throbber
kosiaso
`Paige l 4+1
`
`JUL 3 0 2003
`
`VERTE-STACKT” Spinal System
`510(k) Summary
`June 2003
`
`I.
`
`Company:
`
`Medtronic Sofamor Danek
`
`1800 Pyramid Place
`Memphis, TN 38132
`(901) 396-3133
`
`II.
`
`III.
`
`III.
`
`Proprietary Trade Name: VERTE-STACKT“ Spinal System
`
`Classification Name: Spinal Intervertebral Body Fixation Orthosis (21 CFR
`888.3060)
`
`Product Description
`
`The VERTE-STACK” device, is a stackable PEEK spacer, which inserts between
`
`vertebral bodies in the anterior thoracic and lumbar spine. The device is intended for
`
`vertebral body replacement to aid in the surgical correction and stabilization ofthe Spine’.
`
`The construct is not intended to be employed as a stand-alone device. The VERTE-
`
`STACKTM device is fabricated and manufactured from POLYETHERETHERKETONE
`
`(PEEK OPTIMA LT) as described by ASTM F2026. The tantalum marker used for this
`
`product is made to the voluntary standard of ASTM F-560.
`
`The design ofthe VERTE-STACKTM device includes a variety of stackable components
`
`of different sizes and heights. The stackable components are designed to suit the
`
`individual patient pathology.
`
`The VERTE—STACK“" device may be used individually, or stacked together in order to
`
`accommodate the individual anatomical requirements of the vertebral space created by
`
`the corpectomy.
`
`The VERTE-STACKT“ Spinal System must be used with additional anterior and/or
`
`posterior spinal instrumentation to augment stability.
`
`The purpose of this submission is to add modified components to the VERTE—S'I'ACKT”
`
`Spinal System.
`
`IV.
`
`Indications
`
`The VERTE-STACKTM Spinal System is a vertebral body replacement device intended
`
`for use in the thoracolumbar spine (Tl—L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable
`
`vertebral body due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture). The VERTE-STACKTM Spinal
`
`System is to be used with supplemental fixation. Specifically, the VERTE-STACKT“
`
`|PR2013-00508
`
`MSD 1 134
`|PR2013-00506
`
`000109
`
`

`
`K0 3 I qflgé
`W9?’ 7 01C 2
`
`device is to be used with the Medtronic Sofamor Danek ZPLATE II Anterior Fixation
`System, the Titanium DYNALOKT“ CLASSIC Spinal System, the VANTAGET“
`
`Anterior Fixation System, the Titanium TSRH® Spinal System, the Titanium CD
`
`HORIZON® Spinal System, the Titanium GDLH® Spinal System or their successors.
`
`Additionally, the VERTBSTACKT“ device is intended to be used with bone graft.
`
`V.
`
`Substantial Equivalence
`
`Documentation was provided which demonstrated the VERTBSTACKT“ Spinal System
`
`to be substantially equivalent to the previouslycleared VERTE-STACK‘*“ Spinal System
`
`(KO23570, SE l 1/19/02 and K02l79l, SE 08/26/02).
`
`000110
`
`

`
`“me-.,,,
`
`.
`
`gr‘
`
`g.
`
`3 (
`‘’~«»..
`
`DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH8:.HUMANSERVICES
`
`PublicHealthService
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`9200 Corporate Boulevard
`Rockville MD 20850
`
`JUL 3 0 2003
`
`Richard W. Treharne, Ph.D.
`
`Sr. Vice President Regulatory Affairs
`Medtronic Sofamor Danek
`
`1800 Pyramid Place
`Memphis, TN 38132
`
`Re: K031780
`Trade/Device Name: VERTESTACKW Spinal System
`Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3060
`Regulation Name: Spinal intervertebral body fixation orthosis
`Regulatory Class:
`11
`Product Code: MQP
`Dated: June 27, 2003
`
`Received: June 30, 2003
`
`Dear Dr. Treharne:
`
`We have reviewed yourSection 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device
`referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications
`for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate
`commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to
`devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug,
`and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA).
`You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The
`general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of
`devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and
`adulteration.
`
`If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it
`may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can
`be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may
`publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. '
`
`Please be advised that FDA’s issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean
`that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act
`or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
`comply with all the Act’s requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21
`CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
`forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic
`product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 ofthe Act); 21 CFR 1000- l 050.
`
`

`
`Page 2 ~ Richard W. Trehame, Ph.D.
`
`This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k)
`premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence ofyour device to a legally
`marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device
`to proceed to the market.
`
`If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please
`contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Also, please note the regulation entitled,
`“Misbranding by reference to premarket notification” (21 CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain
`other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small
`Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll—free number (800) 638-2041 or
`
`(301)443-6597 or at its Internet address htt ://www.fda. ov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`all atails/-
`% Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D.
`
`Director
`
`Division of General, Restorative
`
`and Neurological Devices
`Office of Device Evaluation
`Center for Devices and
`
`Radiological Health
`
`Enclosure
`
`

`
`510(k) Number (ifknown):
`
`K 03 H50
`
`Device Name:
`
`VERTE-STACK“ Spinal SQ/stem
`
`Indications for Use:
`
`June 2003
`
`P39‘ I “r ‘
`
`The VERTBSTACK”‘ Spinal System is a vertebral body replacement device intended for use in the
`
`thoracolumbar spine (Tl-LS) to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body due to tumor or
`
`trauma (i.e., fracture). The VERTBSTACKTM Spinal System is to be used with supplemental fixation.
`
`Specifically, the VERTE-STACKT“ device is to be used with the Medtronic Sofamor Danek ZPLATE ll
`
`Anterior Fixation System, Titanium DYNALOK7“ CLASSIC Spinal System, the VANTAGET” Anterior
`
`Fixation System, Titanium TSRH® Spinal System, Titanium CD HORIZON® Spinal System, the Titanium
`
`GDLH® Spinal System, or their successors. Additionally, the VERTE-STACKT“ device is intended to be
`
`used with bone graft.
`
`(PLEASE DO NOT VVRITE BELOW THIS LINHONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
`
`Concurrence OFCDRH, Office of Evaluation (ODE)
`
`Prescription Use
`(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
`
`I
`
`OR
`
`Over-The-Counter Use
`
`(Optional 1-2-96)
`
` (Division Sign—Ofi)
`
`Division of General. Restorative
`and Neurological Devices
`
`510(k) Number
`
`
`
`)<o5/780
`
`000158

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket