throbber
vi'IC I
`
`l'lt:W::i
`
`June 26, 2000 2:25PM PDT
`
`Yahoo sheds lnktomi for new
`search technology
`
`By JimHu fmailto:letters@news.com?subject=FEEDBACK: Yahoo (cid:173)
`sheds Inktomi for new search technology]
`StaffWriter, CNET News
`
`Related Stories
`
`Yahoo finds new ways to rake in revenues
`
`fhtt;p://www,cnet.com/Yahoo-finds-new-ways-to-rak.e-in(cid:173)
`revenues/2009-1023 3-242361.htmll June 26, 2000
`Yahoo shares slide on analyst report
`
`[http://www.cnet.com/Yahoo-shares-slide-on-analyst-report/2100-
`1023 3-242321.htmll June 22, 2000
`Excite@Home broadens search capabilities
`
`[http: //www.cnet.com/ExciteHome-broadens-search(cid:173)
`capabilities/2100-1023 3-242072.html] June 19, 2000
`AltaVista aims to lure eyes from Google
`[http://www.cnet.com/AltaVista-aims-to-lure-eyes-from(cid:173)
`Google/2100-1023 3-240072.html] May 3, 2000
`Alta Vista primes new search engine
`
`[http://www .cnet.com/Alta Vista-primes-new-search-engine/2100-
`1023 3-239998.html] May 2, 2000
`
`Inktomi's stock price and its reputation as the leading Internet search
`provider took major hits today when Yahoo said it will switch to a rival
`search service, but the company's bottom line may not suffer the same fate.
`Inktomi's shares plunged as low as 1Ul3.
`[http: //www.cnetinvestor .com/quote-detail.asp?symbol=INKT] this
`morning when Yahoo said it will begin using start-up search provider Google for its
`primary search engine. By the close of regular trading, Inktomi was down $25.31, or 18
`percent [http://www.cnetinvestor.com/charting/chart-snap.asp?
`symbol=INKT] , to $115.06. Yahoo fell $6 to $119.31.
`
`EXHIBIT 2092
`Face book, Inc. et al.
`v.
`Software Rights Archive, LLC
`CASE IPR2013-00479
`
`

`
`Yahoo sheds Inktomi for new search technology - CNET News
`5/15/2014
`Analysts agreed that the announcement may have hurt Inktomi's pride, but they said
`the implications for its revenues and profitability are mild. While the company is well
`known for its search technology, that side of its business is a money loser that has
`increasingly played second fiddle to its exploding networking services division. The
`search market in general, meanwhile, remains a low-margin, commodity business even
`as it has been swarmed by hungry competitors like Google.
`
`Dick Pierce, Inktomi's chief operating officer, said Yahoo represents less than 2
`percent of Inktomi's overall revenues. Losing the portal as a search licensing partner,
`he said, will have "little impact with respect to profitability."
`
`Inktomi develops Web search technology that companies can license for their sites,
`with clients including America Online, Excite@Home, RealNetworks, Microsoft
`Network and NBC Internet (NBCi). The company divides its revenues and operating
`results primarily into two buckets. Portal services such as search account for 40
`percent of its revenues. Networking services, which help make content delivery over
`the Internet more efficient, make up 60 percent of revenues.
`
`In the last quarter, the company posted its first profits of a penny a share, largely on
`the strength of its networking services, which posted operating income of about $2.8
`million. Portal services, by contrast, posted an operating loss of about $5.6 million,
`according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing.
`
`Yahoo's announcement underscores the shifting competitive landscape among search
`providers and marks a significant coup for Google  [http://www.google.com]  .
`Since its founding in 1998, the Silicon Valley company has lured many early Web
`adopters to its service and has garnered attention from its competition. Just last
`month, Web search veteran AltaVista launched Raging  Search
`[http://www.raging.com]  , a slimmed-down search engine aiming to lure  back
`[http://www.cnet.com/news/0-­1005-­200-­1808590.html]  sophisticated
`Web users who have migrated to Google.
`
`"Yahoo selected Google because they share our strong consumer focus," Jeff Mallett,
`Yahoo's chief operating officer, said in a statement.
`
`The portal attracts one of the largest audiences on the Web, and searching remains one
`of the most popular functions on its site. Like Inktomi, Google will provide search
`results to queries that span beyond Yahoo's human-edited directory.
`
`Yahoo will begin using Google's technology within the next 30 days.
`
`To soften the blow of its decision, Yahoo said it will use Inktomi's search technology in
`its new Corporate Yahoo. Launched  [http://www.cnet.com/news/0-­1005-­
`200-­2151454.html]  today, Corporate Yahoo is the company's attempt to sell
`
`http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-242392.html
`
`2/4
`
`

`
`Yahoo sheds Inktomi for new search technology - CNET News
`5/15/2014
`customized versions of its service to corporations for internal use.
`
`Inktomi's Pierce said the company has an "opportunity" to recoup its search revenues
`with the Corporate Yahoo arrangement.
`
`Although the revenue shortfall will not significantly drag down Inktomi's earnings,
`losing a high-profile client such as Yahoo may hurt the company's image as the search
`technology of choice among Net heavyweights.
`
`"Clearly this is a blow to their prestige," said Peter Ausnit, an equity analyst at
`Prudential Securities.
`
`Despite Inktomi's lead in licensing search technology to Web sites, more players such
`as Google and Direct  Hit  [http://www.directhit.com]  have emerged in its
`rearview mirror. Many of these new competitors are offering more relevant search
`results and licensing their technologies to major sites.
`
`Google is backed by some of Silicon Valley's most influential venture capitalists,
`including Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Founded by Stanford
`University graduates, its technology ranks results based on the popularity of a site; a
`site's popularity is measured by how many other sites link to it.
`
`  [http://tm.intervu.net/s3/cnetreal/06/0626google.ram]  
`
`[http://tm.intervu.net/template/smirror/ivtemplates/cnetwin/vodtac.asx?
`stream=s3/cnetwin/06/0626google.asf;;title=Danny
`Sullivan;;author=CNET  Radio;;copyright=1995-­2000  CNET  Inc,  All  rights
`reserved.=;;xtn=.asx]
`Danny  Sullivan
`Editor  of  SearchEngineWatch.com  
`  
`Yahoo's  selection  of  Google  is  probably  just  a  business  decision  that  gives  the  portal  a  better  deal.
`
`Sequoia Capital's Michael Moritz serves on the boards of both Yahoo and Google.
`Silicon Valley power broker John Doerr, of Kleiner Perkins, is also a Google board
`member.
`Despite Moritz's board role in both companies, Google CEO Larry Page said the link
`between the companies did not play a significant role in today's announcement.
`
`"It's good for both companies in terms of comfort to have a shared board member,"
`Page said. "But companies tend to do what they want to."
`
`Direct Hit has also taken market share from Inktomi. Last year, Lycos' HotBot search
`engine dropped its longtime relationship with Inktomi to make Direct Hit's
`
`http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-242392.html
`
`3/4
`
`

`
`Yahoo sheds Inktomi for new search technology - CNET News
`5/15/2014
`technology its default. In January, Ask Jeeves, a search engine that lets people ask
`questions online, acquired  [http://www.cnet.com/news/0-­1005-­200-­
`1530855.html]  Direct Hit to provide a broader set of answers to customers.
`Web sites such as Yahoo primarily use search technologies as a backup for queries that
`go beyond their own directories. For many Yahoo users, the deal shuffling will barely
`be noticeable.
`
`"I think this will be (as) completely transparent to users as Inktomi's relationship
`(with Yahoo) had been," said Patrick Keane, an analyst at market research firm
`Jupiter  Communications  [http://www.jup.com/]  .
`
`[]
`
`[]
`@CBS Interactive. All rights reserved.
`CNET
`
`close
`
`http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-242392.html
`
`4/4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket