EXHIBIT E
`
`IPR2013-00417 - Ex. 1028
`Toyota Motor Corp., Petitioner
`1
`
`

`
`Prior Art to US Patent No. 8,036,788
`
`
`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`1. A method for providing status
`data for vehicle maintenance,
`comprising:
`
`Claim 1
`US 4,369,426 to Merkel
`See, e.g., Abstract.
`
`US 4,671,111 to Lemelson
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 6-10; col. 4, l. 61 – col. 5, l. 12; Figs. 1A-3.
`
`US 4,675,675 to Corwin et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract”); col. 1, ll. 3-8; col. 5, ll. 41-62; col. 10, ll. 42-46; Fig. 1; Fig. 4.
`
`US 4,804,937 to Barbiaux et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 6-10; col. 1, ll. 30-37; col. 6, ll. 42-53; Fig. 1.
`
`US 4,897,642 to DiLullo et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 8-13; col. 1, ll. 63-66; Fig. 1.
`
`US 4,926,331 to Windle et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; Fig. 1; Fig. 32.
`
`US 5,157,610 to Asano et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 8-14.
`
`US 5,081,667 to Drori et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,223,844 to Mansell et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 6-7 Fig. 1; Fig. 4.
`
`US 5,247,564 to Zicker
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 3, ll. 33-37.
`
`
`
`1 Where possible, page, column, and/or line number citations to any foreign language references refer to the
`translated copies of those particular references produced by Toyota.
`
`-1-
`
`2
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`US 5,311,197 to Sorden et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; Figs. 1-3.
`
`US 5,334,974 to Simms et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 5, ll. 4-8; see also col. 1, ll. 6-20.
`
`US 5,394,136 to Lammers et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 44-46; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,400,018 to Scholl et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 6-9.
`
`US 5,442,553 to Parrillo
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 13-17.
`
`US 5,445,347 to Ng
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 28-65; Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,450,321 to Crane
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 17-21.
`
`US 5,475,597 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 7-11; Figs. 1-2; see also col. 4, ll. 61-64.
`
`US 5,513,107 to Gormley
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 14-16; Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,515,043 to Berard
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 8-11; Figs. 1-2; 8-14.
`
`US 5,531,122 to Chatham et al.
`See, e.g., col. 15, ll. 21-24.
`
`US 5,555,286 to Tendler
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 20-21; Fig. 1.
`
`
`-2-
`
`3
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`US 5,561,610 to Schricker
`See, e.g., Figs. 1-10, col. 1, l. 51-col. 2, l. 7. col. 8, ll. 37-46.
`
`US 5,570,087 to Lemelson
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 7-10; col. 1, ll. 15-17; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,586,130 to Doyle
`See, e.g., Abstract; Fig. 1
`
`US 5,600,558 to Mearek et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9.
`
`US 5,642,284 to Parupalli et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9.
`
`US 5,680,328 to Skorupski et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,719,771 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; Fig. 2B.
`
`US 6,546,363 to Hagenbuch
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 10-14; col. 2, ll. 12-15.
`
`DE 43 21 348 to Eichelbaum
`See, e.g., Abstract.
`
`DE 44 21 960 to Lauinger et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 3-9; Figs. 1-2.
`
`JP H01-197145 to Ishihara
`See, e.g., pp. 1-2.
`
`JP H05-332888 to Sugino
`See, e.g., ¶ 1.
`
`-3-
`
`4
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`
`JP H6-20191 to Taniguchi et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; ¶ 0020; Figs. 1-2.
`
`JP S61-89144 to Imashiro
`See, e.g., p. 1; Figs. 1-4.
`
`WO 90/03899 to Vollmer et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 1, ll. 2-3; Figs. 1-2.
`
`Aravosis, “Twenty-First Century Truck Electronics – Today’s Global Challenge,”
`Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Vol. 203
`See, e.g., pp. 5-7.
`
`Bryant, “A Review of Potential for Vehicle On-Board Diagnostic Safety Systems,”
`SAE Technical Paper 921596
`See, e.g., pp. 97-98.
`
`Cameron et al., “Intelligent Transportation System Mayday Becomes a Reality,”
`Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 Nat’l Aerospace and Electronics Conference
`See, e.g., pp. 340-345; Figs. 1-3.
`
`Fry, “Diesel Locomotive Reliability Improvement by System Monitoring,”
`Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and
`Rapid Transit
`See, e.g., p. 1; pp. 2-3.
`
`“Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems Projects,” Dept. of Transportation, US,
`1994
`See, e.g., pp. 141, 142, 152, 154, 159, 162.
`
`Numazawa, “Automotive Electronics in Passenger Cars,” Int’l Congress on
`Transport Electronics
`See, e.g., pp. 11-12.
`
`Reinhall et al., “Development of an Intelligent Air Brake Warning System for
`Commercial Vehicles,” Emerging Concepts and Products for Intelligent
`Transportation Systems, Progress Report 1, September 1994, IDEA Program,
`Tranp. Research Bd., Nat'l Research Council
`
`-4-
`
`5
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`monitoring for a triggering event on
`a vehicle having a wireless
`communications unit, the triggering
`event relating to a diagnostic or
`prognostic analysis of at least one
`of a plurality of different
`components or subsystems of the
`vehicle; and
`
`See, e.g., pp. 52-55.
`
`Richards, “Tracking for Dollars (Satellite Positioning and Communication
`Technology Usage by the Trucking Industry),” Automotive Industries
`See, e.g., pp. 1-2.
`
`Schweiger et al., “Advanced Public Transportation Systems: the State of the Art,
`Update ’94,” US Dept. of Transp. Rept. No. DOT-T-94-09
`See, e.g., pp. 48-49; p. 55; p. 72.
`
`Yuan et al., “Technology Alternatives for an Automated Collision Notification
`System,” US Dept. of Transp. Rept. No. DOT HS 808 288
`See, e.g., p. ES-1.
`
`US 4,369,426 to Merkel
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, l. 42 – col. 2, l. 2; col. 2, ll. 20-68; col. 3, l. 45 – col. 4, l.
`63; Figs. 2-3.
`
`US 4,671,111 to Lemelson
`See, e.g., col. 3, l. 52 – col. 4, l. 30; col. 4, l. 61 – col. 5, l. 12; Figs. 1A-3.
`
`US 4,675,675 to Corwin et al.
`See, e.g., col. 2, ll. 49-57; col. 5, ll. 41-62; col. 5, l. 62 – col. 6, l. 3. “); col. 7, ll. 28-
`32; col. 7, ll. 43-50; see also Abstract; col. 5, ll. 33-37; col. 6, ll. 63-68; col. 7, l. 62
`– col. 8, l. 43; col. 9, ll. 35-37; col. 9, l. 54 – col. 10, l. 2; col. 10, l. 47 – col. 11, l.
`9; Fig. 1; Figs. 4-5.
`
`US 4,804,937 to Barbiaux et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 47-56; col. 2, ll. 19-22; col. 3, ll. 46-58; col. 5, ll. 4-
`12; col. 6, ll. 42-53; Figs. 2-3; see also col. 1, ll. 6-10; col. 1, ll. 17-22; col. 2, ll.
`51-63; col. 5, ll. 19-27; col. 5, ll. 60-68.
`
`US 4,897,642 to DiLullo et al.
`See, e.g., 6:35-48; 8:26-31; 9:52-10:3; Figs. 1-2; Fig. 4.
`
`US 4,926,331 to Windle et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 13-17; col. 2, ll. 24-28; col. 2, ll. 45-52; col. 4, ll. 10-
`32; col. 7, ll. 31-40; col. 9, l. 60 – col. 10, l. 37; col. 13, ll. 47-55; Fig. 1, Fig. 32;
`see also col. 5, ll. 25-33; col. 7, ll. 8-10; col. 16, ll. 20-57; Figs. 12A-28.
`
`US 5,157,610 to Asano et al.
`
`-5-
`
`6
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, l. 8 – col. 2, l. 3; col. 2, l. 6 – col., 5, l. 7; col. 5, l. 36 –
`col. 12, l. 40; Figs. 1-11.
`
`US 5,081,667 to Drori et al.
`See, e.g., col. 4, l. 44 – col. 5, l. 17; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,223,844 to Mansell et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 7-10; col. 2, ll. 46-49; col. 2, l. 64 – col. 3, l. 7; col. 3,
`ll. 17-27; col. 3, ll. 39-57; col. 4, ll. 1-10 ; col. 4, ll. 51-60; col. 6, ll. 61-66; col. 7, ll.
`3-7; col. 7, ll. 51-55; col. 9, ll. 15-33; col. 9, ll. 43-66; col. 10, ll. 1-14; col. 10, ll.
`20-24; col. 11, ll. 7-9; col. 11, ll. 15-22; col. 11, ll. 24-66; col. 12, ll. 17-33; col. 12,
`ll. 38-42; col. 13, ll. 7-27; col. 13, ll. 38-40; col. 13, l. 66 – col. 15, l. 49; col. 16, ll.
`8-37; col. 16, ll. 39-43; col. 16, ll. 53-55; col. 17, ll. 4-19; col. 17, ll. 34-59; col. 18,
`ll. 3-17; col. 18, ll. 25-41; col. 21, ll. 23-25; col. 21, ll. 30-37; col. 21, ll. 42-44; col.
`21, ll. 49-59; col. 21, l. 66 – col. 22, l. 1; col. 22, ll. 21-37; col. 23, l. 61 – col. 24, l.
`14; col. 24, ll. 32-34; col. 24, ll. 41-44; Fig. 2A; Figs. 3-5; Fig. 8A.
`
`US 5,247,564 to Zicker
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 24-27; col. 2, ll. 61-64; col. 3, ll. 16-45; col. 6, l. 25 –
`col. 8, l. 29; col. 9, ll. 48-58; col. 13, l. 22 – col. 24, l. 36; Figs. 2-11.
`
`US 5,311,197 to Sorden et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 6, ll. 11-15; col. 6, ll. 50-64; col. 7, ll. 14-30; col. 7, l. 48 –
`col. 8, l. 5; col. 8, ll. 34-50; col. 9, ll. 11-14; Figs. 1-3.
`
`US 5,334,974 to Simms et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 6-20; col. 1, ll. 33-35; col. 3, ll. 55-65; col. 5, ll. 15-19; col. 6, ll.
`7-11; col. 6, ll. 19-30; col. 7, ll. 23-25; col. 11, ll. 65-68; Fig. 4; Fig. 6A.
`
`US 5,394,136 to Lammers et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 65-68; col. 2, ll. 21-29; col. 2, l. 62 – col. 3, l. 6; Fig.
`1.
`
`US 5,400,018 to Scholl et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 19-32; col. 1, ll. 35-37; col. 1, l. 68 – col. 2, l. 10; col.
`2, ll. 58-59; col. 3, ll. 18-29; col. 3, l. 38 – col. 4, l. 37; col. 4, ll. 40-43; col. 4, ll. 54-
`63; col. 5, l. 1 – col. 6, l. 68; col. 7, ll. 7-9; Figs. 2-9.
`
`US 5,442,553 to Parrillo
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 39-58; col. 1, ll. 47-54; col. 2, ll. 33-54; col. 3, ll. 8-
`31; col. 3, ll. 39-42; col. 3, l. 50 – col. 4, l. 64; col. 5, ll. 3-13; col. 5, ll. 16-30; Figs.
`2-3.
`
`-6-
`
`7
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`
`US 5,445,347 to Ng
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 13-19; col. 2, ll. 28-65; col. 3, ll. 15-28; col. 3, ll. 45-
`60; col. 3, ll. 61-66; col. 4, ll. 53-57; col. 5, ll. 25-47; col. 5, l. 57 – col. 6, l. 5; col.
`6, l. 6 – col. 7, l. 46; col. 7, l. 48 – col. 8, l. 65; Figs. 2-3; see also col. 5, ll. 49-56.
`
`US 5,450,321 to Crane
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 17-21; col. 2, ll. 23-56; col. 2, l. 66 – col. 4, l. 46; col.
`5, l. 24 – col. 7, l. 25; col. 7, l. 54 – col. 8, l. 67; col. 9, l. 38 – col. 10, l. 24; col. 10,
`l. 38 – col. 14, l. 13; col. 15, ll. 1-31; col. 16, ll. 31-66; Figs. 1-7.
`
`US 5,475,597 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., col. 3, ll. 12-17; col. 3, ll. 47-59; col. 4, ll. 16-21; col. 5, ll. 24-40; col. 6,
`ll. 8-14; Figs. 1-2; see also col. 2, ll. 51-61; col. 5, ll. 12-19; col. 5, l. 56 – col. 6, l.
`8.
`
`US 5,513,107 to Gormley
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 14-16; col. 1, ll. 17-35; col. 2, ll. 54-63; col. 4, ll. 13-
`18; col. 4, l. 48 - col. 5, l. 37 ; col. 5, ll. 50-54; col. 8, ll. 15-24; col. 8, ll. 37-40;
`Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,515,043 to Berard
`See, e.g., col. 3, ll. 37-43; col. 3, ll. 54-58; Figs. 2, 3, 4, 6; see also col. 5, ll. 50-
`53.
`
`US 5,531,122 to Chatham et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 7-11; col. 2, ll. 12-22; col. 2, ll. 49-52; col. 2, l. 57 –
`col. 3, l. 4; col. 4, l. 66 – col. 5, l. 4; col. 5, ll. 8-10; col. 5, ll. 36-43; col. 5, l. 62 –
`col. 13, l. 32; col. 15, ll. 33-40; Fig. 2; Figs. 9-18.
`
`US 5,555,286 to Tendler
`See, e.g., Abstract; col 2, ll. 60-67; col. 4, ll. 12-26; col. 5, ll. 5-11; col. 6, ll. 66-67;
`col. 7, ll. 22-26; Fig. 1; see also col. 6, ll. 48-53.
`
`US 5,561,610 to Schricker
`See, e.g., Abstract; Figs. 1-10, col. 1, l. 51-col. 2, l. 7; col. 2, l. 40-col. 3, l. 10; col.
`3, ll. 30-67; col. 4, ll. 16-23; col. 5, ll. 18-34; col. 8, ll. 37-46.
`
`US 5,570,087 to Lemelson
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 15-35; col. 1, l. 60 – col. 2, l. 3; col. 2, ll. 40-54; col.
`2, ll. 6-11; col. 2, l. 65 – col. 3, l. 11; col. 3, ll. 20-39; Fig. 1.
`
`-7-
`
`8
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`
`US 5,586,130 to Doyle
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 3, l. 62 – col. 4, l. 10; col. 4, ll. 40-57; col. 5, ll. 21-32; Fig.
`2; see also col. 1, ll. 63-67; col. 2, ll. 8-14; col. 5, l. 32 – col. 6, l. 27; col. 6, l. 31 -
`col. 8, l. 21.
`
`US 5,600,558 to Mearek et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9; col. 1, ll. 13-30; col. 1, l. 36 – col. 2, l. 8; col. 2, l.
`37 – col. 5, l. 59; Figs. 1-4.
`
`US 5,642,284 to Parupalli et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9; col. 1, ll. 11-32; col. 1, l. 37 – col. 2, l. 3; col. 2, l.
`29 – col. 3, l. 15; col. 3, ll. 30-32; col. 3, l. 41 – col. 5, l. 10; Figs. 1-7.
`
`US 5,680,328 to Skorupski et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-24; col. 1, l. 35 – col. 2, l. 14; col. 2, l. 37 – col. 5, l.
`20; col. 5, ll. 31-62; Figs. 1-15.
`
`US 6,546,363 to Hagenbuch
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 18-49; col. 1, ll. 60-67; col. 2, ll. 2-25; col. 2, l. 30 –
`col. 3, l. 38; col. 5, l. 61 – col. 8, l. 22; col. 8, l. 31 – col. 13, l. 67; col. 14, l. 47 –
`col. 15, l. 7; col. 17, l. 59; col. 18, ll. 49-51; col. 18, ll. 63-65; col. 19, ll. 23-26; col.
`19, ll. 49-53; col. 20, ll. 27-32; col. 20, l. 57 – col. 21, l. 33; col. 23, ll. 16-27; col.
`24, l. 23 – col. 25, l. 29; Figs. 1A-1C; Figs. 2A-2B; Figs. 3A-3C; Fig. 4; Figs. 5A-
`5B; Figs. 6A-6B; Figs. 7A-7B; Fig. 8; Fig. 10E; Figs. 11A-11C; Figs. 12A-12B.
`
`US 5,719,771 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., col. 6, ll. 43-48; col. 6, ll. 58-64; col. 7, ll. 10-17; col. 7, ll. 36-42; col. 8,
`ll. 42-50; col. 8, l. 60 – col. 9, l. 1; col. 10, ll. 11-15; col. 11, ll. 19-20; col. 11, ll. 29-
`40; col. 12, ll. 40-55; col. 23, ll. 36-39; col. 23, l. 58- col. 24, l. 13; col. 25, ll. 47-
`51;; Figs. 2A, 2B, 21 and 22.
`
`DE 43 21 348 to Eichelbaum
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 1; p. 2; p. 3; p. 4.
`
`DE 44 21 960 to Lauinger et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 2-15; see also col. 2, l. 59 – col. 3, l. 10; Figs. 1-2.
`
`JP H01-197145 to Ishihara
`See, e.g., p. 1; pp. 1-2; p. 2; p. 3; p. 4; p. 5; p. 6; p. 7; p. 8.
`
`
`-8-
`
`9
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`JP H05-332888 to Sugino
`See, e.g., ¶ “Claims”; ¶ 1; ¶ 2; ¶ 3; ¶ 6; ¶ 7; ¶ 9; ¶ 10; ¶ 12; ¶ 15; ¶ 16; ¶ 17; ¶ 19;
`¶ 30.
`
`JP H6-20191 to Taniguchi et al.
`See, e.g., ¶ 0010; ¶ 0016; ¶ 0018; Figs. 1-2; see also ¶ 0023; ¶ 0024; ¶ 0025.
`
`JP S61-89144 to Imashiro
`See, e.g., pp. 1-3; Figs. 1-4.
`
`WO 90/03899 to Vollmer et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 2, l. 30 – p. 3, l. 6; p. 5, ll. 16-23; p. 6, ll. 18-25; p. 7, l. 16 –
`p. 8, l. 14; Figs. 1-2; see also p. 4, l. 20 – p. 5, l. 4.
`
`Aravosis, “Twenty-First Century Truck Electronics – Today’s Global Challenge,”
`Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Vol. 203
`See, e.g.,pp. 5-8.
`
`Bryant, “A Review of Potential for Vehicle On-Board Diagnostic Safety Systems,”
`SAE Technical Paper 921596
`See, e.g., p. 97; p. 98; p. 99; p. 100; pp. 100-101; p. 101; pp. 101-102; p. 102; p.
`103; p. 104.
`
`Cameron et al., “Intelligent Transportation System Mayday Becomes a Reality,”
`Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 Nat’l Aerospace and Electronics Conference
`See, e.g., pp. 340-345; Figs. 1-3.
`
`Fry, “Diesel Locomotive Reliability Improvement by System Monitoring,”
`Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and
`Rapid Transit
`See, e.g., p. 3; p. 8; see also pp. 5-7; Abstract; Fig. 4.
`
`“Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems Projects,” Dept. of Transportation, US,
`1994
`See, e.g., pp. 141, 142, 152, 154, 159, 162.
`
`Numazawa, “Automotive Electronics in Passenger Cars,” Int’l Congress on
`Transport Electronics
`See, e.g., p. 11; p. 12; p. 13; p. 14; p. 16; p. 18; p. 19; p. 20; p. 21-23; Figs. 2-4;
`Figs. 6-8; Figs. 10-12; Figs. 14-15; Figs. 17-19; Figs. 21-24; Table 1.
`
`-9-
`
`10
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`initiating a wireless transmission
`between the communications unit
`and a remote site separate and
`apart from the vehicle in response
`to the triggering event, the
`transmission including a diagnostic
`or prognostic message about the at
`least one component or subsystem.
`
`
`Reinhall et al., “Development of an Intelligent Air Brake Warning System for
`Commercial Vehicles,” Emerging Concepts and Products for Intelligent
`Transportation Systems, Progress Report 1, September 1994, IDEA Program,
`Tranp. Research Bd., Nat'l Research Council
`See, e.g., pp. 52-55.
`
`Richards, “Tracking for Dollars (Satellite Positioning and Communication
`Technology Usage by the Trucking Industry),” Automotive Industries
`See, e.g., pp. 1-2.
`
`Schweiger et al., “Advanced Public Transportation Systems: the State of the Art,
`Update ’94,” US Dept. of Transp. Rept. No. DOT-T-94-09
`See, e.g., p. 48; p. 52; p. 55; p. 58; p. 60; p. 72.
`
`Yuan et al., “Technology Alternatives for an Automated Collision Notification
`System,” US Dept. of Transp. Rept. No. DOT HS 808 288
`See, e.g., pp. ES-1-2; p. ES-4; ES-6; pp. 1-1-3; pp. 2-1-7; p. 3-1; p. 3-14; p. 4-5;
`p. 4-11; p. 4-7; p. 4-27; p. 5-4; p. 5-7; p. 5-8; p. 6-1; pp. 6-3-4; pp. B-1-3; pp. C-1-
`9; pp. D-1-44.
`
`US 4,369,426 to Merkel
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-8; col. 1, l. 35 – col. 2, l. 24; col. 2, l. 44 – col. 3, l.
`12; col. 3, l. 45 – col. 4, l. 63; Figs. 1-3.
`
`US 4,671,111 to Lemelson
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 57-61; col. 2, ll. 34-44; col. 3, l. 52 – col. 4, l. 30;
`Figs. 1A-3.
`
`US 4,675,675 to Corwin et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 3-8; col. 2, l. 49 – col. 3, l. 5; col. 5, ll. 41-62; col. 6, ll. 35-38;
`col. 10, ll. 9-23; col. 10, ll. 30-41; see also Abstract; col. 6, ll. 4-16; col. 11, ll. 10-
`20; Fig. 1; Figs. 4-5.
`
`US 4,804,937 to Barbiaux et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, l. 62 – col. 2, l. 3; col. 3, ll. 1-9; Figs. 1-2; see also col.
`1, ll. 6-10; col. 3, ll. 28-32; col. 3, ll. 41-44.
`
`US 4,897,642 to DiLullo et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, 10-13; col. 2, ll. 10-13; col. 2, ll. 30-64; col. 3, ll. 8-13;
`col. 3, ll. 19-40; col. 4, l. 61 – col. 5, l. 2; col. 5, l. 41 – col. 6, l. 34; col. 6, ll. 40-65;
`col. 9, ll. 56-64; col. 10, ll. 31-50; col. 10, ll. 57-68; col. 12, ll. 5-16; col. 12, ll. 36-
`55; col. 12, ll. 60-68; col. 13, ll. 6-56; Figs. 1-2; Fig. 6; Figs. 9B-9C.
`
`-10-
`
`11
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`
`US 4,926,331 to Windle et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 20-22; col. 2, ll. 55-60; col. 3, ll. 60-65; col. 4, ll. 33-46; col. 13,
`ll. 47-55; Fig. 1; Fig. 32; see also col. 2, ll. 18-20; col. 12, ll. 26-32; col. 18, ll. 51-
`57.
`
`US 5,157,610 to Asano et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 8-14; col. 2, l. 6 – col., 5, l. 7; col. 5, l. 36 – col. 12, l.
`40; Fig. 1; Figs. 3-11.
`
`US 5,081,667 to Drori et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 50-54; 17, ll. 3-10; col. 17, ll. 28-45; col. 18, ll. 5-12;
`Figs. 4(a)-4(d), 8(a)-8(e), 10(a)-10(e), 10(g)-10(z).
`
`US 5,223,844 to Mansell et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 11-13; col. 1, ll. 57-68; col. 2, ll. 31-51; col. 2, l. 55 –
`col. 4, l. 39; col. 4, l. 45 – col. 5, l. 9; col. 6, ll. 31-39; col. 6, l. 54 – col. 7, l. 2; col.
`7, ll. 13-22; col. 7, ll. 32-40; col. 7, ll. 51-55; col. 7, l. 64 – col. 8, l. 6; col. 8, ll. 23-
`27; col. 8, l. 60 – col. 9, l. 5; col. 9, ll. 14-35; col. 10, ll. 25-42; col. 10, l. 55 – col.
`11, l. 4; col. 11, ll. 35-42; col. 11, ll. 50-52; col. 13, ll. 38-65; col. 14, ll. 6-9; col.
`14, ll. 12-16; col. 14, ll. 26-57; col. 15, ll. 17-32; col. 15, ll. 49-53; col. 16, ll. 38-43;
`col. 16, ll. 53-62; col. 17, ll. 34-38; col. 18, ll. 8-18; col. 18, ll. 29-49; col. 18, l. 50
`– col. 21, l. 48; col. 21, l. 60 – col. 22, l. 1; col. 22, ll. 11-14; col. 22, ll. 21-37; col.
`22, ll. 51-61; col. 23, l. 4 – col. 24, l. 47; col. 26, ll. 49-53; col. 30, ll. 63-68; Fig. 1;
`Figs. 2A-2B; Figs. 3-7; Figs. 8A-8B; Fig. 9.
`
`US 5,247,564 to Zicker
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 24-27; col. 1, ll. 47-65; col. 2, ll. 61-64; col. 3, ll. 8-
`12; col. 3, ll. 16-45; col. 4, l. 45 – col. 6, l. 34; col. 18, l. 4 – col. 24, l. 36; Figs. 1-
`2; Fig. 12.
`
`US 5,311,197 to Sorden et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 5, ll. 18-28; col. 6, ll. 23-33; col. 7, ll. 14-30; col. 8, ll. 6-
`25; col. 8, ll. 30-33; col. 9, ll. 18-21; Figs. 1-3; see also col. 7, ll. 31-38.
`
`US 5,334,974 to Simms et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 6-20; col. 3, ll. 55-65; col. 5, ll. 19-24; col. 6, ll. 7-18; col. 7, ll.
`23-30; col. 12, ll. 7-29; Fig. 1; Fig. 4; Fig. 6A; see also Abstract; col. 3, ll. 21-36;
`col. 9, ll. 11-13.
`
`US 5,394,136 to Lammers et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 47-49; col. 1, l. 68 – col. 7, l. 3; col. 2, ll. 29-35; col. 2, l. 62 –
`col. 3, l. 6; Fig. 1.
`
`-11-
`
`12
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`
`US 5,400,018 to Scholl et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 6-9; col. 1, ll. 41-58; col. 1, l. 65 – col. 2, l. 10; col. 2,
`ll. 40-42; col. 2, ll. 45-47; col. 2, ll. 59-61; col. 3, ll. 30-47; col. 3, ll. 58-60; col. 4, ll.
`38-40; col. 4, ll. 43-46; col. 4, ll. 61-65; col. 5, ll. 31-33; col. 6, ll. 19-23; col. 6, ll.
`31-33; col. 6, ll. 38-43; col. 6, ll. 45-52; col. 6, ll. 55-57; col. 6, l. 68 – col. 7, l. 1;
`col. 7, ll. 6-7; col. 7, ll. 9-10; Figs. 1-3; Figs. 7-9.
`
`US 5,442,553 to Parrillo
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 28-30; col. 1, ll. 34-38; col. 1, ll. 39-58; col. 2, ll. 10-
`31; col. 3, ll. 39-53; col. 4, ll. 15-29; col. 4, l. 60 – col. 5, l. 46; Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,445,347 to Ng
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 20-27; col. 3, ll. 29-34; col. 4, l. 61 – col. 5, l. 5; Figs.
`1-3.
`
`US 5,450,321 to Crane
`See, e.g., col. 8, ll. 29-40; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,475,597 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., col. 3, ll. 47-59; col. 4, ll. 16-21; col. 4, ll. 46-53; col. 5, ll. 44-50; col. 6,
`ll. 24-28; Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,513,107 to Gormley
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 54-63; col. 4, ll. 18-21; col. 8, ll. 25-36; Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,515,043 to Berard
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 22-26; col. 2, ll. 38-41; col. 3, ll. 58-63; col. 4, ll. 35-
`48; Figs. 1-2; Figs. 8-14; see also col. 4, ll. 49-58; col. 5, l. 50 – col. 6, l. 5.
`
`US 5,531,122 to Chatham et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 63-65; col. 2, ll. 5-11; col. 2, ll. 52-56; col. 4, l. 66 – col. 5, l. 4;
`col. 5, ll. 44-61; col. 10, ll. 12-17; col. 13, ll. 9-14; col. 14, ll. 20-23; col. 14, ll. 38-
`42; col. 15, ll. 24-27; col. 15, ll. 50-59; Fig. 2.
`
`US 5,555,286 to Tendler
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 4, ll. 12-26; col. 5, ll. 11-21; col. 6, ll. 17-21; col. 6, l. 67 –
`col. 7, l. 5; Fig. 1; see also col. 4, l. 66 – col. 5, l. 5; col. 6, ll. 54-60.
`
`US 5,561,610 to Schricker
`
`-12-
`
`13
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`See, e.g., Abstract; Figs. 1-10, col. 1, l. 51-col. 2, l. 7; col. 2, l. 40-col. 3, l. 10; col.
`3, ll. 30-67; col. 4, ll. 16-23; col. 5, ll. 18-34; col. 8, ll. 37-46.
`
`US 5,570,087 to Lemelson
`See, e.g. Abstract; col. 1, ll. 37-51; col. 2, ll. 6-11; col. 2, l. 65 – col. 3, l. 11; col. 3,
`ll. 50-61; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,586,130 to Doyle
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 1-5; col. 3, ll. 8-50;col. 4, ll. 4-10; Fig. 2; see also
`col. 2, ll. 16-41; col. 6, ll. 27-30.
`
`US 5,600,558 to Mearek et al.
`See, e.g., col. 2, ll. 47-50; col. 3, ll. 38-49; col. 5, ll. 25-59; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,642,284 to Parupalli et al.
`See, e.g., col. 2, ll. 39-42; col. 3, ll. 30-41; Fig. 1.
`
`US 5,680,328 to Skorupski et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-8; col. 1, ll. 35-60; col. 2, ll. 20-24; col. 4, l. 66 –
`col. 5, l. 3; col. 5, ll. 27-30; col. 5, l. 48 – col. 6, l. 3; Fig.1.
`
`US 6,546,363 to Hagenbuch
`See, e.g., col. 7, ll. 18-20; col. 7, ll. 36-46; Fig. 2A; Fig. 8.
`
`US 5,719,771 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 6, ll. 53-55; col. 7, ll. 1-5; col. 7, ll. 10-17; col. 7, ll. 42-44;
`col. 7, l. 68 – col. 8, l. 2; col. 8, ll. 48-50; col. 9, ll. 1-5; col. 10, ll. 11-26; col. 11, ll.
`29-31; col. 11, ll. 41-52; col. 12, ll. 12-18; col. 12, ll. 40-48; col. 12, ll. 56-58; col.
`12, l. 65-col. 13., l. 1; col. 13, ll. 16-25; col. 18, ll. 42-62; col. 23, ll. 2-4; col. 23, ll.
`36-39; col. 25, ll. 47-52; col. 26, ll. 31-35; Fig. 1, Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, Fig. 3, Fig. 20,
`Fig. 21, Fig. 22.
`
`DE 43 21 348 to Eichelbaum
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 1; p. 2; p. 3; p. 4.
`
`DE 44 21 960 to Lauinger et al.
`See, e.g., col. 1, ll. 3-9; col. 1, ll. 34-43; col. 2, ll. 16-29; see also col. 2, l. 59 –
`col. 3, l. 10; Figs. 1-2.
`
`
`-13-
`
`14
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`JP H01-197145 to Ishihara
`See, e.g., p. 1; pp. 1-2; p. 2; p. 3; p. 4; p. 5; p. 6; p. 7; p. 8.
`
`JP H05-332888 to Sugino
`See, e.g., “Claims”; ¶ 1; ¶ 3; ¶ 4; ¶ 6; ¶ 7; ¶ 9; ¶ 10; ¶ 12; ¶ 13; ¶ 15; ¶ 18; ¶ 21;
`¶ 26; ¶ 27; ¶ 29; ¶ 30; “Description of the Reference Numerals”); “Translation of
`Drawings”.
`
`JP H6-20191 to Taniguchi et al.
`See, e.g., ¶ 0016; ¶ 0019; ¶ 0020; ¶ 0031; ¶ 0037; Figs. 1-2; see also ¶¶ 0026,
`0034, 0035.
`
`JP S61-89144 to Imashiro
`See, e.g., pp. 2-3; Figs. 1-4.
`
`WO 90/03899 to Vollmer et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 2, ll. 15-18; p. 2, l. 30 – p. 3, l. 6; p. 4, ll. 15-19; p. 5, ll. 24-
`29; p. 5, l. 26- p. 7, l. 11; col. 8, l. 28 – p. 9, l. 4; Figs. 1-3; see also p. 4, ll. 3-8.
`
`Aravosis, “Twenty-First Century Truck Electronics – Today’s Global Challenge,”
`Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Vol. 203
`See, e.g., p. 6; p. 8.
`
`Cameron et al., “Intelligent Transportation System Mayday Becomes a Reality,”
`Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 Nat’l Aerospace and Electronics Conference
`See, e.g., pp. 340-345; Figs. 1-3.
`
`Fry, “Diesel Locomotive Reliability Improvement by System Monitoring,”
`Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and
`Rapid Transit
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 1; p. 2; p. 3; p. 5; p. 7; p. 8; see also p. 4; Figs. 4-6.
`
`“Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems Projects,” Dept. of Transportation, US,
`1994
`See, e.g., pp. 141, 142, 152, 154, 159, 162.
`
`Reinhall et al., “Development of an Intelligent Air Brake Warning System for
`Commercial Vehicles,” Emerging Concepts and Products for Intelligent
`Transportation Systems, Progress Report 1, September 1994, IDEA Program,
`Tranp. Research Bd., Nat'l Research Council
`
`-14-
`
`15
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`
`3. The method of claim 1,
`
`wherein the triggering event is a
`failure, predicted failure or fault
`code generation of the at least one
`component or subsystem.
`
`See, e.g., pp. 52-55.
`
`Richards, “Tracking for Dollars (Satellite Positioning and Communication
`Technology Usage by the Trucking Industry),” Automotive Industries
`See, e.g., pp. 1-2.
`
`Schweiger et al., “Advanced Public Transportation Systems: the State of the Art,
`Update ’94,” US Dept. of Transp. Rept. No. DOT-T-94-09
`See, e.g., p. 48; p. 52; p. 55; p. 58; p. 60; p. 72.
`
`Yuan et al., “Technology Alternatives for an Automated Collision Notification
`System,” US Dept. of Transp. Rept. No. DOT HS 808 288
`See, e.g., pp. ES-1-7; pp. 1-1-3; pp. 2-4-7; pp. 4-1-28; pp. 6-2-4.
`Claim 3
`See above discussion of claim 1.
`
`US 4,675,675 to Corwin et al.
`See, e.g., col. 2, ll. 49-57; col. 5, ll. 41-62; col. 5, l. 62 – col. 6, l. 3. “); col. 7, ll. 28-
`32; col. 7, ll. 43-50; see also Abstract; col. 5, ll. 33-37; col. 6, ll. 63-68; col. 7, l. 62
`– col. 8, l. 43; col. 9, ll. 35-37; col. 9, l. 54 – col. 10, l. 2; col. 10, l. 47 – col. 11, l.
`9; Fig. 1; Figs. 4-5.
`
`US 4,804,937 to Barbiaux et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 47-56; col. 2, ll. 19-22; col. 3, ll. 46-58; col. 5, ll. 4-
`12; col. 6, ll. 42-53; Figs. 2-3; see also col. 1, ll. 6-10; col. 1, ll. 17-22; col. 2, ll.
`51-63; col. 5, ll. 19-27; col. 5, ll. 60-68.
`
`US 4,897,642 to DiLullo et al.
`See, e.g., 6:35-48; 8:26-31; 9:52-10:3; Figs. 1-2.; Fig. 4.
`
`US 4,926,331 to Windle et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 13-17; col. 2, ll. 24-28; col. 2, ll. 45-52; col. 4, ll. 10-
`32”; col. 7, ll. 31-40; col. 9, l. 60 – col. 10, l. 37; col. 13, ll. 47-55; Fig. 1; Fig. 32;
`see also col. 5, ll. 25-33; col. 7, ll. 8-10; col. 16, ll. 20-57; Figs. 12A-28.
`
`US 5,157,610 to Asano et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, l. 8 – col. 2, l. 3; col. 2, l. 6 – col., 5, l. 7; col. 5, l. 36 –
`col. 12, l. 40; Figs. 1-11.
`
`US 5,223,844 to Mansell et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 7-10; col. 2, ll. 46-49; col. 2, l. 64 – col. 3, l. 7; col. 3,
`
`-15-
`
`16
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`ll. 17-27; col. 3, ll. 39-57; col. 4, ll. 1-10 ; col. 4, ll. 51-60; col. 6, ll. 61-66; col. 7, ll.
`3-7; col. 7, ll. 51-55; col. 9, ll. 15-33; col. 9, ll. 43-66; col. 10, ll. 1-14; col. 10, ll.
`20-24; col. 11, ll. 7-9; col. 11, ll. 15-22; col. 11, ll. 24-66; col. 12, ll. 17-33; col. 12,
`ll. 38-42; col. 13, ll. 7-27; col. 13, ll. 38-40; col. 13, l. 66 – col. 15, l. 49; col. 16, ll.
`8-37; col. 16, ll. 39-43; col. 16, ll. 53-55; col. 17, ll. 4-19; col. 17, ll. 34-59; col. 18,
`ll. 3-17; col. 18, ll. 25-41; col. 21, ll. 23-25; col. 21, ll. 30-37; col. 21, ll. 42-44; col.
`21, ll. 49-59; col. 21, l. 66 – col. 22, l. 1; col. 22, ll. 21-37; col. 23, l. 61 – col. 24, l.
`14; col. 24, ll. 32-34; col. 24, ll. 41-44; Fig. 2A; Figs. 3-5; Fig. 8A.
`
`US 5,400,018 to Scholl et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, l. 68 – col. 2, l. 4; col. 3, ll. 61-65; col. 4, ll. 5-53; col. 5,
`l. 36 – col. 6, l. 27; col. 6, l. 61 – col. 7, l. 5; Figs. 2-9.
`
`US 5,442,553 to Parrillo
`See, e.g., col. 4, ll. 30-50.
`
`US 5,445,347 to Ng
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 2, ll. 13-19; col. 2, ll. 28-65; col. 4, ll. 53-57; col. 5, ll. 25-
`47; col. 5, l. 57 – col. 6, l. 5; col. 6, l. 6 – col. 7, l. 46; col. 7, l. 48 – col. 8, l. 65;
`Figs. 2-3; see also col. 5, ll. 49-56.
`
`US 5,450,321 to Crane
`See, e.g., col. 6, ll. 46-52; col. 9, ll. 36-38; col. 10, ll. 57-60; col. 11, ll. 64-66; col.
`12, ll. 64-68; col. 13, ll. 4-7; col. 18, ll. 43-46.
`
`US 5,513,107 to Gormley
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 14-16; col. 1, ll. 17-35; col. 2, ll. 54-63; col. 4, ll. 13-
`18; col. 4, l. 48 - col. 5, l. 37 ; col. 8, ll. 37-40; Figs. 1-2.
`
`US 5,531,122 to Chatham et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 7-11; col. 2, ll. 12-22; col. 2, ll. 49-52; col. 2, l. 57 –
`col. 3, l. 4; col. 4, l. 66 – col. 5, l. 4; col. 5, ll. 8-10; col. 5, ll. 36-43; col. 5, l. 62 –
`col. 13, l. 32; col. 15, ll. 33-40; Fig. 2; Figs. 9-18.
`
`US 5,561,610 to Schricker
`See, e.g., Abstract; Figs. 1-10, col. 1, l. 51-col. 2, l. 7; col. 2, l. 40-col. 3, l. 10; col.
`3, ll. 30-67; col. 4, ll. 16-23; col. 5, ll. 18-col. 8, l. 36; col. 8, ll. 37-46.
`
`US 5,586,130 to Doyle
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 3, l. 62 – col. 4, l. 10; Fig. 2; see also col. 1, ll. 63-67; col.
`2, ll. 8-14; col. 5, l. 32 – col. 6, l. 27; col. 6, l. 31 - col. 8, l. 21.
`
`
`-16-
`
`17
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`US 5,600,558 to Mearek et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9; col. 1, ll. 13-30; col. 1, l. 36 – col. 2, l. 8; col. 2, l.
`37 – col. 5, l. 59; Figs. 1-4.
`
`US 5,642,284 to Parupalli et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-9; col. 1, ll. 11-32; col. 1, l. 37 – col. 2, l. 3; col. 2, l.
`29 – col. 3, l. 15; col. 3, ll. 30-32; col. 3, l. 41 – col. 5, l. 10; Figs. 1-7.
`
`US 5,680,328 to Skorupski et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 5-24; col. 1, l. 35 – col. 2, l. 14; col. 2, l. 37 – col. 5, l.
`20; col. 5, ll. 31-62; Figs. 1-15.
`
`US 6,546,363 to Hagenbuch
`See, e.g., Abstract; col. 1, ll. 18-29; col. 2, ll. 30-47; col. 2, l. 61 – col. 3, l. 38; col.
`6, ll. 1-5; col. 6, l. 15 – col. 7, l. 6;; col. 7, ll. 41-46; col. 7, l. 57 – col. 8, l. 22; col.
`9, l. 45 – col. 13, l. 67; col. 24, l. 42 – col. 25, l. 30; Fig. 2A; Fig. 2B; Fig. 5A; Fig.
`6A; Fig. 7A; Fig. 10A: Fig. 12B.
`
`US 5,719,771 to Buck et al.
`See, e.g., col. 6, ll. 43-48; col. 6, ll. 58-64; col. 7, ll. 36-42; col. 8, ll. 42-50; col. 26,
`ll. 10-15; Figs. 2A, 2B, 21 and 22.
`
`DE 43 21 348 to Eichelbaum
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 1; p. 2; p. 3; p. 4.
`
`JP H01-197145 to Ishihara
`See, e.g., p. 1; pp. 1-2; p. 2; p. 3; p. 4; p. 5; p. 6; p. 7; p. 9.
`
`JP H05-332888 to Sugino
`See, e.g., ¶ “Claims”; ¶ 1; ¶ 3; ¶ 6; ¶ 9; ¶ 10; ¶ 12; ¶ 13; ¶ 16; ¶ 17; ¶ 18; ¶ 19; ¶
`20; ¶ 27; ¶ 30; “Translation of Drawings”.
`
`JP S61-89144 to Imashiro
`See, e.g., pp. 1-3; Figs. 1-4.
`
`WO 90/03899 to Vollmer et al.
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 7, l. 16 – p. 8, l. 14.
`
`Aravosis, “Twenty-First Century Truck Electronics – Today’s Global Challenge,”
`
`-17-
`
`18
`
`

`
`’788 Patent Claim Limitations
`
`4. A system for providing status
`data for vehicle maintenance
`
`Disclosure in the Prior Art1
`Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Vol. 203
`See, e.g., pp. 5-7.
`
`Bryant, “A Review of Potential for Vehicle On-Board Diagnostic Safety Systems,”
`SAE Technical Paper 921596
`See, e.g., p. 97; p. 98; p. 99; p. 100; pp. 100-101; p. 101; pp. 101-102; p. 102; p.
`103; p. 104.
`
`Fry, “Diesel Locomotive Reliability Improvement by System Monitoring,”
`Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and
`Rapid Transit
`See, e.g., Abstract; p. 5; pp. 4-8; see also p. 1; Fig 4.
`
`“Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems Projects,” Dept. of Transportation, US,
`1994
`See, e.g., pp. 141, 142, 152, 154, 159, 162.
`
`Numazawa, “Automotive Electronics