throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 18
`Entered: April 22, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CONOPCO, INC. dba UNILEVER
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2013-00505 (Patent 6,974,569 B2)
`IPR2013-00509 (Patent 6,451,300 B1)1
`____________
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, and
`RAMA G. ELLURU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 .F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are the same in both cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however, are not
`authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00505 (Patent 6,974,569 B2)
`IPR2013-00509 (Patent 6,451,300 B1)
`
`
`Conference calls were held on April 10, 2014, and on April 21, 2014,
`between Eldora Ellison, counsel for Petitioner; David Maiorana, counsel for Patent
`Owner; and Lora Green, Grace Obermann, and Rama Elluru, Administrative Patent
`Judges. A court reporter was present on both calls, and transcripts are to be filed in
`due course by Petitioner as exhibits.2 The purpose of the calls was to discuss
`adjusting the scheduling orders in both IPR2013-00505 and IPR-00509.
`
`Specifically, in the conference call held on April 10, 2014, Patent Owner
`noted that Petitioner had filed a Motion for Joinder in IPR2014-00506, to join that
`case with IPR2013-00505 (IPR2014-00506, Paper 4); and had also filed a Motion
`for Joinder in IPR2014-00507, to join that case with IPR2013-00509 (IPR2014-
`00507, Paper 3). Patent Owner proposed a schedule that would move the hearing
`date from November 7, 2014 to December 30, 2014. Patent Owner noted that the
`December 30 hearing date should still give the panel sufficient time to issue a final
`decision within the one year statutory deadline in the instant cases in the event that
`IPR2013-00505 and IPR2013-00509 are not joined with IPR2014-00506 and
`IPR2014-00507, respectively. Patent Owner noted that adjusting the schedule
`would allow for a single deposition of witnesses, thus meeting the Board’s goal in
`securing the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding. 37
`C.F.R. 42.1(b).
`
`After conferring, the panel suggested that the parties meet and confer to
`arrive at an adjustment to the scheduling orders that would be mutually acceptable.
`The panel also noted that it would prefer not to move the hearing date seven and
`half weeks later than the current date of November 7, 2014, as proposed by Patent
`
`
`2 This order summarizes the statements made during the conference calls. A more
`detailed record may be found in the transcripts.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00505 (Patent 6,974,569 B2)
`IPR2013-00509 (Patent 6,451,300 B1)
`
`Owner. The panel authorized the parties to file a joint motion to adjust the
`scheduling orders in each of IPR2013-00505 and IPR2013-00509.
`
`A second call was held on April 21, 2014, to further discuss the joint
`motion(s) to adjust the scheduling orders to be filed in IPR2013-00505 and
`IPR2013-00509. The panel noted that the parties should file a joint motion to
`adjust the scheduling order in each case, as opposed to filing a single motion that
`would apply to both cases.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED, that the parties are authorized to file a joint motion to adjust the
`
`scheduling order in each of IPR2013-00505 and IPR2013-00509; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERD, that the joint motions are to be filed no later than
`May 2, 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00505 (Patent 6,974,569 B2)
`IPR2013-00509 (Patent 6,451,300 B1)
`
`
`For Petitioner:
`
`Eldora Ellison
`eellison@skgf.com
`
`Robert Sterne
`rsterne-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`David Maiorana
`dmaiorana@JonesDay.com
`
`John Biernacki
`jvbiernacki@jonesday.com
`
`Michael Weinstein
`msweinstein@jonesday.com
`
`Steven Miller
`miller.sw@pg.com
`
`Kim Zerby
`zerby.kw@pg.com
`
`Carl Roof
`roof.cj@pg.com
`
`Angela Haughey
`haughey.a@pg.com
`
`Calvin Griffith
`cpgriffith@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket