throbber
2. G. Wald: Human Vision and the Spectrum. Sci-
`ence 101: 653-658. 1945
`
`3. V.M. Reading and RA. Weale: Macular Pig-
`ment and Chromatic Aberration. J. Opt. Soc.
`Am. 64: 231-234, 1974
`
`4. MR. Malinow, L. Feeney-Burns. L.H. Peterson.
`M.L. Klein and M. Neuringer: Diet-Flelated Ma-
`cular Anomalies in Monkeys. Invest. Ophthal-
`mol. Vis. Sci. 19: 857-863, 1980
`
`5. L. Feeney-Burns, M.Fl. Malinow, L. Peterson.
`M. Klein and M. Neuringer: Macular Hyper-
`fluorescence in Monkeys. Presented at West-
`
`CYAN EXHIBIT 1029
`
`ern Section Regional Meeting. Association for
`Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. Seal-
`tle, October, 1978
`
`6. B.S. Fine and RP. Kwapien: Pigment Epithelial
`Windows and Drusen: An Animal Model. In-
`
`vest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
`1978
`
`17: 1059-1068.
`
`7. M. Neuringer, D. Denney and J. Sturman: Re-
`duced Plasma Taurine Concentration and
`
`Cone Electroretinogram Amplitude in Monkeys
`Fed a Protein-Deficient. Semi-Purified Diet.
`Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32: xxvi, 1979
`
`THE EFFECT OF DEFICIENCY OF
`
`VITAMINS E AND A
`
`ON THE RETINA
`
`Vitamin E deficiency causes an extensive accumulation of lipofuscin in the pigment
`epithelium of the retina. Rats deficient in vitamins E and A, had less
`retinal lipofuscin than rats deficient in vitamin E only.
`
`Key Words: vitamin E, vitamin A, retina, rod outer
`segment, retinal pigment epithelium, photoreceptor
`cells, antioxidant, peroxidation. lipofuscin
`
`The membranes of the rod outer segments
`(ROS) of the retina have served as models for
`the elucidation of the structure of membranes
`
`since Brown‘ showed that rhodopsin rotates
`freely in the lipid environment of the ROS mem-
`brane. Flecently, the antioxidant theory of the
`function of vitamin E in membranes received
`
`direct and unexpected support from the work of
`Robison, Kuwabara and Bieri.2~3 Again, the
`membranes of the rods of the retina served as a
`
`model. The outer segment of the vertebrate rod
`is made up of a stack of disk membranes con-
`taining an exceptionally high concentration of
`polyunsaturated fatty acids (nearly one-half of
`the ROS fatty acids contain six double bonds)!
`Since the peroxidizability of unsaturated fatty
`acids is directly proportional to the number of
`double bonds they contain,5 the ROS is particu-
`larly susceptible to lipid peroxidation. To aggra-
`vate this situation, the retina also is served with a
`
`336
`
`NUTRITION REVIEWS/VOL. 39. NO. HINOVEMBER 1980
`
`plentiful supply of oxygen since it has an unusu-
`ally high rate of oxidative metabolism. To make
`matters worse, light is known to enhance lipid
`peroxidation in the retina.6
`Vitamin E, a free-radical scavenger, is thought
`to protect membrane lipids from peroxidation.
`The concentration of vitamin E is exceptionally
`high in ROS, 1 mole of a-tocopherol for each 36
`moles of rhodopsin.7 A seasonal dietary decline
`in vitamin E intake in cattle was found reflected in
`
`increased lipid oxidation products in retina in
`vitro, together with some destruction of ROS
`membrane structures.’ In vivo, Hayes‘ observed
`degeneration of the macular region of retina
`when monkeys were fed a vitamin E-deficient
`diet for two years.
`The formation of a yellow autofluorescent
`pigment termed lipofuscin is correlated with
`polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidation and ac-
`cumulates as the end product of lipid peroxida-
`tion. This pigment is found in many tissues with
`advancing age and especially in the pigment
`epithelium of
`the retina. Physiological
`mechanisms that prevent lipid auto-oxidation
`also decrease lipofuscin accumulation. Thus,
`
`

`
`vitamin E protects membrane lipids from auto-
`oxidation and at the same time retards accumu-
`
`lation of lipofuscin.
`Katz et al.9 showed that rats maintained on a
`
`diet deficient in vitamin E accumulated large
`amounts of lipofuscin in the pigment epithelium
`of the retina (RPE), especially in diets also high
`in polyunsaturated fatty acids. The RPE seemed
`to be especially sensitive to vitamin E deficiency,
`since the lipofuscin accumulation in other tis-
`sues was less severe. it is known that the RPE
`
`absorbs the material released during breakdown
`and turnover of ROS disk membranes. The old-
`
`est disks are shed from the ROS tips, absorbed
`and catabolized by the RPE.‘° In fact, the only
`other part of the retina in which Katz et al.9 de-
`tected a small amount of lipofuscin was at the
`ROS tips.
`Robison, Kuwabara and Bieriz investigated
`the effect of vitamin E deficiency together with
`normal or marginal vitamin A intake in the retina
`of the rat. The reason for considering marginal
`vitamin A in conjunction with vitamin E deficiency
`is that vitamin A depletion is known“ to result in
`deterioration of the ROS disk structure, due to
`loss of rhodopsin. Female rats were given a
`vitamin E-deficient diet. One-half received
`
`adequate vitamin A (8.0 mg retinol per kilogram
`diet), -E+A, and one-half received a vitamin
`A-marginal diet (0.8 mg per kilogram), -E-A.
`Control rats received adequate vitamin E (250
`mg dl-a-tocopheryl acetate per kilogram diet),
`with normal or marginal vitamin A (+E+A and
`+ E-A). Tissue vitamin A levels were affected by
`vitamin E deficiency. After five months, the -E-A
`group had one-tenth the liver concentration of
`retinol compared to the -E+A group. The RPE
`cells of all the -E rats had five times the number
`
`of lipofuscin granules (identified by their
`characteristic fluorescence and PAS staining).
`Electron microscopy revealed more secondary
`lysosomes in the RPE in the -E rats. Clearly, the
`great accumulation of lipofuscin in RPE and dis-
`ruption of the rods in all -E rats is the end resultof
`the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the
`absence of antioxidant protection. The simul-
`taneous breakdown of the rods and accumula-
`
`tion of lipofuscin suggests that the breakdown
`products of the rods contribute to the substance
`of the lipofuscin granules. The RPE merely con-
`tinues its normal function of phagocytizing and
`
`degrading pieces of ROS membrane disks and
`thus accumulates the end products of lipid
`peroxidation.
`Surprisingly, there was a 46 percent loss of
`rod nuclei in the -E-A group,whereas the-E+A
`group lost none, compared to controls. There-
`fore, the normal level of dietary vitamin A was
`essential for preserving the number of rod cells.
`The marginal vitamin A intake had no effect on
`the rod cells of the + E rats, whereas a marginal
`vitamin A intake caused a great loss of these
`cells in the -E group. The animals on the -E-A
`diet received some dietary vitamin A, and their
`plasma vitamin A level, though lower than that of
`the -E+A rats, was still appreciable. Hence, the
`authors postulate the occurrence of local tissue
`deficiencies of vitamin A, caused by the lack of
`antioxidant in the microenvironment of the re-
`tina. The decline in vitamin A level in the RPE
`
`and the ROS may be such as to mimick the effect
`of a frank vitamin A deficiency in the whole ani-
`mal, and thus disrupt the ROS disk structure.
`The authors are careful to point out, however,
`that the effect on the ROS of the vitamin E defi-
`
`ciency in conjunction with marginal vitamin A,
`differs from that of a straight dietary vitamin A
`deficiency. In the latter, the rods are affected
`before the cones, whereas in the -E-A rats, rods
`
`and cones deteriorated simultaneously and
`equally.
`In their second paper, Robison, Kuwabara
`and Bieri3 investigated the effect of vitamin A
`deficiency on the rod destruction induced by vi-
`tamin deficiency. They used vitamin E and
`frankly (not marginally) vitamin A-deficient rats in
`the configuration: -E-A, -E+A, +E-A and
`+E+A. All -A rats received retinoic acid to
`
`maintain their general health (retinoic acid can-
`not reverse the effect of vitamin A deficiency in
`the retina). After 21 weeks there was, as ex-
`pected, an accumulation of lipofuscin, the vi-
`tamin E-deficient retinas (-E+A and-E-A. The
`+E-A group had no lipofuscin, but some disk
`membrane disruption and a 27 percent loss of
`rod nuclei. The -E-A group showed a 60 percent
`loss of rod nuclei. After 35 weeks, the vitamin
`E-deficient retinas showed that the accumula-
`
`tion of lipofuscin was two-fold over control in the
`-E-A retinas, and more surprisingly, the pre-
`sence of retinol in the -E+A retinas caused a
`
`five-fold increase in lipofuscin granules. The
`
`NUTRITION REVIEWS/VOL. 38, NO. 11/NOVEMBER 1980
`
`387
`
`

`
`yellow autofluorescence intensity (measuring
`Iipofuscin concentration) also was increased.
`Thus,
`the vitamin E-deficient, vitamin A-
`
`adequate group not only had the largest number
`of Iipofuscin granules, but also the highest con-
`centration of fluorescent pigment, higher than in
`the -E-A group. Unexpectedly,
`though the
`+E+A group had far fewer Iipofuscin granules
`than the -E-A group, their fluorescence intensity
`was greater. The fluorescence intensity in the
`+ E-A group was lowest of all, lower than in the
`+ E+A group.
`Thus, the massive accumulation of Iipofuscin
`in the RPE of the -E animals is most probably
`caused by greatly increased peroxidation, re-
`sulting in damaged membranes. These mem-
`branes would then be phagocytized by the RPE,
`digested and the “undigestible” remnants pack-
`aged as Iipofuscin granules. Further,
`though
`larger numbers of these granules were formed in
`vitamin E deficiency, they were less fluorescent
`in the absence of vitamin A. Possibly, vitamin A
`is involved in Iipofuscin formation in the retina by
`influencing the composition of the pigment. Al-
`ternatively, vitamin A deficiency may decrease
`the rate of rod phagocytosis‘ by RPEJ2 As a
`control, the authors compared the uteri of the
`-E+A and -E-A rats (the vitamin E-deficient
`uterus is rich in Iipofuscin granules). They found
`no difference in that
`tissue. Therefore,
`antioxidant-related pigment formation in tissues
`outside the retina is not influenced by vitamin A.
`Possibly, this may be connected to the fact that
`the uterus responds, but the retina does not
`respond, to the retinoic acid which was being fed
`to the -A animals. It should be remembered that
`
`retinal, derived from retinol but not from retinoic
`acid, is a component of the rhodopsin molecule,
`the principal protein of the rods.
`With regard to the structure of the retina, the
`vitamin E deficiency alone (-E+A), after 35
`weeks, caused a disruption of the disk mem-
`branes and a 20 percent loss of photoreceptor
`cells. A vitamin A deficiency superimposed on
`the vitamin E deficiency (-E-A) led to almost
`complete destruction of the ROS membranes
`and loss of more than 90 percent of the photo-
`receptor cells. As one would expect, vitamin A
`deficiency alone (+E-A) led to a greatly shor-
`tened ROS and an intermediate loss of cells (34
`percent). Thus, a -E-A diet produced a greatly
`
`388
`
`NUTRITION REVIEWS/VOL. 38, NO. 11/NOVEMBER 1980
`
`accelerated degeneration of the photoreceptor
`cells compared to a + E-A diet. While vitamin A
`deficiency leads to some damage of the retina,
`the disruption caused by a combined vitamin
`E-vitamin A deficiency is greatly accentuated,
`apparently more than can be accounted for by
`an additive effect. The authors are of the opinion
`that the vitamin E deficiency caused increased
`oxidation of stored vitamin A in liver and RPE,
`greatly accelerating the process of rod destruc-
`tion.
`
`The membranes of the rod disks are unusually
`sensitive to oxidative damage, yet they are in an
`environment rich in oxygen. Therefore, the au-
`thors suggest, vitamin E appears to be espe-
`cially necessary for protection of the retina. in
`particular because of the accentuation of lipid
`peroxidative damage by light. Moreover, the
`work reveals that in vitamin E deficiency there
`may be increased oxidative destruction of the
`vitamin A stores, leading to more rapid develop-
`ment of damage in the photoreceptor cells. In
`sum,
`to quote the authors? "normal dietary
`levels of both vitamin E and A are essential for
`
`the structural maintenance of the neural retina
`
`and for a normal pigment epithelium," a discov-
`ery of a vitamin interaction of great consequence
`for the maintenance of normal vision. El
`
`1. P.K. Brown: Rhodopsin Rotates in the Visual Re-
`ceptor Membrane. Nature 236: 35-38, 1972
`2. W.G. Robison, Jr., T. Kuwabara and JG. Bieri:
`Vitamin E Deficiency and the Retina: Photo-
`receptor and Pigment Epithelial Changes. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18: 683-690, 1979
`3. W.G. Robison, Jr., T. Kuwabara and J.G. Bieri:
`Deficiencies of Vitamins E and A in the Rat: Reti-
`
`nal Damage and Lipofuscin Accumulation. In-
`vest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19: 1030-1037, 1980
`4. F.J.M. Daemen: Vertebrate Rod Outer Segment
`Membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 300: 255-
`288, 1973
`
`5. L.A. Witting: Lipid Peroxidation In Vivo. J. Am. Oil
`Chem. Soc. 42: 908-913, 1965
`
`6. L. Feeney and E.R. Berrnan: Oxygen Toxicity:
`Membrane Damage by Free Radicals. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. 15: 789-792, 1976
`7. C.C. Famsworth and E.A. Dralz: oxidative Dam-
`
`age of Retinal Rod Outer Segment Membranes
`and the Role of Vitamin E. Biochim. Biophys.
`Acta 443: 556-570, 1976
`
`

`
`8. K.C. Hayes: Retinal Degeneration in Monkeys
`Induced by Deficiencies of Vitamin E or A. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. 13: 499-510, 1974
`
`9. M.L. Katz, W.L. Stone and E.A. Dratz: Fluores-
`
`cent Pigment Accumulation in Retinal Pigment
`Epithelium of Antioxidant-Deficient Rats. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 17: 1049-1058, 1978
`
`10. R.W. Young: The Renewal of Rod and Cone
`
`Outer Segments in the Rhesus Monkey. J. Cell
`Biol. 49: 303-318, 1971
`1 1 . L. Carter-Dawson, T. Kuwabara, P.J. O'Brien and
`
`J.G. Bieri: Structural and Biochemical Changes in
`Vitamin A-Deficient Rat Retinas.
`Invest.
`
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18: 437-446, 1979
`12. J.E. Dowling and I.R. Gibbons in The Structure of
`the Eye. G.K. Smelser, Editor, p. 85. Academic
`Press, New York, 1961
`
`NUTRITION REVIEWS/VOL. 38. NO. 11/NOVEMBER 1980
`
`389

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket