throbber

`
`.
`
`
`
`.ww''.wmtwwmw‘maze-Wra‘wmwn'"fifth-1'11”}"‘
`
`
`
`'
`
`’
`
`'
`
`Data 556 Time
`'5
`:1
`
`01151511151:11:15.
`Detmseatesetssetz
`its12:51 51111
`Anteater 8515516151011, .. ,
`
`
`
`011115151111 11155515115111 111111111111 end 131111155
`
`
`11.111112.—
`-
`2
`1111115512.15114570 teammate), 60,5:- '
`
`_ 35116651, 55115: 12115151
`3 peeopemwe 515550515:
`
`1213' 111515326161 5116' degenerativedisk disease.
`ORWTION:
`'
`'
`'
`1.. Anterempmaifusian 1.241,.
`.2 Antariur'tnemmmi'an usingmtervenebmi5.595,1.24
`3 Leflanhnet‘tfecct‘estbsm,graithenreat.
`2,:
`:
`.
`'
`' mareeeaatme 6156110513:
`-»
`1.2-3 15615511113566 1159511513655 .6365 6isease *
`1111657112315:
`'
`: 85115153 5116993“??? ;1'
`
`.
`'
`-.
`.
`. ffliflisfii. 801E: .»
`'
`
`. The Watts; .15an 1156151561: 51y115,61.6-5?!-
`5,15,15,11{5555116116 tafieiheeis be! new {115$6551515956 1116155669
`
`
`_ mi655ckpa
`-
`on 65625515115161: vaws,555w 11156511111 51’
`11.3 551119311156156,degenerative 511311155 1116151151161 055159115
`
`treatment has 55511 daisies},consistingof Katmai
`
`retmpegitqneai 55611166615251111511513611(1151511 115115a mam,
`61515115155666 cage; The 515556111535 ,herent risks.
`,, '
`-
`.- 55115165! 5511566 and 51555119565115! 11511115have air been
`
`ext-115111511 to 1135 515115111:who 11116515551165.1556wishes to 5166556
`
`
`OPSMTME NOTE:
`'
`'
`'
`’
`Fathering,genera! 15116115516155! 611661515535.111111511511 remitted
`
`‘
`,
`.
`~ 511571151111 ,lheb'iiéiffihve tetateihaitrnam 11165616966 5511,1155
`>
`
`.
`. 1115;115:1615 kept,well 55661116. The 6911111111: 5511:5151 on‘ 511 arm
`
`-- -,
`' 555165116 a bump‘was165,656-551155111, bath tin , s Theabdomen'wes
`
`the}: mattered withHematite fend 615563111.6129{5515511
`,
`
`_ 555511 with 5.2641651715315115 MEMDRMHWM 51112651651:_
`.,
`
`
`ares; 51515115155 51156565515662 amused'TtttettghM6.116 ,1,
`1111111115515 6111115556 6511651311145 5555 using11 1111151111111 this
`
`
`
`_ woundwas then$155156,basewaxed and 526556itriaye'is16611
`' V'W‘J
`,
`.
`.

`.
`,
`
`
`' We'-than 1151165 51.1511511111555155; skint 61,5155which-
`
`1115161515115 515tip'e'rtne,1111165561555562165.2111 55591
`
`
`1111,53 was6511161615111with mesmeriormaigtnat;the 11611115151 -
`
`' 56155 This 111551111551, 3,651 in 1511961511153:1155556613 .we
`. eat-11611;.6511111,to 11165111515516111! 5111151115,}:55115.15$511516...5.116
`-
`.
`
`
`digital 61555561111:was 1151111111 eat :11 51151-11111, [EW_ ,

`
`- 55555, An arigitz'???5511655 15551555515556 51116in 5156'-
`15115115115553: space. arid 615.5655 11155615 we“ 1111111111161
`. than rammed this--1155111111 andpiecedthe fiafigmfl' 55310an
`551.51 656111511 1.11166gas 1115166565» in the maehetitaneai
`5111155 {dflfflfifl-fi it. We 1,116.11 515696 one 16111111 51,116 19155 mm '
`"1251155111 61351515151,area. Bias: dissection was 231511.de '
`1:11: 1151,119me 16 11151111111111 ajatedor meme1,17.Ibe-
`. 95666. 5191111:21.2.31111115space 5111516555151611516115661155used 111'
`396515 lite diskspace Ammaneither 5555311111565 was
`WW and than (attested 115, an antefier:to 555115691
`611556611; 05165 this 5655115556356 9651565611,. it was keptan
`~ 15155511613316 tit-wits impacted trite-11,1512 551155151 body. This
`511111-6115 exa'eilant'1451151651155'0? 1115151515: 25551561 5:155E25.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`,
`
`,
`
`*
`
`'
`
`~
`
`-
`
`,
`
`'
`
`'
`
`.
`
`_
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`
`
`
`111111.115119511112)12.111115151511615 1:11,. 1,511 .
`
`
`
`Confidential Information .-.-' Patent-'Prosecutiott sensitive.
`
`MNUV1417325
`MSD 1 158
`. |PR20.13-00506
`|PR2013-00508
`
`

`

`toa 1'4 :mm heightend titan-9331919 emtsm 111-.a Marat
`positronstthe L2anaemia Wemmm“pm 0142 ‘
`mm Hewett $8mmmama’r All {base summits!was Wed
`A.fullyawake 13 x 41 mm. diatom cage waistguidan-my}:acted
`wins oeupetious-heme andthreadeum‘sethemtatepeee”pina l'e'fl..
`1e {59'mwe Exam: posthonhgwesghm‘nw en bum
`AP and were! flumeoopic mass M mesons!!!) fitment-J's
`were then. removed and gauche! the maximwas cleaned using0
`T ' We?!as the feeds .2a subwtane‘aue and M-subautfwtag-
`. :met. Sterile firashtgsm swims.
`'2 “to his mm he'd.
`
`.
`
`'
`
` .~ patientrem-med
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`~,ATT£NQtNG.-sausage;
`-ThemAZdeblickEND
`
`Asetsrmemcee":
`‘- LR. Demise.Orr, MD
`
`hszszé-m 12:28 W m m 35.3431
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tfizmxm 1312115197 7;21. P T 121222971 5‘7 F 09034%5495
`
`0:: Thomas A. stbttck M.D‘
`
`DOC!9;£_§9712220MN449488405
`
`Memhasmmammmm 52mm 4 :1
`
`TmnscflpflonOnly
`
`Unoffie'ia! Copy
`'
`.-
`; eat!!!
`
`
`
`'.mssmmozgpgimedext-snails2:13RM. C,
`
`_.
`
`
`
`Page‘zef2__if¢7'
`
`Confidential. Infermatibn-s Eatent’Praosecution sensitive
`
`4
`
`4
`
`MNUtI-Mflgze
`
`
`
`

`

`1611?I3?
`‘2thzx1sxg?
`Vi_fi
`
`
`UnH-I'IuL-n
`
`15345?B
`
`ZDEBLI
`
`
`
`L2-L3 FUSIIJH
`
`"
`
`. '-
`
`EdeblickflflflETEr
`
`CDHFIDEI‘JTIAL
`
`

`

`15345?fl
`
`ZDEBLIEH
`
`a
`
`I
`
`IZIISIQ?
`
`15:42=1?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`..
`
`-:.-:g;5,5_.-:J;_
`
`
`
`
`L2-L3 FUSIDH
`
`Edebfickflflflzflfl
`
`

`

`
`
`LmTHEDFN.UC
`
`ZdeblickflflflEE’l
`
`

`

`1584538
`
`ETIEIIE’Q?
`._
`:3“:-
`16:QE=EB
`
`ZDEBLI
`
`"
`
`EdeblickflflflEEE
`
`C DI‘JFIDEI‘JTIAL
`
`

`

`
`
`lCIIZZIINFIIIIIEI*«ITI;I'-"-.L
`
`Zdeblickflflfl233
`
`

`

`LmW.h.EDFN.UC
`
`Zdeblickflflfl234
`
`

`

`
`
`Zdeblickflflfl235
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`
`

`

`ZdeblickflflflEEfi
`
`CDNFIDEI‘JTIAL
`
`

`

`15845?fl
`
`ZDEBLICK
`
`L2-L3 FUSIUH
`
`CDI‘JFIDENTIAL
`
`I'Hiéi1axgi
`_1&=19=55
`
`EdehlickflflflEBT
`
`

`

`LmW.hEDFN.U_nu...
`
`ZdeblickflflflEBB
`
`

`

`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Zdeblicknnfig
`
`

`

`U.H.H.C.
`
`
`'
`16lflfii4fl
`
`
`u
`
`lZleFQ?
`
`1584579
`
`ZDEBLI
`
`
`
`
`
`L2-L3 FUSIUH
`
`
`C DI‘JFIDEI‘JTIAL
`
`
`Edeblickflflflfiflfl
`
`

`

`Deposition of
`THOMAS ZDEBLICK, MD
`
`Date: October 27, 2010
`Volume: 1
`
`Case: WARSAW v. NUVASIVE
`
`SHARI MOSS & ASSOCIATES
`Phone: (650) 692-8900 (415) 402-0004
`Fax: (650) 692-8909
`Email: sharimoss@sharimoss.com
`Internet: www.iptranscripts.com
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
`WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC.,
` Plaintiff,
` -vs- Case No. 3:08-CV-1512 MMA (AJB)
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
` Defendant.
`-----------------------------------------------------
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
` Counterclaimant,
` -vs-
`MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., et al.,
` Counterclaim Defendants.
`
`= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
` CONFIDENTIAL
`
` Deposition of:
` THOMAS A. ZDEBLICK, M.D.
` Madison, Wisconsin
` October 27, 2010
`
` Reported by: Lisa L. Lafler, RPR, CRR
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 114
`1
`Q. So the lateral implant on -- that you describe on
`2
` MNUV0278540 is an implant that would expand the
`3
` entire width of the vertebral body; is that right?
`4
` MR. DAUCHOT: Objection,
`5
` foundation. It mischaracterizes testimony.
`6
`A. No. That's not right.
`7
`Q. At what angle would the implant be put in relative
`8
` to the anterior direction of the spine?
`9
` MR. DAUCHOT: Objection,
`10
` foundation, mischaracterizes testimony,
`11
` assumes facts not in evidence.
`12
`A. I'm trying to characterize your question and see
`13
` if I can answer it in the way you posed it. It
`14
` doesn't specify an angle in this drawing or in the
`15
` description. It implies they're placed in from
`16
` the side of the spine by the nature of the
`17
` drawing; but, again, I don't specify the nature of
`18
` the approach, the anatomy of the approach, or the
`19
` angle of the approach. It's not addressed.
`20
`Q. Now, I think you said before that your idea for
`21
` the anterior implant was developed into the LT
`22
` Cage, but that you didn't think that the lateral
`23
` or posterior was developed; is that -- is that
`24
` correct?
`01:23
`25
`A. Well, I didn't develop it any further than this.
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 115
`Q. You didn't take any additional steps with respect
` to the lateral implant described on MNUV278540?
`A. Not that I recall.
`Q. Do you recall whether Danek took any further steps
` to develop the lateral implant that you described
` on MNUV278540?
`A. I don't know.
`Q. Do you recall communicating with Brad Estes in the
` February 1994 time frame about implants?
`A. I don't have any independent recollection of those
` conversations, no.
`Q. Do you recall any other efforts that you took or
` any other work that you did to develop a lateral
` implant besides what's on MNUV278540?
`A. No. I don't recall any others.
` (Exhibit No. 596 marked
` for identification)
`Q. I'm showing you what has been marked as
` Exhibit 596. Do you recognize that?
`A. I do.
`Q. What is it?
`A. It's a copy of a transcript of an operative note
` from surgery that I performed.
`Q. Now, this morning we talked about for Cervi-Lok
` procedures that you performed, there probably were
`
`01:22
`
`01:22
`
`01:23
`
`01:23
`
`01:23
`
`01:24
`
`01:24
`
`01:26
`
`01:26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`01:26
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 116
`1
` dictated records of the surgery. Would this -- is
`2
` this what you're talking about when you say
`3
` there's dictated records of a surgery?
`4
`A. Yes.
`5
`Q. So there's probably a record similar to this for
`6
` the Cervi-Lok procedure that you performed; is
`7
` that right?
`8
`A. Probably is.
`9
`Q. And where would that be located?
`10
`A. At University Hospitals of Wisconsin.
`11
`Q. Do you recall anything about the procedure that
`12
` you performed in Exhibit 596?
`13
`A. Some. It's quite -- quite a while ago, but I
`14
` recall some of the details of it.
`15
`Q. And what do you recall about it?
`16
`A. Well, I recall that I had a patient that had a
`17
` problem at L2-3; and this was in the time frame
`18
` when we were doing quite a bit of laparoscopic
`19
` anterior spinal fusion, and I was working with one
`20
` of the general surgery partners that I had in
`21
` developing some endoscopic retroperitoneal
`22
` approaches that we had been toying with, and this
`23
` was a patient that we thought would be a good
`24
` candidate to try to use that approach to do a less
`01:28
`25
` invasive fusion at L2-3.
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 117
`
`01:26
`
`01:27
`
`01:27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Q. Can we take a break for a second?
`A. Sure.
` (Recess)
` (Exhibit No. 597 marked
` for identification)
`Q. And now I'm showing you what has been marked as
` Exhibit 597, and I'd just like to keep 596 so that
` we can talk about them together. Do you recognize
` Exhibit 597?
`A. I do.
`Q. And what is that?
`A. They're a number of images that I saved from the
` procedure that I did in December of 1997 to do a
` lateral cage placed endoscopically at L2-3.
`Q. And do you see on Zdeblick 279 in the upper
` left-hand corner there's a number? What is that
` number?
`A. Well, that's the patient identifier.
`Q. Is that the same patient identifier number on
` Zdeblick 280, Zdeblick 282, Zdeblick 287, and
` Zdeblick 290?
`A. It appears to be.
`Q. So all of those pages that I just mentioned would
` be for the same patient; is that right?
`A. That's correct.
`
`30 (Pages 114 to 117)
`
`01:30
`
`01:30
`
`01:30
`
`01:31
`
`01:31
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 118
`1
`Q. And then if you turn back to Exhibit 596 --
`2
`A. Yes.
`3
`Q. -- do you see it has name and number?
`4
`A. Yes.
`5
`Q. And is that the same number 1584570 that was on
`6
` Zdeblick 279, 280, 282, 287, and 290?
`7
`A. It is.
`8
`Q. So does that mean that the pictures on those pages
`9
` of Exhibit 597 that have the number 1584570 relate
`10
` to the same patient that's described in
`11
` Exhibit 596?
`12
`A. They do.
`13
`Q. Do you remember anything about how you implanted
`14
` the intervertebral implant in the surgery
`15
` described in Exhibit 596?
`16
`A. I do.
`17
`Q. What do you remember?
`18
`A. I remember the entire operation.
`19
`Q. Can you tell me what you remember about the entire
`20
` operation?
`21
`A. Well, you can read it in the operative note that
`22
` describes it in the same detail that I remember it
`23
` in.
`24
` So we placed -- made a small incision in the
`01:33
`25
` patient's flank, and using just a finger we
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 119
` entered the retroperitoneal space and placed a
` balloon with a camera inside of it to expand that
` space, and then we could visualize through that
` retroperitoneal expanded space the lateral part of
` the spine. We used fluoroscopy to locate the
` correct disc space at L2-3, and then retracted the
` psoas muscle from anterior to posterior at that
` level to keep it out of the way. I affixed a pin
` into the vertebral body to hold the muscle back,
` and then we proceeded to engage the disc space at
` L2-3 from the side, from the lateral side, pass a
` reamer to remove disc material and a small amount
` of bone above and below, and then placed a
` threaded cylindrical cage that was filled with
` bone graft across the spine to affix the spine
` that way; and there's images that detail that
` position from a front and a side view.
`Q. When you say that you engaged the disc space, did
` that involve pushing the psoas muscle out of the
` way?
`A. The psoas was already retracted, as I mentioned,
` and held out of the way with a -- with a pin that
` I had driven into the vertebra.
`Q. Do you see in your clinical note the third
` sentence states, "Operative treatment has been
`
`01:31
`
`01:32
`
`01:32
`
`01:32
`
`01:33
`
`01:33
`
`01:34
`
`01:34
`
`01:34
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`01:34
`
`01:35
`
`01:35
`
`01:35
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 120
`1
` offered consisting of a lateral retroperitoneal
`2
` endoscopic interbody fusion using a custom lateral
`3
` threaded cage"?
`4
`A. That's correct.
`5
`Q. So did you testify earlier that you did not use an
`6
` implant in a lateral approach?
`7
`A. No. I testified in an anterolateral approach I
`8
` hadn't.
`9
`Q. Is this the only lateral approach that you've
`10
` performed where you've inserted an implant into a
`11
` spine?
`12
` MR. DAUCHOT: Just so we don't get
`13
` confused, I'll object. The prior testimony
`14
` was that he hadn't used it in a translateral
`15
` approach.
`16
` MR. MARTINI: Okay. Fair enough.
`17
`A. Okay. My recollection was I've never done a
`18
` translateral approach, so I couldn't have put an
`19
` implant in; and I'd said that an anterolateral
`20
` approach is I'd only put bone grafts in. Like I
`21
` said, the word "translateral" is a new name.
`22
` There were no such distinctions back in 1997.
`23
`Q. When is the --
`24
`A. But I'm not denying that I did this surgery. So
`01:35
`25
` I'm not sure what your question is. We've said
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 121
` all along that is this was a surgery I did in 1997
` and provided the records for it.
`Q. Right. When was the first time that you heard of
` the term "translateral"? Do you recall?
`A. I don't recall.
`Q. So this approach that's described in Exhibit 596
` and 597 is a lateral approach? Is that what
` you're saying?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And you inserted an implant laterally into the
` patient's spine?
`A. Yes, I did.
`Q. And is this the only lateral approach that you
` performed where you've inserted an implant into
` the spine?
`A. Again, you have to characterize that. So we're
` talking about lumbar spine and interbody fusion;
` is that correct?
`Q. Yes.
`A. And the answer would be yes. That's the only one
` I can remember.
`Q. Did you perform two lateral surgeries on this same
` day of December 18th, 1997, or was this the only
` surgical procedure where you did that?
`A. This was the only lateral one.
`31 (Pages 118 to 121)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`01:36
`
`01:36
`
`01:36
`
`01:36
`
`01:37
`
`

`

`01:37
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 122
`1
`Q. Did you perform another surgery that same day?
`2
`A. I did, but I believe it was a laparoscopic
`3
` anterior fusion.
`4
`Q. And with that other procedure, the laparoscopic
`5
` anterior, were you still placing the
`6
` intervertebral insert laterally into the spine?
`7
`A. I'd have to go back and look at the operative
`8
` note. I don't believe so.
`9
`Q. Turning to -- well, before we turn to Exhibit 597,
`10
` do you see at the bottom of Exhibit 596 it states,
`11
` "Printed at 5-18-2010"?
`12
`A. I do see that, yes.
`13
`Q. Does that mean that you or someone under your
`14
` control printed this off on May 18th, 2010?
`15
`A. It appears that way. I don't really know.
`16
`Q. Do you have any idea why you would have printed
`17
` this off in May of 2010?
`18
`A. Yeah. I have -- and I don't have a specific
`19
` recollection, but I remember being contacted by --
`20
` MR. DAUCHOT: And if these are
`21
` discussions with your counsel, that's
`22
` privileged.
`23
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
`24
`A. I'll just say it was probably related to
`01:38
`25
` discussions with counsel.
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 123
`
`01:37
`
`01:38
`
`01:38
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. DAUCHOT: Okay.
`Q. Was counsel representing you at the time?
`A. No.
`Q. Okay.
`A. Well, I don't know what the word "represent"
` means. That's a good question. What does that
` mean?
`Q. Well, so like in this context you have counsel
` representing you, it's Luke, and he's provided --
` he's talked to you about this deposition process
` and, you know, you've had some communications
` about that; and he's been making objections during
` deposition.
` But back in May of 2010, it might be that,
` you know, you didn't have any attorneys that were
` representing you and attorneys might have
` contacted you and asked you for information; but
` unless there was some sort of relationship where
` they were representing your rights, then they're
` not providing advice to you.
` So, I guess, my question is back in May of
` 2010, were these attorneys that you're saying
` these communications are privileged, were they
` representing you?
`A. I don't actually recall.
`
`01:38
`
`01:39
`
`01:39
`
`01:39
`
`01:39
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 124
`1
`Q. Do you recall who the attorney was that contacted
`2
` you in May of 2010?
`3
`A. I don't.
`4
`Q. Do you recall if the attorney was with the law
`5
` firm of Kirkland & Ellis?
`6
`A. I don't.
`7
`Q. Do you recall having any agreements with attorneys
`8
` in this case prior to preparing for your testimony
`9
` about people representing you?
`10
` MR. DAUCHOT: Yeah. Let me
`11
` shortcut this. I'll withdraw my instruction.
`12
` MR. MARTINI: Okay.
`13
` MR. DAUCHOT: I'll withdraw my
`14
` instruction.
`15
` MR. MARTINI: Okay.
`16
` MR. DAUCHOT: If you remember,
`17
` Doctor, go ahead. If I could just have a
`18
` moment, I just want to make sure I'm not
`19
` missing something.
`20
` MR. MARTINI: Yeah. Sure. Off the
`21
` record.
`22
` (Discussion off the record)
`23
` MR. MARTINI: Back on.
`24
`Q. You understand you're still under oath?
`01:44
`25
`A. I do.
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 125
`Q. So before we went on the break, we were talking
` about May of 2010 when you printed off this --
` when you or somebody working for you printed off
` the report in Exhibit 596, and I had posed the
` question why had you printed off this report in
` May of 2010; and do you know?
`A. I do; and actually, I'm glad you mentioned that
` date because it jogged my memory about how this
` whole -- how I found this patient again.
` So we got a call, my office did, in May of
` 2010 from, my assistant said, a, quote, Medtronic
` attorney, end quote, and I really don't remember
` which firm or who it was, asking if I'd ever done
` a lateral -- if I remember doing a lateral cage
` implant because there's some lawsuit, and I
` responded, "Yeah, I do remember doing that." And
` they wanted to know if we could find the records
` from it. So I went back into my slide collection
` and actually found the set of slides that you have
` in front of us here that documented the procedure,
` found the patient's number on the slides, and used
` that number to retrieve this operative note.
` So now that I remember, it had nothing to do
` with looking in a database, because that would
` have been improbable to find, but I found it off
`32 (Pages 122 to 125)
`
`01:40
`
`01:40
`
`01:40
`
`01:40
`
`01:45
`
`01:45
`
`01:45
`
`01:45
`
`01:46
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 126
`1
` the slide and then dictated -- or not dictated,
`2
` but printed off this operative note; and somehow
`3
` that ended up with the attorneys at that point.
`4
`Q. Did the attorneys tell you why they wanted you to
`5
` print off this report or why they needed the
`6
` translateral -- excuse me, the lateral approach?
`7
` MR. DAUCHOT: Objection,
`8
` foundation.
`9
`A. I don't recall speaking to them directly. I think
`10
` my assistant dealt with them.
`11
`Q. Did your assistant find out why they needed that
`12
` information?
`13
`A. She said there was, quote, some lawsuit, end
`14
` quote, but I didn't know anything more than that
`15
` or may have even been potentially a lawsuit at
`16
` that point. I don't recall.
`17
`Q. Now, in your previous answer you mentioned
`18
` something about a slide collection. What is this
`19
` slide collection?
`20
`A. Back in the old days we used to take photographs
`21
` with cameras that produced slides, and for anybody
`22
` who's in academic medicine in the last 20 years,
`23
` we used to all give our lectures with huge
`24
` carousels of slides; so I would keep, I don't
`01:47
`25
` know, six file cabinets full of slides of cases
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 127
` that I'd done and photographs, and that if I had
` to put a lecture together, I could go back in and
` pull certain slides out to make up such a lecture.
` So I had that for many years; and then when we
` moved to our new office building, I actually got
` rid of it all because slides are out of date and
` all those cases were out of date. But I saved a
` few choice cases like this one that I knew were
` just unique, and for some reason, I don't recall
` why, when I was disposing of the -- most of that
` collection, this is one of the few things that I
` pulled out and saved and put in a drawer.
`Q. Did you save any other slides from that
` collection?
`A. Yes, a couple, less than a hundred; weird, you
` know, unique cases I've seen over two decades.
`Q. Did any of those cases involve anterior cervical
` plates?
`A. I don't recall.
`Q. Did any of those other cases involve inserting
` implants into spines?
`A. Very possibly, yeah. It's what I do.
`Q. Did you search any of those slides as part of your
` response to the subpoena other than to get these
` slides that you produced in Exhibit 597?
`
`01:49
`
`01:49
`
`01:49
`
`01:49
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 128
`1
`A. No. I searched it, and this is the only ones that
`2
` were appropriate to this -- to this subpoena.
`3
`Q. And how did you make the determination what was
`4
` appropriate in response to the subpoena?
`5
` MR. DAUCHOT: To the extent that
`6
` involves communications with counsel,
`7
` Dr. Zdeblick, I instruct you not to answer.
`8
`A. I used my intellect to read the questions and
`9
` interpret them.
`10
`Q. Did any of the slides that you kept from your
`11
` carousel of slides involve a Novus LC implant?
`12
`A. Not that I can recall.
`13
`Q. Did any of the slides involve implanting an
`14
` Interfix cage?
`15
`A. Not that I recall, other than this one that's in
`16
` front of us now.
`17
`Q. Is that the implant that you put in? Was it an
`18
` Interfix cage in Exhibit 597?
`19
`A. As I said before, I don't recall when the names
`20
` changed from TIBFD to Interfix to Novus LC. I
`21
` think they all refer to the same, but I may be
`22
` wrong on that. There may be subtle differences.
`23
` And I don't actually recall which this would fall
`24
` under, but it's a similar design to that.
`01:50
`25
`Q. So it's in that family?
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 129
` MR. DAUCHOT: Objection. I don't
` know what "family" means; and assumes facts
` not in evidence.
`Q. It's one of those three though?
` MR. DAUCHOT: Objection.
`A. Yes.
`Q. Turning to Exhibit 597, what is shown in Zdeblick
` 279?
`A. That's a fluoroscopic image. It's an anterior
` posterior view, meaning from the front, and it
` looks like it's one of the final images we took
` once the cage implant was in place.
`Q. And can you tell how far the implant spans the
` vertebral -- or the spine, I guess? Is it all the
` way across?
`A. It appears to be.
`Q. And it looks like the implant in Zdeblick 279 is
` kind of at an angle, but that would be with
` respect to top to bottom of the spine; is that
` right?
`A. Yes. I guess if by an "angle" you mean tilted
` cephalad, or superiorly, yeah, that would be
` matching the disc space.
`Q. But that wouldn't be at an angle with respect to
` the approach from the side of the spine; is that
`33 (Pages 126 to 129)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`01:50
`
`01:50
`
`01:51
`
`01:51
`
`01:51
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`01:46
`
`01:46
`
`01:46
`
`01:47
`
`01:47
`
`01:47
`
`01:48
`
`01:48
`
`01:48
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 130
`
`01:52
`
`01:52
`
`01:52
`
`01:52
`
`1
` right?
`2
`A. I'm not quite sure what you're asking. We're
`3
` looking at the front of the spine.
`4
`Q. Yeah.
`5
`A. And if you're referring to an angle, you're
`6
` referring to a tilt that goes superiorly, meaning
`7
` from the foot towards the head, of a few degrees.
`8
`Q. Uh-huh.
`9
`A. Am I correct?
`10
`Q. Yes.
`11
`A. So that's what we're talking about. That's all I
`12
` can infer from that image.
`13
`Q. And what is shown in Zdeblick 280?
`14
`A. Again, it's a fluoroscopic image from the same
`15
` procedure but an earlier stage of the procedure.
`16
` It shows a few of the instruments placed in the
`17
` spine. It shows the pin that's driven into the
`18
` vertebra to hold the muscle back. It shows a
`19
` little retractor section device, and then it shows
`20
` the cannula that's being placed within the disc
`21
` space, initial trephine.
`22
`Q. So before we talked about the specific slides that
`23
` have 1584570 on it as being related to the case
`24
` described in Exhibit 596, but there are a few
`01:53
`25
` slides that don't have the number 1584570. Do
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 131
` those also relate to the same case though, those
` pages within Exhibit 597?
`A. Yes. Everything in this exhibit is from the same
` patient.
`Q. So what is shown in Zdeblick 281?
`A. 281 is an x-ray taken postoperatively of the
` implant in place, the same front view of the
` spine.
`Q. And what is in Zdeblick 282?
`A. 282 is a -- also a fluoroscopic image
` intraoperatively that shows a further step in the
` procedure where I'm distracting the disc space
` from the side of the spine.
`Q. And what about Zdeblick 285?
`A. 28 --
`Q. 5.
`A. 285 is the same x-ray view except less magnified
` than the previous one we looked at. Postoperative
` view of the spine from the front.
`Q. What is shown in Zdeblick 286?
`A. 286 is a preoperative x-ray of the side of the
` spine, a lateral x-ray. It shows the pathology
` that we were operating for.
`Q. And what is shown in Zdeblick 287?
`A. 287 is a fluoroscopic image on a lateral approach
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`01:53
`
`01:53
`
`01:54
`
`01:54
`
`01:54
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 132
`1
` -- I mean, a lateral view, so we're looking at the
`2
` side of the spine and seeing the final position of
`3
` the implant as it looked from the side.
`4
`Q. So can you tell from Zdeblick 287 what angle the
`5
` implant has been put into the spine from the side?
`6
` Is it -- is it directly into the spine or is it at
`7
` an angle with respect to the vertebral bodies?
`8
`A. It's directly lateral.
`9
`Q. And what is Zdeblick 289?
`10
`A. Postoperative x-ray lateral view; not perfectly a
`11
` lateral, so it's a little bit oblique, but it
`12
` shows the implant placed in the spine from the
`13
` lateral view.
`14
`Q. Do you recall the length of the implant that you
`15
` put into the patient in Exhibits 596 and 597?
`16
`A. I don't have any independent recollection of that,
`17
` but I can read it from the operative note.
`18
`Q. And what can you read from the operative note is
`19
` the length?
`20
`A. The cage was 41 millimeters in length.
`21
`Q. And what does the 18 on MNUV1417826 refer to?
`22
`A. The diameter.
`23
`Q. And was it a circular cage so that the diameter
`24
` was the same throughout?
`01:56
`25
`A. Yes.
`CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL - CONFIDENTIAL
`Page 133
`Q. Had you performed any surgeries prior to this
` December 18th, 1997, surgery -- or 1997 surgery
` using a Novus LC implant?
`A. You know, I couldn't recall any that I'd ever
` used. The cylindrical cages I had used up to this
` point were the BAK cages. So I wasn't -- I wasn't
` routinely using the Novus LC Cage. And by this
` point in time -- let me just refresh my memory on
` the date. Yeah. By '97 I was only using the LT
` Cage by that point, so I was not using the LC
` Cage.
`Q. I think you said that you were -- the cylindrical
` cages that you were primarily using up to December
` 18th, 1997, were BAK cages. Were there any other
` cylindrical cages that you used?
` MR. DAUCHOT: Objection,
` mischaracterizes testimony. Go ahead.
`A. I used the threaded bone dowels, if you can
` consider that an implant. It was a machined piece
` of cadaver bone that was cylindrical, but that
` came from a bone bank; but no. I used the BAK
` from '93 to '95, and that turned out to be LT Cage
` from '95 onward; and somewhere in the middle there
` I did a few cases with the threaded bone dowels.
`Q. Before when we were talking about your slide
`
`01:55
`
`01:55
`
`01:55
`
`01:55
`
`01:56
`
`01:57
`
`01:57
`
`01:57
`
`01:58
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`34 (Pages 130 to 133)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket