throbber
Computer-to-Pia te:
`Automating the
`Printing Industry
`
`by
`Richard M. Adams II
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`
`Frank J. Romano
`Rochester Institute of Technology
`
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`PrrrSBURGH
`
`

`

`Copyright 1996
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`All Rights Reserved
`
`Library of Congress Card Catalog Number: 96-78325
`International Standard Book Number: 0-88362-191-6
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`Order No. 1435
`
`Reproduction in any form by any means without specific written permission is prohibited.
`
`Individual trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Product names are
`mentioned in this book as a matter of information only and do not imply endorsement
`by the Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`4615 Forbes Avenue
`Pittsburgh, P A 15213-3796
`United States of America
`Phone: 412/621-6941
`Fax: 412/621-3049
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`
`Section 1
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`Section 2
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`
`Technology
`Introduction ............................... 1
`Press Trends ............................... 7
`Origination ............................... 15
`Raster Image Processing ................... .35
`Proofing ................................. .55
`The Image Carrier ......................... 75
`Quality Control ........................... 97
`Digital Workflow ......................... 115
`Return on Investment ..................... 127
`
`Platesetter Profiles
`Barco Graphics ........................... 135
`Creo Products, Inc ......................... 143
`Cymbolic Sciences, Inc ..................... 151
`DuPont ................................. 155
`Gerber Systems Corporation ............... 159
`Krause America, Inc ....................... 171
`Linotype-Hell ............................ 177
`Misomex ................................ 183
`Optronics ................................ 187
`Presstek ................................. 195
`Scitex ................................... 199
`Screen .................................. 203
`Other Platesetters ......................... 209
`Comparisons ............................. 215
`
`Internal vs. External Drum Technology ...... 221
`Appen<lix A
`Platesetter Addresses ...................... 237
`Appen<lix B
`About the Authors ...................................... 239
`
`

`

`

`

`Factoid Foreword
`
`• The first computer-to-plate system was the Lasergraph in 1974. It used two high-powered lasers to
`bum off nonrelief areas of a solid block of plastic to produce a letterpress plate. It almost printed a
`newspaper in Utica, NY.
`• Computer-to-plate technology has been applied since the early 1980s for the Wall Street Journal, the
`New York Times, and the Christian Science Monitor. A pasteup of the pages was scanned to produce
`the data for exposing plates. The Journal and Monitor used satellites to send pages across the U.S.
`The Times sent them across the river to New Jersey.
`• The EOCOM flatbed platesetter was demonstrated in 1984 and later sold to Gerber. It was part of
`the Autologic APPS-1 system, which was the first system to assemble a newspaper digitally and
`expose the plate from that data. It was installed briefly in Morristown, N.J., on its way to
`obscurity.
`• Polyester plates were introduced in the mid-1980s and exposed in early versions of photographic
`imagesetters.
`• As of 1990 almost all printing plates were exposed in vacuum frames.
`• In 1991, Presstek and Heidelberg introduced the first on-press platemaking system with the intro(cid:173)
`duction of the GTO-DI. The system is now used for two-up and four-up presses as well as off-line
`platemaking for wet or dry plates.
`• The first publication produced completely computer-to-plate was Sports Car International in May
`1994. Publisher's Press in Florence, Ky., used an Optronics platesetter for the glossy four-color edi(cid:173)
`tion. Publisher's Press now uses Gerber platesetters and scans ad films to produce digital files.
`• The first publication with advertising supplied digitally and produced computer-to-plate was the
`April1995 The Computer in the 21st Century from Scientific American. Apple Computer was the oniy
`advertiser and their agency, BBDO, supplied digital ads for printer R.R. Donnelley's Creo plate(cid:173)
`setters.
`• In May 1995 there were more CTP systems installed at DRUPA (42) than in user plants around the
`world. As of May 1996 over 400 systems are installed worldwide.
`• There are now almost 20 digital plates and over 32 models of CTP platemakers.
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`

`

`Acknowledgments
`
`The authors wish to thank the many vendors who supplied information and wrote sections on their products for
`this book.
`
`For information on platesetters we thank Chris DeJohnge, Barco Graphics; Mitch Prust, Cortron; Gary Yurkovich,
`Creo Products, Inc.; Ted Stitzer, DuPont Printing & Publishing; Bob Houlihan,. Gerber Systems Corp.; James
`Frisch, Komori Imaging Systems; T.Q. White IL Krause America, Inc.; Ray Cassino, Linotype-Hell Co.; Paul
`Bengtson, Misomex North America; Ray Mullen, Mitsubishi; Ed Chrusciel, Optronics; Sandy Fuhs, Presstek;
`Leigh Kimmelman, Scitex America Corp.; and David Mitchell, Screen U.S.A. For information on internal and
`external drum technology, we thank Ray Smythe, Creo Products, Inc.; and Ron Goulet, Gerber Systems Corp.
`
`For supplying information for the digital proofing chapter, we wish to thank Kent Schoenherr, Sarah Meek, and
`Mary Beth Leone-Getten, 3M/hnation; Dave Walter, DuPont Printing & Publishing; Barbara Jessup, Joe
`Murphy, and Denise Rayo, Eastman Kodak Co.; Lela Moore and Kristi Powers, Encad Corp.; Richard Beck, Fuji
`Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.; Don Rogers, Optronics, Inc.; Doug Gowell and Michael Phelan, Polaroid Graphics
`hnaging, Inc.; Mark Vanover, Sdtex Corp; Mike Pell and Souzie Monshi, Tektronix, Inc.; Dave Mitchell and
`Stacey Levinson, Screen. U.S.A., Inc. Information on the Digital Plate Control Wedge was provided by Dave
`Milburn, GATF.
`
`For information on plate material we would like to thank Kevin Harrell, 3M/hnation; George Barnacle, Agfa Div.
`Bayer Inc.; Dan Victory and Doug Seeley, Enco Products, Agfa Div. Bayer Inc.; Michael Moore, DuPont Printing
`& Publishing; Bruce Kaskey, Eastman Kodak Co.; Ben Butera, Fuji Photo Fihn U.S.A., Inc.; Richard Ferranti,
`Mitsubishi Paper International, Inc.; Dave Sorter, Polaroid Graphics hnaging. Inc.; Sal Lombardo, Polychrome
`Corp.; and Bob Verrando and Sally Fuhs, Presstek.- Inc.
`
`Information on imposition and trapping solutions was provided by Robin Mueller, DK&A, Inc.; Matt Cannard
`and Freda Cook, Luminous Corp. (formerly Adobe Prepress Group); Peter Gorgone and Kevin McSweeney,
`RAMP AGE Systems, Inc.; Lee Kyle, ScenicSoft Corp.; and Joanne David, Ultimate Technographics, Inc.
`Information on preflighting was provided by Ron Bertolina,. GATF.
`
`We wish to thank Lloyd DeJidas and Tom Destree, GATF, for contributing part of the writeup on press automa(cid:173)
`tion. Information on press automation was provided by Mary Lisi, Komori America Corp.; Randy Siver,
`Mitsubishi; and Tom Leibrandt, Sakurai USA. Inc.
`
`The diagrams comparing traditional and digital workflow were created by Tony Stanton.. Carnegie-Mellon
`University. Additional input on the digital workflow model was provided by Hal Hinderliter and Howie Fenton,
`GATF. Information on networks was also provided by Hal Hinderliter.
`
`Much of the historical and technical information is derived from Mike Bruno's "Printing in a Digital World" and
`Status of Printing papers.
`
`For information on other platesettters (Chapter 21), we would like to thank Edward Michaels and Norman J.
`Levy of Nation-Wide Plastics Co., Inc.
`
`Comparison data is provided by the Digital Printing Report, Box 170, Salem, NH 03079, (603) 898-2822.
`
`Finally, we wish to thank ,our GATF editors, Erika Kendra, assistant technical editor, and Tom Destree, editor-in(cid:173)
`chief, for their work in editing and formatting the book_. and Dave Watterson, who created the cover design.
`
`

`

`

`

`Chapter 1
`Introduction
`
`In Aprill995, Scientific American Inc., Apple Computer Inc and its advertising agency BBDO /Los
`Angeles, and the publications printer R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. produced 300,000 copies of a 200-
`page publication in its entirety with a computer-to-plate process. 1his was the first time an entire pub(cid:173)
`lication, including its advertising, had been completely without the use of film for web offset printing.
`In 1994 an Optronics PlateSetter was used at Publisher's Press in Florence, Ky., to produce the
`May 1994 issue of Sports Car International, the first glossy four-color magazine in the world printed
`on a web offset press from plates imaged entirely without film.
`"The pioneering efforts of Apple and BBDO /L.A.'s production and media departments have
`made this a first for the web-offset printing industry," said Richard Sasso, associate publisher and vice
`president of production for Scientific American Inc. "We experimented with the basic technology in
`several editorial sections of previous issues of the magazine. But with Apple, BBDO ad R.R. Donnel(cid:173)
`ley's significant commitment to cooperation and communication_ we are all able to confirm the com(cid:173)
`puter-to-plate technology's viability for producing beautiful and more timely productions."
`Computer-to-plate technology (CTP), or direct-to-plate as it is sometimes called, is a digitized
`printing process. Publishers provide all editorial and advertising content in digital form (either on
`disk or by sending the data over telephone lines) to printers who, in turn, produce electronic web-off(cid:173)
`set printing plates, eliminating all the traditional intermediate film-preparation stages.
`Sasso expects this process to benefit Scientific American in the following ways:
`• Improve print quality by using first-generation digital data to expose the plate
`• Potentially reduce prepress costs, by eliminating film from the process
`• Reduce production time giving advertisers and editors more time to develop content
`
`Apple Computer is the sole advertising sponsor of the special anthology issue of Scientific Amer(cid:173)
`ican magazine entitled The Computer in the 21st Century. Apple and BBDO/Los Angeles provided 21
`pages of advertising to the magazine in digital format that R.R. Donnelley then converted to Post(cid:173)
`Script file format.
`"We were intrigued with the concept of completely digital print production. Working with Sci(cid:173)
`entific American on the anthology issue gave us an opportunity to test the technology's potential first(cid:173)
`hand/' said Mike Donne, vice president of worldwide communications and marketing services at
`Apple Computer. "We found that the efficiency and quality of this new printing technology, com(cid:173)
`bined with the magazine's fully-automated Macintosh publishing house, made this first-time experi(cid:173)
`ence a pleasurable one."
`"Our media and production department found this first-time process to be smoother than antic(cid:173)
`ipated," said Susan Kassman, print production supervisor for BBDO/Los Angeles. "As more publi(cid:173)
`cations embrace a digital production process, we anticipate it's just a matter of time before the
`
`

`

`2 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`advertising industry universally supports digital delivery of ad material. Having worked with Scien(cid:173)
`tific Ammcan, we can all see how this process can save time in the future."
`Scientific American has been committed to the regular use of CTP technology since October 1994,
`publishing more than 60 million printed pages to date with the Mattoon, Ill. division of printer R.R.
`Donnelley & Sons Co.
`"Computer-to-plate printing for the web-offset process is a promising technology for the pub(cid:173)
`lishing industry," said Bob Pyzdrowski, president of magazine services for R.R. Donnelley. "This new
`technology that we've implemented for Scientific American benefits publishers, printers, and advertis(cid:173)
`ers alike with time-savings, efficiency, and quality."
`"As this new technology evolves, we face many challenges. Standards must be put firmly in
`place. Industry organizations such as Specifications for Web Offset Publications (SWOP) need to
`implement specifications for transporting digital data and proofing," said Sasso. "We've proven the
`technology works. Now all parties should work together to develop and embrace the techniques that
`will improve magazine publishing."
`Anyone who has been reading the trade press over the past two years, or has attended the most
`recent trade exhibitions, will be aware of the enormous interest in CTP. Potentially, investing in CTP
`can provide the following benefits:
`• Savings in supplies-film, carrier sheets, film chemicals, tapes, and adhesives
`• Savings in personnel-stripping, film exposure, retouching, and processing
`• Savings in equipment-film exposure, film processing, and processing
`• Savings in space of up to 50%
`
`And so, a market with roots back almost 20 years begins to have an impact on the printing and pub(cid:173)
`lishing industries.
`
`Computer-to-Plate Printing Systems
`
`The trend in printing is toward shorter run lengths, which means changing plates more often. CTP
`seems to be the primary method for conventional lithography to cope with the continuously growing
`demand for short-run printing and increased productivity. CTP means more than installing a plate
`imaging device. A CTP installation involves many additional devices and systems that enable the
`application of a digital workflow. New organizational and technological requirements are created
`(networking, storage and archiving, digital proofing, file transfer, preflighting), and it is important
`that each is thoroughly implemented in order for the whole system to operate efficiently. Imaging
`plates directly from computer files has been an approach to increased productivity in prepress and
`reduced makeready in the pressroom. Its time has come.
`What began in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a trickle has become a river. There are more than
`16 different engines sold by almost 40 firms with about 20 different plates. Some systems expose a
`variety of plates; some concentrate on one plate. CTP has now gone beyond confusion to a point that
`some consider maddening.
`You can quickly categorize the systems into eight or more-up, four-up, and two-up, although
`some systems can handle both four-up and eight-up. Then you can categorize them by dry or wet pro(cid:173)
`cessing. The wet processing can be water for the photopolymer plats or chemistry for the silver-based
`plates. Some of the dry processing requires a smidgen of water.
`These two categorizations get you into a reasonable ballpark in terms of comparison. We will
`assume that the system can produce 8-20 plates per hour (depending on size) from the time the file
`is sent to the RIP until the plates exit from the system. Price tags are still above $400,000 for eight-up
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION 3
`
`systems, but there are a few below that. Digital plates started out about 50% more expensive than con(cid:173)
`ventional plates but that is changing.
`Three types of computer-to-plate printing systems are in use:
`• Plates or image carriers for gravure and flexography on which the images can be produced by
`etching with high-powered lasers or electromechanical engraving devices.
`• High-speed light-sensitive plates for lithography with coatings that have light sensitivities on
`the order of litho film and that can be exposed with low-power visible lasers.
`• Non-light-sensitive plates for lithography with coatings on which images can be produces by
`heat (infrared) radiation rather than light
`
`The Market
`
`Computer-to-plate technology is relatively young in terms of shipments. Based on our best estimates
`there were 271 CTP systems installed in customer plants worldwide at the end of 1995. It is predicted
`that there will be 566 units worldwide at the end of 1996. And by the end of 2000, there will be 2,054
`systems in the world, about half of them in North America.
`
`Worldwide Computer-to-Plate Installations*
`(based on aluminum platemaking systems)
`Through
`1995
`79
`12
`170
`10
`271
`
`1998
`194
`242
`590
`185
`1,211
`+355
`
`1999
`239
`372
`700
`230
`1,581
`+370
`
`Newspaper
`4-up
`8-up
`16-up
`Total
`
`1996
`99
`82
`290
`95
`566
`+295
`
`1997
`134
`142
`460
`140
`876
`+310
`
`2000
`299
`560
`980
`215
`2,054
`+473
`
`"'projections by the Digital Printing Report
`
`Earliest Computer-to-Plate Systems
`
`The first computer-to-plate system was Lasergraph, an ablation system for making relief letterpress
`plates shown in 1974. The company was funded by Gannett, and only one system was ever installed
`to our knowledge. It was discontinued because letterpress was declining in use, and the lasers used
`for ablation (two C02 lasers) used almost as much energy as it took to run a press.
`The following two years witnessed the introduction of a number of other digital plate systems,
`including systems by EOCOM (now Gerber), LogEtronics (from LogScan, now Datrax by Crosfield),
`Dest Data (Wall Street Journal), Azoplate (Kalle, now Enco or Hoechst, acquired by Agfa), and Chemco
`(now Konica). All of these early systems, except the Crosfield Datrax and Gerber, have failed for one
`reason or another. Among the main reasons have been slow exposure speed of early plate coatings,
`and the slow development of complete pagination with trapping programs, plate imposition soft(cid:173)
`ware, and digital color proofing systems.
`
`

`

`4 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`Early Lithographic Computer-to-Plate Systems
`
`These systems were used for making plates for newspapers and business forms. The Wall Street Jour(cid:173)
`nal is produced on such systems in most of its 17 printing locations. The systems use satellite trans(cid:173)
`mission of digital data to Chemco Newsplaters, which record the newspaper pages on Polychrome
`Laserscan plates. The New York Times uses similar concepts for its national newspaper. Crosfield
`Datrax laser platemaking and facsimile transmission systems are used which can produce newspaper
`page images either on Lasermark films or plates.
`Early computer-to-plate systems were not capable of printing commercial lithographic pictorial
`quality, primarily because of the unavailability of plates. The development of the 3M high-speed pho(cid:173)
`topolymer and the Nippon dye-sensitized photopolymer plates and upgrading of the Crosfield
`Datrax to a 150-line screen capability encouraged development of commercial or magazine computer(cid:173)
`to-plate systems. Business forms are being produced on Purup, Misomex, and Harris Digilabel elec(cid:173)
`tronic imaging systems by direct exposure of 3M Onyx plates or Mitsubishi Silver Digiplates (all
`polyester) by helium-neon lasers and printing on a press in runs up to 20,000 impressions.
`The first printing process to use computer-to-plate {image carrier) digital printing commercially
`has been gravure using image carriers made on electromechanical machines. This was followed by
`flexography, lithography, and stencil duplicating.
`
`The Evolution from Phototypesetting to Platesetting
`
`As the printing industry applied phototypesetting, it laid the groundwork for today' s platesetting.
`
`Computer to film. In 1978 Monotype introduced the Lasercomp, the first raster-based imagesetter. It
`was not, however, the first device to apply a laser for typesetting. The abortive Photon laser typeset(cid:173)
`ter in 1976 had that distinction. The term "imagesetter" did not become widespread until1985 when
`Adobe Systems and Linotype-Hell adapted the Linotron laser system to PostScript. From its intro(cid:173)
`duction in 1981, the Linotron, as well as the Lasercomp, suffered from the lack of a page description
`language that could integrate text and graphics. From 1985 onwards, virtually every imagesetter
`incorporated a PostScript raster image processor (RIP). Imagesetters then advanced to two-up film,
`four-up film, and today eight-up and even sixteen-up film sizes.
`
`Computer to imposed film. Optrotech oflsrael introduced an eight-up film imposetter in 1989. It was
`a device already in use for making semiconductor artwork and easily adapted for imagesetting. For(cid:173)
`tunately, the Linotronic 500 was a four-up machine and had been used by a Canadian printer with an
`interest in Ultimate Technographics. The latter company developed the first imposition program, thus
`
`Phototypesetters
`CRT phototypesetters
`Laser phototypesetters
`Laser imagesetters
`Laser imposetters
`Laser platesetters
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`Evolution from Phototypesetters to Platesetters
`Characters
`Line Art
`Photos
`Color
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`Imposed
`
`•
`•
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION 5
`
`making an eight-up machine, dubbed an "irnposetter," possible. Over time many suppliers developed
`irnposetting devices, which paved the way for computer-to-plate.
`
`Computer to imposed plate. As film-based imposetters evolved to larger sizes of output media, util(cid:173)
`ity software for automatic trapping and imposition evolved, as did digital proofing technology. The
`result was a digital infrastructure that was essentially in place when the first CTP systems were
`demonstrated in September 1993. But the genesis of CTP goes back before that time.
`
`The Variations of Computer-to Technology
`
`CTF
`
`Computer to Film
`
`CTIF
`CTP
`CTPP
`
`Computer to Imposed Film
`Computer to Plate
`Computer to Polyester Plate
`
`CTAP
`
`Computer to Aluminum Plate
`
`CTPoP
`
`Computer to Plate on Press
`
`CTPIC
`
`Computer to Plate Image Cylinder
`
`CTEP
`
`Computer to Electronic Printer
`
`CTECP
`
`Computer to Electronic Color Press
`
`Raster-based imagesetters, both capstan(cid:173)
`and drum-oriented
`lmposelters, 4-up and larger format
`Computer-to-plate, any kind of plate
`Imagesetters or imposetters, outputting
`film or plate, or dedicated devices that
`only output polyester plates.
`Platesetters using internal or external
`drum, flatbed or curved approaches.
`Presstek technology presently integrated
`on presses from Heidelberg and Omni(cid:173)
`Adast.
`Creo' s developmental technology that
`involves spraying a material on a press
`cylinder and imaging it with thermal
`lasers.
`Includes all digital printout devices, mono(cid:173)
`chrome or color.
`Specifically involves high-end higher(cid:173)
`speed color printing systems.
`
`Who Will Implement the Various Computer-to Technologies
`Type
`Printers
`Prepress
`CTF
`100%
`40%
`CTIF
`20%
`20%
`CTPP
`5%
`CTAP
`30%
`CTPoP
`10%
`CTPIC
`10%
`CTEP
`60%
`CTECP
`20%
`
`40%
`30%
`
`

`

`

`

`Chapter 2
`Press Trends
`
`Changes in sheetfed and web offset printing markets have been responsible for some modifications
`in sheetfed and web offset press design and operation. Both have directed their efforts at increased
`productivity and lower running costs. Sheetfed, with smaller sheets and shorter run lengths, has con(cid:173)
`centrated on faster makereadies and shorter changeovers. Web offset, with more durable plates and
`longer runs, has concentrated on higher speeds and waste reduction. In gravure, press developments
`are in smaller presses and wider presses with more automation and less manning.
`
`Press Automation
`
`More and more press functions are becoming automated. Many manual tasks, such as plate chang(cid:173)
`ing, are now being augmented or replaced by automated systems. Increased automation has a posi(cid:173)
`tive impact not only on makeready but also on the pressrun. Automation shortens makeready by 50%
`or more, enabling the press operators to mount plates quicker and to make adjustments in less time
`than if they were made manually. During the pressl'Uil, automation allows the press operators to
`adjust ink/water balance and register from a remote control console, instead of making manual
`adjustments to ink keys and ink ratchets, side guides, plate cylinders, and other press devices. In addi(cid:173)
`tion, automatic blanket washers allow press operators to wash blankets without stopping the press(cid:173)
`a critical production consideration especially with web presses. Automation can also result in
`decreased press crew sizes. Many of the sheetfed and web presses displayed at the DRUPA and Graph
`Expo '95 trade shows incorporated one or more of the following features:
`• Automatic plate changers on sheetfed presses
`• Robotic material-handling at both the feed and delivery ends of the presses
`• Automatic washup accessories for the ink trains, blankets, impression cylinders
`• In-line densitometers and spectrophotometers
`• Automatic registration
`• Ink pumping and distribution systems
`• On-line pH and conductivity control
`
`Among the functions that are becoming automated, which vary considerably from press to press
`and from press manufacturer to press manufacturer, are adjustments to:
`• Pile, feedboard, and side-guides on sheetfed presses
`• Roll stand and web guides on web presses
`• Register
`• Delivery
`• Ink/ water balance
`
`

`

`8 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING 1HE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`Automation, greatly added by microprocessors, can also facilitate electronic monitoring of ink
`density, register, ink/ water balance, dot gain, and other printing parameters, and can control various
`makeready functions, plate changing, and troubleshooting.
`
`More Sophisticated Press Control Systems
`
`Press control systems are becoming more sophisticated with enhanced multitasking abilities and
`advances in automatic registration and in-line densitometry and spectrophotometry.
`The critical eye of the press operator has been supplemented, or even replaced, by sophisticated
`closed-loop controls. The trend in both sheetfed and web offset press operating is to replace certain
`human judgments and manual adjustments and operations with automatic functions-but the skills
`of the press operator are still integral to successful printing.
`At Graph Expo '95, Komori America Corp. displayed its 40-in. Lithrone press equipped with
`Komori's PQA (Print Quality Assessment) system and the KMS (Komori Monitoring System), a
`totally integrated system that incorporates control of automatic makeready, cleaning functions, auto(cid:173)
`matic plate changing, troubleshooting procedures, and statistical process control. The KMS monitors
`and displays essential data collected from the press and peripheral devices. The press was also
`equipped with Komori's PDC-S system, first shown at DRUPA '95. The PDC-S is a closed-loop scan(cid:173)
`ning spectrodensitometer.
`Fiber optics are being used increasingly in the pressroom in conjunction with control consoles. For
`example, MAN Roland's PECOM press center uses fiber optics to link the printing units to a central
`console, which features one simple keyboard and one monitor. The control center can direct the oper(cid:173)
`ation of Roland 700- and 300-series presses.
`Another example of a control system is the Heidelberg CPC 21, a colorimetric-based scanning sys(cid:173)
`tem for closed-loop control with color control bars. It takes a reference value from any original and
`creates a comparison of measured patches that produces results corresponding to human color per(cid:173)
`ception. This equipment can be connected online with up to six printing presses and is equipped with
`an open, standardized computer interface for data exchange.
`The Sakurai Color Control System is available on all Sakurai multicolor presses in three models.
`The sec I model features remote ink key control with job storage on floppy disks, including register
`control. The sec n and sec Ill will feature complete integration to the press with all color control
`functions on the console. SCC Ill includes a scanning densitometer. Sakurai predicts that 70% of its
`multicolor presses will be sold with one of the SCC options. On Sakurai's sec ll and sec ill systems,
`digital ink key presets can be determined from ripped data on the Sakurai computer-to-plate sys(cid:173)
`tems, the PlateMaster 52 and PlateMaster 72
`(OEM versions of the Presstek PearlSetters).
`The information can be saved and recalled
`when the job is ready to go to press.
`Mitsubishi offers Graphics Microsystems
`mc.'s (GMI) Autocolor system (shown at right),
`allowing the press operator to use an x-y scan(cid:173)
`ning densitometer to monitor ink densities.
`The press operator also has the option of clos(cid:173)
`ing the loop between scanner and Mitsubishi
`console to allow Autocolor to maintain ink
`densities automatically.
`
`Automatic x-y scanning densitometer for closed-loop
`color control
`
`

`

`PRESS TRENDS 9
`
`These are five examples of the many control systems from press and accessory manufacturers that
`are making the task of running a press easier.
`
`Automatic or Semiautomatic Plate Mounting
`
`In the last few years, several press manufacturers, including Komori, Mitsubishi, and Sakurai, have
`added automatic or semiautomatic plate mounting devices to their presses (see illustration on page
`10). Sakurai said that 98% of its new presses being sold are equipped with SPC. The exact procedure
`involved in using these devices varies with the level of the device's automation, as well as from man(cid:173)
`ufacturer to manufacturer. The basic procedure with one automatic plate mounting system includes
`the following steps:
`1. Press operator loads new plates into a plate cassette.
`2. Press operator selects a unit that needs a new plate and depresses a pushbutton to start the
`mounting procedure.
`3. Safety guard automatically opens, and rear of plate loader moves toward the plate cylinder.
`4. Plate clamp opens, and old plate is discharged into the loader.
`5. New plate leaves loader, is inserted into position, and is mounted on the plate cylinder.
`6. Plate clamp closes, loader retracts to original position, and safety guard closes.
`
`Automatic Blanket and Press Cylinder
`Cleaning
`
`The manual cleaning of blankets and press cylinders
`is a time-consuming procedure because the press has
`to be stopped. Automatic cleaning devices, such a'
`the device shown at the right, however, allow the
`cylinders to be cleaned while the press is operating.
`In addition to eliminating press stoppages, auto(cid:173)
`matic cleaning often results in a reduction in solvent
`consumption and a significant reduction in waste
`signatures. For example, the Baldwin IMPACFM
`Automatic Blanket Cleaner and Press Cylinder
`Cleaner, a winner of a 1995 GAIF InterTech Tech(cid:173)
`nology Award, is said to reduce solvent consump(cid:173)
`tion by 70%.
`
`Automatic Feeder Adjustments
`
`Automatic ink-roller cleaning system
`
`Setting the sheet-handling mechanisms on a sheetfed press is a time-consuming operation. 1f paper
`size and thiclcness are changed, practically all settings must be adjusted. Some newer presses have
`devices that automatically adjust the sheet-handling mechanisms when paper stock is changed, a
`major time-saver during makeready (see illustration on page 11).
`
`Automatic Registration Control
`
`Several manufacturers offer systems for automatic register control. An example is the Sakurai AutoSet
`system, available on Sakurai multicolor presses, which allows remote control of register. The opera(cid:173)
`tor can select a sheet size and automatically set up the feeder, delivery, and impression pressures.
`
`

`

`10 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`Automatic Plate Changing
`
`Automatic plate changing sequence on Komori Lithrone press
`
`1. Place a new plate in
`the loader.
`
`2. When the button is
`pressed, the safety cover
`opens and the loader is
`set in position.
`
`3. Both the front and
`back clamps open to
`start the plate-removal
`operation.
`
`4. With the plate drawn
`into the loader, the plate(cid:173)
`removal operation is
`completed.
`
`5. The new plate is
`inserted in register and
`gripped with the front
`clamp.
`
`6. The plate cylinder
`rotates to wind the new
`plate around it.
`
`8. The loader returns to
`its origin81 position and
`the safety cover closes.
`
`7. When the new plate is
`completely wound around
`the cylinder, its trailing
`edge is pressed down
`and gripped by the back
`clamp. This completes
`plate mounting.
`
`Lateral register, circumferential register, and skewillg can be controlled. Sakurai predicts that 50% of
`its multicolor presses will be ordered with SAS.
`
`

`

`PRESS TRENDS 11
`
`Other Automated Press Controls
`
`Sheet preset control
`
`7 8 9
`4 5 6
`1 2 3
`0 CLR 00
`
`Oscillating roller control
`
`OPERATJIJ<
`
`I Jill( LI(}IJ AIID SliDE fll)]!I~ FR a 1
`
`rnmrnrnmrnrn
`~~~~BBB
`
`Frontlay register control
`
`SIDE

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket