UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________________
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`CONOPCO, INC. d/b/a UNILEVER
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`_________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________________
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`CONOPCO, INC. d/b/a UNILEVER
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`_________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), the undersigned, on behalf of Patent
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`Owner, The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G” or “Patent Owner”), hereby
`
`submits the following objections to Exhibits 1034, 1036, 1037, 1040, 1045-1047,
`
`1051-1055, and 1060-1061, attached to Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever’s (“Unilever”
`
`or “Petitioner”) Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (“Reply”). See IPR2013-00509,
`
`Paper 45 (and exhibits thereto). Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.62, Patent Owner’s
`
`objections below apply the Federal Rules of Evidence (“F.R.E.”).
`
`I.
`
`OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1034
`
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1034, “Second Declaration of Arun
`
`Nandagiri.” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403
`
`(Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other
`
`Reasons), F.R.E. 602 (Lack of Personal Knowledge), F.R.E. 702 and F.R.E. 703
`
`(insufficient support for expert testimony), F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802
`
`(Impermissible Hearsay), 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b) (Outside Scope of Response and
`
`Petition), Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48767, I. (Aug.
`
`14, 2012) (Raises New Issue or Belatedly Presents Evidence), 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible Incorporation by Reference), and F.R.E. 901
`
`(Authentication).
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`II. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS 1036, 1037
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1036, “Lochhead Deposition
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`Transcript (non-public)” and Exhibit 1037, “Lochhead Deposition Transcript
`
`(public – redacted).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403
`
`(Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other
`
`Reasons), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b) (Outside Scope of Response and Petition).
`
`III. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1040
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1040, “Lochhead, R.Y., “Research
`
`Report – Formulation of an Antidandruff Shampoo with Improved Hair
`
`Conditioning Attributes,” Isleworth Laboratory, Unilever Research (October
`
`1979).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 106 (Remainder of or Related Writings),
`
`F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice,
`
`Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802
`
`(Impermissible Hearsay), and F.R.E. 901 (Authentication).
`
`IV. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1045
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1045, “Johnson, D.H. (ed.), “Hair
`
`and Hair Care,” pp. 65-104 (1997).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402
`
`(Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion,
`
`Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802 (Impermissible
`
`Hearsay), F.R.E. 901 (Authentication), 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`Incorporation by Reference), 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b) (Outside Scope of Response and
`
`Petition), and Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48767, I.
`
`(Aug. 14, 2012) (Raises New Issue or Belatedly Presents Evidence).
`
`V. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1046
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1046, “Parran, J.J., “Deposition on
`
`the Skin of Particles of Antimicrobial Agents from Detergent Bases,” The Journal
`
`of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 86-88 (1965).” Grounds for
`
`objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for
`
`Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E.
`
`802 (Impermissible Hearsay), F.R.E. 901 (Authentication), 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3)
`
`(Impermissible Incorporation by Reference), 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b) (Outside Scope
`
`of Response and Petition), and Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 48767, I. (Aug. 14, 2012) (Raises New Issue or Belatedly Presents
`
`Evidence).
`
`VI. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1047
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1047, “Sorkin, M., et al., “The
`
`Practical Evaluation of Shampoos,” J. Soc. Cosmetic Chemists, 17, pp. 539-551
`
`(1966).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding
`
`Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons),
`
`F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802 (Impermissible Hearsay), F.R.E. 901 (Authentication),
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible Incorporation by Reference), 37 C.F.R. §
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`42.23(b) (Outside Scope of Response and Petition), and Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48767, I. (Aug. 14, 2012) (Raises New Issue
`
`or Belatedly Presents Evidence).
`
`VII. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1051
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1051, “Freedberg, I.M., et al.(eds.),
`
`“Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine,” vol. 1, Sixth Ed., pp. 1180-1194
`
`(2003).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding
`
`Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons),
`
`F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802 (Impermissible Hearsay), F.R.E. 901 (Authentication),
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible Incorporation by Reference).
`
`VIII. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1052
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1052, “Lochhead, R.Y., “Recent
`
`Trends in Hair Care Polymers,” Household and Personal Products Industry, vol. 43,
`
`no. 11, pp. 83-87 (November 2006).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402
`
`(Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion,
`
`Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802 (Impermissible
`
`Hearsay), F.R.E. 901 (Authentication), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible
`
`Incorporation by Reference).
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IX. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1053
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1053, “Grote, et al., US 4,741,855,
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`“Shampoo Compositions,” filed July 31, 1987; issued May 3, 1988.” Grounds for
`
`objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance) and F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence
`
`for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons).
`
`X. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1054
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1054, “Winkler, US 4,470,982,
`
`“Shampoo Compositions,” filed April 12, 1982; issued September 11, 1984.”
`
`Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant
`
`Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible Incorporation by Reference).
`
`XI. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1055
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1055, “Lochhead, R.Y., “Shampoo
`
`and Conditioner Science,” Ch. 3, Practical Modern Hair Science, R. Evans & R.R.
`
`Wickett (Eds.) Alluredbooks, Carol Stream (2012).” Grounds for objection: F.R.E.
`
`402 (Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice,
`
`Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), F.R.E. 801 and F.R.E. 802
`
`(Impermissible Hearsay), F.R.E. 901 (Authentication), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3)
`
`(Impermissible Incorporation by Reference).
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`XII. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1060
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1060, “Kalla, et al., WO 97/26854,
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`“Shampoo Compositions with Improved Deposition of Antimicrobial Agents,”
`
`filed January 6, 1997; published July 31, 1997.” Grounds for objection: F.R.E.
`
`402 (Relevance) and F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice,
`
`Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons).
`
`XIII. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 1061
`Patent Owner hereby objects to Exhibit 1061, “Federal Register, vol. 56, no.
`
`233, December 4, 1991, §358.710, “Active Ingredients for the Control of Dandruff,
`
`Seborrheic Dermatitis, or Psoriasis.” Grounds for objection: F.R.E. 402
`
`(Relevance), F.R.E. 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion,
`
`Waste of Time, or Other Reasons), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (Impermissible
`
`Incorporation by Reference).
`
`These objections are being timely served within 5 business days of service
`
`of the evidence with Petitioner’s Reply, in accordance with Rule 42.64(b)(1).
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (Reg. No. 41,449)
`John V. Biernacki (Reg. No. 40,511)
`Thomas R. Goots (admitted pro hac vice)
`Michael S. Weinstein (Reg. No. 62,446)
`JONES DAY
`North Point
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190
`Tel: (216) 586-3939 / Fax: (216) 579-0212
`
`Steven W. Miller (Reg. No. 31,984)
`Kim W. Zerby (Reg. No. 32,323)
`Carl J. Roof (Reg. No. 37,708)
`Angela K. Haughey (Reg. No. 56,373)
`THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
`299 E. Sixth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
`Tel: (513) 983-1100 / Fax: (513) 945-2729
`
`Attorneys For Patent Owner
`The Procter & Gamble Company
`
`8
`
`Dated: September 29, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00509
`Patent 6,451,300
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on September 29,
`
`2014, a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence Pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.64, was served by email, pursuant to agreement of the Parties, on
`
`the following:
`
`Joseph P. Meara, Esq.
`jmeara-PGP@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`150 E. Gilman Street, Suite 5000
`Madison, WI 53703
`
`Matthew J. Becker
`Jonathan A. Harris
`mbecker@axinn.com
`jharris@axinn.com
`AXINN, VELTROP &
`HARKRIDER LLP
`90 State House Square
`9th Floor
`Hartford, CT 06103
`
`
`Michael R. Houston, Esq.
`mhouston@foley.com
`Jeanne M. Gills, Esq.
`jmgills@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`321 North Clark Street, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`
`Edward A. Squillante
`Ronald A. Koatz
`edward.a.squillante@unilever.com
`ronald.koatz@unilever.com
`UNILEVER
`700 Sylvan Avenue
`Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana
`Registration No. 41,449
`JONES DAY
`North Point
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190
`
`Attorney For Patent Owner
`The Procter & Gamble Company
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
