throbber
CYAN EXHIBIT 1021
`
`lllllllllllllllll||l||IllllIllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllllll
`U8005310764A
`
`United States Patent
`
`119]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,310,764
`
`Baranowitz et al.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`May 10, 1994
`
`[54] TREATMENT OF AGE RELATED MACULAR
`DEGENERATION WITH BETA-CAROTENE
`
`[76]
`
`Inventors; Steven Baranowitz, 85 Tices La. -
`Apt. 39, East Brunswick, NJ. 08816;
`Andrew Brookner, 25 Spenser Dr.,
`Short Hills, NJ. 07078
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 880,709
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`May 8, 1992
`
`Int. 01.5 .............................................. A67K 31/07
`[51]
`[52] us. C1. ..................................... 514/725; 514/912
`[58] Field of Search ................................ 514/725, 912
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`PUBLICATIONS
`
`Health Periodicals Abstract of Western Journal of Med-
`icine, vol. 155 Issue No. 4, Oct. 1991.
`Kennekens et a1. Federal Research in Progesss. (The
`Research started on 1984).
`Steven A. Baranowitz, “Regeneration, Neural Crest
`Derivatives and Retinoids: A New Synthesis,” J. Theor.
`Biol, 140: 231—242, 1989.
`Garry J. Handelman et al., “Carotenoids in the Human
`Macula and Whole Retina,” Investigative Ophthalmol-
`ogy, 29:850-855, 1988.
`Richard W. Young, “Solar Radiation and Age—related
`Macular Degeneration," Survey of Ophthalmology,
`32:252—269, Jan.—-Feb., 1988.
`Richard W. Young, “Pathophysiology of Age—related
`Macular Degeneration,” Survey of Ophthalmology,
`31:291—306, 1987.
`Susan B. Bressler et al. “Relationship of Drusen and
`Abnormalities of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium to the
`Prognosis of Newvascular Macular Degeneration,”
`Arch Ophthalmol, 108:1442—1447, Oct, 1990.
`Neil M. Bressler et al., “Age—related Macular Degener-
`ation,” Survey of Ophthalomology, 32:375—413, May—-
`Jun, 1988.
`Howard Schatz et al., “Atrophic Macular Degeneration
`Rate of Spread of Geographic Atrophy and Visual
`Loss,” Ophthalmology, 96:1541—1551, 1989.
`J. P. Sarks et al., “Evolution of Geographic Atrophy of
`the Retinal Pigment Epithelium,” Eye, 2:552—577, 1988.
`D. Pauleikhoff et al., “Drusen as Risk Factors in
`
`Age-Related Macular Disease,” American Journal of
`Ophthmalogy, 109:38—43, Jan., 1990.
`W. T. Ham Jr. et al., “Basic Mechanisms Underlying
`the Production of Photochemical Lesions in Mamma-
`lian Retina,” Current Eye Research, 3:165-174, 1984.
`M. L. Katz et al., “Fluorescent Pigment Accumulation
`in Retinal Pigment Epithelium of Antioxidant—Defi—
`cient Rats,” Investigative Ophthalmology, 17: 1049—1058,
`1978.
`Martin L. Katz et al., “Relationship Between Dietary
`Retinol and Lipofuscin in the Retinal Pigment Epithe-
`lium,” Mechanisms of Ageing
`and Development,
`35:291-305, 1986.
`Martin L. Katz et al., “Development of Lipofuscin—-
`Like Fluorescence in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium in
`Response to Protease Inhibitor Treatment,” Mecha-
`nisms ofAgeing and Development, 49:23—40, 1989.
`C. Kathleen Dorey et al., “Cell Loss in the Aging Re-
`tina,” Investigative Ophthalmology, 30: 1691—1699, 1989.
`Glenn L. Wing et'al., “Topography and Age Relation-
`ship of Lipofuscin Concentration in the Retinal Pigment
`Epithelium,” Investigative OphthalmoIogy, 17, 601—607,
`1977.
`Sheila K. West at al., “Exposure to Sunlight and Other
`Risk Factors for Age-Related Macular Degeneration,”
`Arch Ophthalmol, 107:875—879, Jun., 1989.
`Mike Boulton et al., “The Formation of Autofluores-
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Examiner—Zohreh A. Fay
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Darby & Darby
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACI
`
`According to the present invention, there are provided
`methods for treating age related macular degeneration
`in a mammal; for preventing impairment of the vision or
`for improving impaired vision of a mammal whose eye
`has drusen; for preventing formation or growth of dru-
`sen in the eye of a mammal; and for reducing the num-
`ber or the size of drusen or for fading drusen without
`resultant areas .of retinal atrophy, without resultant
`impairment of vision, or without a combination of the
`foregoing in the eye of a mammal. Beta-carotene in
`appropriate amounts is administered to the mammal.
`
`19 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`

`

`5,310,764
`
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`cent Granules in Cultured Human RPE,” Investigative
`Ophthalmology, 30:82—89, 1989.
`Mike Boulton et al., “Age—Related Changes in the Mor-
`phology, Absorption and Fluorescence of Melano»
`somes and Lipofuscin Granules of the Retinal Pigment
`Epithelium,” Visiain Research, 30:1291-1303, 1990.
`John D. Gottsch et al., “Hematogenous Photosensitiza-
`tion," Investigative Ophthalmology, 31:1674—1683, Sep.,
`1990.
`David A. Newsome et al., “Oral Zinc in Macular De-
`generation,” Arch Ophthalmol. 106:192—198, Feb., 1988.
`Sohrab Mobarhan et al., “Effects of B—Carotene Reple-
`tion on B—Carotene Absorption, Lipid Peroxidation,
`and Neutrophil Superoxide Formation in Young Men,"
`Nutrition & Cancer, 14:195—206, 1990.
`Shirley H. Sarks et al., “Age-related Macular Degener-
`ation: Atrophic Form,” Retina, Chapter 64, 2:149-173.
`
`1989.
`Peter A. Campochiaro et al., “Retinoic Acid Promotes
`Density-Dependent Growth Arrest in Human Retinal
`Pigment Epithelial Cells,” Investigative Ophthmology,
`32:65—72, 1991.
`R. J. Stephens et 211., “Vitamin E Distribution in Ocular
`Tissues Following Long—Term Dietary Depletion and
`Supplementation as Determined by Microdissection
`and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry,” Exp.
`Eye Research, 47:237-245, 1988.
`Craig E. Eldred, “Vitamins A and E in RPE Lipofuscin
`Formation and Implications For Age—Related Macular
`Degeneration,” Inherited and Environmentally Induced
`Retinal Degenerations, pp. 113—129, 1989.
`John J. Weiter, “Macular Degeneration”, Arch. Oph-
`thalmol, 106:183—198, Feb., 1988.
`Theo L. van der Schaft, et al., “Is Basal Laminar De-
`posit Unique for Age-Related Macular Degeneration?”
`Arch. Ophthalmol, 109:420—425, Mar., 1991.
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`May 10, 1994
`
`5,310,764
`
`I
`
`FIG.
`
`FIG.
`
`.2
`
`m ‘
`
`~
`
`1 i“
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|\
`
`.
`.
`é-Q— 93’4“"?
`"Vim?
`5/9--""Qm m 5243/ v
`'
`(CD (4:15))“ «6 61:1
`7
`7
`I
`I
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,310,764
`
`TREATMENT OF AGE RELATED MACULAR
`DEGENERATION WITH BETA-CAROTENE
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention relates to a method for the treatment of
`age related macular degeneration (ARMD) in the eyes
`of mammals. Beta-carotene is administered, preferably
`systemically, in a therapeutically effective amount.
`The administration of beta-carotene has also been
`found to prevent the growth or the formation of drusen,
`to reduce the number or the size of drusen, or to cause
`drusen to fade without resultant retinal atrophy or im-
`pairment of vision.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Age related macular degeneration is a common de-
`generative disease of the retina and is the leading cause
`of blindness in the elderly. The disease is associated
`with chronological age, as ten percent of the individuals
`between the ages of sixty-five and seventy-five in the
`United States have lost some vision because of the dis-
`ease. Thirty percent of people over the age of seventy-
`five have lost some vision due to the disease. Young,
`“Pathophysiology of Age-related Macular Degenera-
`tion”, Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 31, No. 5, Mar-
`ch—April 1987.
`The basic anatomy of the eye is illustrated in FIG. 1.
`The sclera (1) forms the external tissue of the eyeball.
`The choroid (3) is the vascular layer beneath the sclera.
`The retina (5) lines the choroid (3) and is the nervous
`membrane upon the surface of which the images of
`external objects are received and then are transmitted
`through the optic nerve (11). Precisely in the center of
`the posterior part of the retina, corresponding to the
`axis of the eye, and at a point in which the sense of
`vision is perfect in a normal eye,
`is a yellowish area
`called the macula (7) which has a central depression,
`called the fovea (9). FIG. 2 illustrates that beneath the
`sensory retina is a single layer of pigmented epithelial
`cells called the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) (1).
`Between the RPE and the choriocapiliaries is a mem-
`brane known as Bruch’s membrane (7).
`ARMD is believed to be caused by the deterioration
`and death of the retinal pigment epithelium. The cause
`of the degeneration is unknown, but it has been specu-
`lated that ARMD may be an advanced stage of the
`normal aging process. Young, Survey of Ophthalmology,
`Vol. 31, No. 5, March—April 1987. The variability in the
`age of onset of the disease is likely due to the variability
`in biological aging.
`The earliest and most obvious clinical sign of ARMD
`is the presence of drusen. Sarks et al. “Age-related Mac—
`ular Degeneration: Atrophic Form”, Retina, Vol. 2.,
`The C. V. Mosby Company, 1989. Drusen are extracel-
`lular masses of heterogeneous composition containing
`materials excreted from aging RPE cells and remnants
`of dead cells. Young, Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 31,
`No. 5, March—April 1987. They are situated between
`the basal membrane of the RPE and Bruch’s membrane.
`
`Young, Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 31, No. 5, Mar—
`ch—April 1987. Clinically, drusen are seen as localized
`yellowish deposits or excrescences lying deep to the
`retina. Bressler et al. “Age-related Macular Degenera—
`tion”, Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 32, No. 6, May—-
`June 1988.
`i.e. hard drusen, are seen in
`Small discrete drusen,
`eighty-three percent of normal adult eyes. Hard drusen
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`represent a localized disorder of only a few RPE cells.
`The RPE cells overlying the drusen are often thinned
`or pigmented. Bressler et al., Survey of Ophthalmology,
`Vol. 32, No. 6, May-June 1988.
`Larger areas of RPE dysfunction having ill defined,
`nondiscrete boundaries are termed soft drusen. Soft
`drusen are associated with more serious forms of
`ARMD in which there is significant loss of central
`vision. Soft drusen often merge into one another and
`become confluent.
`The interface between the choroid and the retina, the
`development of drusen, and the changes induced by
`drusen are illustrated in FIG. 2. On the far left, the
`retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells (1) contain only
`a few residual bodies (3), and these are largely confined
`to the base of the cells. Melanin granules (5) are present
`near the apical surface. Bruch’s membrane (7) is thin
`and uncontaminated. The visual cells (9) (of which only
`the inner and outer segments are shown) are regularly
`aligned and densely packed. This is the typical appear-
`ance in young eyes. In the adjacent region, early senes-
`cent changes are shown: the number of residual bodies
`(3) has increased throughout the RPE (1) cytoplasm,
`and Bruch’s membrane (7) has thickened. To the right,
`a druse (11) has been formed. On the surface of the
`druse, the attenuated RPE cells are engorged with re-
`sidual bodies, melanin has diminished in amount, some
`
`'of the visual cells have disappeared, and the remainder
`are physically distorted. Surviving rods and cones be-
`come shorter and broader as adjacent cells disappear.
`Patients can still have excellent visual acuity in the
`early stages of ARMD. Bressler et al., Survey of Oph-
`thalmology, Vol. 32, No. 6, May-June 1988.
`Loss of central vision can be attributed to several
`different occurrences, all of which relate to the drusen.
`Vision loss can occur when RPE and photoreceptor
`cells over the drusen degenerate and debris accumu-
`lates. Although the drusen fade and ultimately disap-
`pear, areas of atrophy remain. This fading is believed to
`be due to the activity of macrophages and adjacent
`RPE cells. This form of ARMD is termed geographic
`atrophy. Sarks et al., “Evolution of Geographic Atro-
`phy of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium", Eye. Vol. 2,
`552—577, 1988; see also Schatz eta1., “Atrophic Macular
`Degeneration”, Ophthalmology, 96, October 1989.
`Soft drusen can also cause vision loss by initiating
`breaks in Bruch’s membrane which allow the egress of
`fibrovascular tissue from the choriocapillaries. The
`fibrous tissue can lead to serous or hemorrhagic detach~
`merits of the sensory retina with accompanying severe
`loss of central vision.‘
`_
`Finally, drusen may become so abundant as to in-
`volve the fovea, interrupting the function of the sensory
`retina and resulting in vision loss.
`Research on the effects of phototoxicity in human
`and primate retinas has demonstrated some relationship
`between acute photic damage to the retina and the
`changes symptomatic of ARMD. Young, “Solar Radia-
`tion and Age-related Macular Degeneration”, Survey of
`Ophthalmology, Vol. 32, No. 4, January—February 1988.
`However, if ARMD were caused by chronic phototox-
`icity, one would expect an association between life~long
`light exposure and the prevalence of ARMD. Recent
`epidemiological studies indicate that there is no correla-
`tion between ARMD and the cumulative exposure of
`UV light. West et al., “Exposure to Sunlight and Other
`
`

`

`5,310,764
`
`4
`
`3
`Risk Factors for Age-related Macular Degeneration",
`Arch. Ophthalmol, Vol. 107, June 1989.
`Furthermore, various studies have been proposed or
`performed to determine the ediology of ARMD. Han-
`dleman et al., “Carotenoids in the Human Macula and
`Whole Retina”, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual
`Science, Vol. 29, No. 6, 850—855, June 1988, found that
`the major carotenoids in the retina were lutea and zea-
`xanthin. No beta-carotene was found in the retina. Han-
`
`dleman et a]. proposed to prevent ARMD through the
`use of retinal carotenoids to confer antioxidant protec-
`tion. Handleman et a1. classified carotenoids as protec-
`tive agents against highly reactive singlet oxygen and
`proposed that singlet oxygen-induced liquid perOxida-
`tion was a mediator of light damage in the retina. Carot-
`enoid deficient monkeys were reported to show pig-
`ment changes in the fundus.
`Ham et al., “Basic Mechanisms Underlying the Pro-
`duction of Photochemical Lesions in the Mammalian
`
`Retina”, Current Eye Research, Vol.3, No, 1, 165~l74,
`1984, disclose that both vitamin E and beta-carotene are
`naturally occurring singlet oxygen quenchers and that
`the toxic combination of light and oxygen'leads to the
`generation of free radicals, a possible cause of phototox-
`icity.
`Vitamin E was suggested to be a likely vitamin A
`autoxidation inhibitor by Kat: et al., “Relationship be—
`tween Dietary Retinol and Lipofuscin in the Retinal
`Pigment Epithelium", Mechanisms of Aging and Devel-
`opment, Vol. 35, 291—305, 1986. See also Katz et a1.
`“Development of Lipofuscin-like Fluorescence in the
`Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Response to Protease
`Inhibitor Treatment”, Mechanisms of Aging and Devel-
`opment, Vol. 49, 23—40, 1989; Stephens et al., “Vitamin
`E Distribution in Occular Tissues Following Long-
`term Dietary Depletion and Supplementation as Deter-
`mined by Microdissection and Gas Chromatography-
`Mass Spectrometry", Experimental Eye Research, Vol.
`47, 237—245, 1988.
`Retinoids have been demonstrated to modulate the
`
`growth and differentiation of several types of cells by
`Campochiaro et al., “Retinoic Acid Promotes Density—
`Dependent Growth Arrest in Human Retinal Pigment
`Epithelial Cells", Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual
`Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, January 1991.
`‘
`Gottsch et al., “Hematogenous Photosensitization",
`Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. Vol. 31,
`No. 9, September 1990, hypothesize that tissue damage
`due to photosensitization which in turn is due to free
`radical generation, may be prevented either by inducing
`protective enzymes using scavengers of free radicals
`and singlet oxygen such as vitamin E or by filtering the
`appropriate excitatory wavelengths. See also Boulton et
`al., “The Formulation of Autofluorescent Granules in
`Cultured Human RPE",
`Investigative Ophthalmology
`and Visual Science. Vol. 30, No. 1, January 1989. While
`Gottsch et al. suggest that beta-carotene and vitamin E
`are singlet oxygen quenchers, they strongly suggest that
`treatment of established disease is not aided by these
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`agents and that prophylaxis by vitamin E is not always
`effective.
`
`Katz et a1. “Flourescent Pigment Accumulation in
`Retinal Pigment Epithelium of Antioxidant-Deficient
`Rats“, Investigative Ophthalmoloy Visual, 1049-1058,
`1978, disclose that lipofuscin pigment in rats may be
`attributable to a diet that produces physiological antiox-
`idant deficiency. Young, Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol.
`32, No. 4, January-February 1988, discloses that beta-
`carotene can diminish photodynamic change in the
`retina. However, treatment of established ARMD is not
`disclosed, and no relationship between the presence or
`the growth of drusen and photodynamic damage is
`suggested.
`Because the normal retina has a high concentration of
`zinc, supplemental zinc was investigated in the treat—
`ment of ARMD by Newsome et a1. “Oral Zinc in Macu-
`lar Degeneration", Arch. Ophthalmology, Vol. 106, Feb-
`ruary 1988. No correlation of ARMD with initial serum
`levels of zinc was observed, and progression of the
`disease was seen in both the treatment and the non-
`
`treatment groups. Furthermore, zinc ingestion can be
`accompanied by serious side effects.
`It has now been discovered that the administration of
`
`appropriate amounts of beta-carotene can successfully
`treat ARMD. Beta~carotene had also proven useful in
`the inhibition and resolution of drusen, particularly
`without typical vision impairment or detrimental ana-
`tomical and physiological changes in the eye.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a diagram of the anatomy of the eye.
`FIG. 2 is a diagram of the development of drusen.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`According to the present invention, there is provided
`a method for treating age related macular degeneration
`in a mammal comprising administering to the mammal,
`a therapeutically effective amount of beta-carotene.
`The invention also contemplates a method for pre-
`venting impairment of the vision or for improving im-
`paired vision of a mammal whose eye has drusen com—
`prising administering to the mammal a therapeutically
`effective amount of beta-carotene.
`
`In a further embodiment, a method for preventing
`formation or growth of drusen in the eye of a mammal
`is provided. This method comprises administering to
`the mammal a drusen inhibiting effective amount of
`beta-carotene.
`
`Furthermore, a method for reducing the number or
`the size of drusen or for fading drusen without resultant
`areas of retinal atrophy, without resultant impairment
`of vision, or without a combination of the foregoing in
`the eye of a mammal is provided. Beta-carotene in a
`drusen reducing amount is administered to the mammal.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Carotinoids are terpenes that are widely distributed in
`the plant and animal kingdoms. Beta-carotene is a com-
`mon carotinoid having the chemical structure:
`
`

`

`5,310,764
`
`
`
`Beta-carotene, in mammals, readily undergoes oxida-
`tive cleavage at the central double bond to give two
`equivalents of the aldehyde retinol. Biochemical reduc-
`tion of the aldehyde carbon yields vitamin A.
`Age related macular degeneration is a disease pre-
`dominantly of humans. The most disturbing symptoms
`of ARMD include a slow or sudden loss of central
`vision or vision distortion in one eye. However, ARMD
`is diagnosed by the visualization of drusen in the eye
`coupled with this vision loss.
`The diagnosis of ARMD is typically made by fundus-
`copy which reveals a pigmentary or hemorrhagic dis-
`turbance due to drusen in the macular region of the
`involved eye. The contralateral eye almost always
`shows some pigmentary disturbance and the presence of
`drusen in the macula. Fluorescein angiography can also
`be utilized in the diagnosis of ARMD. This procedure
`visualizes the neovascular membranes beneath the re—
`tina.
`
`Although the mere presence of drusen is not defini-
`tive of ARMD, typically, the presence of drusen will
`lead to the disease. Therefore, it is advantageous to be
`able to treat the presence of drusen by reducing the size
`or the amount of drusen or by fading the drusen before
`and without clinical impairment of vision due to the
`disease.
`Typically, drusen will grow or fade leaving resultant
`areas of retinal atrophy. This retinal atrophy leads to
`vision loss. Drusen can cause vision loss through other
`mechanisms, however. Drusen can cause degeneration
`of the retinal pigment epithelial cells, photoreceptor
`cells, or a combination thereof. Visual impairment can
`also be due to one or more breaks in the Bruch’s mem-
`brane which permit the egress of fibrovascular tissues
`from choriocapillaries. Finally, the vision impairment
`can be due to the formation or growth of drusen itself
`which becomes sufficient to cover a significant portion
`of the fovea.
`Applicants hypothesize, without being bound to any
`particular theory, that by increasing the availability of
`carotinoids, and particularly beta~carotene, to the reti-
`nal pigment epithelium, function can be normalized. In
`fact, it has been suspected for some time that carotinoids
`are present in the human eye as reflected by the term
`macula lutea, lutea meaning yellow.
`In all of the embodiments of the present invention,
`beta-carotene is preferably administered systemically.
`Systemic administration most preferably is by the oral
`route.
`
`The term “daily dosage" identifies the average
`amount of beta-carotene administered to a patient.
`However, the dosage need not be administered daily.
`The daily dosage is merely an average dosage that a
`patient receives when beta-carotene is administered
`over a period. The daily dosage can be administered in
`divided portions so that the total amount administered is
`the daily dosage. Typically, acceptable blood levels of
`beta-carotene and chemically detectable changes in
`blood levels will be achieved after administration of
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`beta-carotene in the prescribed amounts for several
`months, i.e. three to six months.
`Although the safe upper limit of the amount of beta-
`carotene that can be administered to a human has not
`yet been determined, it is believed that such an upper
`limit is at least 1000 mg/day.
`In the treatment of age related macular degeneration
`or in the prevention or improvement of impaired vision
`in an eye with drusen, beta-carotene is administered in a
`therapeutically effective amount. Therapeutically effec—
`tive amounts of beta-carotene are those amounts suffi-
`cient to stabilize the progression of the disease or to
`resolve the symptoms of ARMD. This amount will
`depend upon the age, weight, sex, sensitivity, and the
`like of the individual. In many mammals, the therapeuti-
`cally effective amount can be determined by experimen-
`tation well known in the art such as by establishing a
`matrix of dosages and frequencies and assigning a group
`of experimental subjects to each point in the matrix.
`Typically for a human being, that amount will be at
`least about 50 mg/day of beta-carotene. Most prefera-
`bly, that amount will range from about 60 mg/day to
`' about 350 mg/day. Particularly,
`the dosage will be
`about 240 ing/day.
`The amount of beta-carotene required to prevent
`formation or growth of drusen is a drusen inhibiting
`amount of beta-carotene. Again, this amount will de-
`pend upon the age, weight, sex, sensitivity, and the like
`of the individual. This amount can be determined exper-
`imentally as explained above. Preferably, drusen inhibit-
`ing amounts of beta-carotene will be at least about 50
`mg/day. Most preferably, that amount will range from
`about 60 mg/day to about 350 mg/day. Particularly,
`the dosage will be about 240 mg/day.
`The amount of beta-carotene required to reduce the
`number or the size of drusen or to fade drusen is a dru-
`sen reducing amount of beta-carotene. Again that
`amount may be determined experimentally as explained
`above. Typically for a human being, that amount will be
`at least about 50 mg/day. Most preferably, that amount
`ranges from about 60 mg/day to about 350 mg/day.
`Particularly, the dosage will be about 240 mg/day.
`Although beta-carotene is provided through normal
`diet, the amounts of beta-carotene useful in the present
`invention typically are not provided by normal diet.
`This is because the foods that supply beta—carotene in
`the normal diet contain various other substances. If
`sufficient amounts of these foods were consumed to
`provide the necessary amounts of beta-carotene, these
`other substances would have been consumed in toxic
`amounts. Therefore, beta-carotene is typically supplied
`in the methods of the present invention through supple-
`mentation. Commercially available forms of beta-caro-
`tene are available, for example, from Hoffman-LaRoche
`under the trademark SOLATENE TM or as “beta-caro-
`tene”.
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`last for
`Typically, a course of administration will
`about three months to several years and preferably to
`
`

`

`7
`about three years. If new or further impairment of vi-
`sion, deveIOpment or growth of drusen, or symptoms of
`the disease occur in a subject who has been treated
`according to the present invention, it may become nec-
`essary to repeat the administration, to adjust the dosage
`of beta-carotene, or to administer a maintenance effec-
`tive amount of beta-carotene. This maintenance effec-
`tive amount of betacarotene will be that amount which
`will prevent regression to pretreatment conditions. This
`amount may be the same as or less than the amount used
`during treatment.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`The following examples illustrate the invention with-
`out limitation. Drusen are counted from funduscopy
`photographs and are counted as lighter areas proximate
`to the fovea.
`'
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`An 87 year old male was initially diagnosed as having
`bilateral cataracts and ARMD. The patient underwent
`cataract surgery on one eye about one year after the
`initial diagnosis and underwent cataract surgery on the
`other eye about one year after the first surgery.
`About one year and two months after the last surgery
`(Examination 1), funduscopy revealed a large number
`of drusen in each eye. One year and two months later,
`(Examination 2), visual acuity was measured as 20/20 in
`the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. The patient was
`placed on a regimen of 60 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`About one month later (Examination 3), visual acuity
`was measured as 20/25 in the right eye and 20/30 in the
`left eye. The patient was placed on a regimen of 120
`mg/day of beta-carotene. About one month later (Ex-
`amination 4), visual acuity was measured at 20/30 in the
`right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. The patient was
`placed on'a regimen of 180 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`About one month later, (Examination 5), visual acuity
`was measured as 20/25 in the right eye and 20/30 in the
`left eye. The patient was placed on a regimen of 240
`mg/day of beta-carotene.
`Visual acuity was measured periodically over the
`next three months and ranged from 20/20 to 20/25 in
`the right eye and 20/25 to 20/30 in the left eye, while
`the patient was maintained on the 240 mg/day beta-
`carotene regimen. Funduscopy at the end of this period
`(Examination 6), revealed a 35.8 percent decrease in the
`number of drusen in one eye and a 68.7 percent decrease
`in the number of drusen in the other eye. The decrease
`in drusen was determined by comparing the number of
`drusen seen at Examination 1 and Examination 6. Many
`drusen also decreased in size during this period. Initial
`and final drusen counts are compared in Table 1.
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`An 84 year old female was initially diagnosed as hav-
`ing bilateral cataracts and ARMD. The patient under-
`went cataract surgery on the left eye two weeks after
`the diagnosis and underwent cataract surgery on the
`right eye approximately two and one half months after
`the first surgery. Branch vein occlusion was diagnosed
`in the left eye about one year and two months after the
`initial diagnosis, and central vein occlusion was diag-
`nosed in the left eye about four months subsequently.
`About three years after the initial diagnosis of ARMD
`(Examination 1), visual acuity was measured as 20/ 100
`in the right eye and count fingers vision in the left eye.
`
`5,310,764
`
`5
`
`IO
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The patient was placed on a regimen of 60 mg/day of
`beta-carotene.
`About one month later (Examination 2), visual acuity
`was measured as 20/200 in the right eye and count
`fingers vision in the left eye. The patient was placed on
`a regimen of 120 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`About month later (Examination 3), visual acuity was
`measured as 20/70 in the right eye and count fingers
`vision in the left eye. Funduscopy revealed a concentra-
`tion of drusen in the foveal area of one eye. The patient
`was placed on a regimen of 180 mg/day of beta-caro-
`tene.
`
`About month later (Examination 4) visual acuity was
`measured as 20/70 in the right eye and count fingers
`vision in the left eye. The patient was placed on a regi-
`men of 24-0 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`Visual acuity was measured periodically over the
`next four months and ranged from 20/70 to 20/80 in the
`right eye and remained count fingers vision in the left
`eye, while the patient was maintained on a regimen of
`240 mg/day of beta-carotene. Later, visual acuity in the
`right eye was 20/80 and count fingers vision in the left
`eye.
`Funduscopy at the end of this period (Examination
`5), revealed a 90.9 percent decrease in drusen in the eye
`previously photographed, a sharp reduction in the fo-
`veal region. The decrease in drusen was determined by
`comparing the number of drusen seen at Examination 3
`and Examination 5. Initial and final drusen counts are
`compared in Table 1.
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`A 70 year old female was initially diagnosed as hav-
`ing bilateral cataracts and ARMD. The patient under-
`went cataract surgery on the left eye about ten months
`later. About one year after surgery (Examination 1),
`visual acuity was measured as 20/25 in the right eye and
`20/20 in the left eye. Funduscopy revealed the presence
`of drusen in the foveal region of one eye. The patient
`was placed on a regimen of 60 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`About one month later (Examination 2), visual acuity
`was measured as 20/30 in the right eye and 20/20 in the
`left eye. The patient was continued on the same regimen
`of beta-carotene.
`About one and one half months later (Examination 3),
`visual acuity was measured as 20/30 in the right eye and
`20/20 in the left eye. The patient was placed on a regi-
`men of 120 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`’
`About one month later (Examination 4), visual acuity
`was measured as 20/25 in the right eye and 20/20 in the
`left eye. Funduscopy revealed a 25 percent decrease in
`the number of drusen and a marked decrease in the
`amount of drusen in the foveal area of the eye previ-
`ously photographed. The decrease in drusen was deter-
`mined by comparing the number of drusen seen at Ex-
`amination l and Examination 4. The patient was placed
`on a regimen of 180 mg/day of beta-carotene. Initial
`and final drusen counts are compared in Table 1.
`One and one half months later, visual acuity in the left
`eye was measured as 20/30 and visual acuity in the right
`eye was measured as 20/20. The patient was placed on
`a regimen of 240 mg/day of beta—carotene.
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`An 86 year old male was initially diagnosed as having
`bilateral cataracts and ARMD. The patient underwent
`cataract surgery in the right eye, about five months
`after the initial diagnosis. Three years and three months
`
`

`

`9
`after the initial visit (Examination 1), the patient’s visual
`acuity was measured as 20/40 in the right eye and 20/40
`in the left eye. Funduscopy revealed the presence of
`drusen in the foveal area of one eye.
`About two months later (Examination 2), visual acu-
`ity was measured as 20/30 in the right eye and 20/30 in
`the left eye. The patient was placed on a regimen of 180
`mg/day of beta-carotene.
`About one month later (Examination 3), visual acuity
`was measured as 20/40 in the right eye and 20/30 in the
`left eye. Funduscopy revealed an increase in the amount
`of drusen in the foveal area of the eye previously photo-
`graphed. The patient was placed on a regimen of 240
`mg/day of beta-carotene.
`Over about the following four months visual acuity
`ranged from 20/30 to 20/40 in the right eye and 20/30
`to 20/40 in the left eye, while the patient was main-
`tained on a dosage of 240 mg/day of beta-carotene.
`About one month after this period (Examination 4),
`visual acuity was measured as 20/40 in the right eye and
`20/40 in the left eye. Funduscopy revealed a 40 percent
`decrease in the amount of drusen in the eye previously
`photographed. The decrease was determined by com-
`paring the number of drusen seen at Examination 1 and
`Examination 4. The patient was maintained on the regi~
`men of 240 mg/day of beta-carotene. Initial and final
`drusen counts are compared in Table 1.
`Examples 1—4 demonstrate the remarkable transfor-
`mation of and reduction in number and size of drusen as
`well as the successful treatment of ARMD due to beta-
`carotene administration in accordance with the present
`invention.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket