throbber
Page 1
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC., )
` ) Case IPR2014-00034
` Plaintiff, ) Case IPR2014-00073
` ) Case IPR2014-00074
` VS. ) Case IPR2014-00075
` ) Case IPR2014-00081
`NUVASIVE, INC., ) Case IPR2014-00087
` )
` Defendant. )
`_____________________________)
`
` DEPOSITION OF PATRICK S. MILES
` San Diego, California
` Thursday, September 4, 2014
`
`Job No: 83789
`Reported by: NIKKI ROY
` CSR No. 3052
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 38
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` THE WITNESS: That it responded to the
`requirements of the respective surgery.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. And how did it do that?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: You would have to tell me
`exactly what implant you're describing.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. The CoRoent XL implant.
` A. There are multiple CoRoent XL implants.
` Q. Different sizes?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Can you give me an example of one?
` A. One of -- one of many. In terms of a size,
`do you want a size?
` Q. Sure.
` A. 10 by 22 by 55.
` Q. Okay. And what features of that particular
`implant were specialized so as to pioneer the market
`for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: One of them was that there is
`an anti-expulsion mechanism.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. And what's an anti-expulsion mechanism?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 39
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. In the -- a screw that engaged the
`intervertebral body.
` Q. Is there a screw that engaged the
`intervertebral body?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What features did you personally design of
`the CoRoent XL implant?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: 10 years ago, I wrote the
`requirements for it. I don't specifically recall the
`individual contributions to the specific implants in
`2004 or 5.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. And turn to page 8 of that declaration,
`still within the same paragraph 10. Do you see in
`the second and third lines, it says (reading):
` The total CoRoent XL implant
` revenues from 2005 through 2013
` totaled hundreds of millions of
` dollars.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Yes. When you refer to the hundreds of
`millions of dollars of revenue, does that include all
`interbody fusion products?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 40
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` MR. MILLER: Objection; form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: I'd say the intended
`reflection of that statement is the entire portfolio
`of CoRoent XL.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Does it exclude, for instance, biologics?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: The intended reflection of
`that communication was to demonstrate commercial
`success, which is the end of that sentence, and so
`the intention was to -- to communicate that -- that
`the acceptance of the procedure was very high.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. I'm asking specifically about the number you
`mention you mentioned, hundreds of millions of
`dollars. Is that for implant sales alone or does it
`include other sales?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; scope.
` THE WITNESS: I don't recall exactly whether
`the hundreds of millions of dollars meaning have we
`sold -- have we sold -- have we created a lot of
`revenue from the procedure? We have. You know, the
`intent was that oftentimes the currency of what
`people pay for is the implant, and so I think I was
`intending to say there was great commercial success
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 41
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`based upon a revenue contribution.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Okay. And revenue contribution from the
`implant?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: The intent of that comment was
`to communicate commercial success. And -- and did we
`generate revenue with a myriad of implants? We did.
`Beyond that, I -- I'm not sure exactly what you're
`getting at.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Okay. That's fine.
` Can you turn to, in the binder in front of
`you, Exhibit 1032. Can you identify this document?
` A. It appears like a 10-K.
` Q. From NuVasive?
` A. It appears as such.
` Q. And it's from 2005; is that correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Can you turn to page 18 of that document?
`The middle paragraph there, beginning "Our fixation
`system," do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. It states, (reading):
` Our fixation systems have been
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 120
` SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2014
` 1:34 P.M.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're back on the record
`at 1:34 p.m.
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Mr. Miles, I'm going to hand you a document
`here I've just labeled as Exhibit 1053.
` (The document referred to was marked
` by the CSR as Deposition Exhibit 1053
` (507) for identification and attached
` to the deposition transcript hereto.)
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Look at that document.
` MR. MILLER: Justin, could I have a copy of
`that?
` MR. OLIVER: Yeah.
` MR. MILLER: Thank you.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Do you recognize that document?
` A. Not really.
` Q. Do you see that it says NuVasive on the top
`left corner?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 121
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I do.
` Q. Does it appear to be a NuVasive press
`release?
` A. It looks like a -- a screen capture of the
`website.
` Q. Of NuVasive?
` A. It says www.nuvasive.com below, so I
`presume.
` Q. Okay. Can you look on the second page of
`that document. The end of the second line there's a
`reference to a Triad, NuVasive's Triad.
` Do you see the Triad?
` A. The word "Triad," I see that, yes.
` Q. Do you know what the Triad is?
` A. Back in 2001 we had a -- a machined
`allograft product line named Triad.
` Q. And was that an intervertebral implant, the
`Triad?
` A. Yes. There were multiple intervertebral
`implants.
` Q. Okay. And were they inserted in the XLIF
`procedure?
` A. We had them for PLIF, for TLIF. And we had
`them for A, C, D, F. And we had them for XLIF.
` Q. Okay. And do you recall what the shape of
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 122
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`that implant was?
` A. It was a C-shaped implant based upon the --
`the bone structure of the femur.
` Q. Okay. So it's C-shaped in that the C was
`around the axis of the spine when it was implanted?
` A. No.
` Q. How was it C-shaped then?
` A. It was C-shaped based upon the inner
`medullary canal of the fume.
` Q. Okay. And it was an intervertebral implant?
` MR. MILLER: I'm just going to object to
`form and scope.
` THE WITNESS: What's the question again?
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. It was an intervertebral implant?
` MR. MILLER: Same objections.
` THE WITNESS: No.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. It wasn't an intervertebral implant?
` A. Do you mean inner body implant? Was it used
`in the inner body space?
` Q. Yes.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Do you know approximately how long it
`was?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 123
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` MR. MILLER: Objection; scope, form.
` THE WITNESS: How long what was?
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. How long the Triad implant was?
` A. There were multiple --
` MR. MILLER: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Sorry.
` MR. MILLER: Go ahead.
` THE WITNESS: There were multiple Triad
`implants.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. And what did their lengths range from?
` MR. MILLER: Objection; scope.
` THE WITNESS: To the best of my
`recollection, from 6 millimeters in length to 30 to
`35 millimeters in length.
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Okay. And they were inserted laterally in
`the XLIF procedure?
` A. They were inserted in A, C, D, F. They were
`inserted in PLIF. They were inserted in TLIF. They
`were inserted in XLIF.
` Q. And the XLIF is a lateral procedure; is that
`correct?
` A. Yes. There's XLIF 60 and XLIF 90, and so
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 124
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`there's a postero-lateral procedure and a lateral
`procedure.
` Q. Okay. I'm going to hand you an exhibit
`already marked Exhibit 1055.
` (The document referred to was marked
` by the CSR as Deposition Exhibit 1055
` (507) for identification and attached
` to the deposition transcript hereto.)
`BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. Do you recognize this document?
` MR. MILLER: Justin, what is this an exhibit
`to?
` MR. OLIVER: What is this an exhibit to?
` MR. MILLER: Yes. Where was it marked? Oh,
`what proceeding is this?
` MR. OLIVER: 507 proceeding.
` MR. SCHAEFER: This is clearly out of scope.
`The 507 proceeding --
` MR. OLIVER: Excuse me. Who is defending
`this deposition?
` MR. SCHAEFER: I am speaking. I'm the lead
`attorney.
` MR. OLIVER: To me, he is defending this
`deposition. There should be only one person
`objecting.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket