`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 3
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`PRINTING INDUSTRIES OF AMERICA
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00489
`Patent 6,738,155
`____________
`
`Mailed: August 8, 2013
`
`
`
`Before Althea Wilburn, Trial Paralegal.
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION
`AND
`TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`
`
`The petition for inter partes review in the above proceeding has been
`
`accorded the filing date of August 2, 2013.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00489
`Patent 6,738,155
`
`
`Administrative Patent Judge Brian McNamara has been designated to
`
`manage the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.5.
`
`A review of the petition identified the following defect(s):
`
` Petitioner failed to label each exhibit with the Petitioner’s
`name and exhibit number affixed to the lower right corner
`of the first page. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(d).
`
` Petitioner is requested to provide a readable copy of the
`petition.
`Petitioner must correct the defect(s) within FIVE BUSINESS DAYS
`
`from this notice. Failure to correct the defect(s) may result in an order to
`
`show cause as to why the Board should institute the trial. No substantive
`
`changes (e.g., new grounds) may be made to the petition.
`
`Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later
`
`than three months from the date of this notice. The preliminary response is
`
`limited to setting forth the reasons why the requested review should not be
`
`instituted. Patent Owner may also file an election to waive the preliminary
`
`response to expedite the proceeding. For more information, please consult
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012),
`
`which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`
`Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory
`
`notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of
`
`the petition.
`
`The parties are encouraged to use the heading on the first page of this
`
`Notice for all future filings in the proceeding.
`
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties are
`
`authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00489
`Patent 6,738,155
`
`42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order --
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00010
`
`(MPT), a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under
`
`“Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” Any motion for pro hac
`
`vice admission filed by the parties shall also indicate that the person sought
`
`to be admitted will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct.
`
`See Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013) (effective
`
`May 3, 2013).
`
`The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the
`
`Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web
`
`site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`
`If there are any questions pertaining to this notice, please contact
`
`Althea Wilburn at 571-272-6230 or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at
`
`571-272-7822.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`John Adams
`paip.law@verizon.net
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Mark C. Zimmerman, Esq.
`Hanley, Flight & Zimmerman, LLC
`150 S. Wacker Drive
`Suite 2100
`Chicago, IL 60606
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00489
`Patent 6,738,155
`
`
`Mark Carnow, Esq.
`Carnow & Associates LTD
`778 Frontage Road
`Suite 101
`Northfield, IL 60093
`
`
`
`4
`
`