throbber
IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`---------------------------------------------------
`MEDTRONIC, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` -vs-
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
` Patent Owner.
`Patent Number 8,361,156 B2
`Issue Date: January 29, 2013
`Case IPR2013-00506
`---------------------------------------------------
`MEDTRONIC, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` -vs-
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
` Patent Owner.
`Patent Number 8,187,334 B2
`Issue Date: May 29, 2012
`Case IPR2013-00507
`---------------------------------------------------
`MEDTRONIC, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` -vs-
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
` Patent Owner.
`Patent Number 8,187,334 B2
`Issue Date: May 29, 2012
`Case IPR2013-00508
`---------------------------------------------------
` Examination Under Oath of HANSEN A. YUAN, M.D.,
` held at 211 West Jefferson Street, Suite 21,
` Syracuse, New York, on August 22, 2014, before
` MARITA PETRERA, Registered Professional Reporter,
` and Notary Public in and for the State of New York.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`28
`probably over 60 percent of total fusions, 60 to
`70 percent.
` Q. So 60 percent to 70 percent of the
`60 percent of your total cases?
` A. Right.
` MR. AMON: Dr. Yuan, please let
` Mr. Schwartz finish his question.
` THE WITNESS: Sorry.
` Q. Okay. Sir, and then of those lumbar
`cases, could you break out anterior procedures
`versus posterior procedures?
` A. There were period of time that we did
`anterior surgery and the anterior surgery that we did
`are actually relatively few. We did a
`laparoscopically, we did open, so the majority of the
`lumbar cases, I would say over 80, 85 percent, either
`going to be posterior, posterolateral. And these all
`happen over a period, so in the early, early days, we
`would have done a lot more anterior -- posterior
`because we didn't have any other, and then for a
`short period of time we went ahead and did a lot of
`anterior, and then towards the end with the
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`29
`improvement of the modern interbody spacers, cages,
`we shifted again to posterior and posterolateral and
`then of course the lateral approaches.
` Q. When did you first start doing lateral
`approaches, sir?
` MR. AMON: Objection; vague.
` A. Lateral approaches, for what condition?
` Q. Well, any lateral approach using an
`intervertebral implant for any condition.
` A. I did lateral approaches as early as 1980s.
` Q. 19?
` A. 80s.
` Q. 1980s.
` A. And that included using cages, but those
`are mostly for fractures, and most of those cases are
`in the thoracic, and in the thoracolumbar junction.
` Q. Could you explain what the thoracal lumbar
`junction is?
` A. Between the thoracic which is the ones with
`the ribs and fairly stable and so between the
`thoracic transiting to the lumbar which is more
`flexible, so most of the injuries that's going to
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`30
`occur most commonly is between the thoracic and the
`lumbar. So it's pretty much like T11, T12, L1, L2.
` Q. Okay.
` A. And maybe L3.
` Q. Did you do any vertebral body
`replacements?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did you do any of the vertebral body
`replacements laterally?
` A. Oh, yes.
` Q. The way you said that, "oh, yes," does
`that suggest that that was routine for you to do
`vertebral body replacements laterally?
` A. It isn't routine, because most of the cases
`for a period of time that we did vertebral
`replacement, for example, like in the TB, infections,
`and certainly in certain fractures, but most of the
`fractures we still treat posteriorly.
` Q. You did do some vertebral body
`replacements laterally?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did you do any anteriorly, from an
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`31
`anterior approach?
` A. Vertebral body replacement, is that what
`you're referring to?
` Q. Um-hmm.
` A. I'm trying to, I'm trying to think the
`term. When you make an exposure, if you are going to
`go to replace a whole vertebral body, you can say
`that you're using a lateral incision because in those
`days not so-called minimally invasive, we use a long
`incision. So when you use a long incision, you are
`literally able to approach the spine direct
`anteriorly, so this is why to be specific to answer
`you, I, when I say we are using a lateral approach,
`we are using a lateral incision because it is an open
`procedure and we could replace a vertebral body
`depending on the anatomy of where the major blood
`vessels are, either putting the implant lateral or
`putting an implant in anteriorly.
` Q. Okay. What about an oblique approach,
`sir, did you do any vertebral body replacements
`through what's referred to as an oblique approach?
` A. You tell me what you mean by an oblique.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`32
` Q. Maybe I should switch that around. Do you
`have an understanding of what an oblique approach
`is, sir?
` A. Standing by itself, an oblique just means
`you're going at an angle. I don't understand the
`question.
` Q. Sure. Sir, we talked about vertebral body
`replacements going in laterally, and we talked about
`vertebral body replacements going in anteriorly,
`correct. So now I'm asking about variations from
`the lateral and anterior, and what I'm asking is, is
`there something that is angularly different than
`lateral and anterior where you might go in between
`those two? Perhaps I'll rephrase. Strike the
`question. And unfortunately we don't have a video,
`so I can't capture the precision of this.
` But anteriorly, generally we are talking
`about coming in through the belly, right, sir,
`coming in from the surgeon's perspective and, well,
`what I'm pointing to towards the belly, towards,
`towards the spine, correct, sir?
` A. (Nodding.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`33
` Q. And then laterally, generally we are
`talking about from the side of the patient going in
`at an angle towards the side directly into the
`vertebra, or generally, correct, sir?
` A. (Nodding.)
` Q. So for an oblique, I apologize again for
`not having this down.
` A. Go ahead.
` Q. Would be somewhere in between where my
`hand and my pen are, so at an angle something like
`this?
` A. You are still referring, so let me qualify.
`You are still referring to in the thoracolumbar
`junction?
` Q. Correct, sir.
` A. Okay. And the thoracolumbar junction, when
`you are saying going in obliquely, we don't use a
`term because of the, once you open with a long
`incision, you can put the implant in lateral,
`anterior, slightly off anterior, and in adjusting it,
`you can do all of those.
` Q. Okay.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`34
` A. So I was a little puzzled why you would ask
`me to describe that, in those levels, an oblique.
`Because I'm, I have the whole area open.
` Q. Okay.
` A. So the implant can go in slightly at an
`angle, direct lateral or anterior.
` Q. So something that would be off an angle
`from the lateral or anterior, you would just
`generally categorize as one of those two, lateral or
`anterior as opposed to calling it an oblique?
` MR. AMON: Objection;
` mischaracterizes Dr. Yuan's testimony.
` A. We have not used the word oblique, so
`that's, excuse me, so we will say you are making a
`lateral approach and then you have the ability to see
`both lateral and anterior, depending on the visceral
`structures, and how the peritoneum falls away,
`whether it is L2 near where the kidney is, you
`definitely cannot go anterior laterally. So consider
`the kidney is, you are going to go laterally. And
`then when you get below the kidney, you going to go
`anterior. So in that area, there is visceral
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`35
`structures, particularly the thoracolumbar junction,
`so we have never used the term oblique approach.
` Q. Okay.
` A. But you are looking at the whole thing.
` Q. Maybe I can do this by diagrams just so we
`can actually have a record. Well, we'll get to
`that. There will come a document that will perhaps
`help us.
` Getting back to your CV, sir,
`Exhibit 2021, there's a couple of entries that I'd
`like to talk about. If you could turn to Page 27 of
`that document, I'll wait -- okay. Do you see, sir,
`the entry for Thai Orthopedic Association.
` A. Yes.
` Q. And within that is the One Year Follow Up
`on Experiences With BAK in Posterior Interbody and
`Anterior Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Disc and
`Low Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the
`Lumbar Spine. Do you see that entry, sir?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Can you explain to me, if you recall, what
`that one year follow-up was describing? I realize
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`36
`it's 20 years ago, sir, so if you don't recall I
`appreciate that.
` A. That's okay. Very simple. I can cover
`that topic.
` As I was testifying before during your
`questioning of what cases, when we did them -- this
`is back in 1994 -- so in 1994 there was a period of
`time as I mentioned we did some anterior approaches.
` So in this case here, we are using the
`either posterior which is the very popular described
`mostly by my neurosurgical colleagues who are
`comfortable doing posterior interbodies, and we are
`kind of developing and pioneering an approach of
`doing laparoscopic anterior.
` So what the caption here reads is a
`minimally invasive, so is no longer an open
`procedure. We are making stab wounds in different
`location and once we make the stab wounds, we
`actually -- we are filling the abdominal cavity with
`air or carbon dioxide. So we insufflating the
`abdominal cavity and then what that does is allow the
`structures to be able to be moved aside. And then we
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`41
`for one or the other.
` Q. Okay, sir. If you would, I'd like to move
`to another entry. This is on Page 33 of your CV.
`It's the North American Spine Society entry. And
`specifically, sir, do you see that entry?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Specifically, sir, I'm interested in the
`Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Single
`Posterolateral Threaded Cage Insertion.
` Did I read that correctly?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Can you describe what that was about?
` A. I'm sorry it's taking time.
` Q. Sure, no problem.
` A. I'm reading. I haven't looked at this in
`long time. So I'm thinking back, as you say 1997.
`Northern American Spine we have several papers.
` Q. Okay.
` A. And so I train a lot of fellows, so each
`fellow in the laboratory will be doing different
`studies. So one of the studies, so this here is
`speaking of a cadaver study. It's a cadaver study.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`42
`Why I say it's a cadaver study is because we are
`trying to evaluate how a single posterolateral cage
`as far as allowing us to know the stability of the
`segment after it's implanted. So by going in here we
`are testing how instead of using two cages routinely,
`we are using only one cage. And we are also
`evaluating how this one cage will distract and how
`the dynamics and the stability will be on different
`testings.
` Q. Now, when you say posterior lateral cage,
`I think was the word you used, what do you mean by
`that?
` A. It's the same cage that we are talking
`about, is like the -- again, this is in the same
`period that we are doing the BAK, and so we are using
`a single BAK cage.
` Q. Do you recall if it was longer than the
`anterior or posterior cage?
` A. The BAK cage has a series of sizes. The
`BAK cage sizes generally and here, I don't have the
`document in front of me to let me know exactly, I'm
`just doing this all by recall, so it's an estimate.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`43
`I would say the longest cage probably is
`28 millimeters, okay. That's what I can recall, was
`28 millimeters. So if it was 28-millimeter cage we
`are using here, we are putting one cage from
`posterolateral angle to study the mechanical
`stability and ability to distract a segment.
` When you have like spondylolisthesis,
`meaning the spine is slightly slipped because the
`disc material has settled and the facet joints are
`worn a little bit to allow the slip, so if you go to
`the front and, then the spine is so-called little bit
`kyphotic, tilted to the front, if you distract it and
`actually open the space up and you also somewhat
`reduce the slippage, this is we are talking about is
`really as we say here is a degenerative
`spondylolisthesis, not isthmic, isthmic meaning,
`meaning a crack in the bone along a slip, but
`degenerative meaning just a wear and therefore
`settling.
` Q. Now, you mentioned the posterior lateral
`angle. What is that referring to?
` A. You're going through a transforaminal
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`44
`approach.
` Q. So you're coming in from the posterior but
`you're going in diagonally across the space?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And you refer to that as posterior
`lateral?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay. Sir, you mentioned that you
`distract and open the space up. About how much
`would you open the space up?
` A. That's a very important comment, because
`once a disc is degenerated particularly from the
`posterior approach or posterolateral approach, you
`can only distract it whatever the ligaments or the
`annular ligaments will allow. You don't have the
`ability of putting in a spreader and jacking it up
`like a jack.
` So what, how we do this is by putting in a
`debrider so you prepare the disc space by cleaning it
`out, and then you use a smaller size bore of a drill
`to drill the space and when you drill the space you
`actually remove bone from both inferior end plate of
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`45
`the level above to the superior end plate of the
`level below, so there's a smaller bore drill, and
`then you put in your cage.
` The front of the cage slightly tapered, so
`the slightly tapered cage will allow you to purchase
`and as it purchase it will slowly raise the level as
`it's implanted. So that's how you distract. So you
`don't distract very much. You distract probably a
`couple millimeters at the most.
` Q. Okay. Would that be a couple millimeters
`on both sides or a couple millimeters in total?
` A. Pretty much in total.
` Q. Okay. Sir, if you would turn to Page 34
`in your CV. You see the entry there for
`January 24th to the 27th of 1998, that begins Spinal
`Surgery dot dot dot?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Specifically my question is with regard to
`the portion dealing with Posterior Lateral Interbody
`Approach With BAK Cage and Facet Fixation. Do
`you see that, sir?
` A. Yes.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`46
` Q. Perhaps as a shortcut, is that basically
`the same procedure you were just talking about with
`regard to NASS or is there something different?
` A. It is something different.
` Q. Okay. I'm trying to avoid duplication,
`but what were the differences?
` A. The NASS was a presentation of anatomical
`cadaver study. This thing here is the, this
`paragraph really speak about current and innovative
`theories and technique. So it is not, it's not the
`standard of care, it's not what is generally used.
`It is really speaking about either, either anatomical
`studies or small clinical studies, small means small
`number.
` So the idea here is, for example, if you
`look at the whole paragraph to make sense, we're
`using anterior thoracolumbar plates for trauma.
` Q. Okay.
` A. This is a 1998. There's a major question
`whether that is stable after you put in a vertebral
`body replacement, and because the biomechanics of
`this is not as stable as using pedicle screws. So we
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`47
`are using anterior thoracolumbar plates and again
`here is a current and innovative theory and
`techniques that we are talking about.
` So with that the posterolateral in the body
`approach using the BAK cage, a single cage, and then
`once you put the cage in, I shared a little bit with
`you before to say once you distract a segment, that
`segment is a little bit unstable because it has a
`little bit of a slippage or listhesis, and once you
`distract you like to hold that position, so then you
`are using the facet joints to fix the facet joints.
`So it's an addition of adding fixation to that
`segment to give it more stability.
` Q. Okay.
` A. So important thing here is really, again
`the topic goes on to talk about anterior load
`sharing. And you know, it's understanding the
`biomechanics. So this is again a biomechanical study
`and describing these techniques and the testing
`results.
` Q. And the posterolateral interbody approach
`with the BAK cage that's being studied here, is that
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`48
`same single BAK put in at a diagonal?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Sir, and then further on down that
`same page, you see the Ray TFC Symposium?
` A. Yes, sir.
` Q. And the entry that says "My experience
`with BAK open anterior/posterior laparoscopic and
`transforaminal approach with adjunctive fixation and
`lateral approach using minimally incisional
`approach."
` A. Yes.
` Q. I read that correctly?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Can you describe what that is and if it's
`the same as something you've already said, you can
`just tell me that.
` A. We've been doing BAKs at that time in the
`beginning all posterior. And then we begin to
`develop the anterior approach, either open or
`laparoscopic. And it's an extension of what we talk
`about using the single cage lateral --
`transforaminally and then begin to start putting in a
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`49
`few of these cages laterally. All of this is done
`pretty much in the upper lumbar spine, thoracolumbar
`junction, upper lumbar spine. The reason for us
`doing these studies is to assess can we go to a
`minimal incisional approach.
` At this particular time, actually Dr. Paul
`McAfee was my fellow -- actually was my resident --
`and so we were doing cases in the laboratory looking
`at the biomechanical and then the, we begin to do a
`few cases clinically. But none of this went on to
`marketing. The reason why is the specifics of that
`cage design, because it has to drill out the end
`plates and then putting in a small cage, even though
`with adjunctive fixation these things collapsed. So
`none of it was developed, none of it went to market.
`Both the mechanical testing results tells us the
`adjunctive fixation might make it work, but
`clinically Paul and I have done a couple lateral
`approach; didn't work. And neither did the
`transforaminal approach.
` Q. Are you done, sir? I don't want to
`interrupt.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`50
` The couple lateral that you did with Paul,
`were those in human patients?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So living people?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And when you say it didn't work, what do
`you mean by that? They didn't die, did they?
` A. No. Patient didn't die. But spine
`actually we tried to correct it into lordotic posture
`and then as I said, the, the properties are not
`correct because of the end plates being removed to
`use those cages even though they were big cages, and
`the length of them we only had 28s, so those cages
`actually subsided and then the spine basically
`resumed the deformity, which is kyphosis. So a
`kyphotic spine is not a good end result. The
`patients didn't die. But these are done under
`individual hospital IRB approval.
` Q. So the IRB communicated to you that it was
`okay to go ahead with the procedure?
` A. It's all approved and documented. The
`patients' permission and signature and all of this is
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`51
`notified to the FDA.
` Q. So at least you and Dr. McAfee thought it
`would be safe to do it with a patient?
` A. No. We've done mechanical testing, the
`mechanical testing results indicated to us that
`mechanically we're able to achieve the stability, but
`on the clinical usage of it over time, it didn't
`prove out. So many, many, many things that as we say
`innovative and technical, you go through testing, it
`is safe to use on a patient, but when you do it on a
`patient the outcome is not 100 percent.
` So the outcome in our mind listing here is
`something we should not propagate.
` Q. But before you put it in the patient you
`thought it was safe to do what you ultimately did,
`correct, sir?
` A. It is safe.
` Q. Okay. It is safe?
` A. But it's not efficacious.
` Q. And when you -- before you did the
`procedure, you thought it was reasonable to proceed
`with the procedure, correct?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00506; IPR2013-00507; IPR2013-508
`Yuan, M.D., Hansen A.
`August 22, 2014
`
`62
` A. Transforaminal is posterolateral approach.
` Q. You would describe that then as a subset
`of a posterior lateral approach, or a type of
`posterior lateral approach? Strike that.
` Would you describe the transforaminal as a
`type of posterior lateral approach?
` A. The transforaminal is a posterolateral
`approach.
` Q. Okay.
` A. As you probably try to broad

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket