throbber

`
`
` Paper 38
`
`
` Entered: August 18, 2014
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., LINKEDIN CORP., and TWITTER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2013-00478 (Patent 5,544,352)
`IPR2013-00479 (Patent 5,832,494)
`IPR2013-00480 (Patent 5,832,494)
`IPR2013-00481 (Patent 6,233,571)
`____________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE and BARBARA A. PARVIS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00478 (Patent 5,544,352)
`IPR2013-00479, -00480 (Patent 5,832,494)
`IPR2013-00481 (Patent 6,233,571)
`
`
`On August 15, 2014, during cross-examination of Dr. Amy Langville
`by counsel for Petitioner, counsel for Patent Owner instructed the witness
`not to reveal certain confidential information because counsel for Petitioner
`has not signed the appropriate Protective Order. Counsel for Petitioner
`initiated a conference call with the Board to seek an order compelling the
`witness to answer, without revealing confidential information, and to ask for
`additional time for cross-examination because of undue interference from
`opposing counsel. Judges Parvis and Lee participated in the conference call.
` During the conference call, counsel for the parties resolved their
`dispute as to the questions posed to the witness by agreeing to a certain
`format for those questions. No assistance from the Board was necessary. In
`light of the agreement reached by the parties, we declined to authorize
`additional time for cross-examination. We indicated, however, that counsel
`for Petitioner may renew the request if the cross-examination will not be
`completed within the scheduled time period.
`We remind the parties of the guidelines regarding cross-examination
`as set forth in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756,
`48,772–73 App. D (Aug. 14, 2012). An objection must be stated concisely.
`Order
`
`It is
`ORDERED that no additional time for the cross-examination of
`Dr. Amy Langville is authorized at this time.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00478 (Patent 5,544,352)
`IPR2013-00479, -00480 (Patent 5,832,494)
`IPR2013-00481 (Patent 6,233,571)
`
`
`FOR PETITIONERS:
`
`Heidi L. Keefe
`COOLEY, LLP
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`dcpatentdocketing@cooley.com
`
`David Silbert
`KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
`djs@kvn.com
`efiling@kvn.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Martin M. Zoltick
`Nancy J. Linck
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`mzoltick@rfem.com
`nlinck@rfem.com
`SRA-IPR@rfem.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket