`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APOTEX CORP.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299 B2
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE DATES 2–3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`Pursuant to the January 2, 2014 Scheduling Order (Paper 10), and further to
`
`the Notice of Joint Stipulation to Extend Due Dates 1-3 of February 3, 2014,
`
`petitioner Apotex Corp, (“Apotex”) hereby provides notice that Alcon Research,
`
`Ltd. (“Alcon”) and Apotex have agreed to extend Due Dates 2–3, as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 1 ..................................................................................... March 24, 2014
`March 27, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 2 ........................................................................................ June 16, 2014
`June 19, 2014
`July 31, 2014
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 3 ......................................................................................... July 14, 2014
`July 17, 2014
`August 1, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner opposition to motion to amend
`
`In accordance with the Scheduling Order, Due Dates 4–7 remain as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 4 ...................................................................................... August 4, 2014
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`Petitioner’s motion for observation regarding
`cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`DUE DATE 5 .................................................................................... August 18, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 6 .................................................................................... August 25, 2014
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 7 .............................................................................. September 17, 2014
`
`
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00428
`U.S. Patent No. 8,268,299
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`Additionally, in light of the adjustments to the schedule, Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner have jointly agreed to postpone the depositions of Patent Owner’s
`
`witnesses Noticed to the Board in Papers filed May 1, 2014.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Eldora L. Ellison/
`Eldora L. Ellison, Ph.D. (Reg. No. 39,967)
`Lead Attorney for Petitioner Apotex Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 13, 2014
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e))
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing “Notice of Joint
`
`Stipulation to Extend Due Dates 2-3” was served in its entirety on May 13, 2014,
`
`via email upon the following counsel of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Stanley E. Fisher
`David M. Krinsky
`Adam L. Perlman
`Barry L. Copeland
`
`
`
`
`
`sfisher@wc.com
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`aperlman@wc.com
`barry.copeland@alcon.com
`patent.docketing@alcon.com
`
`
`
`
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
` /Eldora L. Ellison/
` Eldora L. Ellison, Ph.D.
`Date: May 13, 2014
` Lead Attorney for Petitioner Apotex Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Registration No. 39,967
`Washington, D.C.20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`1850814
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
