throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00462-LED Document 1 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-cv-462
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
` §
`
`











`
`
`
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC
`LUXEMBOURG S.A.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`DISTINCTIVE DEVELOPMENTS LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc. (“Uniloc USA”) and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. (“Uniloc
`
`
`
`Luxembourg”) (collectively, “Uniloc”) file this Original Complaint against Distinctive
`
`Developments Ltd. for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,857,067 (“the ’067 patent”).
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Uniloc USA, Inc. (“Uniloc USA”) is a Texas corporation with its headquarters
`
`and principal place of business at Legacy Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano,
`
`Texas 75024. Uniloc USA also maintains a place of business at 315 North Broadway, Suite 307,
`
`Tyler, Texas 75702.
`
`2.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. (“Uniloc Luxembourg”) is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Luxembourg with its principal place of business at 15, rue Edward
`
`Steichen, L-2540, Luxembourg.
`
`3.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg and Uniloc USA are collectively referred to as “Uniloc.”
`
`Uniloc researches, develops, manufactures and licenses information security technology
`

`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:12-cv-00462-LED Document 1 Filed 07/20/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
`
`solutions, platforms and frameworks, including solutions for securing software applications and
`
`digital content. Uniloc’s patented technologies enable software and content publishers to
`
`securely distribute and sell their high-value technology assets with minimum burden to their
`
`legitimate end users. Uniloc’s technology is used in several markets, including software and
`
`game security, identity management, intellectual property rights management, and critical
`
`infrastructure security.
`
`4.
`
`Distinctive Developments Ltd. (“Distinctive Developments”) is a limited
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom with its principal place
`
`of business in Sheffield, England. Upon information and belief, Distinctive Developments does
`
`business in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`Uniloc brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, namely 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, and 284-285, among others. This Court has
`
`subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), and 1367.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and
`
`1400(b). On information and belief, Defendant is deemed to reside in this judicial district, has
`
`committed acts of infringement in this judicial district, has purposely transacted business
`
`involving its accused products in this judicial district and/or, has regular and established places
`
`of business in this judicial district.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant is subject to this Court’s specific and general personal jurisdiction
`
`pursuant to due process and/or the Texas Long Arm Statute, due at least to its substantial
`
`business in this State and judicial district, including: (A) at least part of its infringing activities
`
`alleged herein; and (B) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent
`

`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:12-cv-00462-LED Document 1 Filed 07/20/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
`
`conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods sold and services provided to Texas
`
`residents.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`COUNT I
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,857,067)
`
`Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1 through 7 herein by reference.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg is the owner, by assignment, of the ’067 patent, entitled
`
`“SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO
`
`ELECTRONIC DATA.” A true and correct copy of the ’067 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`10.
`
`Uniloc USA is the exclusive licensee of the ’067 patent with ownership of all
`
`substantial rights in the ’067 patent, including the right to grant sublicenses, exclude others and
`
`to enforce, sue and recover damages for past and future infringements.
`
`11.
`
`The ’067 patent is valid, enforceable and was duly issued in full compliance with
`
`Title 35 of the United States Code.
`
`12.
`
`Distinctive Developments is directly infringing one or more claims of the ’067
`
`patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in Texas, including at least claim 107, without the
`
`consent or authorization of Uniloc, by or through making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or
`
`importing Android based applications for use on cellular phones and/or tablet devices that
`
`require communication with a server to perform a license check to prevent the unauthorized use
`
`of said application, including, but not limited to, Rugby Nations 11.
`
`13.
`
`Uniloc has been damaged as a result of Defendant’s infringing conduct described
`
`in this Count. Defendant is, thus, liable to Uniloc in an amount that adequately compensates it
`
`for Defendant’s infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together
`
`with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
`

`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:12-cv-00462-LED Document 1 Filed 07/20/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Uniloc hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Uniloc requests that the Court find in its favor and against Defendant, and that the Court
`
`grant Uniloc the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`Judgment that one or more claims of the ’067 patent has been infringed, either
`literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Defendant;
`
`Judgment that Defendant account for and pay to Uniloc all damages to and costs
`incurred by Uniloc because of Defendant’s infringing activities and other conduct
`complained of herein;
`
`Judgment that Defendant account for and pay to Uniloc a reasonable, on-going,
`post judgment royalty because of Defendant’s infringing activities and other
`conduct complained of herein;
`
`That Uniloc be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages
`caused by Defendant’s infringing activities and other conduct complained of
`herein; and
`
`That Uniloc be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just
`and proper under the circumstances.
`
`
`
`Dated: July 20, 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Barry J. Bumgardner (w/permission Wesley Hill)
`Barry J. Bumgardner
`Lead Attorney
`Texas State Bar No. 00793424
`Steven W. Hartsell
`Texas State Bar No. 24040199
`NELSON BUMGARDNER CASTO, P.C.
`3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Phone: (817) 377-9111
`Fax: (817) 377-3485
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:12-cv-00462-LED Document 1 Filed 07/20/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
`
`James L. Etheridge
`Texas Bar No. 24059147
`ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324
`Southlake, Texas 76092
`Telephone: (817) 470-7249
`Facsimile: (817) 887-5950
`Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`E-mail: jw@wsfirm.com
`J. Wesley Hill
`Texas State Bar No. 24032294
`E-MAIL: WH@WSFIRM.COM
`WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM
`P.O. Box 1231
`1127 Judson Rd., Ste. 220
`Longview, Texas 75606-1231
`(903) 757-6400
`(903) 757-2323 (fax)
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`

`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket