throbber
Managed Care Strategic Briefing
`
`Challenge of CHF Management:
`A Culmination ot Precursors
`'
`
`Rot congestive heart failure, pharma-
`
`Office Visits at Home
`
`The questions to congestive heart fail—
`ure patients are customary, but the set
`ting is unusual: “Are your clothes get-
`ring tighter at the waist?" “Did you
`wake up short of breath during the
`night?" “Are your ankles more swollen
`than usual?" “Did you take your medica—
`tions today!" “How's the exercise pro;
`gram going?" The scene might not be
`the traditional office visit. More and
`more, such questions are being put to
`patients in their homes, through small.
`user—friendly network computers that
`"talk" to patients — in one case. a talk—
`ing scale. After weighing oneself, the
`patient responds to various questions by
`hitting :1 YES or NO button. The
`weight and answers are automatically
`dialed out to a central monitoring sta—
`tion. In another application of daily
`monitoring technology, the patient uses
`radiOvequipped home measurement
`instruments — a digital scale, a blood
`pressure cuff, and an EKG rhythm strip
`recorder.
`
`Such is one face of the brave new world
`of CHF management. Although the
`value of invhome data export devices is
`not universally embraced, giving
`patients control of sending in infarmav
`tion via unobtrusive monitoring devices
`at home apparently can benefit bath
`patients and their families.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`
`
`system that accommodates DRG cote
`other than waiting tor a diagnosis
`
`gories. Physicians’ oiiice practices are
`usually not organized or statted around a
`lot at proactive followup. Disease man
`agement vendors claim to attend to those
`details, proactively.
`The value at
`in-home data export
`
`devices draws some skepticism. Will
`sick, elderly heart Failure Elients inter-
`act with daily monitoring technolggy?
`Yes
`in the case at a talking scale a
`small intuitive monitoring device tar use
`at home. The patient responds to non-
`iudgmental questions by hitting a yes or
`no button. The device automatically dials
`out to a central monitoring station and
`uploads that information.
`Some drug manufacturer-sponsored
`interventions are attracting more interest
`trorn provider groups than From health
`plans. One manufacturer has develofl
`a clinical mana ement s stem — a
`ro
`rieta
`software
`lattorm and the clini-
`cal
`r
`rams that run on the
`lattorm.
`Evidence-based guidelines,
`though nec-
`essarily broad, can be adjusted to indi
`vidual patients. lt's crucial that the client
`have a case management and cosetind
`ing infrastructure in place.
`' Health plans tend to be reluctant to
`link their care management programs to
`the prior ettorts of pharmaceutical com-
`panies, believed to emphasize product
`sales. Manutocturers are Erceived as
`ised to deliver ‘maiter'-
`r
`rams
`
`cy benelit management (PBM) lirms
`generally try to identity people at risk
`postrmyocardial
`intarction. Success has
`been reported from getting such Etients
`onto hypolipidemic or ACE inhibitor ther-
`apy or 53mg ocker use. Because CHF is
`such an integrated prob em, some PBMs
`are wary ot an external company man-
`aging CHF as a ‘carveout,’ thought to
`detach patients from needed feedback.
`HMOS are coming to realize they had
`better treat CHF patients, even though
`membership
`turnover means
`these
`patients may end up someplace else;
`chances are an HMO will get somebody
`else's patients down the line! A growing
`view is that it each HMO carria its Ear
`
`share ot the load, no one HMO would be
`hit hard with adverse selection.
`Health plans ask: Is there a return on
`investment in pumping additional dollars
`into CHF programs? Yes,
`it you get
`
`patients with severe CHF stabilized on
`
`medication. But putting another dollar
`
`toward trying to wring an incremental
`gain out at Enems who are stabilized is
`
`robabl not mone wells
`nt. Employ-
`
`ers, however, generally have a longer-
`term interest in employees, and may even
`
`see a role tor health promotion in culti-
`
`vating employee satisfaction,
`retention,
`and recruitment.
`
`Provider groups operating under undile
`
`terentioted capitation needed outside
`rather than tailoring care plans to indi-
`help in designing costetlective disease
`vidual needs,
`interacting with phfii
`
`management programs. Capitation may
`cians, trackng p_atients, and having a
`home health camEnent.
`be tadifl, but likely to be replaced by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Bosch Ex. 2053
`Bosch EX. 2053
`Cardiocom v. Bosch IPR2013-00468
`Cardiocom V. Bosch IPR2013—00468
`
`

`

`Cost—effective methods of managing CHF are taking on
`greater urgency as CHF case management becomes more
`labor intensive. Owing to the aging population, CHF is the
`only area in cardiovascular medicine for which all expendiv
`tures throughout — medical, pharmaceutical, laboratory —
`are increasing in the aggregate. CHF is the largest cost cen—
`ter for senior care. Three—quarters of the money spent on
`heart failure goes for hospitalization. One irony is that as
`other cardiovascular conditions —— hypertension, myocardial
`infarctions —— become amenable to better treatments, sur—
`vivors are at the highest risk for congestive heart failure.
`CHF will loom larger down the line.
`
`The problem is, a large number of health plans don't have
`the mindset to look at downstream clinical outcomes. And
`
`physicians’ office practices have never really been organized
`or staffed around a lot of proactive follow—up. Hence a role
`for pharmacy benefit management firms. disease manage
`ment vendors, informatics units, telephonic demand man—
`agement organizations, monitoring device/service firms, and
`drug manufacturer initiatives. The perspectives of leaders in
`those fields were gleaned through interviews by The Genesis
`Report/Mex and are presented here as Part II of a tw0vpart
`article on CHF management. Part I, in the September issue,
`highlighted views from clinical and academic settings and
`managed care organizations.
`
`”Health Buddy Personal Information Appliance extends beyond congestive heart failure. But CHF is probably the
`
`number one application because it’s the largest cost Center for senior care. it’s also one offering the greatest possi-
`
`Health Hero Network, inc »
`
`bility of preventing hospitalizations by having iust a little information a little sooner.”
`
`Steve Brown, CEO
`
`Health Buddy/Health Hero Network:
`An Information Appllance for the Kitchen
`Steve Brown is CEO of Health Hero Network, Inc (Moun-
`tain View, CA), a privately held e—health company that
`provides a flexible Intemet—based communications platform
`that enables disease management companies, inthuse man—
`aged care providers, and informal caregivers to communicate
`daily with their patients at home. About his communica«
`tions platform, he said there are two parts: Health Buddy,
`the patient interface, and Health Hero on—line service, used
`by the nurse or the case manager.
`
`“Essentially, Health Buddy focuses on wiring the senior pop’
`ulation to healthcare services over the Internet through our
`extremely simple information appliance. The idea is finding
`a way to get to the point of selfvcare in the home, where
`patients are making decisionsabout their health, or taking
`their medicine, or doing some kind of self—care routine. At
`the touch of a button, the appliance sends information to a
`
`care manager.
`
`“Health Buddy Personal Information Appliance extends
`beyond congestive heart failure. But CHF is probably the
`number one application because it's the largest cost center
`for senior care. It’s also one offering the greatest possibility
`of preventing hospitalizations by having just a little informa—
`tion a little sooner.
`
`“The Health Buddy information appliance for the patient’s
`home," Brown continued, “can go anywhere from the
`kitchen countertop to the nightstand. It plugs into a phone
`line, and has four buttons and a display screen. It turns itself
`on, it lights up, and it asks you questions about how you‘re
`feeling. It collects data about symptoms, and it gives you
`educational information or feedback. To collect more data,
`it also has (pending FDA clearance) the capability of being
`an interface to a wide range of medical devices, whether
`that's a weight scale, a blood pressure cuff, or a blood glua
`case meter. It's a platform for focused, protocol—based comr
`
`2
`
`

`

`own programs. Whatever
`customers want to create
`
`protocols for, they can
`use Health Hero. We are
`
`creating the platform on
`which one can create
`one’s own disease man—
`
`agement program.
`
`less Slippage
`Through the Cracks
`“Health Hero has cus‘
`tomers that are assessing
`the outcomes as they go
`along," Brown added.
`“Since we have only
`anecdotal results so far,
`we haven’t published any
`data yet. Last week I
`talked to the medical
`director of one of our
`
`munication with the patient in the home, and it can work
`for just about any disease and any patient, depending on the
`kind of protocol assigned to it.
`
`“It’s kind of a little four—button consumer appliance. It’s the
`simplest computing device in the world right now. A big
`part of this is making it extremely convenient for patients,
`not interrupting-their daily routine. It's like E—mail. You’re
`getting a little message on a display screen that says, ‘How
`are you feeling today? Good? Bad? Did you have difficulty
`breathing last night? Yes? No.7 On a scale of 1 to 10, how
`difficult was your breathing?’ And you can press in an
`answer.
`
`Website for Stratifying by Risk
`
`“The Health Hero on»line service,” explained Brown, “is
`essentially an Internet‘based communications platform that
`tells a nurse the status of her patients. The data are all
`graphically presented, so you see who’s in the red zone, the
`yellow zone, the green zone, by different categories, like
`symptoms, behavior, or knowledge. Every time the patient
`answers a question, a risk score is attached to that answer, so
`the nurses have daily data on their patients, organized and
`risk stratified.
`
`“A case manager has an account, and within that can create
`a protocol to assign to patients or groups of patients. Case
`managers can type in questions, or they can use the protocol
`that the medical director or perhaps a third party has creatr
`ed. So the case manager can say, ‘l have 100 patients with
`congestive heart failure whom I want to enroll in our CHF
`program.’ When the nurses want to add a new patient, they
`go to the Internet and push a button. We automatically ship
`to the patient and get them set up.
`
`“It's an open system for communicating with patients, using
`a protocol. With 600,000 doctors and 2 million nurses in
`this country, there are a lot of different ideas about the right
`way to communicate with patients. So we made a flexible
`system that every doctor and every nurse can use to create
`their own protocols if they want to.
`
`“We have the same customers, the same sites, using the
`same system for congestive heart failure, cardiovascular CllSv
`ease, coronary artery bypass, hospital discharge, diabetes,
`even transplants. Besides that, there’s mental health, the
`frail elderly, disability, and shorttterm disability. Protocols
`for all those kinds of things are being developed by different
`groups. We have a library of sample dialogues, so you could
`give people a head start. But some groups are creating their
`
`”I think the big thing that’s going to
`
`happen in the morket is that medical
`
`groups are going to start doing dis-
`
`eose‘monogement themselves rather
`
`n=k that ultimately
`than outsource. lt
`..7.
`‘
`.
`.
`.
`t -
`*
`i
`. he doctors and the nurses in this
`country will be the disease mon—
`
`ogers, and wont to do that. But we
`
`need to help them get reimbursed
`
`appropriately for it; we're working
`
`on that.”
`
`Health Hero Network, Inc
`
`Steve Brown, CEO
`
`customers and got forr
`warded E—mail from
`another. One said,
`‘We’ve prevented anothv
`er hospitalization by
`detecting a problem
`sooner and just scheduling an office visit.’ The other said,
`‘We've saved the first life using Health Hero because it was
`somebody who had really slipped through the cracks and
`was identified with their Health Buddy.’
`
`“We have about 15 organizations that signed up for it so far,
`and we think we’re going to have a number more soon. And
`all those organizations are developing their own programs
`based on the platform. How many Health Buddies get out
`there depends on how far those groups take their disease
`management programs.” Brown noted that a Health Hero
`customer may be a managed care organization or a medical
`group as well as an employer.
`
`“I think the big thing that’s going to happen in the market is
`that medical groups are going to start doing disease manage—
`ment themselves rather than outsource. I think that ultimately
`the doctors and the nurses in this country will be the disease
`managers, and want to do that. But we need to help them get
`reimbursed appropriately for it; we're working on that.”
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket