leased department locations (primarily payroll
`and employee benefit costs, and percentage ofnet sales occupancy payments to Macy’s) and increased legal expenses, partially offset by lower
`variable incentive compensation expense and our continued expense control initiatives. The decrease in expense percentage for fiscal 2011 reflects
`the favorable leverage from our increased sales and our continued expense control initiatives.
`Store Closing, Asset Impairment and Asset Disposal Expenses. Our store closing, asset impairment and asset disposal expenses for fiscal
`2011 decreased by approxirnately $1.3 million, to $1.0 million fiom $2.3 million for fiscal 2010, which p1’in1a1‘ilyreflected lower in1pain11er1t charges for
`write-downs oflong-lived assets.
`Restructuring and Ot/ier Charges. ln fiscal 2011, we incurred pretax expense of $0.2 million from our management transition. In fiscal 2010,
`we incurred pretax expense of $5.7 million from our strategic restructuring, cost reduction and other initiatives, and our management transition. See
`“Restructuring a11d Other Charges” ir1 this Item 7 below for a detailed description of these charges.
`l')vmv/vrivzn I1/v/‘r114/ml flnr nnprnrinn irmnmp fnr fiqnnl 701 1
`innnancp/*1 11v '71 70,/.. nr ‘RR R millinn tn ‘C132 7 millinn finm (21 A millinn fnr fiqonl 7010
`
`Source: Destination Maternity Corp, 10—K, 12/14/2012 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_O91
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`uye: wttn5 uteume. um vtlvjuuus Juvuurv nu uauur ax/1 1 ululvuavu u_y 41. r /u, u: nuu.u uuiuuu, Lu LU./\}.k ujuuvu LIVJJJ .u.u .-r Juuuuu nu uavtu AVLU.
`Operating income as a percentage ofnet sales for fiscal 2011 increased to 7.0% from 5.9% for fiscal 2010. The increase in operating income was
`primarily due to our higher gross profit and significantly lower restructuring and other charges, partially offset by higher selling, general and
`administrative expenses. The increase in operating income percentage was primarily due to our significantly lower restructuring and other charges.
`Interest Expense, Net. Our net interest expense for fiscal 2011 decreased by 32.3%, or $1.1 million, to $2.2 million from $3.3 million in fiscal
`2010. This decrease was due to our lower debt level, primarily as a result of the $12.6 million of Term Loan prepayments we made in fiscal 2011 and
`the $11.0 million of Term Loan prepayments we 111ade in fiscal 2010, and to a u1ucl1 lesser extent, lower interest rates. During fiscal 2011, we did 11ot
`have any direct borrowings under our credit facility and we did not have any direct borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2011. During fiscal
`2010, our average daily level of direct borrowings under our credit facility was $0.4 million.
`I,0s.v on Extinguislzrnent «7fDeI:t. During fiscal 201 1, we prepaid $12.6 million principal amount of our outstanding Term Loan, which resulted
`i11 pretax charges of $37,000, represeutirrg the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs. During fiscal 2010, we prepaid $l1.0111illio11
`principal amount of our outstanding Term Loan, which resulted in pretax charges totaling $51,000.
`Ineome Taxes. For fiscal 201 1, our effective tax rate was 36.1% compared to 40.1% for fiscal 2010. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 201 1 was
`slightly higher than the statutory federal tax rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes, net of federal benefit, on our pretax
`income for fiscal 2011, partially offset by reductions of state income tax expense, net of federal expense, of $0.9 million recorded in the second
`quarter of fiscal 2011, which were related to settlements of uncertain income tax positions. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 was higher than the
`statutory federal tax rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes, net of federal benefit, and additional income tax expense
`(including interest a11d pcnaltics) recognized as required by the accounting standard for unccrtain incomc tax positions. Scc Note 15 of the Notes
`to Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere in this report, for the reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to o11r
`effective tax rate.
`
`Net Income. Net income for fiscal 2011 increased by 36.6%. to $23.0 million from $16.8 million for fiscal 2010. Net income per share (diluted)
`for fiscal 201 1 increased by 31 .6%, to $1.75 per share from $1.33 per share
`43
`
`in fiscal 2010. Net income for fiscal 2011 includes (net of tax) stock—based compensation expense of $1.5 million, restructuring and other charges of
`$0.1 million, and loss on extinguishment of debt of $23,000. Net i11come for fiscal 2010 includes (net oftax) stock—based compensation expense of
`$1 .2 million, restructuring and other charges of $3.5 million, and loss on extinguishment of debt of $3 2,000. Before stock—based compensation
`expense, restructurirrg and other charges, and loss o11 extinguishment of debt, our fiscal 2011 net income was $24.6 million or $1.87 per share
`(diluted) compared to $21.6 million or $1.70 per share (diluted) for fiscal 2010.
`Our average diluted shares outstanding of 13.1 million for fiscal 2011 was 3.4% higher than the 12.7 million average diluted shares
`outstanding for fiscal 2010. The increase in average shares outstanding reflects the higher shares outstanding in fiscal 201 1 compared to fiscal
`2010, primarily as a result of the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock, slightly offset by lower dilutive impact of outstanding
`stock options a11d restricted stock for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.
`Following is a reconciliation ofnet income and Diluted EPS to net income and Diluted EPS before stock—based compensation expense,
`restructurirrg and other charges, and loss on extinguishment of debt for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (i11 thousands, except per
`share amounts):
`
`V:-nr Furl:-1|
`
`V:-nr Fnrlml
`
`Source: Destination Maternity Corp, 10—K, 12/14/2012 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2041_092
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`As reported
`Add: stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
`Add: restructuring and other charges, net oftax
`Add: loss o11 extinguishnlent of debt, 11et of tax
`As adjusted before stock-based compensation expense, restructuring a11d other
`charges, a11d loss on extingnishrnent of debt
`
`September 30. 2011
`Net
`Diluted
`Income
`Shares
`
`Diluted
`EPS
`
`September 30. 2010
`Net
`Diluted
`Diluted
`Income
`Shares
`EPS
`
`$ 1.75
`
`$22,988
`1,467
`120
`B
`
`13,120
`—
`—
`—
`
`$ 1.33
`
`$16,829
`1,210
`3,514
`32
`
`12,691
`—
`—
`—
`
`$24,598
`
`13,120
`
`$ 1.87
`
`$21,585
`
`12,691
`
`$ 1.70
`
`Restructuring and Other Charges
`In July 2008, we announced that we were streamlining our merchandise brands and store nameplates and implementing cost reductions in
`order to simplify our business model, reduce overhead costs and improve and tighten our merchandise assortments. and during fiscal 2009 we
`began to implement actions to achieve further cost reductions. The objectives of our restructuring and cost reduction program were to improve
`and simplify critical processes, consolidate activities and infrastructure, and reduce our expense structure. As of September 30, 2010, we had
`completed the planned activities of these initiatives and we incurred $3.9 million of pretax expense substantially related to these initiatives in fiscal
`2010, primarily for consulting services. These initiatives resulted in approximate pretax savings of $12 million in fiscal 2009, with incremental pretax
`savings of approximately $11 million in fiscal 2010 and an additional approximately $6 million in fiscal 2011. Thus we estimated that we realized total
`prctax savings of approximately $29 million in fiscal 2011 as a rcsult of our cost reduction initiatives, which included thc savings rcalizcd i11 fiscal
`2009 and fiscal 2010.
`
`After his retirement on September 30, 2008, Dan Matthias, our former Chief Executive Officer (“Former CEO”), agreed to continue to serve us
`as a director and as no11-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and agreed to remain available to us in an advisory capacity through
`September 2012. For these services, we agreed to pay the Former CEO a11 annual retainer of $200,000 through September 2012. In November 2009,
`tl1e Forrner CEO e11tered i11to a letter agreement with us, which confinned that he would not seek reelection to tl1e Board of Directors (and,
`therefore, would no longer serve as our non-executive Chairman of the Board) after the expiration of his term in January 2010. The letter agreement
`did not change the terms of payment under the annual retainer for advisory services, however we incurred a pretax charge of $0.6 million in fiscal
`2010, representing the amount due for the remaining term of the arrangement.
`
`44
`
`In connection with the retirement of Rebecca Matthias. our former President and Chief Creative Officer, at the end of fiscal 2010, we incurred
`a pretax charge of $0.9 million in fiscal 2010. The charge reflects benefit costs related to an amendment to the executives supplemental retirement
`agreement with us.
`111 April 2011. we announccd the hiring of Chris l_)anicl as our President effective June 1, 2011. ln conncction with our efforts to hire a new
`President, we incurred pretax charges of $0.2 million in fiscal 2011 for relocation

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket