throbber
0~7 (cid:9)
`
`The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products
`Veterinary Medicines Evaluation Unit
`
`EMEA/MRL/6 14/99-FINAL
`June 1999
`
`COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
`
`POLYOXYL CASTOR OIL
`POLYOXYL HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
`
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Polyoxyl n castor oil (n=30 to 40) (synonyms: ethoxylated castor oil, polyethylene glycol castor
`oil) is a mixture of triricinoleate esters of ethoxylated glycerol with small amounts of
`polyethyleneglycol (macrogol) ricinoleate and the corresponding free glycols. The number (n)
`associated with the name of the substance represents the average number of oxyethylene units in
`the compound. Polyoxyl n hydrogenated castor oil (n40 to 60) is a mixture of trihydroxystearate
`esters of ethoxylated glycerol with small amounts of macrogol trihydroxystearate and the
`corresponding free glycols. The substances are generally highly dispersible in water.
`
`Polyoxyl castor oil and polyoxyl hydrogenated castor oil are nonionic surfactants, which are used
`as emulsifying and solubilising agents in pharmaceutical preparations and cosmetics. Examples
`are polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL; CAS 61791-12-6), polyoxyl 40 castor oil (Marlowet
`40, Emulgin RO 40), polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 40) and polyoxyl
`60 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 60). The substances are included as excipients in
`numerous preparations intended for use in all food producing species by parenteral, oral or topical
`administration. The concentration in products is usually between 0.1% and 20% with a maximum
`of 27.5%. The doses of concentrated substances to different species is in a range of 0.01 and
`2.5 ml/day (cattle and horses 0.75 to 2.5 ml, sheep and goats 0.2 to 0.5 ml, swine 0.25 to 1.20 ml,
`poultry 0.001 to 0.03 ml and salmon as a dip for 30 minutes in a 36% solution diluted 1/3 x 106
`before use).
`
`In rats, polyoxyl 35 castor oil, had some antidiuretic effect after oral administration of
`2.5 ml/kg bw. It was shown that polyoxyl 35 castor oil could bind to membrane transport
`P-glycoproteins in vitro, thereby inhibiting the elimination of drugs out of cells and increasing
`bioaccumulation of drugs within cells. It was concluded that polyoxyl 35 castor oil is a
`pharmacological active substance. However, polyoxyl castor oil and polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated
`castor oil are claimed to be devoid of pharmacological activity at the concentrations at which they
`are employed as excipients, i.e. a maximum of 2.5 ml/animal by the intramuscular, subcutaneous,
`topical or oral route. Studies showing possible pharmacological activity have not been performed
`in the target species.
`
`4. No data on metabolism and pharmacokinetics of polyoxyl castor oil and polyoxyl hydrogenated
`castor oil were provided. However, it is known that polyoxyethylene compounds are poorly
`absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract due to their high dispersibility in water and limited
`liposolubility.
`
`7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK
`Switchboard (44-20-7) 418 8400 Fax (44-20-7) 418 8447
`http://www.eudra.org/emea.html
`E-mail: mail'emea.eudra.org (cid:9)
`cFMFA 1999 Rpnrnrliintion nd1or dietrihiition of this rtoniiment is iithorised for non nommerriI niirnoses only nrovirted the FMFA is enknowledned
`
`

`

`6.
`
`7.
`
`For polyoxyl 35 castor oil oral LD 50 values of 640 mg/kg bw in the dog and 6500 mg/kg in the
`mouse have been reported in the published literature. The acute oral toxicity of polyoxyl 40 castor
`oil appears to be low, the LD 50 in rats being greater than 10000 mg/kg bw. According to
`summary information provided In another study the acute oral toxicity of polyoxyl 40 castor oil
`was investigated in male Wistar rats. The LD 50 was reported to be greater than 2000 mg/kg. The
`acute toxicity of polyoxyl 25 hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil,
`polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil were reported to be very low with LD 50 values of more than
`5000 mg/kg body weight in rats.
`
`Polyoxyl 35 castor oil and polyoxyl hydrogenated castor oil were judged slightly irritating when
`applied to skin to both humans and rabbits and non-irritating to the eye. Polyoxyl 35 castor oil did
`not induce sensitisation in guinea pigs.
`
`In the published literature there are toxicology studies reported for polyoxyl-40 hydrogenated
`castor oil, polyoxyl 40 castor oil, polyoxyl 35 castor oil and polyoxyl castor oil (number of moles
`of ethyleneoxide was not specified).
`Studies with polyoxyl-40 hydrogenated castor oil were performed in rats for 6 months with doses
`up to 100 000 mg/kg/feed (theoretical calculated doses 5000 mg/kg bodyweight) and in dogs for
`6 months with doses up to 5% of the diet (theoretical calculated doses 3750 mg/kg bw). No
`treatment related effects were observed.
`Furthermore, polyoxyl castor oil 10% (number of moles of ethyleneoxide was not specified) was
`tested as a vehicle control in a study with mice for 90 days in the drinking water. The absolute
`and relative liver and kidney weights were significantly increased and the weight of the brain was
`significantly less than in the control group who received de-ionised water. Some statistically
`significant differences in the haematological and clinical chemistry values were also recorded.
`The same substance was tested for 3 weeks in Sprague Dawley rats in a dose of 0.5% in drinking
`water. The only change that was observed was reduced weight of the brains in the treated groups
`compared to the controls.
`Polyoxyl 40 castor oil was tested in rats and in dogs for 90 days with doses up to 5% in the feed.
`No treatment related effects were observed.
`
`Repeated dose studies after intramuscular injection were performed in dogs, after dosing with 11
`injections of 1 ml 50% polyoxyl 35 castor oil, in rabbits after dosing with 10 injections of 0.5 ml
`and in guinea pigs after dosing with 10 injections of 0.1 ml polyoxyl 35 castor oil, respectively.
`No significant effects were recorded.
`
`Only summaries of published studies concerning reproductive and teratogenic effects have been
`provided. Polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil was tested in rats fed up to 5 g/kg bw in the feed
`day 0 to 20 of gestation and to mice fed up to 1.5 g/kg bw in the feed during day 6 to 15 of
`gestation. No maternotoxic or teratogenic effects were recorded. Furthermore, a 3-generation
`study was performed with 1% polyoxyl 30 castor oil given to mice in the drinking water. No
`significant changes in reproductive performance were observed in any of the 3 generations. Mean
`litter size, postnatal body weights and survival indices were unaffected. The F Ic and F2b matings
`were produced to screen for dominant lethal and teratology effects. In this screening tests an
`increase in the ratio of dead foetuses to live foetuses was observed. In addition, polyoxyl-35
`castor oil was tested as a vehicle control in a teratogenicity study in mice. The mice were given
`oral doses of 0.005 mIll g bw of an 8% polyoxyl 5 castor oil in water at day 9, 10 or ii of
`gestation. No treatment related effects were observed.
`
`9. Only summaries of published studies of mutagenicity tests have been provided. Polyoxyl-35
`castor oil was tested in a dominant lethal test, micronucleus test in mice, spermatogonial test in
`Chinese hamsters. Polyoxyl-30 castor oil was tested in a chromosomal aberration assay using
`Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, micronucleus and spermhead abnormality assays in mice.
`Furthermore, polyoxyl-60 hydrogenated castor oil was tested in Salmonella microsomal assay,
`with and without metabolic activation, in a chromosome aberration test in Chinese hamster V79
`cells, with and without metabolic activation, and in a micronucleus test in mice. None of the
`substances showed any mutagenic effect in any of the studies performed.
`
`2/3
`nFMEA lqqq
`
`

`

`10. Polyoxyl castor oil, when used as a vehicle in parenteral preparations, has been associated with
`severe anaphylactic reactions in humans. No reports of sensitisation after oral treatment either in
`humans or in animals have been reported even though the polyoxyl castor oil derivatives have
`been used in several cosmetic products. In the toxicity studies provided, no allergic reactions have
`been observed after oral treatment.
`
`11. Polyethylene glycols with molecular weights 200 to 10000 are already included in Annex II of
`Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2377/90). The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food
`Additives (JECFA) has evaluated castor oil as a food additive and established an ADI of
`0.7 mg/kg bw. Castor oil is approved by the FDA for use in e.g. hard candy.
`
`Conclusions and recommendation
`
`Having considered that:
`
`(cid:149) (cid:9)
`(cid:149) (cid:9)
`(cid:149) (cid:9)
`
`polyoxyl castor oil and polyoxyl hydrogenated castor oil are of low oral toxicity,
`only low doses administered to the target species,
`the incorporation of polyoxyl castor oil and polyoxyl hydrogenated castor oil in medicinal
`products intended for use in food producing species is unlikely to result in residues in food
`products of animal origin at concentrations of toxicological relevance to the consumer;
`
`the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products concludes that there is no need to establish an
`MRL for polyoxyl castor oil and polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil and recommends its
`inclusion in Annex II of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 in accordance with the following
`table.
`
`Animal species
`
`Pharmacologically active
`substance(s)
`Polyoxyl castor oil with 30 to All food producing species
`40 oxyethylene units
`Polyoxyl hydrogenated castor All food producing species
`oil with 40 to 60 oxyethylene
`units
`
`Other provisions
`
`
`
`For use as excipient
`
`For use as excipient
`
`3/3
`nFMFA 1qqA
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket