throbber

`:GHLY CONE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 ”
`— ATTORW
`1 £8 ONLY - R.
`P
`
`
`
`
`T1) STATfiS
`
`
`
`”
`
`
`
`CT COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ST< CT OE PfiNNSYLVANnA
`
`2—12—CV—05680-AI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` TY CORBO
`
`
`
`Plain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`
`Friday, October 18, 2013
`
`
`
`Reported by:
`
`Amy A. Rivera, CSR, RPR, CLR
`
`J03 NO. 66675
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`IPR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 2‘
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCON
`
`October 18, 2013
`9:09 a.m.
`
`Page 3+
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`APPEARANCE S:
`DLA PIPER
`
`Videotaped deposition of REBECCA PICCONE
`held at the office of DLA PIPER, 1650 Market
`
`Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pursuant to
`Notice, before Amy A. Rivera, Certified
`Shorthand Reporter, Registered Professional
`Reporter, Certified LiveNote Reporter, and a
`Notary Public of the State of New York.
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`1251 Avenue of the Americas
`
`New York, New York 10020
`BY: MELISSA REINCKENS, ESQ.
`-and-
`
`KRISTEN HAN, ESQ.
`
`In-House Counsel at Destination Maternity
`Corporation
`
`FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Target Corporation
`300 North Meridian Street
`
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
`BY: MATTHEW ENNIS, ESQ.
`TREVOR CARTER, ESQ.
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
`
`Gerard Alfe, Legal Video Specialist
`TSG Reporting, Inc.
`
` 2
`
`Page 4
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCON
`
`Page 5
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`VIDEOGRAPHER: This video deposition
`is now beginning. The date, October 18th,
`2013. The time is 9:09. This is the start
`
`of tape labeled number 1 in the deposition
`of Rebecca Piccone in the matter of
`
`Destination Maternity Corporation versus
`Target Corporation, Cherokee, Inc. and
`Elizabeth Lange, LLC being held in the
`United States District Court of Eastern
`
`Pennsylvania, No. 2-12-CV-05680-AB.
`Deposition is taking place at DLA
`Piper, LLC, 1 Liberty Place, Philadelphia,
`PA, 19103.
`Counsel will now introduce themselves.
`MS. REINCKENS: Melissa Reinckens on
`
`behalf of the plaintiff, Destination
`Maternity Corporation.
`Also with me is general counsel from
`Destination Maternity, Kristen Han.
`MR. ENNIS: Matthew Ennis with Faegre
`Baker Daniels on behalf of Target.
`And with me is my colleague, Trevor
`Carter, also of Faegre Baker Daniels on
`behalf of Target.
`
`REBECCA PICCONE,havingbeenduly
`sworn, testified as follows:
`EXAIVIINATION
`BY MR. ENNIS:
`
`Good morning, Ms. Piccone.
`Good morning.
`Have you ever been deposed before?
`Yes.
`
`Okay. What was the subject matter
`of -- excuse me -- strike the question.
`When were you last deposed?
`2004.
`
`A.
`
`Q. What was the subject matter of that
`deposition?
`A. The illegal collection of vendor
`allowances.
`
`Q. And were you working for Destination
`Maternity at that time?
`No.
`
`Who were you working for?
`Saks Fifth Avenue.
`
`Okay. Have you ever been deposed
`besides the time in 2004?
`A. Yes.
`
`(Pages 2
`
`to 5)
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 6%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 7*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Q. Okay. When was the other time?
`A.
`1993.
`
`Q. Great. And then, is there anything
`that would prevent you from giving complete and
`accurate testimony today?
`A. No.
`
`Q. Okay. And if you ever need a break,
`just please let me know. We can take a brief
`break. The only caveat to that is I‘d ask that
`please don‘t take a break while we are in the
`middle of a pending question.
`Is that okay?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And the same goes for lunch.
`If you need a lunch break at any time, definitely
`let us know, and we can work with that.
`
`Is that all right?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And then, ifI ask you a
`question and you don‘t understand it, please let
`me know and I‘ll rephrase it so that way you can
`give an answer to that -- to a question that you
`would understand.
`
`Is that okay?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. All right. And if you don‘t do that,
`
`Q. Okay. What was the subject matter of
`that deposition?
`A.
`Sexual misconduct at a swimming pool.
`That‘s unfortunate.
`
`QA
`
`.
`
`Yes, it was.
`
`Q.
`A
`
`Any other times besides those two?
`No.
`
`Q. Okay. Great. So you‘re somewhat
`familiar with how a deposition works? I‘ll ask
`questions, you‘ll answer them?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And I‘ll just run through some
`of the other basics just so that way you
`understand and we can kind of have a relationship
`with how we work through things.
`You know, I‘ll ask the questions.
`You‘ll answer them. From time to time, your
`counsel may object. Unless your counsel instructs
`you not to answer, I‘d ask that you answer the
`question to the best of your ability.
`Is that okay with you?
`A. Yes.
`
`
`
`Page 8
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 9
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`0040101.;me
`
`mfiwNi—‘OkomdofimfiwNi—‘OKO
`
`MNNNNNHi—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘H
`
`I‘ll presume that you understand the question.
`Is that okay?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. You understand today that you
`are here to testify on behalf of Destination
`Maternity?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And also in your individual capacity,
`correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`(Exhibit 100, deposition notice, was
`marked for identification at this time.)
`
`Q. Okay. The court reporter has put in
`front of you Exhibits 100 and 41. If we could
`start with Exhibit 100.
`
`Just let me know you have that in
`front of you.
`Okay.
`Have you seen Exhibit 100 before?
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And you understand that Exhibit
`100 is the 30(b)(l) notice for you to testify in
`your personal capacity today?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Great.
`
`Now, if you can take a look at
`Exhibit 41.
`
`And Exhibit 41 is Target‘s 30(b)(6)
`notice to Destination Maternity.
`Is that correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Thank you.
`MR. ENNIS: Counsel, perhaps we can
`short circuit this a little bit. We have an
`
`understanding of what topics Ms. Piccone
`will be testifying about today. I just
`wanted to go ahead and confirm that with
`you --
`VIS. REINCKENS: Sure.
`VIR. ENNIS:
`-- and we can move on.
`
`Let me know when you‘re ready.
`VIS. REINCKENS: Yeah, I‘m ready.
`VIR. ENNIS: Okay. Topic 9 in whole',
`17 in part.
`VIS. REINCKENS: Okay.
`stop you right there.
`With respect to 17 --
`VIR. ENNIS: Okay.
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`
`-- Destination
`
`I‘m going to
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`3
`
`(Pages 6 to 9)
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 10%
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCON
`
`Page 11*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Maternity has provided complete testimony on
`this, and in light of Target‘s contentions
`concerning the waiver of attomey-client
`privilege, Ms. Piccone is not going to be
`testifying today to this topic.
`MR. ENNIS: Okay. We -- we‘ll
`obviously reserve our rights with respect to
`that topic. We can take that up later.
`Twenty-nine in whole?
`MS. REINCKENS: Yes.
`
`MR. ENNIS: Thirty-two in part?
`MS. REINCKENS: Yes.
`
`MR. ENNIS: Thirty-three in part?
`MS. REINCKENS: Yes.
`
`MR. ENNIS: Thirty-six?
`MS. REINCKENS: Yes.
`
`MR. ENNIS: Forty-three?
`MS. REINCKENS: And all of these are,
`
`of course, subject to the objections we‘ve
`already lodged and discussed with counsel,
`but --
`MR. ENNIS: Of course.
`
`-- you said 43?
`MS. REINCKENS:
`MR. ENNIS: Correct.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: No, I don‘t have 43.
`IVIR. ENNIS: Okay.
`We confirmed these topics in the
`deposition of Ms. Hendrickson with Tamar, so
`our understanding is off the record. But,
`you know, we can circle back later in the
`day if you‘d like, but --
`VIS. REINCKENS: Yeah, I have 43 as
`
`dropped and --
`VlR. ENNIS: Okay.
`-- not agreed. We do
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`not agree that we‘d provide a witness for
`that topic --
`VlR. ENNIS: Okay.
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`
`-- so we can revisit
`
`that, but --
`VlR. ENNIS: Let‘s revisit that.
`
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`
`-- as of now, she‘s
`
`not going to be testifying as to that topic.
`VlR. ENNIS: All right. Yeah, I mean,
`we have a -- yeah, we have correspondence
`from Ms. Duvdevani on October 3rd that
`
`states that you‘ll be providing a witness
`and that witness would be Ms. Piccone. You
`
`
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCON :3
`can confirm that with Tamar --
`
`Page 12
`
`Page 13
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Yeah, that‘s in the same e-mail, so I
`
`MS. REINCKENS: Okay. Well, as of
`now, she‘s not going to be testifying as to
`that, but we can discuss that off the
`record.
`VIR. ENNIS: Wonderful.
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`I‘ll review the
`
`correspondence.
`VIR. ENNIS: Great.
`
`Forty-four in part?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VIR. ENNIS: Forty-seven in whole?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VIR. ENNIS: Forty-eight in whole?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VIR. ENNIS: Forty-nine in part?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`guess we will discuss that.
`MS. REINCKENS: Okay. Yeah, we‘ll --
`we‘ll take a look -- I mean, looking at that
`topic, it looks -- it‘s quite similar to the
`other topics, so it might have been an
`omission on my part --
`VlR. ENNIS: Okay. We‘ll --
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`-- but I just want to
`confirm.
`VlR. ENNIS: We can confirm after the
`break. That‘s fine.
`
`Sixty-six in whole?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VlR. ENNIS: Sixty-nine in part?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VIR. ENNIS: Seventy-one in part?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VlR. ENNIS: Seventy-two -- excuse
`me -- in part?
`VIS. REINCKENS: Correct.
`
`VlR. ENNIS: Great. Okay.
`VIS. REINCKENS: So the ones that we
`
`are revisiting are topic 60 and topic --
`
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`VIR. ENNIS: Fifty-eight in whole --
`50 -- sorry, and then 59 to 64 in whole?
`VIS. REINCKENS:
`I have 58 and 59 for
`
`Ms. Piccone. And then 61 through 64, not
`inconclusive of topic 60.
`VIR. ENNIS: We‘ll have to get back to
`you on that one.
`
`(Pages 10
`
`to 13)
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530
`
`, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 14%
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCON
`
`Page 15*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`MR. ENNIS: Thirty -- no, forty-three.
`MS. REINCKENS: Okay. Thanks.
`MR. ENNIS: And then we obviously
`have -- we‘re reserving our rights with
`respect to 17.
`And, also, while we‘re here, on --
`
`during the earlier depositions on Tuesday
`and Wednesday, we learned that Destination
`Maternity has what‘s called a POM database
`that‘s not been -- excuse me, been made
`available for inspection by Target, and from
`testimony from Ms. Hendrickson, we
`understand that contains part life cycle,
`design documents. So we will obviously be
`keeping this deposition open subject to our
`review of that database.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: We, of course, object
`to your request to keep this deposition
`open, but we‘ll discuss it at a later point
`in time.
`MR. ENNIS: Understood.
`
`The court reporter could mark
`Exhibit 101.
`
`MS. REINCKENS:
`
`I‘d also wouldjust
`
`like to note that we‘re marking this entire
`transcript attorneys‘ eyes only, highly
`confidential.
`
`And then also, looking at this
`document, I see that it should actually also
`be marked highly confidential, attorneys‘
`eyes only, and we‘ll provide a corrected
`version of this document.
`MR. ENNIS: And then we also had an
`
`understanding during the first two days of
`the week that DMC documents produced by DMC
`would be stipulated as authentic. I wanted
`to see if that would continue through this
`deposition.
`MS. REINCKENS:
`
`I‘ll -- I‘ll consider
`
`it on a document-by-document basis.
`MR. ENNIS: Okay. So I guess during
`a -- during a break we can discuss whatever
`exhibits are done or clean it up at the end.
`MS. REINCKENS: Yeah, I mean, we have
`
`the -- an agreement to, I think, talk
`amongst ourselves about that --
`MR. ENNIS: Yep.
`MS. REINCKENS:
`
`- so it
`
`I mean,
`
`Page 16
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 17
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`I‘m not going to agree that every document
`that you show the witness is authentic, but
`if you want to ask me as you go through each
`document or we can consider it at a later
`time.
`
`VIR. ENNIS: But it -- to be clear, it
`
`was for documents produced by DMC.
`VIS. REINCKENS: That‘s fine.
`
`VIR. ENNIS: So -- okay. Ijust wanted
`to make sure --
`
`VIS. REINCKENS: My --
`VIR. ENNIS:
`-- whether there‘s
`
`hingI should --
`VIS. REINCKENS: Yeah, my statement
`still stands.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 101, can you relate to me your education
`history starting with post high school?
`A. Yes.
`
`I‘d like you to please do so.
`Q.
`I went to Mount Holyoke College.
`A.
`Graduated in 1996.
`
`Q. What was the degree that you got from
`Mount Holyoke College?
`A. A bachelor of arts in psychology and
`economics.
`
`Q. Was that a double major orjust a
`psychology and economics together?
`A.
`It was -- psychology was the major.
`Economics was the minor.
`
`Q. Okay.
`Okay. And then what did you do after
`you graduated education wise from Mount Holyoke?
`A.
`I starred in the executive training
`program at Bloomingdale‘s.
`Q. Okay.
`Okay. Any certifications or
`certificates you have beyond your BA?
`A. No.
`
`Q. Okay. And when did you start at
`
` 5
`
`VIR. ENNIS: Okay. Wonderful.
`BY IVIR. ENNIS:
`
`Q. All right. So, Ms. Piccone, you have
`Exhibit 1 -- okay.
`(Exhibit 101, Mothers Work company
`profile, was marked for identification at
`this time.)
`BY MR. ENNIS:
`
`Q. Ms. Piccone, before we jump into
`
`(Pages 14 to 17)
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 18%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 19*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`in 19 -- in July ‘97 you had a new position?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And what company was that
`position with?
`A. Bloomingdale‘s.
`Q. Okay. And then what was the new
`position?
`A. Associate buyer.
`Q. Okay. That would be a promotion,
`correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. What additional
`responsibilities would an associate buyer have as
`compared to an assistant buyer?
`A.
`I was given my own area of
`responsibility, which was special size dresses,
`and I reported directly to the divisional
`merchandise manager.
`Q. What -- what type of dresses would
`be -- strike the question.
`Would special sizes -- strike that
`question, too.
`When you say, “special size,“ what do
`you mean by that?
`
`Page 21
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`outerwear.
`
`Q. All right. Just so I understand,
`outerwear would be jackets, coats, things like
`that?
`A.
`
`Just coats.
`
`Q.
`
`Just coats. Understood.
`Anything additional compared to the
`associate buyer?
`A.
`I get a direct report at that time
`and, you know, it was a larger area of
`responsibility in terms of the sales and margin
`dollars for the company.
`Q. You‘re also still at Bloomingdale‘s?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. How long -- strike the
`question.
`What was the level of your direct
`report when you were the buyer?
`A. Assistant buyer.
`Q. Okay. So you were mentoring at that
`point --
`A. Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`-- as you mentioned?
`How long were you the buyer of ladies‘
`
`(Pages 18 to 21)
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`Bloomingdale‘s?
`A.
`July of 1996.
`Q. And then you said it was in the
`executive training program?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And what were your
`responsibilities at that time at Bloomingdale‘s in
`the executive training program?
`A.
`Started off as an assistant buyer.
`Q. And then how long were you an
`assistant buyer?
`A. Let‘s see, one year.
`Q. What are the responsibilities of an
`assistant buyer at Bloomingdale‘s at that time?
`A.
`Spending at least three days a week in
`the 59th Street store, interacting with customers,
`tracking purchase orders, a lot of data entry, and
`shadowing the buyer who would be my boss to start
`to learn the tools of the trade.
`
`Q. And then you mentioned the 59th Street
`store.
`
`What city was that in?
`A. Manhattan, New York.
`
`Q. Okay. And then
`
`so I guess, what,
`
`Page 20
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`0040101.;me
`
`mfiwNi—‘Okomdofimiwai—‘OKO
`
`MNNNNNHi—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘H
`
`A. Large sizes.
`Q.
`So an example of that would be 1X,
`2X --
`A. Correct.
`
`Q.
`
`-- type dresses?
`Would that include maternity?
`A. No.
`
`Q. Anything besides 1X, 2X, that type of
`dress?
`
`It was also Alpha sized.
`A.
`Q. Okay. So --
`A.
`I‘m sorry, numeric sizes. Alpha is
`the 1X, 2X.
`
`Q. Right. Okay. Understood.
`And then, how long were you the
`associate buyer and responsible for the special
`size dresses?
`
`One year.
`Okay. So around July ‘98?
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And then, what was your new job
`in July of ‘98?
`A.
`Still at Bloomingdale‘s. Iwas
`promoted to the buyer of ladies‘ designer
`
` 6
`
`

`

`Page 22%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 23*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`It was actually a little less than two
`A.
`years. It was around April of 2004.
`Q. Okay. What was your new job in
`April 2004?
`A.
`I moved back to New York City, and I
`was a senior buyer at Saks Fifth Avenue.
`Q. And is Saks -- pardon my ignorance,
`but Saks is a higher-end store than Express,
`correct?
`
`A. Repeat the question?
`Q.
`Saks is a higher-end store than
`Express. Is that correct?
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection. Form.
`You may answer.
`Q. Can you answer question?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And what were your responsibilities as
`a senior buyer at Saks?
`A.
`I was responsible for the entire
`petite department.
`Q.
`So it would be all aspects of petite?
`Correct.
`
`. Would that include maternity petite?
`A No. Saks did not carry maternity.
`
`designer outerwear?
`A. Until July of 2002.
`Q. Okay. And then what was your new
`position in July ‘02?
`A.
`I moved to Columbus, Ohio and became a
`
`senior buyer for Express, which is a subsidiary of
`Limited Brands.
`
`So that would have been also, so to
`Q.
`spoke, a promotion?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. What -- when you were a senior buyer
`at Express, what type of clothing were you
`responsible for?
`A. Outerwear, jackets and dresses.
`Q. Would this all have been women‘s or
`would that included men‘s?
`A. Women‘s.
`
`Q. Okay. And how long were you the
`senior buyer at Express?
`A. Two years.
`Q. Okay. So around July 2004 you would
`have left?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay.
`
`Page 24
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`0040101.;me
`
`m»J>wi\)>—‘Oxom\lofimu>wi\)i—‘OKO
`
`MNNNNNHi—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—i
`
`None of the companies I worked for
`carried maternity.
`Q. Thank you.
`And how long were you the senior buyer
`at Saks?
`
`A year.
`Okay. So around April ‘05?
`It was until June of‘05.
`
`Okay. During that whole time, you
`were the senior buyer for petites?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. Then where did you go in June
`of ‘05?
`
`In August of ‘05, Ijoined New York &
`A.
`Company.
`Q. New York & Company?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. What was your position with that
`company?
`A. For the first year, I was a senior
`buyer.
`Q. Of what type of product?
`A. Woven collections.
`
`Q. Would that be for both genders?
`
` 7
`
`A Q
`
`Page 25
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`No.
`
`Okay. Which gender?
`Women.
`
`All right. And then what about after
`your first year?
`A.
`I was then promoted to divisional
`merchandise manager.
`Q. Okay. Same company, obviously?
`A.
`Same company. Additional
`responsibility was added. It was dresses,
`intimate apparel, and outerwear.
`Q.
`Just so I understand, what‘s the
`difference between a woven collection and a dress,
`
`for example? Some dresses may be woven, I‘m just
`trying to understand the distinction.
`A. Yes. Woven collections are wear to
`
`work. It is clothing you would wear to work, and
`it is strictly bottoms, suit jackets, and what is
`considered a woven wear to work shirt.
`
`Is there an abbreviation for
`Q. Okay.
`wear to work that is used in the fashion industry?
`A.
`I can‘t speak for the entire fashion
`industry.
`I can only speak for how I abbreviate
`it, andI do abbreviate it sometimes.
`
`(Pages
`
`22 to 25)
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 26%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 27
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Q. Okay. What would that abbreviation be
`that you would use in your work?
`A. WTW.
`
`Q. Great. So moving on, you were the
`division manager at New York & Co. around
`August ‘06?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And how long did you have that
`position?
`A. Two years. And I was added --
`additional responsibility was added in that two
`years, knits, wear to work knit tops.
`Q. Anything else?
`A. No.
`
`Q. Okay. Great.
`Excuse me. So then, August ‘08 you
`were offered a position?
`A.
`In august ‘08, I was still there --
`Q. Okay.
`A.
`-- and I was promoted to vice
`president, general merchandise manager of the
`casual division.
`
`Q. Would that be for women‘s still?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. Would wear to work or woven
`collections fall within casual or not?
`A. No.
`
`Q. What type of clothing would be
`included in the casual division?
`
`A. Denim, knits that are casual, tee
`shirts, tank tops, I mean, casual tees. There‘s
`casual woven tops, so things that are washed and
`processed. Active. So yoga, work-out clothes
`with wicking on them, and then non-denim casual
`pants, chinos, twills, things that are washed and
`processed.
`Q. Understood. Any maternity at that
`point?
`A. No.
`
`Q. Okay. And then New York & Co. didn‘t
`do any maternity, correct?
`A. No.
`
`Q. And then how long were you VP of
`general merchandising at New York & Co.?
`A. Until September of 2011.
`Q. Okay. Any change in responsibility
`from August ‘08 to September 2011 as the VP of
`general merchandising?
`
`time.
`
`Page 28
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`A. No.
`
`Page 29
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`DMC?
`
`Q. Okay. What was your new position on
`September 20 1 1?
`A.
`I joined Destination Maternity --
`Q. Okay.
`A.
`-- as the vice president of
`Motherhood.
`
`Is that the position you hold today?
`Q.
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. What are your -- are your
`responsibilities as VP of Motherhood?
`A.
`I am responsible for the design team
`as well as the merchant team. Ultimately, I am in
`charge of driving a profit for the company.
`Q.
`So Motherhood is one of Destination
`Matemity‘s brands?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And then you would be, so to speak,
`responsible for that brand?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay.
`Okay. If you could look at
`Exhibit 101. Is this a type of document that
`you‘ve seen before in your work at Mothers Work or
`
`I‘d just like to
`MS. REINCKENS:
`object and give the witness some time to
`take a look at the document.
`BY MR. ENNIS:
`
`Q. Take as much time as you need.
`MR. ENNIS: And, also, while we‘re
`waiting on the witness here, there may be
`some other documents of this nature, so I
`
`guess we will treat them as highly
`confidential, attorneys‘ eyes only if we see
`anything that is similar to this?
`MS. REINCKENS: Sure. You know, I‘m
`
`not sure where this came from, so I just
`need to take a look at it. But I want to
`
`make sure that we reserve the right right
`now.
`
`MR. ENNIS: No, absolutely, I
`understand.
`I just want to let you know
`there are some others, so --
`MS. REINCKENS: Understood.
`
`MR. ENNIS:
`
`-- just when you get the
`
`0040101.;me
`
`mfiwNi—‘Okomdofimiwai—‘OKO
`
`MNNNNNHi—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—i
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`8
`
`(Pages 26 to 29)
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 30%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`BY MR. ENNIS:
`
`Page 31*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`been here.
`
`Q. And documents like this would be an
`example of that?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. All right. If you could turn to
`page 22, and let me know when you‘re there.
`A.
`I‘m there.
`
`Q. Thank you.
`What do the bubbles in the chart on
`
`the right-hand side of the page represent?
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection to form.
`I don‘t know.
`I didn‘t create this
`A.
`document.
`
`Q. Do you have an understanding as to
`what those bubbles represent?
`A. Are you asking me that in a personal
`capacity?
`Q. We can back up for a second.
`When I‘m asking you questions and you
`provide answers, I‘m assuming that your answer
`will be both in your capacity as DMC‘s corporate
`representative and under your personal
`understanding.
`If that ever differs, just please let
`
`Page 33
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Do you see that?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Does DMC have any understanding of
`what those bubbles and names in those bubbles
`mean?
`
`Yes.
`
`What is that understanding?
`These are people who are in our market
`
`Q A
`
`Q A
`
`And what market space is that?
`. Maternity.
`Maternity market as a whole?
`Yes.
`
`Q. All right. Ms. Piccone, have you had
`time to review the document?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. Have you seen this document
`before?
`A. No.
`
`Q. Okay. Have you seen a document
`similar to this in any way?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. All right. When was the last time you
`saw a document like that?
`A.
`I have seen -- I saw a similar
`
`document to this yesterday.
`Q. That was during preparation for your
`deposition today?
`A. Yes.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection to form.
`Q. Did that document refresh your -- your
`recollection in any way?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. How did it do that?
`A.
`I‘ve seen iterations of company
`strategies at key points in the two years I‘ve
`
`Page 32
`
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE 5
`me know that you‘re either answering just for DMC
`or just for yourself.
`Can you do that?
`I‘m going to object to
`MS. REINCKENS:
`that direction and ask that you provide
`guidance to the witness as to when you‘re
`asking in her corporate capacity or as a
`personal representative.
`MR. ENNIS: All of my questions are
`corporate questions. So she can tell me
`when, you know, she doesn‘t have corporate
`knowledge, might have personal knowledge.
`Is that fair?
`
`I‘m just going to
`
`MS. REINCKENS:
`object on the record.
`MR. ENNIS: Fair enough.
`BY IVIR. ENNIS:
`
`Q. Looking at page 22 of Exhibit 101, you
`see the table on the right-hand side of the page,
`correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And you see that there are some
`circles, bubbles, and they will contain words,
`such as “Old Navy,“ “Mimi,“ and “Independen.”
`
`0040101.;me
`
`mfiwNi—‘Okomdofimiwai—‘OKO
`
`MNNNNNHHi—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘H
`
` 9
`
`Q. What meaning, if any, is there to the
`size of the bubbles on page 22 of Exhibit 101?
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection to form.
`Q. You can answer the question.
`A.
`I don‘t know.
`I didn‘t create this
`document.
`
`Q. Does DMC have any understanding
`regarding the size of the bubbles on page 22 of
`Exhibit 101?
`A.
`I don‘t know.
`
`Q.
`
`So DMC has no testimony regarding the
`
`(Pages 30 to 33)
`
`TSG Reporting
`
`— Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013-OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 34%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 35*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`size of the bubbles on page 22 of Exhibit 101. Is
`that correct?
`
`pointing to the right on that same chart?
`A. Yes.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection to form.
`Q. You can answer the question.
`A. What is in front of me is a document
`
`I
`from 2007. I was not an employee until 2011.
`am not comfortable speaking to what bubble sizes
`mean prior to my start date.
`Q. Then who is the person best able to
`answer questions about bubble sizes in documents,
`such as Exhibit 101, prior to your start date in
`2011 at DMC?
`
`Possibly Lisa Hendrickson.
`Anyone else?
`Not that I can recall.
`
`All right. Does DMC -- excuse me.
`Strike the question.
`Does DMC have any understanding of the
`location of the bubbles on page 22 -- strike the
`question again.
`Do you see a price up arrow in the
`table on page 22 ofExhibit 101?
`A. A price up -- yes.
`Q. And then you see a fashion arrow
`
`Q. What is DMC‘s understanding of --
`well, strike the question.
`So if I understand this document
`
`correctly, price increases as you go vertical, is
`that correct, on the table?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And then fashion would increase as you
`go right on the table. Is that correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection to form.
`So do you see the Pea in the Pod in
`Q.
`the upper right-hand corner?
`A. Yes.
`
`So looking at that table, Pea in the
`Q.
`Pod is high on the price and high on the fashion.
`Is that correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And it is higher on price and higher
`on fashion than Mimi Maternity, for example, which
`is the Mimi bubble, right?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. So if you look at the Pea in
`
`
`
`Page 36
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 37
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`0040101.;me
`
`UI>J>wi\)i—‘Okoco\lo‘xmu>wi\)i—‘OKO
`
`MNNNNNHi—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—‘i—i
`
`the Pod bubble, would all Pea in the Pod products
`be covered inside that bubble on this table for
`
`price and fashion?
`A. Restate the question?
`Q. Okay. So you see the -- the various
`bubbles on the table on page 22, correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. They‘re on different locations on a
`price-by-fashion table.
`Is that your understanding as well?
`I understand that.
`
`Is that DMC‘s understanding?
`
`Okay.
`Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. And you understand that Pea in
`the Pod is higher on price and higher on fashion
`than, for example, Mimi Maternity on this table.
`Is that correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And looking at the Pea in the Pod area
`on that chart, all Pea in the Pod products covered
`within that area of price by fashion?
`MS. REINCKENS: Objection to form.
`Q. You can answer.
`A. You know, again, I was not here at the
`
`I do not know
`time this document was published.
`what Mimi Maternity had and if Mimi Maternity
`carried some products that may have been Pea in
`the Pod. So I‘m not comfortable answering that
`question.
`Q. Okay. If you could look at Exhibit 41
`again?
`A. Yes.
`
`So ifyou look at topics 58 through 64
`Q.
`on page 17?
`A. Topic --
`Q. Topics 58 through 64.
`Do you see those?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. What did you do to prepare to give
`testimony on behalf of DMC regarding those topics
`from 2007 to 2011?
`
`MS. REINCKENS: Yeah, I‘m going to
`object here and -- and caution the witness
`not to answer to the extent it would
`
`result -- you know, to the extent it would
`be a disclosure of attomey-client
`privileged information.
`Counsel, if you‘re asking about this
`
`TSG Reporting Worldwide
`
`877—702—9580
`
`10
`
`(Pages
`
`34 to 37)
`
`Target Corporation Exhibit 1156
`
`Target v. DMC
`
`|PR2013—OO530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`

`Page 38%
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Page 39*
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`Q. And did you speak with anyone at DMC
`in preparation for your deposition today?
`A. Yes.
`
`Who did you speak with?
`My attorney.
`Any employee of DNC -- DMC?
`No.
`
`Q A
`
`.
`
`Q.
`A
`
`Q. And did you speak with anybody that
`was at DMC from 2007 to 2011?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Who was that -- well, strike the
`
`question.
`In preparation for your deposition,
`did you speak with anybody who was at DMC from
`2007 to 2011?
`A. Yes.
`
`Who was that person?
`I met with Steve Kahn.
`
`Anyone else?
`No.
`Who is Steve Kahn?
`The head of e-commerce.
`
`Q. And how long has he been at
`Destination Maternity based on DMC‘s
`
`Page 41
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`MS. REINCKENS:
`-- but -- I do realize
`
`that there are two counsel -- counsel, you
`know, here taking deposition. So, I mean,
`you know, the rules here, Trevor. If Matt
`has an objection and wants to state
`something on the record, he‘s welcome to do
`so.
`
`ButI would just like to take a break
`for a moment.
`I think the witness is
`
`confused and I would just like to have a
`conversation.
`
`MR. ENNIS: Sure. Let‘s go off the
`record.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: Okay.
`VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now going off
`the record. The time is 9:51.
`
`(Recess)
`VIDEOGRAPHER: Back on, 10:06.
`
`I just wanted
`MS. REINCKENS: Okay.
`to start by saying that I confirmed with my
`cocounsel that Ms. Piccone is going to be
`speaking to topics 43 and 60 subject to the
`objection and overbreadth of -- the
`overbreadth objections we‘ve already
`
`
`
`document, the document speaks for itself.
`You‘ve asked about bubble size and location
`of bubbles.
`
`If you‘re trying to get at what the
`document actually talks about, why don‘t you
`ask questions about what the document talks
`about.
`BY MR. ENNIS:
`
`Q. Can you answer the question?
`A. Repeat the question.
`Q. What did you do to prepare to give
`testimony on behalf of DMC regarding topics 58
`through 64 from 2007 to 2011?
`A.
`I was instructed not to answer that.
`
`So that you‘re unable to provide any
`Q.
`answer that is not subject to attomey-client
`privilege. Is that correct?
`You can answer the question.
`A. Repeat the question.
`Q.
`So you‘re unable to provide any
`testimony in response to that question that is not
`subject to attorney-client privilege. Is that
`correct?
`A. Correct.
`
`Page 40
`IHGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY - R. PICCONE
`
`understanding?
`A.
`I do not know.
`
`Q But he was there before you were?
`A Yes.
`
`Q. Okay. Do you know when he started?
`A No.
`
`MS. REINCKENS: You know, Counsel, if
`we could actually just take a break here for
`a moment?
`
`I thinkI have some -- you know,
`confusion about kind of the scope and my
`objection on attorney-client privilege.
`I
`just want to take a break for a moment.
`MR. CARTER: Yeah, I‘ll just note for
`the record -- I‘m not takin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket