throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 76
`571-272-7822
` Entered: September 11, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC,
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2013-00417
`Patent 8,036,788 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, BARBARA A. PARVIS,
`and GREGG I. ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`Order
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.05
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00417
`Patent 8,036,788 B2
`
`
`Introduction
`A conference was held on September 11, 2014, between Antony Pfeffer and
`Thomas Makin, counsel for Petitioner, Toyota Motor Company, Thomas
`Wimbiscus and Scott McBride, counsel for Patent Owner, American Vehicular
`Sciences, LLC, and Judges Lee, Parvis and Anderson. The purpose of the
`conference was to make of record Petitioner’s position regarding Patent Owner’s
`Second Motion to Amend (“Second Motion,” Paper 75) filed September 3, 2014.
`Discussion
`Patent Owner filed a Motion to Amend on March 24, 2014 (“First Motion,”
`
`Paper 29), which sought to cancel claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 16 and 18, but not
`claim 9. Patent Owner withdrew the First Motion on August 7, 2014 (Paper 64).
`At the final hearing on this matter, the parties represented that the only
`remaining claim for our consideration was claim 9 and that claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8,
`11, 15, 16 and 18 had been cancelled. In order that the preceding be made of
`record, our Order dated August 29, 2014 (Paper 74) required Patent Owner file a
`paper to indicate that it requests cancellation of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 16
`and 18. In response to our Order, Patent Owner filed its Second Motion seeking
`cancellation of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 16 and 18, but not claim 9.
`An additional motion to amend may be filed only with authorization of the
`Board and a showing of good cause. 37 CFR § 42.122(c). Our Order constituted
`authorization to file the Second Motion. At the conference, counsel for Petitioner
`stated it had no objection to the Second Motion.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00417
`Patent 8,036,788 B2
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Second Motion will be
`treated as unopposed by Petitioner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR PETITONER:
`
`A. Antony Pfeffer
`Thomas R. Makin
`Matt Berkowitz
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`apfeffer@kenyon.com
`tmakin@kenyon.com
`mberkowitz@kenyon.com
`ptab@kenyon.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas J. Wimbiscus
`Scott P. McBride
`Stephanie Samz
`MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD.
`twimbiscus@mcandrews-ip.com
`smcbride@mcandrews-ip.com
`ssamz@mcandrews-ip.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket