throbber
tt/sz/u
`
`LJ
`E 0'
`E22
`= :
`——: h
`E -
`E '0
`E a
`= O
`
`
`
`Pleasetypeaplussign(+)inthisbox—~>[+]
`
`0H \36 \O O
`
`
`
`PTO/$13105 (2/98)
`Approved for use through 09/30/2000 OMB 0651-0032
`Patent and Trademark Office U S. DEPARTMENT OWOMME
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valld OMB cd'h'ol nu "3;.
`=-
`UTILITY
`
`PATENT APPLICATION
`David Scott Dunlap et a . _"
`First Inventor orApplication Identifier
`TRANSMITTAL
`Title
`SI—LAMPOOS PROVIDING A SUPERIOR COMBINATIO mg: 5
`ANTI-DANDRUFF EFFICACY AND CONDITIONING 010 E .
`(Only for new nonprovisional applications under 37 CFR
`E, K4492 1 802 1 US
`Express [Mail Label N0.
`-
`
`15305))
`Assistant Commissioner for Patents
` APPLICATION ELEMENTS
`
`
`ADDRESS TO: Box Patent Application
`
`See MPEP chapter 600 concerning utility patent application contents.
`
`
`Washington, DC 20231
`6. Cl Microfiche Computer Program (Appendix)
`
`1. El Fee Transmittal Form
`(Submit an original and a duplicate for fee processing.)
`
`[Total pages = 62+ abstract]
`2_ M Specification
`(preferred arrangement set forth below)
`— Descriptive title of the Invention
`— Cross References to Related Applications
`‘ Statement Regarding Fed SPOHSOFed R351)
`— Reference to Microfiche Appendix
`
`7. Nucleotide and/or Amino Acid Sequence Submission
`(if applicable: all necessary)
`a. I] Computer Readable Copy
`b. E] Paper Copy (identical to computer copy)
`0. El Statement verifying identity of above copies
`ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION PARTS
`
`8. Cl Assignment Papers (cover sheet & document(s))
`9. CI 37 CFR 3.73(b) Statement
`El Power of
`(when there is an assignee)
`Attorney
`10. El English Translation Document (if applicable)
`11. D Information Disclosure
`Cl Copies of
`Statement (IDS)/PTO-1449
`IDS Citations
`12. El Preliminary Amendment
`13. 121 Return Receipt Postcard (MPEP 503)
`(Should be specifically itemizeaD
`14. Cl Small Entity El Stmt. filed in prior application,
`Statement(5)
`Status still proper and desired
`15. CI Certified Copy of Priority Document(s)
`(ifforeign priority is claimed)
`
`16. El Other:
`
`* Background ofthe Invention
`- Brief Summary Offlle Invention
`~ Brief Description of the Drawings (if filed)
`— Detailed Description
`— Claim(s)
`— Abstract of the Disclosure
`[Total Sheets = 0]
`3. D Drawing(s) (35 USC 113)
`[Total Pages = 2]
`4. Oath or Declaration
`a. El Newly executed (original or copy)
`b. El Copy from a prior application (37 CFR 1.63(d))
`(for continuation/divisional with Box 17 completed)
`[NM 3"" 5 below]
`.
`1. El DELETION OF INVENTOR! S)
`Signed statement attached deleting inventor(s)
`named in the prior application, see 37 CFR
`§§1.63(d)(2) and 1.33(b).
`Incorporation By Reference (useable ifBox 4b is checked)
`The entire disclosure of the prior application, from
`which a copy of the oath or declaration is supplied
`under Box 4b, is considered as being part of the
`disclosure of the accompanying application and is
`hereby incorporated by reference therein.
`17. If a CONTINUING APPLICATION, check appropriate box, and supply the requisite information below and in a preliminary amendment:
`
`El Continuation
`Cl Divisional
`El Continuation-impart (CIP) of prior application No.
`/
`Prior application information: Examiner:
`Group/Art Unit:
`18. CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`
`5. Cl
`
`-
`
`D Customer Number or Bar Code Label
`
`or El Correspondence address below
`
`(Insert Customer No. or attach bar code label here)
`
`NAME Andrew A Paul--Box 325
`
`ADDRESS
`
`The Procter & Gamble Company
`Sharon Woods Technical Center
`
`
`1 1511 Reed Hartman Highway
`CITY Cincinnati
`STATE OH
`ZIP CODE 45241
`
`(513) 626-1355
`TELEPHONE (513) 626—2404
`COUNTRY
`Burden Hour Statement. This form is estimated to take 02 hours to complete. Time will vary depending upon the needs of the individual case,
`Any comments on the amount of time required to complete this form should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, Patent and Trademark
`Office, Washington, DC 2023]. DO NOT SEND FEES 0R COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Assistant Commissioner
`for Patents, Box Patent Application, Washington: DC 20231.
`
`1
`
`UNL 1002
`
`1
`
`

`

`Please type a plus sign (+) in this box —> [+]
`
`PTO/SB/29 (12/97)
`Approved for use through 09/30/00. OMB 0651-0032
`Patent and Trademark Office: US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`CLAIMS
`
`/
`
`_
`
`\3
`
`%
`
`(2) NUMBER FILED
`
`(3)NUMBER EXTRA
`
`(4) RATE
`
`(1) FOR
`TOTAL CLAIMS
`(37 CFR 1.16(c))
`INDEPENDENT
`. l.
`2-3=
`CLAIMS (37 cm
`V '
`' 'IPLE DEPENDENT CLAIMS (if applicable)(37 CFR 1.16(d))
`
`34-20=
`
`i4
`
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`(5) CALCULATIONS
`
`
`$252.00
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`+ $260.00 =
`
`BASIC FEE
`
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(a)) $690.00
`‘ W Wig“:
`‘ was;
`’
`“r
`A?
`at;
`
`
`K)
`was 1:
`
`Reduction by 50% for filing by small entity (Note 37 CFR 1.9, 1.27, 1.28). $942.00
`
`
`
`
`19. Small entity status:
`
`a.
`b.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`El A small entity statement is enclosed.
`El A small entity statement was filed in the prior nonprovisional application and such status is
`still proper and desired.
`El Is no longer claimed.
`c.
`20. The Commissioner is hereby authorized to credit overpayments or charge the following fees to
`Deposit Account No. 16-2480:
`a. El Fees required under 37 CFR 1.16.
`b.
`121 Fees required under 37 CFR 1.17.
`C.
`III Fees required under 37 CFR 1.18.
`21. III A check in the amount of $
`22. D Other:
`
`is enclosed.
`
`
`
`
`AndrewAPaul P-46,4OA
`_‘g‘
`' '
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[Page 2 of 2]
`
`"Express Mail" mailing label number E K449213021US
`Date ofDeposn
`25 A2111 2000
`I hereby certify that this paper/fee is being deposited With the United
`States Postal Service Express Mail Post Office to Addressee”
`service under 37 CFR l 10 on the date indicated above and is
`addressed to Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington, DC
`2023 1
`Andrew A Paul
`Attomeymailing application
`
`Reg No
`
`Signature ofAnomev /
`
`2
`
`

`

`"LVPI'CSS Mall" mailing label number IIKé-WZ erUZIUS
`Date ochposil 25 AEnI 2000
`I hereby ccml‘v that
`lhls paper/fee IS being deposited \uth the
`United States Postal Scrvuce
`“Express Mail Post Office to
`Addmsslx" sun/I01: under 37 CFR I m an the date indicated above
`and IS addmsscd to (he Asmwm Commlssmncr
`for Patent.
`Washingwn.DC 2023:
`
`Signature of Person mallin_ application
`
`P&G Case7546M
`
`SHAMPOOS PROVIDING A SUPERIOR COMBINATION
`
`OF ANTI-DANDRUFF EFFICACY AND CONDITIONING
`
`David Scott Dunlop
`
`Roberta Atwood Boyd
`
`Susan Marie Guskey
`
`James Robert Schwartz
`
`Anthony Raymond Marchetta
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to shampoo compositions which provide a superior combination
`
`of anti—dandruff efficacy and conditioning.
`
`These compositions contain anionic surfactants,
`
`conditioning agents, anti-dandruff agents, cationic polymers, and water. These anti-dandruff and
`
`conditioning shampoo compositions exhibit (a) at least a certain bioavailability/coverage index value,
`
`(b)
`
`less than or equal
`
`to a certain first conditioning index value,
`
`(c) at
`
`least a certain second
`
`conditioning index value, and (d) at least a certain minimal inhibitory concentration index value, as
`defined herein.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Shampoo compositions comprising various combinations of detersive surfactants and
`
`conditioning agents, especially silicone conditioning agents, are known in the art and are commercially
`
`available. Many of these compositions have been found to provide excellent hair cleansing and
`
`conditioning performance. For example, Pantene® Shampoo Plus Pro~Vitamin Conditioner-in-One
`
`formulas which contain anionic surfactants, a cationic polymer and silicone conditioning agents provide
`
`excellent cleaning, conditioning and hair feel benefits upon application to hair.
`
`Anti-dandruff shampoos are also well known in the art and are also commercially available.
`
`Anti—dandruff shampoos typically incorporate an anti-dandruff active and detersive surfactants. Among
`
`the preferred type of anti—dandruff agents are particulate, crystalline anti-dandruff agents, such as
`
`15
`
`20
`
`
`
`4O
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`3
`
`

`

`l0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`sulfur, selenium disulfide and heavy metal salts of pyridinethione. Soluble anti-dandruff agents, such
`
`as ketoconazole, are also known in the art,
`
`Anti—dandruff shampoos which also provide conditioning benefits are likewise known in the
`
`art.
`
`For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,666 exemplifies and claims shampoo compositions, which
`
`contain anionic surfactants, cationic polymers and zinc pyridinethione, as an anti—dandruff agent. U.S.
`
`Pat. No. 5,624,666 teaches that conditioning agents such as silicone fluids can optionally be
`
`incorporated into the compositions therein. Head & Shoulders® Dandruff Shampoo Plus Conditioner
`
`is an example of a marketed product which provides both anti-dandruff and conditioning benefits upon
`
`application of the shampoo to hair.
`
`Nevertheless, some consumers desire a shampoo which provides a superior combination of
`
`anti—dandruff efficacy and conditioning performance versus currently marketed products.
`
`Such a
`
`superior combination of efficacy and conditioning can be difficult to achieve.
`
`For example, one way to achieve excellent conditioning benefits is to employ a fairly high
`
`level of cationic polymer in the shampoo composition. However, the use of high levels of cationic
`
`polymer can affect the characteristics of the coacervate formed between the cationic polymer and the
`
`anionic surfactant in a manner which negatively impacts the deposition of the anti—dandruff active on
`
`the hair and scalp. Thus,
`
`it has heretofore been believed that the level of cationic polymer had to be
`
`balanced to provide the best balance of conditioning and anti-dandruff efficacy.
`
`Also by way of example, it was previously believed that excellent anti-dandruff efficacy could
`
`be achieved by utilizing a coacervate to deposit anti-dandruff actives on the hair and scalp.
`
`Unfortunately, the use of coacervates to deposit anti—dandruff actives on the hair or scalp can negatively
`
`affect conditioning, specifically clean hair feel.
`
`In order to achieve good conditioning, the level of anti-
`
`dandruff agent could be reduced, resulting in good conditioning, but less than optimal anti-dandruff
`
`efficacy.
`
`Applicants have now discovered, however, that, surprisingly, bioavailabilifl and coverage of
`
`the anti-dandruff active are much more predictive of efficacy than deposition of the active on the hair
`
`or scalp.
`
`In fact, Applicants have found that,
`
`in some cases, even when an anti-dandruff active
`
`deposited very well on the hair and scalp, acceptable anti—dandruff efficacy was not achieved.
`
`Conversely, good anti-dandruff efficacy could be achieved in situations where the anti-dandruff active
`
`had good coverage and was highly bioavailable, but did not deposit superiorly to the hair or scalp.
`
`Thus, in order for a shampoo composition to provide a superior combination of anti-dandruff efficacy
`
`and conditioning compared to known shampoo compositions, it must meet certain criteria with respect
`
`to bioavailability and coverage, but it does not necessarily have to have the ability to deposit the anti-
`
`dandruff active superiorly on the hair or scalp.
`
`4
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`Applicants have found that four requirements must be satisfied in order to provide shampoo
`
`compositions which provide a superior combination of efficacy and conditioning. Particularly, (1)
`
`bioavailability and coverage of the anti—dandruff active are important to anti-dandruff efficacy; (2)
`
`comb-ability of wet hair and (3) clean hair feel are important to the consumer perception of well-
`
`conditioned hair; and (4) the inherent ability of the anti-dandruff active to inhibit the growth of
`
`microorganisms has an impact on the anti—dandruff efficacy as well as overall consumer acceptance of
`
`the shampoo product.
`
`Whether or not the requisite criteria are met for a given shampoo composition depends on a
`
`number of aspects of the shampoo formulation including, for example, the level and type of cationic
`
`polymer employed in the composition, the type of anti-dandruff agent employed, the amount of anionic
`
`surfactant employed, the level and type of polyalkylene glycol employed, if any, and the rheological
`characteristics of the coacervate’.
`
`It is an object of the present invention to provide shampoo compositions, which provide a
`
`superior combination of anti-dandruff efficacy and conditioning.
`
`It is also an object of the present
`
`invention to provide a method for cleansing and conditioning the hair. These, and other objects, will
`
`become readily apparent from the detailed description below.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to a shampoo composition comprising: (A) from about 5% to
`
`about 50%, by weight, of an anionic surfactant; (B) from about 0.01% to about 10%, by weight, of a
`
`non~volatile conditioning agent; (C) from about 0.1% to about 4%, by weight, of an anti-dandruff
`
`agent; (D) from about 0.02% to about 5%, by weight, of at least one cationic polymer; and (E) water.
`
`The composition (A) has a bioavailability/coverage index value, as defined herein, of at least about
`
`1.25; (B) has a first conditioning index value, as defined herein, of less than or equal to about 1.0; (C)
`
`has a second conditioning index value, as defined herein, of at least about 1.5; and (D) has a minimal
`
`inhibitory concentration index value, as defined herein, of at least about 0.125.
`
`The present invention further relates to a method for providing anti-dandruff efficacy and
`
`conditioning hair comprising applying to the hair and scalp an amount of the above—described
`
`composition which is effective to provide such benefits.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`The shampoo compositions of the present invention provide a superior combination of anti-
`
`dandruff efficacy and conditioning. Such anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions can
`
`comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the essential elements and limitations of the invention
`
`5
`
`

`

`l0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`4o
`
`45
`
`50
`
`
`
`described herein, as well as any of the additional or optional ingredients, components or limitations
`
`described herein.
`
`Particularly,
`
`these compositions comprise anionic surfactants, conditioning agents, anti-
`
`dandruff agents, cationic polymers, and water. More particularly, these compositions exhibit certain
`
`characteristics which are measured by four indecies, defined herein.
`
`The shampoo compositions of the present invention have a bioavailability/coverage index value
`
`of at least about 1.25, preferably at least about 1.5, more preferably at least about 2.0. This index is
`
`indicative of anti-dandruff efficacy. Generally, the higher the index value of the composition, the better
`
`its anti-dandruff efficacy, due to more bioavailable anti-dandruff agent,
`
`increased coverage of anti-
`
`dandruff agent, or both. Applicants have discovered that, surprisingly, bioavailability and coverage of the
`
`anti-dandruff active are much more predictive of efficacy than deposition of the active on the hair or
`
`scalp.
`
`ln fact, Applicants have found that,
`
`in some cases, even when an antidandruff active deposited
`
`very well on the hair and scalp, acceptable anti—dandruff efficacy was not achieved. Conversely, good
`
`anti—dandruff efficacy could be achieved in situations where the anti-dandruff active had good coverage
`
`and was highly bioavailable, but did not deposit superiorly to the hair or scalp.
`
`Applicants believe that there are a number of ways to increase the bioavailability of the anti—
`
`dandruff active. For example, the composition can be formulated (as hereinafter described) such that the
`
`anti—dandruff active is present on the surface of the coacervate (i.e.,
`
`loosely associated with the
`
`coacervate) rather than integrated into or encapsulated by the coacervate. Another way to increase
`
`bioavailability of the anti-dandruff active is to formulate the composition (as hereinafter described) such
`
`that the coacervate is spreadable or
`
`flowable (rather than elastic) to increase the bioavailability of any
`
`anti-dandruff active that is integrated into or encapsulated by the coacervate.
`
`The shampoo compositions of the present invention have a first conditioning index value of less
`
`than or equal to about 1.0, preferably less than or equal to about 0.96, more preferably less than or equal
`
`to about 0.94, most preferably less than or equal to about 0.91. This index is indicative of conditioning,
`
`as realized by consumers of the shampoo composition. Generally, the lower the index value of the
`
`composition, the better its conditioning, due to easier to comb and less tangled wet hair.
`
`The shampoo compositions of the present invention have a second conditioning index value of
`
`at least about 1.5, preferably at least about 1.75, more preferably at least about 2.0, still more preferably
`
`at least about 2.25, most preferably at least about 2.5. This index is indicative of conditioning, as realized
`
`by consumers of the shampoo composition. Generally, the higher the index value of the composition, the
`
`better its conditioning, due to increased clean hair feel.
`
`'55
`
`The shampoo compositions of the present invention have a minimal inhibitory concentration
`
`index value of at least about 0.125, preferably at least about 0.25, more preferably at least about 0.5.
`
`This index is
`
`indicative of anti-dandruff efficacy. Generally,
`
`the higher the index value of the
`
`6
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`composition, the better its anti-dandruff efficacy, due to increased inherent ability of the anti-dandruff
`
`agent to inhibit the growth of microorganisms.
`
`The components, including those which may optionally be added, of the shampoo compositions
`
`of the present invention, as well as methods for preparation, methods for use are described in detail
`
`below. Also, methods for assessing the four indecies are described in detail.
`
`The anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions of the present invention comprise an
`
`anionic surfactant, a conditioning agent, an anti-dandruff agent, a cationic polymer, and water. Each of
`
`I. Components
`
`20
`
`these ingredients is described in detail below.
`
`A. Anionic surfactant
`
`
`
`The anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions of the present invention comprise
`
`from about 5% to about 50%, by weight of the composition, preferably from about 8% to about 30%,
`
`more preferably from about l0% to about 25%, most preferably from about 12% to about 18%, of an
`
`anionic detersive surfactant component suitable for application to the hair or skin. The anionic
`
`detersive surfactant
`
`is believed to provide cleaning and lather performance to the composition.
`
`Additionally, the anionic detersive surfactant forms a coacervate, upon aqueous dilution, with the
`
`cationic polymer component (described below) of the present invention. This coacervate is believed to
`
`be important in providing the efficacy and conditioning benefits described herein.
`
`The anionic detersive surfactant component can comprise an anionic detersive surfactant, a
`
`zwitterionic or an amphoteric detersive surfactant having an attached moiety that is anionic at the pH of
`
`40
`
`the composition, or a combination thereof; preferably an anionic detersive surfactant. Such surfactants
`
`should be physically and chemically compatible with the essential components described herein, and
`
`should not otherwise unduly impair product stability, aesthetics or performance. Examples of anionic
`
`45
`
`detersive surfactants which may be suitably employed in the shampoo compositions herein include, but
`are not limited to: sulfates, sulfonates, sarcosinates and sarcosine derivatives.
`1. Sulfates
`
`Preferred anionic detersive surfactants for use in the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo
`
`50
`
`compositions of the present invention are the alkyl and alkyl ether sulfates. These surfactants have the
`
`respective formulae ROSOSM and R(CZH40)XOSOSM, wherein R is alkyl or alkenyl from about C3 to
`
`about C‘s, x is an integer having a value from 1
`
`to 10, and M is a cation selected from the group
`
`55
`
`consisting of electropositive covalently bonded moieties (e.g. ammonium), alkanolamines (e.g.
`
`triethanolamine), monovalent metals (e.g. sodium or potassium), polyvalent metal cations (cg.
`
`magnesium and calcium) and mixtures thereof. The cation M should be selected such that the anionic
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`1..) U:
`
`40
`
`45
`
`.50
`
`55
`
`detersive surfactant component is water soluble. Solubility of the surfactant will depend upon the
`
`particular anionic detersive surfactants and cations chosen.
`
`Preferably, R is from about C8 to about C”, more preferably from about C10 to about C16, most
`
`preferably from about C12 to about C”,
`
`in both the alkyl and alkyl ether sulfates. The alkyl ether
`
`sulfates are typically made as condensation products of ethylene oxide and monohydric alcohols from
`
`about C8 to about C34. The alcohols can be synthetic or they can be derived from fats, e.g., coconut oil,
`
`palm kernel oil, and tallow. Lauryl alcohol and straight chain alcohols derived from coconut oil or
`
`palm kernel oil are preferred. Such alcohols are reacted with from 0 to about 10, preferably from about
`
`2 to about 5, most preferably about 3, moles of ethylene oxide. The resulting mixture of molecular
`
`species will have, for example, an average of 3 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol, and is
`sulfated and neutralized.
`
`Non—limiting examples of alkyl ether sulfates which may be used in the shampoo compositions
`
`of the present invention include sodium and ammonium salts of coconut alkyl triethylene glycol ether
`
`sulfate,
`
`tallow alkyl
`
`triethylene glycol ether sulfate, and tallow alkyl hexaoxyethylene sulfate.
`
`Preferred alkyl ether sulfates are those comprising a mixture of individual compounds, wherein the
`
`compounds in the mixture have an average alkyl chain length from about Clo to about C,6 and an
`
`average degree of ethoxylation of from about 1 to about 4 moles of ethylene oxide.
`
`Specific examples of preferred alkyl sulfates include, but are not limited to, ammonium lauryl
`
`sulfate, ammonium cocoyl sulfate, potassium lauryl sulfate, potassium cocoyl sulfate, sodium lauryl
`
`sulfate, sodium cocoyl sulfate, monoethanolamine lauryl sulfate, monoethanolamine cocoyl sulfate,
`
`diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, triethanolamine lauryl sulfate, triethylamine lauryl sulfate, and mixtures
`
`thereof. Especially preferred is ammonium lauryl sulfate.
`
`Specific examples of preferred alkyl ether sulfates include, but are not limited to, ammonium
`
`laureth sulfate, potassium laureth sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate, monoethanolamine laureth sulfate,
`
`diethanolamine laureth sulfate,
`
`triethanolamine laureth sulfate,
`
`triethylamine laureth sulfate, and
`
`mixtures thereof. Especially preferred is ammonium laureth sulfate.
`
`Still another class of sulfate surfactants suitable for use in the for use in the anti-dandruff and
`
`conditioning shampoos of the present
`
`invention are the sulfated glycerides, an example of which
`
`includes, but is not limited to, lauric monoglyceride sodium sulfate.
`2. Sulfonates
`
`Also suitable for use in the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoos of the present invention
`
`are those anionic detersive surfactants known as olefin sulfonates. As used herein, the term "olefin
`
`sulfonates" refers to compounds which can be produced by the sulfonation of oc-olefins by means of
`
`uncomplexed sulfur trioxide, followed by neutralization of the acid reaction mixture in conditions such
`
`that any sulfones which have been formed in the reaction are hydrolyzed to give the corresponding
`
`8
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`
`
`4o
`
`45
`
`hydroxy-alkanesulfonates. The sulfur trioxide can be liquid or gaseous, and is usually, but not
`
`necessarily, diluted by inert diluents, for example by liquid SOZ, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and the like,
`
`when used in the liquid form, or by air, nitrogen. gaseous 803, and the like, when used in the gaseous
`
`form. The or—olefins from which the olefin sulfonates are derived are mono-olefins which are from
`
`about Clo to about C24, preferably from about C12 to about C [6‘ Preferably, they are straight chain
`
`olefins.
`
`in addition to the true alkene sulfonates and a proportion of hydroxy-alkanesulfonates, the
`
`olefin sulfonates can contain minor amounts of other materials, such as alkene disulfonates depending
`
`upon the reaction conditions, proportion of reactants, the nature of the starting olefins and impurities in
`
`the olefin stock and side reactions during the sulfonation process. A non-limiting example of such an
`
`or-olefin sulfonate mixture is described in US. Pat. No. 3,332,880, which description is incorporated
`
`herein by reference.
`
`Another class of sulfonates suitable for use in the anti—dandruff and conditioning shampoo
`
`compositions of the present
`
`invention are those anionic detersive surfactants known as B-alkyloxy
`
`alkane sulfonates. These surfactants conform to the general Formula (1):
`
`0R2 H
`
`R1
`
`503M
`
`where R' is a straight chain alkyl group from about C6 to about C20, R2 is a lower alkyl group from
`
`about C , to about C3, preferably C1, and M is a water-soluble cation, as described above.
`
`Still other sulfonates suitable for use in the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo
`
`compositions of the present
`
`invention are those anionic detersive surfactants known as alkyl aryl
`
`sulfonates. Non-limiting examples of alkyl aryl sulfonates include sodium tridecyl benzene sulfonate,
`
`sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, and mixtures thereof.
`
`Other suitable sulfonates for use in the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoos of the present
`
`invention are the water-soluble salts of organic, sulfuric acid reaction products conforming to the
`
`formula [ R’-SO3-M ] where R' is a straight or branched chain, saturated, aliphatic hydrocarbon radical
`
`from about C8 to about C24, preferably about C,0 to about Cm; and M is a cation described above. Non-
`
`limiting examples of such anionic detersive surfactants are the salts of an organic sulfuric acid reaction
`
`product of a hydrocarbon of the methane series, including ism, new, and n—paraffins, and a sulfonating
`
`55
`
`agent, e.g., 503, H2504, obtained according to known sulfonation methods. The sulfonation methods
`
`may include bleaching and hydrolysis. The salts are preferably from about C8 to about C24; more
`
`9
`
`

`

`preferably from about C,2 to about Cm. Preferred are alkali metal and ammonium sulfonated Cl0 to CH5
`
`n-paraffins.
`
`Still other suitable sulfonates for use in the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo
`
`compositions of the present invention are the reaction products of fatty acids, which are esterified with
`
`isethionic acid, and then neutralized with sodium hydroxide. Preferred fatty acids are those derived
`
`from coconut oil or palm kernel oil. Also suitable are the sodium or potassium salts of fatty acid
`
`amides of methyl tauride in which the fatty acids are derived from coconut oil or palm kernel oil. Other
`
`similar anionic surfactants are described in US. Pat. No. 2,486,921; US. Pat. No. 2,486,922; and US.
`
`Pat. No. 2,396,278, which descriptions are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Other sulfonates suitable for use in the antivdandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions
`
`of the present invention are the succinnates, examples of which include, but are not limited to, disodium
`
`N-octadecylsulfosuccinate, disodium lauryl
`
`sulfosuccinate, diammonium lauryl
`
`sulfosuccinate,
`
`tetrasodium N-(1,2-dicarboxyethyl)-N-octadecylsulfosuccinnate, diamyl ester of sodium sulfosuccinic
`
`acid, dihexyl ester of sodium sulfosuccinic acid, dioctyl esters of sodium sulfosuccinic acid, and
`mixtures thereof.
`
`3. Sarcosinates and sarcosine derivatives
`
`Also suitable for use in the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoos of the present invention
`
`are those anionic detersive surfactants known as sarcosinates and sarcosine derivatives. Sarcosinates
`
`are the derivatives of sarcosine and N-methyl glycine, acylated with a fatty acid chloride, They conform
`
`to the general Formula (11):
`
`O I
`
`l
`R—— C— 114—— CH2— (3— o— o— x
`CH3
`
`wherein RC0- is a fatty acid radical and wherein X is either hydrogen (acid form) or a cationic species,
`
`such as Na+ or TEA+ (salt form). Non-limiting examples of sarcosinates and sarcosine derivatives
`
`include: sodium lauryl sarcosinate,
`
`lauryl sarcosine, cocoyl sarcosine, and mixtures thereof. A
`
`preferred sarcosinate is sodium lauryl sarcosinate.
`
`B. Conditioning agent
`
`The anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions of the present invention comprise
`
`from about 0.01% to about 10%, by weight of the composition, preferably from about 0.1% to about
`
`8%, more preferably from about 0.1% to about 5%, most preferably from about 0.2% to about 3.5%, of
`
`
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`9.) VI
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`a conditioning agent suitable for application to the hair or skin.
`
`It is believed that the conditioning
`
`agent provides improved conditioning benefits to the hair, particularly clean hair feel and wet rinse feel.
`
`The conditioning agent comprises a water insoluble, water dispersible, non-volatile, liquid that
`
`forms emulsified, liquid particles or are solubilized by the surfactant micelles. in the anionic detersive
`
`surfactant component (described above). Suitable conditioning agents for use in the shampoo
`
`composition are those conditioning agents characterized generally as silicones (e.g. silicone oils,
`
`cationic silicones, silicone gums, high refractive silicones, and silicone resins), organic conditioning
`
`oils (e.g. hydrocarbon oils, polyolefins, and fatty esters) or combinations thereof, or those conditioning
`
`agents which otherwise form liquid, dispersed, particles in the aqueous surfactant matrix herein. Such
`
`conditioning agents should be physically and chemically compatible with the essential components of
`
`the composition, and should not otherwise unduly impair product stability, aesthetics or performance.
`
`The concentration of the conditioning agent in the shampoo composition should be sufficient
`
`to provide the desired conditioning benefits, and as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
`
`Such concentration can vary with the conditioning agent, the conditioning performance desired, the
`
`average size of the conditioning agent particles, the type and concentration of other components, and
`other like factors.
`
`1. Silicones
`
`The conditioning agent of the anti-dandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions of the
`
`present invention is preferably an insoluble silicone conditioning agent. The silicone conditioning agent
`
`particles may comprise volatile silicone, non-volatile silicone, or combinations thereof. Preferred are
`
`non~volati1e silicone conditioning agents. If volatile silicones are present, it will typically be incidental
`
`to their use as a solvent or carrier for commercially available forms of non-volatile silicone materials
`
`ingredients, such as silicone gums and resins. The silicone conditioning agent particles may comprise a
`
`silicone fluid conditioning agent and may also comprise other ingredients, such as a silicone resin to
`
`improve silicone fluid deposition efficiency or enhance glossiness of the hair (especially when high
`
`refractive index (e.g. above about 1.46) silicone conditioning agents are used (e.g. highly phenylated
`
`silicones).
`
`The concentration of the silicone conditioning agent typically ranges from about 0.01% to
`
`about 10%, by weight of the composition, preferably from about 0.1% to about 8%, more preferably
`
`from about 0.1% to about 5%, most preferably from about 0.2% to about 3%. Non~limiting examples
`
`of suitable silicone conditioning agents, and optional suspending agents for the silicone, are described
`
`in US. Reissue Pat. No. 34,584, US. Pat. No. 5,104,646, and US. Pat. No. 5,106,609, which
`
`descriptions are incorporated herein by reference. The silicone conditioning agents for use in the anti—
`
`dandruff and conditioning shampoo compositions of the present invention preferably have a viscosity,
`
`as measured at 25°C, from about 20 to about 2,000,000 centistokes (“csk”), more preferably from about
`
`11-
`
`11
`
`

`

`10
`
`1,000 to about 1,800,000 csk, even more preferably from about 50,000 to about 1,500,000 csk, most
`
`preferably from about 100,000 to about 1,500,000 csk.
`
`The dispersed, silicone conditioning agent particles typically have a number average particle
`
`diameter ranging from about 0.01pm to about 50pm. For small particle application to hair, the number
`
`average particle diameters typically range from about 0.01pm to about 4pm, preferably from about
`
`0.01pm to about 2pm, more preferably from about 0.01pm to about 0.5pm.
`
`For larger particle
`
`application to hair, the number average partic

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket