throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________________
`
`CARDIOCOM, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ROBERT BOSCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________________________
`
`Case IPR2013-00451
`Patent No. 7,587,469
`
`_____________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.70
`
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner, Robert Bosch Healthcare
`
`Systems, Inc. (“Bosch”) hereby requests oral argument currently scheduled for
`
`September 9, 2014, in the present inter partes review proceeding. Bosch
`
`specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether Petitioner has met its burden to prove that a person of
`
`ordinary skill would have combined the teachings of Cohen (Exhibit
`
`1002) and Wahlquist (Exhibit 1003), as alleged in the Petition;
`
`2. Whether Petitioner has met its burden to prove that a person of
`
`ordinary skill would have combined the teachings of Cohen, Wahlquist,
`
`Neumann (Exhibit 1004), and Jacobs (Exhibit 1005), as alleged in the
`
`Petition;
`
`3. Whether Petitioner’s expert applied a proper methodology in his
`
`obviousness analysis;
`
`4. Whether claims 1, 2, and 5-10 of US Patent No. 7,587,469 (the
`
`“’469 Patent”) (Exhibit 1001) are obvious over Cohen and Wahlquist;
`
`5. Whether claims 1, 2, and 5-10 of the ’469 Patent are obvious over
`
`Cohen, Wahlquist, Neumann, and Jacobs;
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`The appropriate construction to be given the disputed claim terms;
`
`Reply to any arguments raised in the Petitioner’s Reply;
`
`2
`
`

`
`8.
`
`Response to any issues specified by Petitioner in its request for
`
`oral argument;
`
`9. Whether Bosch’s Motion to Exclude should be granted;
`
`10. Response to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`11. Any other issues briefed or presented by the parties throughout this
`
`trial.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`Dated: July 30, 2014
`
`By:
`
`/Don Daybell/
`Don Daybell
`Reg. No. 50,877
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`3
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned “PATENT
`
`OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R.
`
`§42.70” was served in its entirety on July 30, 2014, upon the following parties via
`
`e-mail:
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Daniel W. McDonald
`Andrew J. Lagatta
`Merchant & Gould
`80 South 8th St., Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`CardiocomIPR@merchantgould.com
`
`By:
`
`/Karen Johnson/
`Karen Johnson

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket