Filed on behalf of: Software Rights Archive, LLC Paper ____
`
`
`
`
`
`By: Martin M. Zoltick, Lead Counsel
`Nancy J. Linck, Back-up Counsel
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`E-mail: mzoltick@rfem.com
` nlinck@rfem.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., LINKEDIN CORP., and TWITTER, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
`_______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: Martin M. Zoltick, Lead Counsel
`Nancy J. Linck, Back-up Counsel
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`E-mail: mzoltick@rfem.com
` nlinck@rfem.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., LINKEDIN CORP., and TWITTER, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
`_______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
`Pursuant to the Decision Instituting Trial (Paper 17) and the Office Trial
`
`Practice Guide 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 at 48765-66, Patent Owner Software Rights
`
`Archive, LLC (“SRA”) hereby provides a list of proposed motions that it may file
`
`during the trial:
`
` Motion Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.121 To Amend
`
`SRA may file a motion to amend to cancel one or more of the challenged
`
`claims on which trial was instituted. Specifically, in the Decision, the Board
`
`instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 5, 8, 10, 11, 14-16, 35, and 40 on the
`
`following grounds:
`
`1. Claims 14-16 of the ’494 Patent are unpatentable, under 35 U.S.C. § 102, as
`anticipated by Fox Thesis;
`
`2. Claims 1 and 5 of the ’494 Patent are unpatentable, under 35 U.S.C. § 102,
`as anticipated by Fox SMART;
`
`3. Claims 8, 10, 11, and 35 of the ’494 Patent are unpatentable, under 35
`U.S.C. § 103(a), as obvious over Fox SMART and Envision; and
`
`4. Claim 40 of the ’494 Patent is unpatentable, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), as
`obvious over Fox Thesis, Envision, and Salton.
`
`
`SRA may seek to cancel one or more of dependent claims 8, 10, 11, 35, and 40,
`
`which would partially or fully eliminate the unpatentability grounds based on
`
`obviousness in the inter partes review proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
` Motion Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(2) For Additional Discovery
`
`SRA may file a motion for additional discovery to obtain production of the
`
`following documents and things referred in the Declaration of Dr. Edward A. Fox
`
`(“Fox Dec.”) (Ex. 1009) submitted by Petitioners in support of their Petition
`
`requesting inter partes review of claims 1, 5, 8, 10, 11, 14-16, 35, and 40 of the
`
`‘494 patent (Paper 2):
`
`1. ¶ 7 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`E. Fox. Development of the CODER System: A Testbed for Artificial
`Intelligence Methods in Information Retrieval. Information Processing &
`Management (IP&M), 1987, 23(4):341-366;
`
`E.Fox and R. France. Architecture of an Expert System for Composite
`Document Analysis, Representation and Retrieval. International Journal of
`Approximate Reasoning, 1987, 1(2): 151-175; and
`
`N. Belkin, C. Borgman, H. Brooks, T. Bylander, W.Croft, P. Daniels, S.
`Deerwester, E. Fox, P. Ingwersen, R. Rada, K. Sparck Jones, R. Thompson,
`and D. Walker. Distributed Expert-Based Information Systems: An
`Interdisciplinary Approach. IP&M, 1987, 23(5): 395-409.
`
`2. ¶ 37 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`Kessler, M.M. (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers,
`American Documentation
`
`3. ¶ 38 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`Gerard Salton, 1968, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval,
`McGraw Hill
`
`4. ¶ 40 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
`G. Salton, ed. 1971. The SMART Retrieval System- Experiments in
`Automatic Document Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River,
`NJ, USA
`
`5. ¶ 41 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`Gerard Salton and Michael J. McGill. 1983. Introduction to Modern
`Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
`
`6. ¶ 43 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`The “SMART system”
`
`7. ¶ 44 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`The “COmposite Document Expert/extended/effective Retrieval System”
`
`8. ¶ 45 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`Chen, QiFan, An object-oriented database system for efficient information
`retrieval applications, Virginia Tech Dept. of Computer Science doctoral
`dissertation, Blacksburg, VA, March 1992.
`
`9. ¶ 46 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`Betrabet, Sangita, A query language for information graphs, Virginia Tech
`Dept. of Computer Science Master’s thesis, Blacksburg, VA, Dec. 1993
`
`10. ¶ 48 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`E. Fox, R. France, E Sahle, A Daoud, and B. Cline, Development of a
`Modern OPAC: From REVTOLC to MARIAN, Proc. 16th Annual Intern’l
`ACM SIGIR Confr. On R&D in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’93
`Pittsburgh, PA, June 27-July 1, 1993, 248-259
`
`11. ¶ 49 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`MARIAN and Envision System Demonstrations, for 16th Intern’l Conf. on
`R&D in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’93, Pittsburgh, PA, June 27, - July 1,
`1993
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
`
`
`
`
`12. ¶ 52 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`The “additional publications [that] Envision”
`
`13. ¶¶ 65, 72, 74, 78, and 86 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`ISI collection and files (e.g., magnetic tapes)
`
`CACM collection and files (e.g., magnetic tapes)
`
`14. ¶ 74 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`“INGRES database system”
`
`15. ¶¶ 78-82, 84, 88, and 94 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`Code for the function “Raw_data” and the data referred to
`
`16. ¶ 95 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`“Source-cited pairs”
`
`17. ¶ 131 of the Fox Dec.:
`
`The “five files” of document collections; and
`
`Code for the “Figure 5: Routines for Search and Ranking”
`
`SRA may seek authorization at a later date to file one or more motions
`
`requesting discovery relating to objective evidence of nonobviousness and, more
`
`specifically, to evidence of commercial success. The ‘494 patent is the subject of
`
`numerous licenses and SRA may seek discovery from one or more of the licensees,
`
`to the extent that SRA cannot reach agreement through negotiation. SRA may also
`
`seek authorization at a later date to file one or more motions requesting discovery
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`Patent 5,832,494
`relating to factual issues that may be raised by Petitioners during the trial phase of
`
`this inter partes review proceeding.
`
` Motion Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.54 to Seal
`
`SRA may seek authorization at a later date to file a motion to seal containing
`
`a proposed protective order, in the event that SRA determines that it intends to rely
`
`upon confidential information during the trial phase of this inter partes review
`
`proceeding.
`
`As SRA is still evaluating the Board’s Decision, as well as the prior art and
`
`arguments addressed therein, SRA expressly reserves the right not to file these
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/s/Martin M. Zoltick
`Martin M. Zoltick, Reg. No. 35,745
`Nancy J. Linck, Reg. No. 31,920
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST &
`MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Software
`Rights Archive, LLC
`
`6
`
`motions.
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 24, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 24th day of February, 2014, a true and correct
`
`Case IPR2013-00480
`
`
`
`
`
`copy of the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS was
`
`served by electronic mail, upon the following lead and backup counsel of record
`
`for Petitioners Facebook, Inc., LinkedIn Corp. and Twitter, Inc.:
`
`Heidi L. Keefe – Lead Counsel for all Petitioners
`Cooley LLP
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 700
`Washington, DC 20004
`Ph: 650-843-5001
`Fx: 650-849-7400
`E-mails: hkeefe@cooley.com
`
`Mark R. Weinstein – Backup Counsel for Facebook, Inc.
`Cooley LLP
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 700
`Washington, DC 20004
`Ph: 650-843-5007
`Fx: 650-849-7400
`E-mail: mweinstein@cooley.com
`
`David Silbert – Backup Counsel for LinkedIn Corp. and Twitter, Inc.
`Keker & Van Nest LLP
`633 Battery Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Ph: 415-391-5400
`Fx: 415-397-7188
`E-mail: djs@kvn.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Erik van Leeuwen
`Erik van Leeuwen
`Litigation Operations Coordinator
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
