throbber
Online Marketin~: Research
`
`• SEO Research
`• SEO Book
`• SEO Tools
`• SEO Resources
`• About
`• Subscribe
`
`SEO Articles
`
`The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`
`October 6th, 2006
`
`The recent Tool bar RageRank update once again has generated a lot of discussion in the SEO community .
`Webmasters report their websites receiving not much more traffic despite the increased visible PageRank. In
`numerous forum threads people question the reliability of toolbar values. By unveiling the following five myths I
`hope to answer to some of the uncertainties caused by this update.
`
`1. PageRank values range from 0 to 10.
`
`While some people believe that PageRank is an integer number or at least converge to an integer after intensive
`recursive calculations, actually it is a floating point number. Google rounds up the real value to the closest integer
`and puts it on the 0-10 scale which is displayed in your browsertoolbar.
`
`2. PageRank value displayed in the toolbar is the one used to rank the results.
`
`As you might have noticed, the toolbar value is updated every few months with no regular intervals. In the
`present time Google continuously calculates and updates PageRank so that sometimes actual PageRank and its
`tool bar values can differ. The toolbar value should be considered not as a current rank but as a level your_pag~
`EXHIBIT 2079
`Face book, Inc. et al.
`v.
`Software Rights Archive, LLC
`CASE IPR2013-00479
`
`

`

`5/15/2014
`» The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`has reached by the time of the latest toolbar update.
`3. PageRank is the primary factor to rank the search results.
`Not exactly. PageRank was the backbone of the Google success as a search engine because of its integrity, ability
`to use the unique democratic nature of the web and hyperlinks, and relatively high immunity to abuse. But as
`years passed the Google technology became far more sophisticated. Now Google uses a cloud of factors to rank
`its search results. Some of them are query specific (keyword saturation of the page copy and the backlinksâ
`€™anchor text) and some of them are domain specific (domain age, keywords in domain name, and of course
`PageRank). Nobody outside the Google’s offices knows the actual weight of each factor and it is quite
`possible that PageRank is no longer the primary one.
`4. Google toolbar shows an increase of PageRank for my pages. My traffic is going to skyrocket!
`Wrong. There won’t be any sudden traffic increase after toolbar upgrades any more. As I said before, the
`continuous calculation and update of the Google’s internal PageRank means that the rankings also adjust
`gradually as your pages get or lose backlinks. So the toolbar upgrade itself will not cause any changes in search
`results.
`5. Toolbar PageRank is of no use, it is just for entertainment.
`This is allegedly a quote by one of the Google representatives. This is only partially true. The reason why Google
`doesn’t show the actual PageRank any more is that there have been repeated attempts by hackers to access
`an exploit these data. Since 2004 the toolbar values updates are no longer synchronized with the actual rankings
`changes, and therefore should not to be considered too seriously in terms of SEO. However toolbar ranks still
`remains the easiest and most obvious way to evaluate the quality of a page and millions of web users regularly
`judge websites according to what Google toolbar shows them.
`See also the following resources:
`Matt Cutts explains PageRank
`Can Google Multitask?
`Google says: Toolbar PageRank is for entertainment purposes only
`
`0  points
`
`Did you like it? Was it useful? Bookmark or share this post:
` Subscribe for the Feed
` Digg This!
` Technorati
` Del.icio.us
` Furl
` Blinklist
` Ma.gnolia
` Yahoo! My Web
`Posted by oleg.ishenko Filed in Search Engine Optimization, Search Engines Technology
`12 Comments »
`
`http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm
`
`2/6
`
`

`

`5/15/2014
`» The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`12 Responses to “The 5 Myths about Google PageRank”
`1. Mobile360 Says:
`October 7th, 2006 at 4:01 pm
`PageRank can vary over months with Google constantly updating the way that PageRank is worked out.
`2. oleg.ishenko Says:
`October 7th, 2006 at 4:08 pm
`‘PageRank can vary over months with Google constantly updating the way that PageRank is worked out.’
`Also true: while the basic formula stays the same, parameter weights can be changed, or the data input can
`be refined (like some reciprocal links no longer count)
`3. Up2j.com » Blog Archive » The 5 Myths about Google PageRank Says:
`October 11th, 2006 at 1:51 am
`[...] Originally published at The 5 Myths about Google PageRank [...]
`4. Search Marketing Facts » The 5 Myths about Google PageRank Says:
`December 19th, 2006 at 3:04 am
`[...] The recent Toolbar RageRank update once again has generated a lot of discussion in the SEO
`community. Webmasters report their websites receiving not much more traffic despite the increased visible
`PageRank. In numerous forum threads people question the reliability of toolbar values. By unveiling the
`following five myths I hope to answer to some of […]Read full entry [...]
`5. Peter Says:
`February 20th, 2007 at 5:01 am
`I think the 80/20 rule applies. For 20% of your effort you should be able to move your page rank up to say
`5. After that it gets very hard. You may spend triple that time again, and still only move from a low 5 to a
`high 5. But your original 20% of effort, has got you out of the riff-raff and above all the mums and dads
`sites.
`6. The 5 Myths About Google PageRank - keluarga.biz Says:
`March 19th, 2007 at 6:21 am
`[...] Originally Published at http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm [...]
`7. San Diego RE Says:
`May 20th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
`I totally agree with Peter\’s comment above. Out of about three dozen sites, I have only one that has
`reached PR5.
`http://www.la-orange-county-lawyers-attorney-directory.com has held a PR5 for over a year, but, even
`with great effort, have not been able to increase it.
`Any ideas??
`San Diego RE
`8. sims cheats Says:
`February 20th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
`
`http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm
`
`3/6
`
`

`

`5/15/2014
`
`» The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`I thought that the site age as effecting page rank was a myth. I know I have a personal web page on a major
`univerity domain and the first round of pr after I created it was up to pr4, with no effort on my part. This
`was only for a page not a domain. Is there a difference?
`9. Beyond the Boardroom Sales Training Says:
`May 14th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
`Very interesting post. I agree it seems that you can to get to 4 or 5 but after that it becomes really difficult to
`improve PageRank.
`10. The German Travel Blog » The 5 Myths About Google PageRank Says:
`August 1st, 2008 at 4:22 pm
`[...] Originally Published at http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm [...]
`11. Marital Conflict | Dr. Adina McGarr-Knabke Says:
`April 17th, 2010 at 6:57 pm
`[...] » The 5 Myths about Google PageRank [...]
`12. Sanjit Mandal Says:
`November 16th, 2012 at 2:02 am
`I found this article sometime ago and kept it in my favorites about how Google computes PageRank:
`http://www.webworkshop.net/pagerank.html. Enjoy.
`
`TechWyse Search Experts
`techwyse.com
`Canada's Largest Search Marketing Firm. Full Service Approach
`
`Leave a Reply
`
` Name (required)
` Mail (will not be published) (required)
` Website
`
`Submit Comment
`
`http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm
`
`4/6
`
`

`

`» The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`
`5/15/2014
`Type the text
`Privacy & Terms
`
`
`Categories
`SEO Book - self study SEO
`Copywriting
`Link Popularity Algorithms
`Search Engine Optimization
`Search Engines Technology
`Tutorials
`Web 2.0
`Website is a Marketing Being
`WordPress Blogging
`List of Web Directories
`Research Papers
`SEO Library
`
`SEO Topics
`SEO for WordPress Part II
`SEO for WordPress
`How Much Blog Spam? A Study of a Ping Dataset
`Articles Directories List: Ordered by Alexa Rating
`Google’s New Algorithm to Rank Pages and Detect Spam: “PhraseRank”?
`Guidelines to a Perfect Link Exchange Scam
`Emerging SEM Markets: Portugal
`Making Money From Your Blog’s RSS Feed
`Avoiding Keyword Stuffing Ban
`How to Make a WordPress Blog Duplicate Content Safe
`Online Copywriting: Addressing Personality Types
`Duplicate Content – What You Ought to Know About
`Search Engines vs. SEO Spam: Statistical Methods
`The Future of the Web
`Distribution of Clicks on Google’s SERPs
`SEO: Flash Is Evil. Five Big Reasons Not to Use Flash
`Link Popularity Building Strategies and Tips
`The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`Online Copywriting. Copy and Content: Any Difference?
`Matt Cutts: Webmaster Guidelines to Succeed in Google
`
`
`
`http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm
`
`5/6
`
`

`

`5/15/2014
`
`» The 5 Myths about Google PageRank
`
`
`
`I$ ! CATALOG I
`SEO and Web Marketing Research by Oleg Ishenko. 2006 - 2007
`l Best sites •I
`
`http://www.seoresearcher.com/the-5-myths-of-google-pagerank.htm
`
`6/6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket