throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APOTEX CORP.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, and pursuant to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`authorization to file this motion provided by the Board during a conference call
`
`with the parties on July 10, 2014, Petitioner Apotex Corp. (“Apotex”) and Patent
`
`Owner Alcon Research, Ltd. (“Alcon”) jointly request the termination of this inter
`
`partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299.
`
`The parties have settled their dispute and executed a settlement agreement to
`
`terminate this inter partes review and the parties’ co-pending inter partes review
`
`proceedings 2013-00429 and 2013-00430.
`
`The parties’ settlement agreement has been made in writing, and a true and
`
`correct copy is being filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit 1020. The parties are
`
`also filing concurrently herewith a joint request to treat the settlement agreement as
`
`business confidential information and keep it separate from the files of the IPR and
`
`the involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).
`
`Termination of this inter partes review is proper under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a)
`
`because the Board has not yet decided the merits of the proceeding. Indeed, the
`
`briefing and discovery process in this proceeding has not yet been completed.
`
`Alcon has filed a Patent Owner’s Response to the Petition, but Alcon’s declarants
`
`have not been deposed, and Apotex has not filed a Reply or any evidence in Reply.
`
`Alcon did not file a Motion to Amend and thus no such motion is pending.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No other party’s rights will be prejudiced by the termination of this inter
`
`partes review. While there is no litigation pending between Alcon and Apotex
`
`relating to the patent that is the subject of this inter partes review, there is pending
`
`litigation relating to this patent between Alcon and other parties in the following
`
`actions: (1) Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. & Mylan Inc., No.
`
`1:13-cv-01332 (SLR) (D. Del.), (2) Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Wockhardt Ltd.,
`
`Wockhardt Bio AG, & Wockhardt USA, LLC, No. 1:13-cv-02040 (SLR) (D. Del.),
`
`(3) Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Micro Labs Ltd. & Micro Labs USA Inc., No. 1:14-cv-
`
`00014 (SLR) (D. Del.), and (4) Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Watson Labs., Inc.,
`
`Actavis, Inc. and Actavis Pharma, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-00647 (SLR) (D. Del.). Each
`
`of these litigations is at an early stage. The Mylan action is the fact discovery
`
`period. The Wockhardt action is also in the fact discovery period, albeit at an
`
`earlier stage than the Mylan action. The Micro action has been stayed pending the
`
`outcome of the Mylan or Wockhardt actions. The Watson action has just begun, as
`
`Watson has not yet filed an Answer. None of these other parties’ rights will be
`
`impacted by the termination of this inter partes review.
`
`There are no other proceedings pending before the Patent and Trademark
`
`Office relating to the patent at issue in this inter partes review.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Accordingly, Apotex and Alcon respectfully request that this inter partes
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Eldora L. Ellison/
`Eldora L. Ellison, Ph.D.
`Reg. No. 39,967
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
`P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-371-2600
`1877177.1
`
`
`
`
`review proceeding be terminated.
`
`Dated: July 14, 2014
`
`
`
`/Stanley E. Fisher/
`Stanley E. Fisher
`Reg. No. 55,820
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth Street NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Phone: 202-434-5289
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e))
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing “Joint Motion
`
`to Terminate Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317,” along with Exhibit 1020,
`
`were served in their entirety on July 14, 2014, via email upon the following
`
`counsel of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Stanley E. Fisher
`
`David M. Krinsky
`
`Adam L. Perlman
`
`Dov P. Grossman
`Christopher J. Mandernach
`David M. Horniak
`
`Barry L. Copeland
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sfisher@wc.com
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`aperlman@wc.com
`dgrossman@wc.com
`cmandernach@wc.com
`dhorniak@wc.com
`barry.copeland@alcon.com
`patent.docketing@alcon.com
`
`
`
`
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
` /Eldora L. Ellison/
` Eldora L. Ellison, Ph.D.
`Date: July 14, 2014
` Lead Attorney for Petitioner Apotex Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Registration No. 39,967
`Washington, D.C.20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket