throbber
Z6/2014
`
`
`
`DZNOVO PRiCE
`
`ELLWANC-EER 8: HARDY LLP
`
`Victor G. Hardy
`
`fl91‘399—LLiS.
`tel no: 512.539.2626
`faXno:512_539_2627
`
`Home
`
`Firm Overview
`
`Practice Areas
`
`-I
`
`Professionals
`
`j
`
`Fee Stnrctures
`
`iRepresentative Cases
`
`News
`
`Contact
`
`Suite 350 Austin, Texas 78731
`
`Practice Areas
`rt
`-
`t
`in ellectual Prope y
`- Commercial Litigation
`
`l"19”eCtU3l PTOPEFW I-iti93ti0|'l
`'
`- Technology
`
`. Aiteinative Dispute Resoitition
`. Eientronic Discovery
`, Emnioyment Litigation
`
`Contact "5:
`
`Austtn office
`
`7000 North Mopac Expressway
`
`P: 512.539.2626
`F: 512.539.2627
`
`Dallas Office
`
`400 South Zang Boulevard
`
`Suite 1202
`Dallas. Texas 75208
`F’: 214.948.3334
`
`Ft 214-853-9410
`
`Victor G, Hafdy
`
`Download ‘Card
`
`Practice Concentration & Experience
`
`Victor Hardy has extensive experience in high-stakes patent
`infringement litigation and other types of litigation, including
`seven jury trials, two bench trials, and several
`evidentiaryMarkman hearings. He has had extensive involvement
`in nearly every aspect oftrials in many different contexts, ranging
`from the cross-examination of Johnson & Johnson’s World Wide
`
`Chairman of Consumer Products in a patent infringement trial to
`
`the direct examination ofa ballistics expert in a criminal
`homicide trial.
`
`Mr. Hardy is also highly experienced in patent finance and
`investment, patent negotiation and acquisition, patent valuation,
`due diligence, and strategic enforcement of IP assets. Mr. Hardy has evaluated thousands of patents
`for purposes of business investment and enforcement for leading IP investment institutions. He uses his
`extensive litigation experience to bring a real world perspective to financial modeling and valuation of
`patent assets.
`
`Victor G‘ Hardy
`
`Additionally, Mr. Hardy has substantial experience in class action civil rights matters including
`discrimination under Title VII and the ADEA.
`Education
`
`Harvard Law School (LL.M. 1997)
`University of Texas School of Law (JD. 1994)
`University of Houston (B.B.A. 1991)
`
`Licenses & Admissions
`
`Licensed to practice in the state courts of Texas and New York
`
`Representative Matte rs
`
`- Mr. Hardy represents plaintiff Software Rights Archive insoftware Rights Archive v. Google et al, an
`industry-wide patent infringement case involving foundational patents directed towards non-semantic
`search engine algorithms. The case is currently being litigated in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`- Mr. Hardy represented sixteen plaintiffs in EEOC v. Allied Aviation, a class action racial
`discrimination lawsuit. This case resulted in the largest settlement in the history ofthe Dallas office
`of the EEOC.
`it garnered national media attention in the New York Times and the Los Angeles
`Times, as well as being featured on several national news broadcasts including Anderson Cooper's
`360 on CNN.
`
`- Mr. Hardy was a senior member ofthe trial team for plaintiff Applera Corp. in Applera and Roche
`Molecular Systems v. MJ Research, a patent infringement, unfair competition, and antitrust suit
`involving the enforcement of six patents directed to the Nobel Prize-winning gene amplification
`process called the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and thermal cycling instruments used to
`
`EXHIBIT 2008
`,
`.
`Facebook Inc et al_
`v_
`Software Rights Archive, LLC
`CASE IPR2013'00479
`
`ht-in-Ilunnu dnalauu .mmIon1 ‘I/1r‘/\A'r\+r\r_r1_|'\arr‘\l
`
`4 la
`
`

`
`2/6/2014
`
`\fictor G. Hardy
`
`automate PCR. PCR has been hailed as one of the 100 greatest inventions of mankind. After a four
`week jury trial in the District of Connecticut, the jury found all six patents infringed, and four of them
`wilfully infringed, and the Court awarded nearly $50 million in damages.
`In addition, Mr. Hardy
`successfully obtained the dismissal of the defendant's antitrust tying counter-claims and patent
`misuse defenses on the eve of trial.
`
`- Mr. Hardy represented Universal Instruments in Aguayo v. Universal Instruments, a patent
`infringement case involving assembly machines for printed circuit boards. The case was tried to a
`jury and settled on highly favorable terms.
`
`- Mr. Hardy was a senior member of the trial team for defendant Bayer Corporation in McNei/-PPC,
`Inc. v. Bayer Corporation, a patent infringement lawsuit. McNeil, the makers of Tylenol, sued Bayer
`for its production of Bayer Aspirin gelcaps. Alter a five week jury trial and the dismissal of one of the
`patents in suit and the plaintiffs’ willful infringement claims, the case was settled on terms favorable
`to the client.
`
`I Mr. Hardy represented defendant Compal Electronics in an industry-wide patent infringement suit
`
`involving power management in notebook computers, desktop PCs, and monitors. He successfully
`obtained summary judgment of claims being asserted against Compal and its subsidiaries.
`
`- Mr. Hardy was one of the trial counsel for defendant Delta Air Lines, lnc. in Process Resources v.
`Delta Air Lines, Inc., a patent infringement suit involving three-layer composite thermal paper used in
`airline baggage tags. The case was favorably settled days before the trial was to begin.
`
`- Mr. Hardy represented CompUSA in a turnover proceeding brought by the debtor Tomorrow's Toys.
`The case was favorably settled for an amount that was a small fraction of what the plaintiff was
`seeking.
`
`- Mr. Hardy is lead counsel in pursing Banco |nverlat’s claim for failure to deliver securities in the
`Socimer liquidation proceedings pending in the Bahamas.
`
`- Mr. Hardy represented the creditors of Transmarketing Houston in a preference action against
`Aquilla Gas. After a five day bench trial, the Court set aside as a preference 1.8 million dollar
`transfer at issue.
`
`- Mr. Hardy represented the creditors of Transmarketing Houston in a breach of fiduciary duty action
`against the former owners of TMHI. The case was eventually resolved after a jury trial where the
`creditors committee recovered a 12 million dollarjury verdict.
`
`in addition to his experience in as a civil litigator, Mr. Hardy has been active with New York government
`agencies. In 2000, he served as a Special Assistant District Attorney in the Kings County District
`Attomey‘s Office in its Homicide Division. While there he tried four homicide cases (obtaining
`convictions in all four cases), including the prosecution of Jarred Errington in the notorious “punk rock
`slay trial," which received several days of coverage in the New York Post.
`
`In 1999, Mr. Hardy served as Special Assistant Corporation Counsel for the New York City Law
`Department, Manhattan Trial Unit, Torts Division. He also served as an intern to the Honorable Nathan
`Hecht, Texas Supreme Court.
`
`httn://\Mrwv_doe|aw_corr1/2011/10/victor-a -hardv/
`
`9/’!
`
`

`
`2/6/2014
`
`Wctor G. Hardy
`
`Intellectual Property I Commercial Litigation I
`
`Home I Firm Overview I Practice Areas I Pmlegonals I Fee Structures I Representative Cases I News I Contact
`intellectual Property Litigation I Technology I Altemative Dispute Resolution I Electronic Discovery I Employment Litigation
`© 2013 by DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP. All rights reserved. Diazlaimer
`Website Design and Marleling by: Lawfirm Press, LLC. and MJW Media. lnc.
`
`htio://wm/w.doe|aw.con1/2011/10/victor-c1-hardv/
`
`3/3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket