throbber
higher markdowns, as well as the decreased appeal ofour brands. Particular fashion trends, or an inaccuracy ofour forecasts regarding fashion
`trends, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, in fiscal 2007 we were
`negatively impacted from the popularity of certain styles in the non—matemity women’s apparel market, such as trapeze and baby—doll dresses and
`tops, which can more readily fit a pregnant woman early in her pregnancy than typical no11-matcmity fashions.
`
`Thefailure to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified senior management personnel could have a material adverse impact on our
`business, financial condition and results of operations.
`Our business requires disciplined execution at all levels of our organization in order to timely deliver and display fashionable merchandise in
`appropriate quantities in our stores. This execution requires experienced and talented management. We currently have a management team with a
`great deal of experience with us a11d in apparel retailing. If we were to lose the benefit of tl1is experience, our business, financial conditio11 and
`results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. On November 6, 2009, we announced the retirement ofRebecca Matthias, our co-
`founder, at the end of fiscal 2010. Pursuant to our transition agreement with Ms. Matthias, she will be a full—time employee ofthe Company until
`June 5, 2010. After June l5, 2010, Ms. Matthias will remain in an employment relationship with us on a part—time basis through September 30, 2010,
`and will then provide consulting services to us, as requested, through September 30, 2012. If we were unable to compensate for the loss of tlie
`benefit of \ls. \/latthias’ experience, our business, financial condition and results ofoperations could be materially and adversely affected.
`In addition, as our business expands, we believe that our success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly
`skilled and qualified personnel. There is a high level of competition for personnel in the retail industry. Like most retailers, we experience significant
`employee turnover rates, particularly among store sales associates and managers, and our continued growth will require us to hire and train even
`more new personnel. V\7e therefore must continually attract, hire and train new personnel to meet o11r staffing needs. We constantly compete for
`qualified personnel with companies in our industry and in other industries. A significant increase in the turnover rate among our sales associates
`and managers would increase our recruiting and training costs and could decrease our operating efficiency and productivity. If we are unable to
`retain our employees or attract, train. assimilate or retain other skilled personnel in the future, we may not be able to service our customers as
`effectively, which could impair our ability to increase sales and could otherwise harm our business.
`
`Our quarterly operating results and inventory levels may fluctuate significantly as a result ofseasonality in our business.
`Our business, like that of other retailers, is seasonal. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
`achieved for a full fiscal year. Quarterly results may fluctuate materially depending upon, among other things, increases or decreases in comparable
`store sales, the timing of new store openings and new leased department openings, net sales a11d profitability contributed by new stores and
`leased departments, the timing of the fulfillment of purchase orders under our product and license arrangements, adverse weather conditions,
`shifts ill the timing of certai11 holidays and promotions, changes in inventory a11d production levels and the timing of deliveries of inventory, and
`changes in our merchandise mix. Our quarterly net sales have historically been highest in our third fiscal quarter, corresponding to the Spring
`selling season, followed by our first fiscal quarter, corresponding to the Fall/holiday selling season. Given the historically higher sales level in our
`third fiscal quarter and the relatively fixed nature of most of our operating expenses and interest expense. we have typically generated a very
`significant percentage of our full year operating in come and net income during our third fiscal quarter. Thus, any factors which result in a material
`reduction of o11r sales for the third quarter could have a material adverse effect o11 our results of operations for our fiscal year as a whole. Seasonal
`fluctuations in sales also affect our inventory levels, as we usually order merchandise in advance of peak selling periods and sometimes before
`new fashion trends are confirmed by customer purchases. We must carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the Fall/holiday and
`Spring selling seasons. If we are not successful in selling our inventory during this period. we may be forced to rely on markdowns or promotional
`sales to sell the excess inventory or we may not be able to sell the inventory at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
`financial condition and results of operations.
`
`23
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2009 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_023
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Our business depends on sustained demandfor maternity clothing and is sensitive to birth rates, women ’sfashion tren dv, econ umic conditions
`and consumer spending.
`Our business depends upon sustained demand for matemity clothing. Our future performance will be subject to a number of factors beyond
`our control, including demographic changes, fashion trends, economic conditions and consumer spending. If demand for maternity clothing were
`to decline for any reason. such as a decrease in the number of pregnancies, our operating results could be adversely affected. Additionally, our
`operating results could be adversely affected if certain non-matemity women’s apparel fashions have a more pregnancy-fiiendly fit. For example, in
`fiscal 2007, we were negatively impacted by the popularity of certain styles i11 the non-maternity women’s apparel market, such as trapeze and
`baby-doll dresses a11d tops, which can more readily fit a pregnant woman early i11 her pregnancy than typical 11on-maternity fashions. Downturns,
`or the expectation of a downturn, in general economic conditions could adversely affect consumer spending patterns, our business, financial
`condition and results of operations. In addition, the specialty apparel retail business historically has been subject to cyclical variations. Consumer
`purchases of specialty apparel products, including maternity wear, may decline during recessionary periods and at other times when disposable
`income is lower. Declines in consumer spending patterns may have a more negative effect o11 apparel retailers than some other retailers. Therefore,
`we may not be able to maintain our historical sales and earnings, or remain as profitable, if there is a decline in consumer spending patterns. A
`prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
`
`If an independent manufacturer violates labor or other laws, or is accused of violating any such laws, or
`those generally accepted as ethical, it could harm our business and brand image.
`While we maintain policies and guidelines with respect to labor practices that independent manufacturers that produce goods for us are
`contractually required to follow, and while we have an independent firm and Company employees inspect certain manufacturing sites to monitor
`compliance, we cannot control the actions of such manufacturers or the public’s perceptions of them, nor can we assure that these manufacturers
`will conduct their businesses using ethical or legal labor practices. Apparel companies can be heldjointly liable for the wrongdoings ofthe
`manufacturers of their products. While many of our independent manufacturers are routinely monitored by buying representatives, who assist us
`in the areas of compliance, garment quality and delivery, we do not control the manufacturers’ business practices or their employees’ employment
`conditions, and manufacturers act in their own interest which may be in a manner that results in negative public perceptions of us, and/or
`employee allegations against us or court determinations that we are jointly liable. Violations of law by our importers, buying agents, manufacturers
`or distributors could result in delays in shipments and receipt of goods and could subject us to fines or other penalties, any of which could restrict
`o11r business activities, increase our operating expenses or cause our sales to decline.
`
`their labor practices diverge from
`
`We may be unable to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property and may be subject to liability if we are alleged to have infringed
`on an oth er party ’s intellectual property.
`We believe that our trademarks, service marks and other intellectual property are important to our continued success and our competitive
`position due to their recognition with our customers. We devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection ofour trademarks,
`service marks and other intellectual property. Although we actively protect our intellectual property, there can be no assurance that the actions
`that we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks, service marks and other intellectual property, including our rights in our management
`information systems and our proprictary rights in products for which we have applied for patent protcction (for cxamplc, our Sccrct l~'it Bcllym
`innovation). will be adequate to prevent imitation of our marks, products or services by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of
`our products as a violation of their trademarks, service marks or other proprietary rights. Also, others may assert rights in, or ownership of, our
`trademarks and other proprietary rights or may allege that we have or are infringing on their intellectual property rights and we may not be able to
`successfully resolve these types of conflicts. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect our trademarks and proprietary
`rights to the same extent as
`
`24
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2009 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_O24
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`do the laws ofthe United States. We cannot assure you that these registrations will prevent imitation of our name, merchandising concept, store
`design or private label merchandise, or the infringement of our other intellectual property rights by others. Imitation of our name, concept, store
`design or merchandise in a manner that projects lesser quality or carries a negative connotation of our brand image could have a material adverse
`effect on our business. financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the high expense i11 both prosecuting and defending against,
`and potential liability related to, alleged infringements of intellectual property rights could be substantial a11d could have a material adverse effect
`on our business, financial condition a11d results of operations.
`
`War or acts ofterrorism or the threat of eith er may negatively impact availability of merchandise and otherwise adversely impact our
`business.
`
`I11 the event of war or acts of terrorism, or if either is threatened, our ability to obtain merchandise available for sale maybe negatively
`affected. A substantial portion of our merchandise is imported from other countries. If goods become difficult or impossible to import into the
`United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be adversely
`affected. In the event that commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may
`have difficulty shipping merchandise to our main distribution facility and retail locations, as well as fulfilling Internet orders.
`
`The terms of our debt instruments imposefinancial and operating restrictions.
`Our credit facility and tenn loan agreements each contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our
`long term best interests. These covenants limit or restrict, among other things, our ability to:
`-
`incur additional indebtedness;
`-
`pay dividends or make other distributions in respect of our equity securities, or purchase or redeem capital stock, or make certain
`investments",
`
`- have our subsidiaries pay dividends, make loa11s or transfer assets to us;
`-
`sell assets, including the capital stock of our subsidiaries;
`-
`enter into any transactions with o11r affiliates;
`-
`transfer any capital stock of any subsidiary or permit any subsidiary to issue capital stock;
`-
`create liens;
`-
`enter into certain sale/leaseback transactions; and
`effect a consolidation or merger or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets.
`These limitations and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or engage in other
`business activities that may be in our best interests. In addition, our ability to borrow under the credit facility is subject to borrowing base
`requirements. If we breach any ofthe covenants in our credit facility or term loan agreements, we may be in default under our credit facility and/or
`o1Lr term loan. If we defa11lt, the lenders under o11r term loan or the lender under our credit facility eo11ld declare all borrowings owed to them,
`including accrued interest and other fees, to be due and payable.
`
`Our chatter documents contain certain anti-takeover provisions, and we are entitled to certain oth er protective provisions under Delaware
`law.
`
`We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third party to
`acquire control of the Company, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. We also have adopted a stockholder
`rights plan, commonly known as a “poison pill,” that entitles our stockholders to acquire additional shares of us, or a potential acquirer of us, at a
`25
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2009 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_O25
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`substantial discount to their market value in the event of an attempted takeover. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
`and by-laws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider
`favorable by, among other things:
`-
`authorizing the issuance of preferred stock, the terms of which maybe determined at the discretion of o11r Board of Directors;
`-
`restricting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders; and
`-
`establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can he acted
`on by stockholders at meetings.
`These provisions 1nay also reduce the market value of our common stock.
`
`We do not expect to pay cash dividends in theforeseeablefature.
`We l1ave 11ot paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our initial public offering and do 11ot anticipate paying cash dividends on
`our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of each of our credit facility and term loan agreements restrict our ability to
`declare or pay dividends on our common stock. Even if our ability to pay dividends were not restricted, any future payment of dividends would
`still be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and would be based upon any applicable restrictive financial covenants, earnings, capital
`requirements a11d our financial condition, among other factors, at the time any such dividend is considered.
`
`Any increase in our sales and marketing eflorts that target markets outside the United States and Canada would expose as to additional risks
`associated with international operations.
`Although an immaterial amount of our sales are currently derived from international sales outside of Canada, we are actively seeking to
`expand our international presence, and we have begun to do so through franchise arrangements in the Middle East and India. We may not be
`successful in these efforts. International operations and sales subject us to risks and challenges that we would otherwise not face if we conducted
`our business only in the United States. For example, we may depend on third parties to market our products through foreign sales channels, and
`we may be challenged by laws and business practices favoring local competitors. In addition, our ability to succeed in foreign markets will depend
`on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We must also adapt our pricing structure to address different pricing environments and may face
`difficulty in enforcing revenue collection internationally. Emerging markets are a significant focus of our international growth strategy. The
`developing 11atL1re of these markets presents a number of risks. Deterioratioll of social, political, labor, or economic conditions i11 a specific country
`or region and difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations may also adversely affect our operations or financial results or those of our
`franchisees. Operations outside the United States may be affected by changes in trade protection laws, policies and measures, and other
`regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments.
`To the extent we achieve significant sales outside of the United States in the fi1l'Ll1‘6, we may have significant exposure to fluctuating foreign
`currency exchange rates.
`
`We could havefailures in our system of internal controls.
`We maintain a documented system of internal controls which is reviewed and monitored by management, who meet regularly with our Audit
`Committee of tlie Board of Directors. We believe we have a well-designed system to maintain adequate internal controls on the business. We
`cannot assure you that there will not be any control deficiencies in the future. Should we hecoine aware of any control deficiencies, we would
`report them to the Audit Committee and recommend prompt remediation. We have devoted significant resources to document, test, monitor and
`improve our internal controls and will continue to do so; however, we cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that our controls are
`adequate in the future or that adequate controls will be effective in preventing fraud. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls,
`we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. Any failures in the effectiveness of our internal controls could have
`a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results or cause us to fail to meet reporting obligation s.
`26
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2009 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_026
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Item 1B.
`
`Unresolved Staff Comments
`
`Not applicable.
`
`Properties
`Item 2.
`We own our principal executive offices and distribution facility, which is located at 456 North Fifth Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
`subject to a mortgage under the terms of which we owe approximately $2.4 million as of September 30, 2009. This facility consists of approximately
`318,000 square feet. of which approximately 45,000 square feet is dedicated to office space and the remaining square footage is used for finished
`goods warel1o11sir1g ar1d distribution. O11 August 26, 2002, we entered ir1to a ten-year lease for a facility located at 2001 Kitty Hawk Avenue,
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the Philadelphia Naval Business Center. The area leased at this facility, which we use for some finished goods
`warehousing and distribution, as well as raw material cutting and warehousing, consists of approximately 64,000 square feet of space. To facilitate
`our store growth in Canada, we entered into a three-year lease commencing November 1, 2002 for approximately 12,000 square feet of finished
`goods warehouse and distribution space in Mississauga, Ontario in Canada. Since this time. we have renewed this lease in Canada on multiple
`occasions and it currently expires on October 31, 2010. From time to time we may also utilize third-party warehousing services in the Philadelphia,
`Pennsylvania area when we have increased storage requirements. These services essentially operate on a month-to-month basis. We believe that
`these facilities will be adequate to support our anticipated distribution needs for the near term and, potentially, longer. In the event we need
`additional space to meet our future distribution needs, We believe that such space would be readily available. Our facilities are subject to state and
`local regulations that range from building codes to health and safety regulations.
`We lease our store premises for initial terms averaging from five to ten years. Certain leases allow us to terminate or reduce our obligations at
`specified points in time in the event that the applicable store does not achieve a specified sales volume. Some of our store leases also provide for
`contingent payments based on sales volume, cscalations of the base rent, as well as increases i11 operating costs, marketing costs and real estate
`taxes.
`
`As of September 30, 2009, the following numbers of store leases are set to expire as listed in the table below. We do 11ot expect the expiration
`of any leases to have a material adverse impact on our business or operations.
`
`Fiscal Year Leases Expire
`2010
`2011
`2012
`2013
`201 4
`2015 and later
`Total
`
`Number
`of
`Stores
`104
`108
`85
`119
`1 36
`172
`724
`
`In addition to the stores we operate, we have arrangements with department and specialty stores, including Sears, Kmart, Macy’s.
`Rloomingdale’s, Rahies“R”Us, P>oscov’s and Gordmans to operate maternity apparel departments in their stores. These leased departments
`typically involve the lease partner collecting all ofthe revenue from the leased department. The revenue is remitted to us, less a fixed percentage of
`the net sales earned by the lease partner as stipulated in the agreement. We provide at least some amount of staffing for each of the leased
`departments. with the amount varying depending on the specific arrangement. Generally, under each of our leased department agreements, our
`lease partner has the right to terminate any or all of our rights to operate our leased departments in their stores subject to varying notice
`requirements.
`
`Legal Proceedings
`Item 3.
`From time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. Litigation is inherently
`unpredictable and altl1o11gh tl1e an1o11r1t of any liability that could arise with respect to currently pending actions car1r1ot be accurately predicted,
`we do not believe that the resolution of any pending action will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity.
`
`Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
`Item 4.
`Not applicable.
`
`27
`
`Source: DESTIN»'¥l'ION F¢’|AT'ERNITY CORR, 10~K, 12714-/2009 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_O27
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
`Item 5.
`Our co111111o11 stock is traded o11 tl1e Nasdaq Global Market u11der the sy111bol “DEST.” Prior to Dece111ber 9, 2008 (before giving effect to our
`corporate name change), our common stock traded under the symbol “MWRK.” The following table sets forth for the periods indicated below the
`reported high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market:
`
`PART H.
`
`Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009:
`Quaiter ended Dece111ber 31, 2008
`Quarter ended March 31, 2009
`Quarter ended June 30, 2009
`Quarter ended September 30. 2009
`Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2008:
`Quarter ended l_)ecember 31, 2007
`Quarter ended March 31, 2008
`Quarter ended June 30, 2008
`Quarter ended September 30, 2008
`
`EL
`
`Low
`
`$14.68
`8.70
`18.13
`23.74
`
`$19.78
`20.21
`18.46
`17.39
`
`$ 5.72
`4.42
`5.92
`16.30
`
`$14.93
`14.58
`8.97
`9.61
`
`As of December 1, 2009, there were 1,288 holders ofrecord and 949 estimated beneficial holders of our common stock.
`We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our initial public offering and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on
`our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our senior secured Term Loan B due March 13. 2013 (the “Term Loan”) and
`our credit facility restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on o11r connnon stock. Even if we were not restricted under the terms of our Term
`Loan or our credit facility from being able to pay dividends, any future payment of dividends would still be at the discretion ofour Board of
`Directors and would be based upon certain restrictive financial covenants, earnings, capital requirements and our financial condition, among other
`factors. at the time any such dividend is considered.
`Under our Amended a11d Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), awards 111ay be granted i11 the forn1 of options, stock
`appreciation rights, restricted stock or restricted stock units. Up to 700,000 shares of our common stock may be issued in respect of awards under
`our 2005 Plan, with no more than 350,000 of those shares permitted to be issued in respect of restricted stock or restricted stock units granted
`under the 2005 Plan.
`
`111 July 2008, our Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase up to $7.0 million of our outstanding common stock. Under the
`program, we may repurchase shares from time to time through solicited or unsolicited transactions in the open market or in negotiated or other
`transactions. The program will be i11 effect until the end of July 2010. There were no repurchases of common stock under the program during fiscal
`2009 or fiscal 2008.
`
`28
`
`Source: DESTINATION lw’|AT'ERNITY CORR,
`
`lO~K, 12/'14/2009 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_028
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Stock Price Performance Graph
`The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock for the period from September 30, 2004 to
`Scptcmbcr 30, 2009, with thc cumulativc total return ofthc Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and thc Standard & Poor’s Apparcl Rctail Indcx. Thc
`comparison assumes $100 was invested on September 30, 2004 in our Common Stock and in each of tlie foregoing indices and assumes
`reinvestment of dividends.
`
`COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CI IMI ILATIVE TOTAL RETI IRN*
`Among Destination Maternity Corporation, The S&P 500 Index
`And The S&P Apparel Retail Index
`
`5350
`
`5300 -
`
`S2504
`
`5150‘
`
`S200 -
`
`S50—
`
`9-'04
`
`QIDE
`
`QIDB
`
`QED?
`
`9.108
`
`EH19
`
`
`
`*
`
`S100 invested on 9/30/04 in stock or index—inc1uding reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending September 30.
`2004
`2005
`2006
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`Destination Maternity Corporation
`S&P 500
`S&P Apparel Retail Index
`
`515 100.00
`$ 100.00
`519 100.00
`
`68.97
`$
`$ 112.25
`$
`95.12
`
`$ 331.86
`$ 124.36
`$ 120.21
`
`$ 128.76
`$ 144.81
`$ 119.08
`
`95.72
`$
`$ 112.99
`515 104.08
`
`$ 125.03
`$ 105.18
`$ 120.43
`
`29
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORR, 10-K, 12/14/2009 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_O29
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data
`Item 6.
`The following tables set forth selected consolidated statement of operations data, operating data, other financial data, and balance sheet
`data as of and for thc pcriods i11dicatcd. The sclcctcd consolidatcd statcmcnt ofopcrations and balancc shcct data for cach of thc five fiscal ycars
`presented below are derived from our consolidated financial statements. Yo11 should read this information in conjunction with ‘‘Management’s
`Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
`included elsewhere in this report.
`
`Statement of Operations Data:
`Net sales
`Cost of goods sold
`Gross profit
`Selling, general and administrative expenses
`Storc closing, assct impairmcnt and assct disposal cxpcnscs
`Restructuring and other charges
`Goodwill impainneiit expense
`Operating income (loss)
`Interest expense, net
`Loss on extinguishment of debt
`Income (loss) before income taxes
`Income tax provision (benefit)
`Net income (loss)
`Net income (loss) per share—Basic
`Average shares outstanding—Basic
`
`Net income (loss) per sha1‘e—Diluted
`Average shares outstanding—Diluted
`
`30
`
`2009
`
`$531,251
`248,476
`282,775
`259,552
`536
`1,557
`50,389
`(29,259)
`4,720
`123
`(34,102)
`6,580
`$(40,682)
`$
`6.79)
`5,992
`
`$
`
`6.79)
`5,992
`
`Year Ended September 30,
`2006
`2007
`2008
`(in thousands, except per share amounts)
`
`$564,602
`281,561
`283,041
`271,592
`2,916
`3,461
`—
`5,072
`6,974
`97
`(1,999)
`(610)
`$ (1,389)
`$
`(0.23)
`5,924
`
`$
`
`(0.23)
`5,924
`
`$581,371
`281,155
`300,216
`279,719
`1,788
`—
`—
`18,709
`9,848
`9,423
`(562)
`(169)
`(393)
`0.07)
`5,802
`
`$
`$
`
`$
`
`0.07)
`5,802
`
`$602,744
`288,082
`314,662
`279,713
`4,621
`—
`—
`30,328
`14,534
`873
`14,921
`5,819
`9,102
`1.70
`5,348
`
`$
`$
`
`$
`
`1.63
`5,591
`
`2005
`
`$561,627
`277,453
`284,174
`264,652
`5.284
`—
`—
`14,238
`15,293
`—
`(1,055)
`(880)
`(175)
`0.03)
`5.242
`
`$
`$
`
`$
`
`0.03)
`5,242
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORR,
`
`‘lO~K, 1.?/'14/2089 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_O30
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Operating Data:
`Comparable store sales increase (decrease) (1)
`Average net sales per gross square foot (2)
`Average net sales per store (2)
`Gross store square footage at period end (3)
`Gross retail location square footage at period
`end (4)
`Number of retail locations at period end:
`Motherhood Maternity stores
`Mimi Maternity stores (5)
`A Pea in the Pod stores (5)
`Destination Maternity stores ( 5)
`Total stores
`Leased departments
`Total retail locations
`Other Financial Data:
`Adjusted l:'B1'1'DA (6)(7)
`Ratio of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA
`Ratio 0fAdjusteL1 EBITDA to i11terest expense,
`net
`Adjusted EBITDA before restructuring and
`other charges (6)(7)
`Adjusted net income (loss), before goodwill
`irnpainnent expense (7)
`Adjusted net income (loss) per share—Diluted,
`before goodwill impairment expense (7)
`Adjusted net income (loss), before goodwill
`impairment expense, restructuring and other
`charges, and loss on extinguishment of debt
`(7)
`Adjusted net income (loss) per share—Diluted,
`before goodwill impairment expense,
`restructuring and other charges, and loss 011
`extinguishment of debt (7)
`Cash flows provided by operating activities
`Cash flows used in investing activities
`Cash flows used in financing activities
`Capital expenditures
`Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
`Cash and cash equivalents
`Short-term investments
`Working capital
`"otal assets
`"otal debt
`Net debt (7)(8)
`Stockholders’ equity
`
`2009
`
`Year Ended September 30,
`2006
`2007
`2008
`(unaudited; in thousands, except operating data,
`ratios and per share amounts)
`
`2005
`
`(4.3)%
`290
`$
`$ 573,000
`1,462,000
`
`0.2%
`302
`$
`$ 588,000
`1,492,000
`
`(4.8)%
`299
`$
`$ 568,000
`1,498,000
`
`4.3%
`305
`$
`$ 570,000
`1,532,000
`
`(2.5)%
`295
`S
`S 534,000
`1,579,000
`
`1,619,000
`
`1,623,000
`
`1,811,000
`
`1,819,000
`
`1,874,000
`
`591
`—
`67
`66
`724
`360
`1,084
`
`38,762
`1.5x
`
`8.2x
`
`40,191
`
`9,707
`
`1.60
`
`15
`
`616
`89
`30
`19
`754
`278
`1,032
`
`25,501
`3.1x
`
`3.7x
`
`28,717
`
`(1,389)
`
`(0.23)
`
`$
`
`635
`100
`32
`14
`781
`795
`1,576
`
`38,579
`2.4x
`
`3.9x
`
`38,579
`
`(393)
`
`(0.07)
`
`$
`
`659
`106
`33
`12
`810
`731
`1,541
`
`51,715
`2.3x
`
`3.6x
`
`51,715
`
`9,102
`
`1.63
`
`S
`
`690
`117
`37
`8
`852
`739
`1,591
`
`33,906
`3.8x
`
`2.2x
`
`33,906
`
`(175)
`
`(0.03)
`
`10,751
`
`843
`
`5,355
`
`9,635
`
`(175)
`
`1.77
`42,525
`(12,455)
`(21,592)
`(12,639)
`
`20,626
`—
`50,580
`196.007
`57,409
`36,783
`49,800
`
`0.14
`27,822
`(13,347)
`(12,457)
`(15,688)
`
`$
`
`12,148
`
`$
`
`61,611
`256.248
`78,646
`66,498
`89,468
`
`31
`
`0.87
`27,398
`(8,112)
`(28,060)
`(15,444)
`
`10,130
`—
`64,923
`275.925
`93,180
`83,050
`88,523
`
`1.72
`42,413
`(23,166)
`(3,380)
`(13,933)
`
`18,904
`9,425
`83,772
`287.736
`118,349
`90,020
`80,700
`
`$
`
`(0.03)
`7,324
`(11,414)
`(1,340)
`(17,644)
`
`S
`
`3,037
`—
`71,228
`273.317
`128,856
`125,819
`63,328
`
`15
`
`$
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORR,
`
`‘10~K, 12/'14/2089 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2040_O31
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`(l)
`
`Comparable store sales figures represent sales at retail locations that have been in operation by us for at least twelve full months at the
`beginning of tl1e period for which s11cl1 data is presented. As 11sed i11 this Form l0-K, “retail locations” include stores a11d leased
`departments, and exclude locations where Kohl’

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket