throbber
CYAN EXHIBIT 1030
`
`MAY 1979 Vol. 18/5
`
`Investigative Ophthalmology
`& Visual Science
`
`A Journal of Clinical and Basic Research
`
`
`Articles
`
`Structural and biochemical changes in
`vitamin A—deficient rat retinas
`
`Louvenia Carter-Dawson, Toichiro Kuwabara, Paul]. O’Brien, and John G. Bieri*
`
`The levels of rhodopsin and opsi n were investigated in relation to the maintenance of retinal
`structure in retinas of vitamin A—deficient rats reared in low levels of cyclic illumination (1.5 to
`2 foot-candles). Rhodopsin levels decreased in the deficient retinas to approximately 20% of
`control at 9 weeks, and this level was retained through 39 weeks on the deficient diet. Opsin
`levels decreased at a slower rate but reached about 20% of control levels at 32 weeks. Despite
`the decrease in rhodopsin levels, obvious deterioration of disc structure was not observed
`until 16 weeks of deficiency, when opsin levels had already decreased to 60% to 70% of control.
`The structural disruption of photoreceptor outer segments was localized initially in discs
`of the distal
`third. Rod cell degeneration preceded cone cell degeneration in vitamin
`A—deficient retinas. Most of the rods and cones persisted in the posterior retina at 23 weeks on
`the deficient diet; however, by 40 weeks, only 11% of the rod nuclei remained. In contrast,
`about 63% of the cone nuclei were present at 40 weeks of deficiency. The photoreceptor cells
`were affected by the deficiency to a greater extent in the inferior hemisphere than in the
`superior hemisphere of the eye.
`
`Key words: vitamin A deficiency, photoreceptor degeneration, rat, rhodopsin,
`opsin, rods, cones
`
`Vitamin A deficiency has been shown to
`produce biochemical, morphological,
`and
`physiological changes in the retina. In rat ret—
`inas,
`the first sign of the deficiency, night
`
`
`
`From the Laboratory of Vision Research, National Eye
`Institute, and *National Institute of Arthritis, Metal)-
`olism and Digestive Diseases, National Institutes of
`Health, Bethesda, Md.
`Submitted for publication June 12, 1978.
`Reprint
`requests: Louvenia Carter-Dawson, Ph.D.,
`Building 6, Room 201, National Institutes of Health,
`Bethesda, Md. 20014.
`
`blindness, was determined by the rise in
`threshold for eliciting the electroretinogram
`(ERG). This rise in threshold was directly re-
`lated to a decrease in the level of rhodopsin
`detected by 4 to 5 weeks on the dietary reg-
`imen. "4 By 10 months, no response could be
`elicited from retinas of the deficient rats."2
`Structural deterioration of outer and inner
`
`segments occurred" 5‘3 as well as degenera-
`tion of photoreceptor nuclei."3’ 7’ 9
`Several studies have shown the presence of
`cone photoreceptors in the rat retina.”—l3
`Cone photoreceptor cells are affected to a
`
`437
`
`

`

`438 Carter-Dawson et (ll.
`
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.
`May 1979
`
`lesser extentin some experimental lesionsw’ ‘4
`and some genetic disorders in several spe-
`cies.‘5"8 The present study was designed to
`compare the rate of rod and cone degenera-
`tion and the ultrastructural deterioration of
`
`outer segments associated with decreasing
`levels of rhodopsin and opsin in vitamin
`A-deficient rat retinas.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Animals. In order to accelerate the depletion of
`retinol from the experimental animals, pregnant
`female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a vitamin
`A—deficient diet (basal diet*) 7 days prior to deliv-
`ery and throughout lactation. This procedure re~
`sults in ofl‘spring with normal blood levels of ret—
`inol, but with reduced liver stores and thus an
`earlier onset of tissue depletion (Bieri, unpub-
`lished observations). The male offspring were
`weaned at 21 days of age and divided into three
`groups:
`(1) basal diet,
`(2) basal diet plus retinyl
`palmitate (4 mg/kg diet) at 21 days of age, and (3)
`basal diet plus retinoic acid at 35 days ofage. The
`supplement in group 3 was delayed for 2 weeks
`after weaning to prevent the known sparing of tis-
`sue retinol by retinoic acid.“ All rats were main-
`tained at a temperature of about 24° C with 12 hr
`cyclic illumination of 1.5 to 2 foot-candles.
`Rhoclopsin and opsin measurements. Rats were
`dark-adapted overnight, and the eyes were enu-
`cleated under ether anesthesia in dim red light.
`After rinsing in physiological saline, the lens and
`vitreous were removed through a slit in the cor—
`nea. To prevent loss of retinal tissue in dissection,
`the whole eye cup from a given rat was homoge-
`nized in 1 ml of phosphate buffer (66 mM, pH
`7.1).
`rhodopsin measurement, 10 pd of the
`For
`nonionic detergent Emulphogene BC 720 (Gen-
`eral Aniline and Film) was added to each sample
`and allowed to stand for 1 hr at room temperature.
`However,
`for opsin measurements, both control
`and deficient retina homogenates were bleached
`for 10 min with 60 foot-candles of white light, and
`0.1 pmol of 9-cis-retinal was added to each
`homogenate in the dark.22 Each sample with reti-
`nal was incubated for 5 hr at room temperature
`
`*Percentage composition: vitamin-free casein, 20; DL-
`methionine, 0.3; cellulose, 5.0; corn oil, 5.0; AIN-76
`mineral mix,l9 3.5; vitamin mix-3 without retinol,20 2.0;
`sucrose, 64.2. DL-a-Tocopheryl acetate was added at
`20 mg/kg.
`
`before another 0.1 mnol 9-cis-retinal was added.
`These mixtures were incubated at 4° C overnight.
`On the following day, the samples were warmed to
`room temperature for 30 min and incubated with
`10 (11 of Emulphogene for 1 hr. All samples were
`centrifuged at 25,000 X g for 15 min to clarify the
`rhodopsin or isorhodopsin extracts. To each sam-
`ple, 0.1 ml of hydroxylamine (0.1M, pH 7.2) was
`added. A Beckman Acta II spectrophotometer was
`used to scan the absorption spectra of the extracts
`before and after exposure to white light of about 60
`foot-candles for 10 min. With the procedure de-
`scribed above for extraction of rat rhodopsin, the
`absorption peak was 493 nm as previously de—
`scribed. 23 The changes in absorbance at 493 or 485
`nm after bleaching was taken as a measure of
`rhodopsin or isorhodopsin (i.e., opsin) content, re-
`spectively. Results were expressed as percentage
`of control values. Opsin was determined by the
`above bleaching and regeneration procedure to
`provide a control, to ensure that regeneration ac-
`tually could occur and to compensate for variation
`in the degree of regeneration from one experiment
`to the other.
`
`Histological procedures. The eyes were enu-
`cleated from some rats of each group between 4
`and 40 weeks. All eyes were fixed by immersion in
`4% glutaraldehyde in 0.15M Na-K phosphate buf-
`fer at room temperature for about 80 min. Portions
`of the posterior eye cup,
`including the retina,
`were excised from the inferior hemisphere within
`2 mm of the optic nerve head. In the peripheral
`region of the same hemisphere, segments approx-
`imately 2 mm in length were excised. These seg—
`ments were postfixed with 1% osmium in the
`Na—K phosphate buH‘er for 30 min at room tem—
`perature and 30 to 45 min at 4° C. The tissue was
`processed for embedding in Epon. For light ini-
`croscopy, sections were cut at 1 to 1.5 pm and
`stained with a solution of 1% toluidine blue in 1%
`tetraborate buffer. Ultrathin sections, stained with
`uranyl acetate and lead citrate, were examined
`with an electron microscope.
`Counts of rod and cone nuclei were made in the
`
`posterior and peripheral retina of the inferior
`hemisphere. Rod and cone nuclei were distin-
`guished by their nuclear morphology. Cone nuclei
`contain multiple small clumps of heterochromatin,
`and rod nuclei contain a large central clump. ‘0' “‘ ”
`In the posterior and peripheral regions, seven
`consecutive segments 90 pm in length were exam-
`ined in each of four sections. Counts were made
`
`within 2 mm of the optic nerve head in the
`posterior retina and beginning 180 pan from the
`ora serrata moving posteriorly in the peripheral
`
`

`

`Volu me 18
`Number 5
`
`Vitamin A—(leficie-nt rat retinas
`
`439
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Weigh!ingrams
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`IO
`
`12
`
`14
`
`o—c Basal diet 4‘ vetinyl pulmitale
`o—o Basal diet 0 retinoic add
`I—- Basal diet
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`2E
`
`30
`
`32
`
`,1
`
`20
`IO
`6
`Week: an die!
`
`Fig. 1. Weight of rats on basal diet, basal diet + retinoic acid, and basal diet + retinyl
`palmitate. Each point represents the mean weight of 4 to 8 animals.
`
`retina. The numbers of rod and cone nuclei were
`
`first 2 weeks of the diet. Around the third
`
`recorded in each region, and the mean, standard
`error of the mean, and percentage of remaining
`rod and cone nuclei were calculated.
`To compare the elTects of the deficiency on the
`four quadrants of retina, eyes from two rats sup-
`plemented with retinoic acid were examined at 36
`weeks on the diet. The left eyes were bisected
`through the optic nerve along the vertical merid-
`ian and the right eyes along the horizontal merid-
`ian after fixation in glutaraldehyde. Portions of the
`cornea were removed to indicate inferior and nasal
`hemispheres. The half hemispheres were post-
`fixed and embedded in Epon as described above.
`Sections were cut to include the cornea; thus, in a
`given section,
`temporal and nasal regions or in-
`ferior and superior regions were present. Seven
`consecutive segments, 90 am in length, were ex—
`amined in each of four sections beginning 180 pm
`from the era serrata moving posteriorly. The
`number of photoreceptor cells was recorded for
`each region, and the mean and standard error of
`the mean were calculated.
`
`Results
`
`three groups
`in all
`Animals. Animals
`gained weight at about the same rate for the
`
`week, rats in the group receiving only the
`basal diet weighed approximately 20 gm less
`than those supplemented with retinoic acid
`or retinyl palmitate. Rats fed only the basal
`diet also showed porphyrin around their
`eyes. By 4 weeks, many animals lost weight
`(Fig. I), became lethargic, and showed hind
`limb weakness. All rats in this group were
`sacrificed by the fifth week. Rats in the other
`two groups continued to gain weight. Those
`supplemented with retinoic acid did not gain
`as much as the ones supplemented with ret-
`inyl palmitate (control group) beginning at 8
`weeks on the diet through the period stud—
`ied. These differences in weight were not
`statistically significant (mean i- S.D.: plus
`retinoic acid 481 t 47 gm; plus retinyl pal-
`mitate, 521 i 53; p > 0.2). Rats maintained
`with retinoic acid appeared as healthy as
`those supplemented with retinyl palmitate.
`Rhodopsin and opsin levels. The amount of
`rhodopsin in the retinas of vitamin A-
`deficient rats (plus retinoic acid) was below
`control levels as early as 2 weeks on the diet
`
`

`

`440 Carter-Dawson et al.
`
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.
`May 1979
`
`
`
`.
`
`Pusan!olccnlvol
`
`‘
`
`o—o Rhodopsin
`r—u Opsin
`
`
`
`o
`
`2
`
`4 e-é ioiziti61'82'02'2'1'42'62'3503'2543'63840
`Wulu on diet
`
`Fig. 2. Rhodopsin and opsin levels in vitamin A—deficient retinas expressed as percent of
`control. The curves are drawn to show the general trend of rhodopsin and opsin levels.
`
`(Fig. 2). The level of rhodopsin was about
`70% of the normal value at 2 weeks. Over the
`
`the percentage of rho-
`following 8 weeks,
`dopsin decreased to approximately 20% of
`control values. (Analyses were made only on
`eyes from rats supplemented with retinoic
`acid, since those on the basal diet were sac-
`rificed by 5 weeks. Hereafter, rats referred to
`as deficient were fed the basal diet plus ret-
`inoic acid.) The amount of rhodopsin in the
`retinas of the deficient rats remained rela-
`tively constant between 10 and 39 weeks on
`the diet. Opsin levels remained high in the
`retina during the early stages of vitamin A
`deficiency. After 8 weeks on the deficient
`diet, the retinas contained 85% of the control
`value ofopsin (Fig. 2). By 28 weeks, the level
`of opsin was around 40% of control. The per-
`centage of opsin dropped to 19% of control
`levels by 32 weeks of deficiency.
`Histology. Retinas of rats in all groups ap—
`peared normal through 5 weeks on their re-
`spective diets. By 7 weeks,
`the distal
`two
`thirds of the outer segments in the posterior
`retina of rats supplemented with retinoic acid
`stained less intensely with toluidine blue, but
`no other morphological changes were seen.
`
`However, around 16 weeks on this diet, the
`outer segments began to show morphological
`abnormalities. Some discs were distended
`
`and disrupted into small vesicles ranging
`from 0.19 to 0.35 pan in diameter. This ab-
`normal structure was confined largely to the
`distal third of the outer segment. The length
`of these outer segments in the posterior ret-
`ina of rats receiving retinoic acid was compa-
`rable to controls (mean i S.E.M.: plus ret-
`inoic acid, 21 i 0.4 pm; control, 20 i- 0.3;
`n = 10 outer segments).
`At 23 weeks,
`the structure of outer seg-
`ments in the posterior region of deficient rat
`retinas appeared more disorganized (Fig. 3).
`Many discs in the distal third of the outer
`segments were distended or dispersed into
`vesicles approximately 0.1 to 0.3 am in di—
`ameter. Some outer segment discs were ori-
`ented parallel
`to the long axis. Numerous
`densely stained, membranous vesicles, 0.2 to
`0.4 pm in diameter, presumably portions of
`disc membranes, were present in the pig—
`ment epithelium and between pigment epi-
`thelial cell processes. In contrast, discs in the
`outer segments of refinas from rats sup-
`plemented with retinyl palmitate (control
`
`

`

`Valium.- [8
`Number 5
`
`Vitamin A—deficient rut retinas
`
`441
`
`
`
`Fig. 3. Posterior retina of vitamin A—deficient nit maintained on the diet 23 weeks. The discs
`in the distal portion of many outer segments are disrupted into small vesicles. Some small
`vesicles are present between and in pigment epithelial processes (arrow). Processes of the
`pigment epithelium (pep) have lost their normal contact with outer segments.
`
`group) were intact (Fig. 4). The outer seg~
`ments were also shorter by 5 um at 28 weeks
`in the posterior retina (mean i S.E.M.-. de-
`ficient,
`l4 1' 0.3 pm; control,
`19 t 0.1;
`n = 10 outer segments).
`The intimate contact between the pigment
`
`epithelial cells and outer segments was lost
`in light-adapted deficient rat retinas (Fig. 3).
`Also, the lipid droplets in the pigment epi-
`thelium of the deficient retinas were quite
`homogeneous
`in density, except
`for
`an
`electron-dense cortical region (Fig. 5). Most
`
`

`

`442 Carter-Dawson et (:1.
`
`insert. Ophllmlmul. Visual Sci.
`May 1979
`
`
`
`Fig. 4. Outer segment tips in the posterior region of the control retina maintain contact with
`pigment epithelial processes (pep). The outer segment discs also maintain their normal struc-
`ture (28 weeks on diet).
`
`of the lipid droplets were located near the
`base of the pigment epithelial cells. The
`density and size of these droplets varied from
`cell to cell. The distribution and density of
`other organelles in the pigment epithelial
`cells appeared normal. In contrast, the pig-
`ment epithelial processes of the control
`animals were closely apposed to the outer
`segments. and the lipid droplets were less
`homogeneous in density. Several concentric
`rings were seen in the lipid droplets, which
`varied in electron density. In the center of
`these droplets electron-lucent spots were
`often seen (Fig. 6). The distribution and
`number of lipid droplets 1.5 pm in diameter
`and larger were similar in the control and
`deficient epithelial cells.
`Degeneration of both rod and cone nuclei
`
`was seen in the posterior retina of vitamin
`A—deficient rats. Most of the rod nuclei per.
`sister] through 23 weeks of deficiency (Table
`I). By 28 weeks on the diet about 59% re-
`mained. Twelve weeks later, at 40 weeks,
`only about 11% of the rod nuclei survived.
`Less than 13 rods/90 pan length persisted in
`the posterior retina of deficient rats at 40
`weeks (Table I). Some cone nuclei also de-
`generated as early as rods. However,
`the
`percentage of surviving cone nuclei was
`greater than that of rod nuclei at 28 weeks.
`By 40 weeks of deficiency, approximately
`62% of the cone nuclei persisted in the
`posterior retina, whereas only about 11% of
`the rod nuclei remained (Table 1, Figs. 7
`and 8).
`Rod and cone nuclei survived longer in the
`
`

`

`Volume 18
`Number 5
`
`Vitamin A-deficient mt retinas
`
`443
`
`
`
`Fig. 5. Typical lipid droplet in the pigment epithelium of a vitamin A—deficient retina.
`Fig. 6. Lipid droplet in pigment epithelium ofcontrol retina. Electron-lucent spots are promi-
`nent in the internal structure.
`
`Table 1. Rod and cone nuclei" in sections of retinas from control and vitamin A—deficient rats
`
`l D
`
`eficient l
`
`94.5 t 2 I
`1.5 t 0.1
`85.6
`93.8
`
`65.0 .+_ 2 6
`1.4 t 0.3
`58.9
`87.3
`
`12.5 + 0.5
`1.0 : 0.1
`11.3
`62.5
`
`Conn-01,1
`28 wk
`
`110.4 I 0.5
`1.6 = 0.2
`
`96.
`
`8
`2
`
`
`
`Weeks on diet:
`
`Posterior retina:
`Hod nuclei
`Cone nuclei
`% rod nuclei renmining
`% cone nuclei remaining
`Peripheral retina;
`Hod nuclei
`Cone nuclei
`96 rod nuclei remaining
`95 cone nuclei remaining
`
`60.0
`[.0
`
`It'4’
`
`1.0
`0.2
`
`54.4 t 1.1
`1.0 t 0.2
`90.7
`100
`
`53.2: 11
`1.0 1 0.2
`88.7
`100
`
`17.5 1 1.0
`0.7 t 0.2
`29
`70
`
`‘ Mean 3 S. EM. per 90 Jun length of retina: count: based on 28.90 urn lengths. 7 consecutive lengths in each 01"! sections.
`lCun'trol. lrasal that + letlnyl palmitate.
`l Deficient. basal diet + retinoic acid.
`
`peripheral retina than in the posterior retina.
`At 28 weeks of deficiency, about 59% of the
`rod nuclei persisted in the posterior retina,
`but approximately 89% remained in the pe-
`ripheral retina. By 40 weeks, about 11% and
`29% survived in the posterior and peripheral
`retinas, respectively (Table 1). Cone nuclei of
`the deficient retinas also survived longer in
`the peripheral retina than in the posterior
`retina. The number of cone nuclei was not
`
`affected in the peripheral retina at 23 or 28
`weeks, but some cone nuclei had degener-
`ated in the posterior retina (Table I).
`
`All hemispheres of the retina in vitamin
`A~deficient rats were not affected to the
`same extent. At 36 weeks on the deficient
`
`diet (plus retinoic acid) peripheral temporal
`and nasal retinas contained 20.3 1' 2.2 and
`
`25.5 1 3.2 photoreceptor cells/90 um re-
`spectively (mean i S.E.M.; p > 0.2). In the
`periphery, 32.1 I 0.9 photoreceptor cells/90
`you were seen in the superior hemisphere,
`but only 18.2 i 1.9 were seen in the inferior
`hemisphere (mean : S.E.M.: control, su-
`perior
`hemisphere
`61.1 i 1.6;
`inferior
`hemisphere 61.1 i 2.0; p <01). Photore-
`
`

`

`444 Carter-Dawson et at.
`
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.
`Mnll [979
`
`
`
`Fig. 7. Outer nuclear layer of a 10-month control retina. Cone nuclei (arrows) are present
`among many rod nuclei.
`Fig. 8. One to two rows ofphotoreceptor nuclei remain in deficient retinas, as well as remnants
`ofiuuer and outer segments. Cone nuclei are distinguished by their nuclear chromatin pattern
`(arrow).
`
`ceptor cells were affected to a greater extent
`in the inferior half of the eye.
`
`Discussion
`
`We observed dilterences in the rate of loss
`
`of rhodopsin, opsin, and photoreceptor nu-
`clei at various stages of vitamin A deficiency.
`Rhodopsin levels decreased 1 to 5 weeks ear-
`lier than reported previously.""" 7 Although
`rhodopsin levels decreased below 30% of
`normal at 8 weeks, opsin levels were 85% of
`normal. At 8 weeks ot'deficiency the amount
`of opsin found in the present study was
`greater than reported previously by 24%.
`Even at 32 weeks ofdeficiency 20% ofnormal
`rhodopsin and 19% of regenerable opsin
`persisted. Perhaps the difi'erences observed
`between our results and those of previous
`studies are a result of a difference in rat
`
`strain, type of diet. or level of illumination.
`Structural deterioration of photoreceptor
`Outer segments initiated at their distal tips
`and progressed proximally in vitamin A—
`deficient
`retinas. Why degeneration pro-
`ceeded in this fashion is unclear, but at least
`two possibilities can be invoked to explain
`the observed pattern. First, the available vi-
`tamin A may be bound preferentially to
`newly synthesized membranes at the base of
`the outer segment, and in the absence ol'ret-
`inol, opsin may undergo denaturation, result-
`ing in structural deterioration. Second, disc
`synthesis may be slowed“; thus discs which
`
`are normally shed remain attached for longer
`periods and then deteriorate as a function of
`their age.
`The pigment epithelium of the vitamin
`A—deficient rats remained structually normal
`except for the ultrastmcture of the lipid drop-
`lets. Many of the lipid droplets in the
`deficient pigment epithelium were quite
`homogeneous in structure. However,
`those
`in the control pigment epithelium were less
`homogeneous and ofien contained electron-
`lucent spots. These droplets were similar in
`structure to those described by Robison and
`Kuwabara’5 in the pigment epithelium of
`mice receiving injections of vitamin A. Al-
`though these lipid droplets do show various
`forms of electron density,“ the preponder-
`ance of the more homogeneous type ob-
`served in the deficient pigment epithelium
`suggests a (liEerence in composition. This dif-
`ference may be related to low levels or ab-
`sence of stored vitamin A or its metabolites.
`
`The most striking change seen in the vi-
`tamin A—deficient retinas was the differential
`
`rate of rod and cone cell degeneration. Ap-
`proximately 12% of the rod nuclei had cle-
`generatcd in the posterior
`retina by 23
`weeks, whereas only abOut 6% of the cones
`were lost. By 40 weeks, 89% ol'd'ie rod nuclei
`had degenerated but only 37% of the cone
`nuclei. Rod cells may degenerate faster than
`cones because of metabolic differences.
`
`Rod photoreceptor cells were affected
`
`

`

`Volume 18
`Nu mber 5
`
`Vitamin A—deficient rat retinas
`
`445
`
`more than cones in human patients with ab—
`normally low serum levels of vitamin AZ6
`Patients with abetalipoproteinemia have low
`serum levels of vitamin A. Electrophysiologi-
`cal studies showed a reduction in amplitude
`of the ERC, but a small signal could be iso-
`lated exclusively from cones. By 6 hr after
`administration of vitamin A, the amplitude of
`the ERG for cones was increased, but that of
`rods increased only after 24 hr. Histopatho-
`logical examination of the retina from a pa-
`tient with abetalipoproteinemia revealed com-
`plete degeneration of the photoreceptor cells
`except in the macula and the area between
`the macula and temporal margin of the disc.
`Cones were seen in both regions, and a small
`number of rods were seen in the tempo-
`ral margin of the discs.27 The rods appear to
`be affected to a greater extent than cones.
`Whether or not these changes are due pri—
`marily to the low levels of vitamin A in these
`patients is unknown.
`Regional differences were seen in the rate
`of photoreceptor cell degeneration in the
`present study. The percentage of photore-
`ceptor cells remaining in the posterior retina
`was lower than that seen in the peripheral
`retina at 28 weeks of deficiency and persisted
`through 40 weeks. Thus a central-peripheral
`gradient of photoreceptor cell degeneration
`exists. This central-peripheral gradient of de—
`generation has been observed in other retinal
`lesions.‘8' 23
`
`Another regional ditference in degenera-
`tion was seen in retinal hemispheres. More
`photoreceptor cells were seen in the periph-
`ery of the superior hemisphere than in the
`periphery of the inferior hemisphere. Photo-
`receptor cells degenerated faster in the in-
`ferior region of the eye.
`The photoreceptor cells in the inferior re—
`gion of the retina are affected to a greater
`extent in some experimental and genetic le-
`sions. Iodoacetate poisoning produces more
`damage to photoreceptor cells in the inferior
`hemisphere of cats and rabbits.28 Sector ret-
`initis pigmentosa in man frequently pro—
`duces more damage in the inferior nasal half
`of the eye.29 Photoreceptor cells in the in-
`ferior hemisphere of black-eyed Royal Col-
`
`lege of Surgeons (RCS) rats and dark-reared
`pink-eyed RCS are more severely affected.23
`However, the peripheral retinas of pink-eyed
`RCS rats reared in cyclic light, 20 to 35 foot-
`candles, show uniform degeneration in the
`superior and inferior hemispheres.23 Light
`appears to accelerate the rate of degeneration
`in the superior region of the eye in the pink-
`eyed RCS rats.
`It is unclear whether the rate of photore-
`ceptor cell degeneration in the superior
`hemisphere was affected by illumination in
`the present study. The rats used in our study
`were reared in dim cyclic light (maximum of
`1.5 to 2 foot-candles). Perhaps this level of
`illumination can produce the same effects in
`the superior hemisphere of vitamin A—
`deficient retinas as darkness does in the
`
`retinas of pink-eyed RCS rats. It is also a
`possibility that regional differences in retinal
`hemispheres occur in vitamin A—deficient
`retinas independently of the lighting condi-
`tion. Additional studies are needed to deter-
`
`mine whether regional degeneration is me-
`diated by light.
`We thank Ms. Teresa Tolliver and Mr. William
`Mills for technical assistance. Special
`thanks are ex-
`tended to Mr. Leonard L. Dawson for preparing the
`graphs.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Dowling, ].E., and Wald, 0.: Vitamin A deficiency
`and night blindness, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
`44:648, 1958.
`2. Dowling, ].E., and Wald, C.: The biological func-
`tion ofvitamin A acid, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
`46587, 1960.
`].N., Pitt, C.A., and
`3. Lewin, D.R., Thompson,
`Howell, ].M.: Blindness resulting from vitamin A
`deficiency in albino and pigmented guinea pigs and
`rats, Int. J. Vitam. Res. 40:270, 1970.
`4. Noell, W.K., Delmelle, M.C., and Albrecht, R.:
`Vitamin A deficiency effect on retina: dependence of
`light, Science 172:72, 1971.
`5. Tansley, K.: Factors affecting the development and
`regeneration of visual purple in the mammalian ret-
`ina, Proc. R. Soc. B 114:79, 1933.
`6. Johnson, M.L.: The effects of vitamin A deficiency
`upon the retina ofthe rat, J. Exp. Zool. 81:67, 1939.
`7. Dowling, ].E., and Gibbons, 1.11.: The effect of vi—
`tamin A deficiency on the fine structure of the ret-
`ina. In Smelser, 0., editor: The Structure of the
`Eye, New York,
`1961, Academic Press,
`Inc.,
`1). 85-99.
`
`

`

`446 Carter-Dawson at a].
`
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.
`May 1979
`
`Hayes, K.C.: Retinal degeneration in monkeys in-
`duced by deficiencies of vitamin E or A,
`INVEST.
`OPHTHALMOL. 13:499, 1974.
`Ramalingaswami, V., Leach, E.H., and Srirama-
`chari, 5.: Ocular structure in vitamin A deficiency in
`the monkey, Q. ]. Exp. Physio]. 40:337, 1955.
`Walls, C.L.: The visual cells of the white rat, J.
`Comp. Psychol. 18:363, 1934.
`Soko], 5.: Cortical and retinal spectral sensitivity of
`the hooded rat, Vision Res. 10:253, 1970.
`Green, D.C.: Scotopic and photopic components of
`the rat electroretinogmm, J. Physio]. 228:781, 1973.
`Cicerone, C.: Cones survive rods in the light-
`damaged eye of the albino rat, Science 194:1183,
`1976.
`LaVai], M.M.: Survival of some photoreceptor cells
`in albino rats following long-term exposure to con-
`tinuous light, INVEST. OPIITHALMOL. 15:64, 1976.
`Parry, H.B.: Degenerations of the dog retina.
`II.
`Generalized progressive atrophy of hereditary ori-
`gin, Br. J. Ophthalmol. 37:487, 1953.
`Aguirre, C.D., and Rubin, L.F.: Progressive retinal
`atrophy (rod dysplasia) in the Norwegian elkhound,
`J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 158:208, 1971.
`Aguirre, C. D., and Rubin, L.F.: Rod—cone dysplasia
`(progressive retinal atrophy) in Irish Setters, J. Am.
`Vet. Med. ASSOC. 166:157, 1975.
`Carter-Dawson, L.D., LaVai], M.M., and Sidman,
`R.L.: Differential effect of the rd mutation on rods
`and cones in the mouse retina,
`INVEST. OPHTHAL-
`MOL. VISUAL SCI. 17:489, 1978.
`Report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad
`Hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Stud-
`ies, J. Nutr. 7:1340, 1977.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`29.
`
`Bieri, ].C., and Priva], E.L.: Effect ofdeficiencies of
`a-tocopherol, retino] and zinc on the lipid composi-
`tion of rat testes, J. Nutr. 89:55, 1966.
`Krishnamurthy, 5., Bieri, ].C., and Andrews, E.L.:
`Metabolism and biological activity of vitamin A acid
`in the chick, J. Nutr. 79:503, 1963.
`O’Brien, P.]., and Muellenberg, C.C.: The biosyn-
`thesis of rhodopsin in vitro, Exp. Eye Res. 18:241,
`1974.
`LaVail, M.M., and Battelle, B.A.; Influence of eye
`pigmentation and light deprivation on inherited ret-
`ina] dystrophy in the rat, Exp. Eye Res. 21:167,
`.1975.
`Herron, W.K., ]r., and Riege], B.W.: Production
`rate and removal of rod outer segment material in
`vitamin A deficiency,
`INVEST. Ol’l-lTl-IALMOL. 13:46,
`1974.
`Robison, W.C., 11"., and Kuwabara, T.: Vitamin A
`storage and peroxisomes in retinal pigment epithe-
`lium and liver,
`INVEST. OPllTl-lALa-IOL. VISUAL SCI.
`1611110, 1977.
`Coums, P., Carr, RE, and Gunkel, R.D.: Retiuitis
`pigmentosa in abeta]ipoproteinemia: effects of vi-
`tamin A, INVEST.OPHTHALMOL. 10:784, 1971.
`Von Sallmann, L., Gelderman, AH, and Laster,
`L.; Ocular histopathologic changes in a case of
`A-Beta-Lipoproteinemia, Doc. Ophthalmol. 26:451,
`1969.
`Noel], W. K. : The impairment ofvisua] cell structure
`by iodoacetate, J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 40:25, 1952.
`Krill, A.E., Archer, D., and Martin, D.: Sector ret-
`initis pigmentosa, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 69:977, 1970.
`
`Information for authors
`
`their material.
`
`Most of the provisiOns of the Copyright Act of 1976 became effective on January 1, 1978.
`Therefore, all manuscripts must be accompanied by the following written statement,
`signed by one author: “The undersigned author transfers all copyright ownership of the
`manuscript (title of article) to The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology,
`Inc., in the event the work is published. The undersigned author warrants that the article
`is original,
`is not under consideration by another journal, and has not been previously
`published. I sign for and accept responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any
`and all co-authors." Authors will be consulted, when possible, regarding republication of
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket