throbber
United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,645,596
`
`Kim et a1.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Jul. 8, 1997
`
`USOOS645596A
`
`[54] CERAMIC VERTEBRAE PROSTHESIS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Phyo Kim; Masao Suzuki, both of
`Tokyo, Japan
`
`[73] Assignee: Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki
`Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 268,103
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Jul. 6, 1994
`
`[30]
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Jul. 7, 1993
`Nov. 12, 1993
`
`[JP]
`[JP]
`
`Japan .................................... 5-037185
`Japan .................................... 5-060953
`
`Int. Cl.6 ........................................................ A61F 2/44
`[51]
`
`[52] US. Cl.
`....... 623/17
`
`[58] Field of Search .................................... 623/1, 11, 16,
`623/17, 18; 606/60—63
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`........................... 623/17
`2/1975 Stubson et a1.
`3,867,728
`4,713,076 12/1987 Draenert ................... 623/23
`
`7/1988 Bueliner-Janz et a1. .......... 623/17
`4,759,766
`4,798,585
`1/1989 Inoue et a1.
`.
`
`.
`
`.................................. 623/17
`
`9/1989 Manson .................................... 623/17
`4,863,477
`8/1990 Hirayama et 211..
`4,946,378
`11/1990 Ojima.
`4,969,913
`5/1991 Hirayama et a1.
`5,017,518
`7/1991 Ogawa et a1.
`.
`5,030,611
`5,064,436 11/1991 Ogiso et al. .
`5,082,803
`1/1992 Sumita.
`5,123,926
`6/1992 Pisharodi
`5,137,534
`8/1992 Sumita.
`5,147,361
`9/1992 Ojima et a].
`5,158,756 10/1992 OgaWa et a1.
`5,171,720 12/1992 Kawakami .
`5,215,941
`6/1993 Yasukawa .
`.............................. 623/17
`5,306,307
`4/1994 Senter et al.
`
`5,306,309
`4/1994 Wagner et ale
`623/17
`5,314,478
`5/1994 Oka et a].
`................................. 623/18
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Primary Examiner—Robert A. H. Clarke
`Attomey, Agent, or Firm—Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A ceramic vertebrae prosthesis to be inserted in a cavity
`defined between upper and lower vertebra bodies with a
`removed intervenebral disk or disks is provided with upper
`and lower convex contact surfaces that come into contact
`with the upper and lower vertebra bodies.
`
`21 Claims, 5 Drawing Sheets
`
`[10
`
`11
`
`123
`
`12b
`
`12
`
`NUVASIVE1110
`
`1
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 8, 1997
`
`Sheet 1 of 5
`
`5,645,596
`
`Fig. I
`
`X
`
`Z
`
`Y?»
`
`10
`
`/
`
`12
`
`Fig.2
`
`A
`
`<25
`
`[10
`
`“
`
`12b
`12a
`x._fl__._—/
`
`12
`
`Z L
`
`y
`
`x
`
`2
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 8, 1997
`
`Sheet 2 of 5
`
`5,645,596
`
`Fig.3
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 8, 1997
`
`Sheet 3 of 5
`
`5,645,596
`
`F i g . 5
`
`32'/3O
`L
`
`32
`
`[30
`
`Z
`33 by
`
`Fig. 5
`
`31
`
`A 3
`
`*)-
`
`4
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 8, 1997
`
`Sheet 4 of 5
`
`5,645,596
`
`32
`
`/30 .
`
`32
`
`Fig.7
`
`Z 1
`
`y
`
`.x
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 8, 1997
`
`Sheet 5 of 5
`
`5,645,596
`
`Fig . 8
`
`' 31
`
`—T—’
`
`A
`
`32
`
`/3o
`
`33
`
`32
`
`6
`
`

`

`5,645,596
`
`1
`CERAMIC VERTEBRAE PROSTHESIS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to a ceramic vertebrae
`prosthesis which utilized as a substitute for one or more
`intervertebral disks that have been resected in a resection
`operation.
`2. Description of the Related Art
`If a nerve root is subject to a pressure due to an injury of
`an intervertebral disk, such as a cervical vertebrae, various
`neurological symptoms often arise therefi‘om. To cure this
`problem, the injured portion is usually subject to local rest
`and fixation thereof and a conservative curing process, such
`as an extensive curing process. Notwithstanding, if pain is
`not remitted, or the injury is too severe to be restored by such
`a curing procedure, a patient undergoes a surgical operation.
`There are two surgical operation methods in which the
`injured intervertebral disk is removed in front of the body of
`the vertebra or the vertebral arch is partly resected in the rear
`of the body of the vertebra so as to deliver a hernia. The first
`operation method in which the injured intervertebral disk is
`resected in front of the body of the vertebra is referred to as
`a forward adhesion in which a bone is implanted and
`adhered in a cavity formed between the upper and lower
`bodies of vertebra.
`
`In such a forward adhesion, in many cases, a self—fliac
`bone is used as a bone to be implanted. However, a patient
`suffers from heavy burden and physical load as a result of to
`a secondary invasive procedure necessitates by the extrac—
`tion of the iliac bone. To this end, prostheses, such as
`ceramics have been recently used and implanted instead of
`the self-iliac bone. In general, the ceramics are stable in and
`highly biocompatible, with the organ in which the prosthesis
`is to be grafted
`However, the ceramics are brittle and hard, and accord-
`ingly are weak with respect to physical shock It is necessary
`for a vertebra prosthesis to have a mechanical strength
`strong enough to resist the compression load exerted to
`upper and lower vertebra bodies. In addition thereto, the
`vertebra prosthesis must be brought into direct contact with
`or directly adhered to the bone without an intervening soft
`tissue between the prosthesis and the bone while no bone
`resorption occurs between the upper and lower vertebra
`bodies.
`
`The shape of the prosthesis is such that the portion of the
`bone to be resected is as small as possible, since the
`prosthesis must be partly removed in accordance with the
`shape of the vertebrae prosthesis. In general, a known
`prosthesis (prosthesis other than ceramics) is subject to a
`certain stress (pressure) due to repeated absorption and bone
`resorption with respect to a sound bone to keep a balanced
`state. However in particular, the ceramic cervical vertebrae
`prosthesis in which no bone resorption takes place must be
`shaped so as to disperse or uniformly distributes the com-
`pression stress. Nevertheless, the conventional ceramic ver-
`tebrae prosthesis has been focused mainly on the strength of
`the material of which the vertebrae prosthesis is made. to
`increase the resistance to the compression load but little or
`no consideration of the shape have been taken into account.
`Moreover, little or no attempts to reduce the amount of the
`bone to be resected have been made.
`
`is necessary to expand the distance
`it
`Furthermore,
`between the upper and lower vertebra bodies so as to insert
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`4o
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`the vertebrae prosthesis therebetween. However, the con—
`ventional vertebrae prosthesis cannot, by itself. expand the
`distance between the upper and lower vertebra bodies.
`Accordingly, it is necessary to use a special expanding tool
`or device, thus resulting in an increase in the time for the
`operation. In particular, a conventional elongated prosthesis,
`which is to be inserted to substitute for a plurality of
`removed vertebra bodies. is usually in the form of a circular
`or angular post linearly extending in the vertical direction.
`Accordingly, it does not conform to the profile of the
`continuously curved vertebra bodies. Consequently, the con—
`ventional elongated prostheses were morphologically
`unnatural.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The primary object of the present invention is to provide
`an improved prosthesis having an increased resistance to the
`compression stress, wherein no bone resorption occurs; the
`amount of the vertebra body to be resected upon operation
`can be minimized; the prosthesis can be easily inserted; and,
`the inserted prosthesis is stably held in the inserted position.
`Another object of the present invention is to provide an
`improved ceramic prosthesis for a plurality of vertebra
`bodies having a morphologically natural shape.
`These and other objects of the present invention will be
`appreciated more fully after the following descriptions con-
`cerning preferred embodiments of the present invention.
`One of the most significant features of the present inven—
`tion is addressed to the shape of the ceramic vertebrae
`prosthesis. Namely, the inventors have found that the contact
`surface of the vertebra body with the intervertebral disk is
`macroscopically a concave surface. Consequently, if the
`vertebrae prosthesis, which substitutes for the intervertebral
`disk, is provided with a convex surface corresponding to the
`concave contact surface,
`technical advantages can be
`achieved Particularly an increase in resistance to achieved
`compression load, the prevention of a bone resorption, a
`minimization of the amount of vertebral bone to be resected,
`ease of insertion, and an increase in stableness after
`insertion, etc., can be all achieved.
`Namely, according to an aspect of the present invention,
`there is provided a ceramic vertebrae prosthesis to be
`inserted in a cavity defined between upper and lower ver-
`tebra bodies, by removal of an intervertebral disk or disks,
`wherein the vertebrae prosthesis is provided with upper and
`lower outwardly convex contact surfaces that come into
`contact with the upper and lower vertebra bodies.
`The outwardly convex contact surfaces of the vertebrae
`prosthesis provide an increased resistance to the compres-
`sion stress exerted by the upper and lower vertebra bodies.
`Since the contact surfaces of the vertebra bodies that come
`into contact with the prosthesis are macroscopically concave
`surfaces, the amount of bone of the vertebra bodies to be
`resected, depending on the convex surfaces of the prosthesis,
`can be minimized. The engagement of the concave contact
`surfaces of the vertebra bodies and the convex contact
`surfaces of the prosthesis provides a high resistance to the
`compression stress not only in the vertical direction
`(longitudinal direction of the vertebrae) but also in the
`lateral direction slightly deviated from the longitudinal
`direction, since the stress is substantially uniformly distrib—
`uted or dispersed. The distribution of the stress prevents the
`bone of the vertebrae from being resorbed by the prosthesis,
`that is, no bone resorption takes place. Consequently, no
`sinking of the prosthesis results. so that the prosthesis
`appropriately and stably functions as a substitute for the
`
`7
`
`

`

`5,645,596
`
`3
`removed vertebrae for a long time, without causing a defor-
`mation of the remaining vertebrae.
`The contact surfaces of the prosthesis with the vertebrae
`can be made of either a single curvature of or a composite
`curved surface consisting of different curvatures of crrrved
`surfaces in combination. For instance, in the composite
`curved surface. the curvature thereof in a section perpen—
`dicular to the insertion direction of the prosthesis is different
`from the curvature in a section parallel with the insertion
`direction.
`
`Preferably, the width of the prosthesis gradually decreases
`toward the front end thereof as viewed in the insertion
`direction thereof, so that the prosthesis can be easily inserted
`in a cavity or space between the upper and lower vertebra
`bodies. Namely, for ease for insertion of the prosthesis, the
`latter is preferably of a wedge-shape. Meanwhile, it should
`be recalled that the prosthesis is preferably provided with
`curved surfaces as a whole, as mentioned above. In view of
`these two different requirements, it is preferable that each of
`the curved contact surfaces of the prosthesis in a cross
`section parallel with the insertion direction thereof is made
`up of a front curved surface having a small curvature and a
`rear curved surface opposite thereto having a large
`curvature. so as to satisfy the two requirements.
`Another feature of the present invention is directed to an
`improved cervical prosthesis. The cervical vertebrae are in
`the form of a forwardly convex arch. Accordingly,
`the
`cervical prosthesis, to substitute for the cervical vertebrae,
`should be correspondingly curved into an arch-shape so as
`to provide a morphologically natural form. Furthermore, if
`the upper and lower contact surfaces of the cervical
`prosthesis, with the upper and lower vertebra bodies, are
`made of convex surfaces, the compression stress can be
`effectively dispersed or distributed.
`Namely, according to another aspect of the present
`invention, there is provided a ceramic cervical vertebrae
`prosthesis for a multiple vertebra bodies to be inserted in a
`cavity formed by resecting a plurality of continuous cervical
`vertebrae, wherein the vertebrae prosthesis is provided with
`an outwardly arched front surface, corresponding to front
`surfaces of the removed vertebra bodies, and upper and
`lower convex contact surfaces that come into contact with
`the corresponding upper and lower vertebra bodies.
`In the present invention, there is no limitation on the
`radius of curvature of the front surface of the ceramic
`
`cervical vertebrae prosthesis, but preferably, the radius of
`curvature is 100 mm to 200 mm. The radius of curvature of
`the rear surface of the ceramic cervical vertebrae prosthesis
`can be the same as or different from that of the front surface
`thereof. If the radius of curvature of the rear surface of the
`ceramic cervical vertebrae prosthesis is smaller than the
`radius of curvature of the front surface thereof, the ceramic
`cervical vertebrae prosthesis can be easily and advanta-
`geously inserted from the front of the vertebrae.
`If the upper and lower contact surfaces of the cervical
`vertebrae prosthesis are made of outwardly convex surfaces.
`the resistance to the compression stress exerted by the upper
`and lower vertebra bodies, can be increased. Since the
`contact surfaces of the vertebra bodies that come into
`contact with the prosthesis are macroscopically concave
`surfaces, the amount of bone of the vertebra bodies to be
`resected, depending on the convex surfaces of the prosthesis,
`can be minimized. The engagement of the concave contact
`surfaces of the vertebra bodies and the convex contact
`surfaces of the prosthesis provides a high resistance to the
`compression stress not only in the vertical direction (i.e..
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4
`direction connecting the two adjacent vertebrae bodies) but
`also in the lateral direction slightly deviated from the
`longitudinal direction, since the stress is substantially uni-
`formly distributed or dispersed. The distribution of the stress
`prevents the bone of the vertebrae from being resorbed by
`the prosthesis, that is, no bone resorption takes place.
`Consequently, no sinking of the prosthesis is caused, so that
`the prosthesis appropriately and stably functions as a sub-
`stitute for the removed vertebrae for long time without
`causing a deformation of the remaining vertebrae.
`The contact surfaces of the prosthesis with the vertebrae
`can be made of either a single curvature or a composite
`curved surface consisting of different curvatures of curved
`surfaces in combination. For instance, in the composite
`curved surface, the curvature thereof in a section perpen-
`dicular to the insertion direction of the prosthesis is different
`from the curvature in a section parallel with the insertion
`direction.
`
`The ceramic of which the vertebrae prosthesis (including
`the cervical vertebrae prosthesis) is made can be selected
`from alumina, zirconia, or calcium phosphate ceramic, etc.
`Among them, in particular, the calcium phosphate ceramic
`is advantageous and preferable since a spontaneous adhesion
`of the calcium phosphate ceramic vertebrae prosthesis to the
`associated vertebrae takes place, resulting in a firm connec-
`tion therebetween. As the calcium phosphate ceramic cal—
`cium phosphate compound whose Ca/P ratio is 1.0 to 2.0,
`such as hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, tetracalcium
`phosphate, calcium hydrogen phosphate. can be advanta-
`geously used. These substances can be used singly or as a
`mixture or compound.
`More preferably, the vertebrae prosthesis of the present
`invention is made of porous calcium phosphate ceramics
`whose porosity (true porosity) is 20 to 55%, and preferably
`30 to 45%. In case of porous ceramics, an accelerated
`adhesion thereof to the vertebra bodies can be expected
`owing to the penetration of the osteoblast into the pores at
`the contact surface of the vertebrae prosthesis and the
`vertebra bodies. This expedites the recovery of function of
`the vertebrae. If the (true) porosity is below 20%, the
`number of the pores is too small to expect the above—
`mentioned advantages. Conversely, if the porosity is above
`55%. the mechanical strength of the prosthesis is too small
`to resist the compression stress. The (true) porosity refers to
`a percentage of a total volume of the closed pores (cells) and
`the open pores (cells) to a unit volume.
`The ceramic vertebrae prosthesis can be produced as
`follows. In the following discussion, hydroxyapatite ceram-
`ics are used to make the ceramic vertebrae prosthesis by way
`of example.
`Phosphate salt and calcium salt are synthesized in a wet
`composition process per se known to obtain a hydroxyapa-
`tite slurry. The slurry thus obtained is dried by use of arotary
`drum type drier or the like to obtain a hydroxyapatite
`powder. The powder is pressed. for example, by use of a dry
`type static hydraulic press into the shape of the ceramic
`vertebrae prosthesis. The compact member thus obtained is
`heated at 1000° C. to 1200° C. in an electric furnace to
`obtain vertebrae prostheses (including cervical vertebrae
`prostheses). Alternatively, it is possible to employ a slurry
`casting process, an injection molding process, or to produce
`a green compact member which is machined by a lathe into
`a predetermined shape.
`The methods mentioned above are useful in producing a
`dense vertebrae prosthesis whose porosity is less than 10%.
`To produce a porous vertebrae prosthesis whose porosity
`is more than 20%, a foaming agent and water are added to
`
`8
`
`

`

`5,645,596
`
`5
`and mixed with the hydroxyapatite powder to obtain a
`foamed slurry which is then dried. The dried slurry is
`machined by a milling machine or the like into a predeter-
`mined shape of vertebrae prosthesis which is thereafter
`heated at 1000° to 1200° C. in an electric furnace to obtain
`a final product, i.e., a vertebrae prosthesis. In the process
`mentioned above, it is alternatively possible to add a powder
`of thermally disappearing substance, so that the mixture is
`formed and heated to produce a vertebrae prothesis. A
`thermally disappearing substance refers to any of various
`plastic or wood powders that disintegrate when heated at
`high temperatures,
`Furthermore. the vertebrae prosthesis according to the
`present invention can be made of ceramics having a dense
`center portion and a porous circumferential portion. The
`dense center portion mainly contributes to an increase in the
`mechanical strength as a whole, and the porous circumfer-
`ential portion mainly contributes to an accelerated adhesion
`of the vertebrae prosthesis to the vertebra bodies. To produce
`such a ceramic vertebrae prosthesis having a dense center
`portion and a porous circumferential portion, for example, a
`dried dense material corresponding to the center portion is
`fitted in a dried porous material corresponding to the cir-
`cumferential portion and the assembly is heated. or the dried
`dense material is adhered to the dried porous material by an
`apatite slurry and the assembly is heated.
`The subject of the present invention is directed to a
`structure or shape of a vertebrae prosthesis and not to the
`production process thereof. Accordingly, the manufactlning
`process is not limited to those mentioned above.
`The present disclosure relates to subject matter contained
`in Japanese utility model application Nos. 5-37185 (filed on
`Jul. 7, 1993) and 5-60953 (filed on Nov. 12, 1993) which are
`expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The present invention will be described below in detail
`with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a plan view of a ceramic vertebrae prosthesis
`according to an embodiment of the present invention;
`FIG. 2 is a front elevational View of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a vertebrae prosthesis
`shown in FIGS. 1 through 3. inserted between vertebra
`bodies;
`
`FIG. Sis a cross sectional plan view of a ceramic cervical
`vertebrae prosthesis according to an embodiment of the
`present invention;
`FIG. 6 is a front side elevational View of FIG. 5;
`FIG. 7 is a left side elevational view of FIG. 5;
`FIG. Sis a perspective View of FIG. 5: and.
`FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a ceramic cervical vertebrae
`prosthesis shown in FIGS. 5 through 8. inserted between
`vertebra bodies.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`FIGS. 1 through 3 show a ceramic vertebrae prosthesis 10
`according to the present invention by way of example. The
`ceramic vertebrae prosthesis 10 is substantially rectangular
`in plan View corresponding to the cross sectional shape of
`the vertebra body (cervical vertebrae or
`thoracolumber
`vertebrae). The ceramic prosthesis 10 is has a symmetrical
`shape with respect to the center axis (median plane) in the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`6
`vertical direction Z. The ceramic prosthesis 10 is provided
`with a center portion 11 of wedge-shape which is provided
`on the upper and lower surfaces thereof with curved contact
`surfaces 12 which are in the form of a convex surface.
`
`The wedge-shape center portion 11 has a width which
`gradually decreases toward the front end thereof, in a section
`in a direction parallel with the direction “A” (i.e., z—x plane)
`of insertion of the ceramic prosthes is between the vertebra
`bodies, as can be seen in FIG. 2.
`In a section in a direction parallel with the insertion
`direction “A” (i.e., z—x plane), the contact surfaces 12 are
`each provided with a front small curvature surface portion
`120 (having a large radius of curvature) and a rear large
`curvature surface portion 12b (having a small radius of
`curvature) in combination. The curved surface in each cross
`section in z—y plane perpendicular to the insertion direction
`“A” is comprised of a curved to surface having one curva-
`ture as shown in FIG. 3.
`
`The ceramic prosthesis 10 as constructed above is inserted
`between the vertebra bodies 20 with the front small curva—
`ture surface portion 12a being the leading end, as can be
`seen in FIG. 4. Since the small curvature surface portion 12a
`has a curvature smaller (radius of curvature larger) than the
`large curvature surface portion 12b, and the wedge—shape
`portion 11 reduces the thickness thereof at the front end, the
`ceramic prosthesis 10 can be inserted between the vertebra
`bodies 20 while expanding the space defined between the
`vertebra bodies, due to the wedge effect thereof as a whole.
`When the insertion is completed, the contact surfaces 12
`which are in the form of a convex surface consisting of the
`small curvature surface portion 12a and the large curvature
`surface portion 12b substantially uniformly distribute or
`disperse the compression stress exerted by the vertebra
`bodies 20. and no bone resorption takes place. so that the
`ceramic prosthesis can be stably held between the vertebra
`bodies 20. Moreover, the amount of the vertebra bodies 20
`to be cut—away can be as small as possible, since the convex
`surface 12 correspond to the surfaces of the associated
`vertebra bodies 20 that are macroscopically concave sur—
`faces.
`
`In the illustrated embodiment, although the central por-
`tion 11 is in the form of a wedge which contributes, together
`with the convex contact surfaces 12, to an easy insertion of
`the ceramic prosthesis, as mentioned above, the central
`portion 11 may be in the form of a parallel—sided plate.
`Moreover, in the illustrated embodiment, the vertebrae pros—
`thesis 10 is of a symmetrical shape with respect to the center
`axis in the vertical direction, and accordingly, the prosthesis
`can be inserted with either side (upper or lower side in FIGS.
`2 and 3) located up. Alternatively, the ceramic vertebrae
`prosthesis 10 can be of an asymmetrical shape.
`The following discussion will be adressed to examples of
`a production process of the ceramic vertebrae prosthesis 10
`according to the present invention.
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`A hydroxyapatite slurry was prepared by a wet composi—
`tion process. The slurry thus obtained was dried by a rotary
`drum type drier produced by Nishimura Tekkou Seisakusho
`Co. Ltd., to obtain a hydroxyapatite powder. The powder
`was calcined at 800° C. in an electric furnace for three hours
`for an easy handling thereof.
`The calcined powder was pressed by a metal press to
`obtain a green compact in the form of a cylinder whose
`diameter and length were 35 mm and 35 mm, respectively.
`The green compact thus obtained was pressed at a hydraulic
`
`9
`
`

`

`5 ,645,596
`
`7
`
`pressure of 1 ton/cm2 by a static hydraulic press to obtain a
`cylindrical green compact having a mechanical strength
`strong enough to machine the same. The cylindrical green
`compact thus obtained was machined by an NC milling
`machine to produce different sizes of products whose shape
`is as shown in FIGS. 1 through 3, taking into account a
`contraction of the green compact caused during a heating
`process thereof. The products were then heated at 1100° C.
`in an electric furnace for two hours to obtain different sizes
`
`of vertebrae prostheses. The vertebrae prostheses were
`implanted in patients suflering from an intervertebral disk
`hernia or the like by the forward adhesion process. As a
`result. good results were obtained.
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`A hydroxyapatite slurry which was prepared by a wet
`composition process was dried by a rotary drum type drier
`produced by Nishimura Tekkou Seisakusho Co. Ltd.. to
`obtain a hydroxyapatite powder. The powder was calcined at
`800° C. in an electric furnace for three hours for an easy
`handling thereof.
`100 g of albumen albumin was added to and gradually
`mixed with 200 g of the calcined powder by a dry type ball
`mill. Thereafter, 500 g of water was added to the mixed
`powder and foamed for 15 minutes by a hand mixer.
`Thereafter, the foamed mixture was transferred onto a glass
`Petri dish having 20 cm diameter and 5 cm depth. and dried
`at 80° for 24 hours in a drier to obtain a dried porous body.
`The porous body was cut into parallelepiped shapes and
`machined by an NC lathe and milling machine to produce
`diiferent sizes of products whose shape is as shown in FIGS.
`1 through 3. taking into account a contraction thereof caused
`during a burning process thereof. The products were then
`heated at 1200° C. for three hours in an electric furnace to
`
`obtain diiferent sizes of vertebrae prostheses. The vertebrae
`prostheses were implanted in patients sufiering from an
`intervertebral disk hernia or the like by the forward adhesion
`process. As a result. good results were obtained.
`FIGS. 5 through 9 show a ceramic cervical vertebrae
`prosthesiac 30 for multiple vertebra bodies according to the
`present invention. by way of example.
`The ceramic cervical vertebrae prosthesis 30 is in the
`form of an arch corresponding to the shape of the cervical
`vertebrae. so that when the prosthesis 30 is implanted and
`adhered. the surface of the prosthesis 30 corresponding to
`the front surface of the cervical vertebrae is made of a
`convex surface 31. The upper and lower surfaces of the
`prosthesis 30. that are brought into contact with the upper
`and lower vertebra bodies 20. are formed as convex surfaces
`32
`
`Note that the radius of curvature of the front surface 31 of
`the prosthesis 30 corresponding to the front surface of the
`cervical vertebrae is not necessarily identical to and can be
`difierent from the radius of curvature of the rear surface 33
`of the prosthesis 30 opposite to the front surface 31. For
`instance. if the radius of curvature of the convex front
`surface 31 of the prosthesis 30 is larger than the radius of
`curvature of the concave rear surface 33 thereof. the pros—
`thesis 30 can be more easily inserted into a cavity formed
`when a plurality of vertebra bodies have been resected. In
`the illustrated embodiment. the radii of curvature of the
`convex surface 31 and concave surface 33 are 160 mm and
`150 mm. respectively.
`When the ceramic cervical vertebrae prosthesis 30 is
`inserted. the convex front surface 31 is a leading end. as
`shown in FIG. 9. Consequently. the cervical vertebrae pros-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`8
`thesis 30 has a natural curve corresponding to the cervical
`vertebrae. When the insertion of the prosthesis 30 is
`completed, the convex contact surfaces 32 that come into
`contact with the vertebra bodies 20 substantially uniformly
`distribute or disperse the compression stress from the ver—
`tebra bodies 20 due to the convexity thereof, so that the
`prosthesis 30 can be stably held between the vertebra bodies
`20 without a bone resorption. Moreover. the amount of the
`vertebra bodies 20 to be resected is minimized since the
`
`surfaces of the vertebra bodies 20 are microscopically
`concave surfaces, as mentioned above.
`Examples of production process of the ceramic cervical
`vertebrae prosthesis 30 according to the present invention
`will be discussed below.
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`A powder of tricalcium phosphate marketed by Taiheiyou
`Kagaku Co. Ltd, was calcined at 800° C. for three hours in
`an electric furnace. It was identified by an X-ray analizer
`that the calcined powder had a hydroxyapatite crystal struc-
`ture. The calcined powder was pressed by a metal press to
`obtain a green compact in the form of a prism of 25 mmx25
`mmx80 mm (height). The green compact thus obtained was
`pressed at a hydraulic pressure of 1 ton/cm2 by a static
`hydraulic press to obtain a prism-shape of green compact
`having a mechanical strength strong enough to machine the
`same. The green compact was then machined by an NC
`milling undergo machining to produce different sizes of
`products whose shape is as shown in FIGS. 5 through 9.
`taking into account a contraction of the green compact
`caused during a heating process thereof. The products were
`then heated at 1100° C. for two hours in an electric furnace
`to obtain difl’erent sizes of cervical vertebrae prostheses. The
`cervical vertebrae prostheses were implanted in patients
`sufiering from an intervertebral disk hernia or the like by the
`forward adhesion process. As a result, good results were
`obtained after the lapse of six months.
`
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`50 g of albumen albumin was added to and gradually
`mixed with 200 g of calcined hydroxyapatite powder
`obtained by the same process as Example 3. mentioned
`above, by a dry type ball mill. Thereafter. 500 g of water was
`added to the mixed powder and foamed for 15 minutes by a
`hand mixer. Thereafter, the foamed mixture was transferred
`onto a glass Petri dish having 20 cm diameter and 5 cm
`depth, and dried at 80° C. for 24 hours in a drier to obtain
`a dried porous body. The porous body was cut into paral-
`lelepiped shapes and machined by an NC milling machine to
`produce different sizes of products whose shape is as shown
`in FIGS. 5 through 9. taking into account a contraction
`thereof caused during a heating process thereof. The prod—
`ucts were then heated at 1200" C. for three hours in an
`electric furnace to obtain diiferent sizes of cervical vertebrae
`prostheses. The cervical vertebrae prostheses were
`implanted in patients suffering from an intervertebral disk
`hernia or the like by the forward adhesion process. As a
`result. good results were obtained after the lapse of seven
`months.
`
`As can be seen from the above discussion, according to
`the present invention. a vertebrae prosthesis having an
`increased resistance to the compression stress can be
`obtained. wherein no bone resorption of the prosthesis
`occurs; the amount of the bone of the vertebra body to be
`resected during the surgical operation can be minimized; the
`vertebrae prosthesis can be easily inserted between the
`
`1O
`
`10
`
`

`

`5,645,596
`
`9
`vertebra bodies; and, the vertebrae prosthesis can be stably
`held between the vertebra bodies.
`Furthermore, according to the present invention, a cervi-
`cal vertebrae prosthesis for a multiple vertebra bodies can be
`advantageously implanted in a cavity by a forward adhesion
`process after a plurality of vertebra bodies are removed. In
`the cervical vertebrae prosthesis, the compression stress
`exerted by the associated upper and lower vertebra bodies
`can be dispersed or uniformly distributed. thus resulting in
`an increased resistance of the prosthesis to the compression
`stress. In addition to the foregoing, in the cervical vertebrae
`prosthesis according to the present
`invention, no bone
`resorption takes place;
`the amount of the bone of the
`vertebra body to be resected during the surgical operation
`can be minimized; the cervical vertebrae prosthesis can be
`easily inserted between the vertebra bodies; the vertebrae
`prosthesis can be stably held between the vertebra bodies for
`long period; the prosthesis serves as a morphologically
`natural substitute, so that an operator or a patient can be
`remitted from burden or physical load.
`We claim:
`1. A ceramic vertebra prosthesis to be inserted in a cavity
`defined between upper and lower vertebra bodies with a
`removed intervertebral disk or disks, said vertebra prosthesis
`comprising a ceramic

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket