throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
` HEI-MUN CHRISTINA FAN and STEPHEN QUAKE }
`
` Junior Party, }
`
` vs. }
`
` }
`
` YUK-MING DENNIS LO, ROSSA WAI KWUN CHIU,
`
` and KWAN CHEE CHAN, }
`
` Senior Party. }
`
` PATENT 8,195,415
`
` CASE IPR2013-00390
`
` - and -
`
` PATENT 8,195,415
`
` APPLICATION 13/070,266
`
` PATENT INTERFERENCE NO. 105,922 (DK)
`
` Deposition of JOHN C. DETTER, Ph.D.
`
` Washington, D.C.
`
` July 1, 2014
`
` 9:13 a.m.
`
` Veritext Legal Solutions
`
` Mid-Atlantic Region
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
` 1250 Eye Street NW - Suite 1201
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`25
`
`SEQUENOM EXHIBIT 1090
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`Sequenom v. Stanford
`SEQUENOM EXHIBIT 1090
`IPR2013-00390
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` Deposition of JOHN C. DETTER, Ph.D.,
`
` held at the offices of:
`
` ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC
`
` 607 14th Street, Northwest, Suite 800
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
` (202) 783-6040
`
` Pursuant to Notice, before Michele E.
`
` Eddy, Registered Professional Reporter, Certified
`
` Realtime Reporter, and Notary public in and for the
`
` District of Columbia.
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`Page 3
`
` ON BEHALF OF THE JUNIOR PARTY:
`
` R. DANNY HUNTINGTON, ESQUIRE
`
` SETH E. COCKRUM, ESQUIRE
`
` Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`
` 607 14th Street, Northwest, Suite 800
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
` (202) 783-6040
`
` dhuntington@rfem.com
`
` scockrum@rfem.com
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

` A T T E N D A N C E , C o n t i n u e d
`
`Page 4
`
` O N B E H A L F O F T H E S E N I O R P A R T Y :
`
` M I C H A E L J . W I S E , E S Q U I R E
`
` P e r k i n s C o i e , L L P
`
` 1 8 8 8 C e n t u r y P a r k E a s t , S u i t e 1 7 0 0
`
` L o s A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 0 6 7
`
` ( 3 1 0 ) 7 8 8 - 3 2 1 0
`
` M W i s e @ p e r k i n s c o i e . c o m
`
` - A N D -
`
` P A T R I C K M O R R I S , P h . D . , E S Q U I R E
`
` P e r k i n s C o i e , L L P
`
` F o u r E m b a r c a d e r o C e n t e r , S u i t e 2 4 0 0
`
` S a n F r a n c i s c o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 1 1 1
`
` ( 4 1 5 ) 3 4 4 - 7 1 0 5
`
` P M o r r i s @ p e r k i n s c o i e . c o m
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`1 0
`
`1 1
`
`1 2
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`

`

` EXAMINATION INDEX
`
` PAGE
`
` EXAMINATION BY MR. WISE 7
`
`Page 5
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` (Attached to the Transcript)
`
` DEPOSITION EXHIBIT PAGE
`
` Exhibit 1101 Article titled "Initial 64
`
` Sequencing and Analysis of
`
` the Human Genome"
`
` Exhibit 1105 Article titled "Supplementary 64
`
` Information for Initial
`
` Sequencing and Analysis of the
`
` Human Genome, Methods and
`
` Additional Notes"
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5 6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

` EXHIBIT INDEX CONTINUED
`
`Page 6
`
` EXHIBITS PREVIOUSLY MARKED AND REFERRED TO
`
` (Retained by Counsel)
`
` DEPOSITION EXHIBIT PAGE
`
` Exhibit 1001 50
`
` Exhibit 1002 110
`
` Exhibit 1005 85
`
` Exhibit 1036 32
`
` Exhibit 2049 157
`
` Exhibit 2110 24
`
` Exhibit 2112 23
`
` Exhibit 2113 23
`
` Exhibit 2117 56
`
` Exhibit 2132 19
`
` Exhibit 2138 10
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 7
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` Washington, D.C.
`
` July 1, 2014, 9:13 A.M.
`
` - - -
`
` JOHN C. DETTER, PH.D.,
`
` having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR SENIOR PARTY
`
` BY MR. WISE:
`
` Q Good morning.
`
` A Good morning.
`
` Q At the beginning of cross-examination,
`
` since this involves an interference, I'm required to
`
` tell you the following. The party conducting the
`
` cross-examination must instruct the witness on the
`
` record as to opposing counsel, that's me, rather
`
` than the witness' own counsel, that's
`
` Mr. Huntington, for clarifications, definitions, or
`
` explanations of any words, questions, or documents
`
` presented during the cross-examination. The witness
`
` must follow these instructions.
`
` Will you do that?
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q Just to refresh, we've been here a couple
`
` of times already. You remember?
`
` A I do, unfortunately.
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 8
`
` Q We want verbal responses so please avoid
`
` nonverbal responses like shaking or nodding of the
`
` head. Would you do that for me today, please?
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q Again, you and I tend to talk over each
`
` other a bit. So would you please wait for me to
`
` finish the question and I will try to wait for you
`
` to finish your answer.
`
` A I will certainly try.
`
` Q Any reason, drugs, medication, something
`
` of that nature, that prevent you from giving
`
` truthful testimony today?
`
` A No.
`
` Q Okay. How many times have you been
`
` deposed now in proceedings other than the one that
`
` I've taken?
`
` A They all kind of run together, I think
`
` twice.
`
` Q Let me ask you it a different way.
`
` Have all of the -- I've taken your
`
` deposition twice.
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q Okay. Other than me, has anybody else
`
` taken your deposition?
`
` A Yes.
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q Okay. Other than Michele Bosch, the woman
`
` that was with me, has anybody else taken your
`
`Page 9
`
` deposition?
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q What was that deposition?
`
` A I do not recall everything. It was -- I
`
` don't recall the name -- the number of the
`
` deposition or what it was.
`
` Q Do you remember the name of the parties?
`
` A Not without guessing.
`
` Q So other than the depositions that have
`
` occurred that I've been present at and this other
`
` one that you don't recall --
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q -- any other depositions?
`
` A Not that I recall.
`
` Q Any live testimony in front of a judge or
`
` a jury?
`
` A No.
`
` Q How much time did you prepare for today?
`
` A I would say approximately two days' worth,
`
` not full 24-hour days, so maybe, I would say,
`
` approximately 16 hours.
`
` Q And when? When did you do that
`
` preparation?
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 10
`
` A Last night --
`
` Q Yes.
`
` A -- over the weekend a few hours, and then
`
` a little bit last Friday.
`
` (Exhibit 2138 was previously marked and
`
` referred to.)
`
` Q All right.
`
` Now, there are some -- we're going to talk
`
` about Exhibit 2138, and I believe there were some
`
` edits that you made to that; is that correct?
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q When did you make those?
`
` A On Friday of last week.
`
` Q Okay.
`
` A On -- as a written process. Verbally,
`
` there were discussions. I don't remember all the
`
` discussions, but written process was on Friday.
`
` Q Why did you make the edits?
`
` A As we were reviewing those, we saw that
`
` the pages had a few pages that were off by a page or
`
` two and then saw that there were some misquoted
`
` comments and words left out from when the quotes
`
` were done from one document to the other.
`
` Q Now, if you turn to Exhibit 2138, and if
`
` you look at paragraph 7, it sets forth claim 1 of
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 11
`
` the '415 patent?
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q Have you ever practiced that claim?
`
` A As a scientist?
`
` Q Yes.
`
` A No, I have not.
`
` Q Have you ever detected fetal aneuploidy
`
` with massively parallel sequencing?
`
` A As a scientist, I have not, no.
`
` Q Ever used windows to normalize data as a
`
` scientist?
`
` A I have had staff that have done that, yes.
`
` Q Personally know the people that work for
`
` you did it for you; is that correct?
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q In what context did you do that, or did
`
` they do that for you?
`
` A Mostly comparative genomic type of
`
` activities. When you're comparing one genome to
`
` another genome, that's -- usually you have a
`
` control, some sort of -- you have some sort of
`
` control genome that you're comparing a recently
`
` sequenced genome to or a region to, and you're doing
`
` that. So you're comparing different regions.
`
` Q When?
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 12
`
` A I would say numerous times between the
`
` years of 2005 and 2012. I do not remember all the
`
` occasions.
`
` Q Is that a standard statistical or
`
` conventional statistical tool for normalizing data?
`
` A Yes, it is.
`
` Q How about sliding windows?
`
` A Yes. That's a standard tool as well.
`
` Going back, yes, as long as I've been in the field,
`
` at least since 1999.
`
` Q Right. So either sliding windows or
`
` dividing a genome or a chromosome into numerous
`
` windows of defined length?
`
` A Using windows for comparative genomics has
`
` been in the field for a long time, I don't remember
`
` the exact date but at least since 2005, if not
`
` earlier, using the windows for comparative analyses.
`
` Q Okay. Any of your windows -- any of the
`
` windows work that you worked on for normalizing
`
` data, was that ever published?
`
` A I don't recall the context in which it was
`
` published. The work that I had done as a result of
`
` a number of publications, for me directly, I don't
`
` remember the exact context of the sliding windows or
`
` the data analysis, what components have been in
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 13
`
` there. I do know data analysis has been in there.
`
` Q I guess let me put it a different way.
`
` If I were looking for a particular paper
`
` of yours from your CV that would identify windows
`
` analysis, is there any one that you can think of
`
` that I could look to to see that?
`
` A Not that I recall.
`
` Q Have you ever used windows to measure GC
`
` content?
`
` A That is part of the analyses one would do,
`
` yes. Me personally? No. When we do comparative
`
` genomics and we look at biases, we look at mixed
`
` genomes, genomes -- when you sequence one genome and
`
` you look at the biases within that genome, you do
`
` analyses like that.
`
` Q Same time frame, from 2000 to 2005?
`
` A From 2005 to 2012 is what I mentioned.
`
` Q You did, I apologize.
`
` Same question for windows to measure GC
`
` content. Can you recall a publication of yours that
`
` would contain that information?
`
` A Not without reviewing all of my
`
` publications, going through it, no.
`
` Q By "reviewing your publications," you
`
` don't mean looking in your CV, do you?
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 14
`
` A No, I don't.
`
` Q You mean physically reading through the
`
` publications?
`
` A I would have to go through and actually
`
` flip through them, yes, correct.
`
` Q Okay.
`
` A Most of the genomes I did, you know, I
`
` said from 2005 to 2012, lots of details, lots of
`
` information of context like that, but I would have
`
` to look through them.
`
` Q Okay. And GC bias, is that a function of
`
` the -- a functioning of the sequencing process?
`
` A Can you, I guess, narrow your question
`
` down a little bit.
`
` Q Let me ask it a different way.
`
` A Okay.
`
` Q What is GC bias?
`
` A In one sense, GC bias is when you
`
` sequence -- a genome has various contents of As, Ts,
`
` Gs, and Cs. A 50/50 ratio is not what -- some
`
` genomes has a 50/50 ratio. Genome sequencers seem
`
` to have an easier time with the 50/50 ratio.
`
` Unfortunately, most genomes are not 50/50, and if
`
` they are, they're not 50/50 within all regions.
`
` Certain regions of a genome have higher GCs or ATs,
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 15
`
` depending on what you want to call it, AT bias or GC
`
` bias, depending on what you want to call it.
`
` Sequencers have issues in certain regions
`
` of high AT or certain regions of high GC for
`
` different reasons, that the sequencing process has a
`
` hard time either getting through that region, kills
`
` the sequencing reaction, causes data issues.
`
` Different sequencers have different problems
`
` associated with GC, depending on the type of
`
` chemistry it uses.
`
` Q Is your answer complete?
`
` A I think so.
`
` Q Just a note. You and I talk quickly. We
`
` need to slow it down a little bit for her.
`
` A I'll try. A lot of people have tried.
`
` I'm sorry, I apologize.
`
` Q Have you ever met Christina Fan?
`
` A No, I have not.
`
` Q Now, if you look at paragraph 3, you
`
` indicate that you read her declaration. I guess it
`
` says "reviewed." Is there a difference between
`
` reviewed and read?
`
` A Depends on the context. I've reviewed her
`
` declaration.
`
` Q What do you mean by "reviewed"?
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 16
`
` A I have looked through her declaration. I
`
` have done a quick read of some sections and a
`
` detailed read of other sections.
`
` Q Okay. Read every page, word for word?
`
` A I've reviewed every page.
`
` Q Did you read every page word for word?
`
` A I do not recall.
`
` Q Did you read any other declarations that
`
` were submitted by party Quake besides the Christina
`
` Fan declaration?
`
` A For this case here specifically? Or my --
`
` Q Well, we're here on -- yes, for this case
`
` specifically. And what I mean by "this case
`
` specifically" is the 922 interference of the
`
` priority contest and then the IPR for, essentially,
`
` the swear behind, I think is what you have on the
`
` note on the document.
`
` A I don't recall all the documents I've read
`
` without having them in front of me. I would have
`
` to ...
`
` Q Did you read Dr. Quake's declaration, for
`
` example?
`
` A Not that I recall.
`
` Q And then if you look in here, there's
`
` other references to some of the documents. For
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 17
`
` example, if you look at paragraph 6, there's a
`
` person by the name of Yair Blumenfeld. Did you read
`
` a declaration from Yair Blumenfeld?
`
` A Not that I recall.
`
` Q Paragraph 8, did you read a declaration
`
` from a guy by -- a person by the name of Dr. Leonard
`
` Herzenberg?
`
` A Not that I recall.
`
` Q Okay. So as we sit here today, to the
`
` best of your recollection, in this proceeding,
`
` you've only read the Fan declaration; is that
`
` correct?
`
` A I've only read the Fan declaration to my
`
` best recollection in this specific instance, yes.
`
` Q Did you ask if there were additional
`
` declarations when you were reviewing the Fan
`
` declaration?
`
` A Not that I recall.
`
` Q Did you notice that Dr. Fan made similar
`
` errors in her declaration as to yours with respect
`
` to documents that -- let me rephrase.
`
` Did you notice that Dr. Fan made similar
`
` errors in her declaration as the corrections you
`
` made in yours, Exhibit 2138?
`
` A Yes, I did.
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 18
`
` Q Did you double-check your changes this
`
` time? In other words, did you double-check the
`
` paragraphs and the line numbers and all of these
`
` changes that you made in Exhibit 2138 to the
`
` originals, or did you just compare them to Dr. Fan's
`
` changes?
`
` A To the originals. Then that's when I made
`
` the changes.
`
` Q What's an actual reduction to practice?
`
` It's in paragraph 5.
`
` A Thank you.
`
` Q At least that's where you --
`
` A That's where I refer to reduction in
`
` practice.
`
` Q Correct.
`
` You can take your time looking at the
`
` whole thing if you would like.
`
` A Okay, thank you.
`
` (Pause in proceedings.)
`
` Q You also refer to it in paragraph 7.
`
` A Thank you.
`
` So as far as a legal definition, I won't
`
` probably give you that, but my nonlegal definition,
`
` a reduction to practice is when a previous set of
`
` work actually generates the experiments, data
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 19
`
` necessary to carry out a set of experiments that
`
` have -- that are also done in the future, so to
`
` speak, for a set of claims or something like that.
`
` The legal definition here is, it's essentially
`
` stating that a previous set of documents and work
`
` and protocols and processes actually are -- generate
`
` the data necessary to develop the claims of, like,
`
` for this instance, the '415 patent.
`
` Q What do you mean by "generate the data
`
` necessary to develop the claims in the '415 patent"?
`
` (Exhibit 2132 was previously marked and
`
` referred to.)
`
` A The actual experiments that were done
`
` previously. For example, the work in 21 -- let me
`
` see here, experiments that were outlined in 2132.
`
` Without referring back to the actual documents,
`
` those experiments actually -- the protocols and
`
` processes of carrying out those experiments actually
`
` resulted in each and every claim of the '415 patent.
`
` Without doing those experiments, the '415 patent
`
` claims would not have been possible. So by doing
`
` the experiments previously, you were able to
`
` generate the claims in the '415 patent.
`
` Q Do you know if there's any other
`
` requirements for a reduction -- actual reduction to
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 20
`
` practice other than doing experiments that generate
`
` the claims?
`
` A Not that I recall without looking at the
`
` legal definitions.
`
` Q Did you ever have the legal definitions?
`
` A I can't say for sure if I've looked at the
`
` actual law definitions, web.
`
` Q Now, all of this work that you're talking
`
` about in Exhibit 2138 that Dr. Fan did and the
`
` publications and whatnot --
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q -- when did you first learn of that
`
` information? And just give me a year. I don't need
`
` a specific date.
`
` A The work that was done, all of the work
`
` that was done to generate the 2138 document or the
`
` protocols and processes that I'm referring to?
`
` Q Well, if I look through paragraph 21 --
`
` here's my question.
`
` A Okay.
`
` Q You weren't around at the time that's
`
` referenced here in these documents, like, for
`
` example, the experiments she performed in 2132
`
` referenced in paragraph 4. You weren't
`
` contemporaneously around at that time working with
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 21
`
` Dr. Fan and seeing this documentation, correct?
`
` A That is correct. I was not working with
`
` Dr. Fan during these experiments.
`
` Q Right. So, for example, a lot of this
`
` declaration refers to occurrences in 2008, and in
`
` 2008, were you involved with the legal -- with Quake
`
` and Fan at all?
`
` MR. HUNTINGTON: Objection, irrelevant.
`
` A I have -- to my knowledge, I have not been
`
` involved with Dr. Quake, Dr. Fan in any way other
`
` than the proceedings that we're talking about here.
`
` Q Right. So when you talk about, you know,
`
` what's in the documents and, you know, what's in the
`
` Fan declaration, what's in the Fan notebook, what's
`
` in the Fan draft manuscript, those things in this
`
` declaration, you're using hindsight as opposed to
`
` testifying as to occurrences that occurred at that
`
` particular moment in time, correct?
`
` A I'm not sure how to exactly answer that.
`
` I'm using -- I've been given a list of documents to
`
` use and provide my subject matter expertise on that,
`
` my opinion on that. I was not involved in these
`
` experiments.
`
` Q Right. So you're looking back at the
`
` experiments that occurred in 2008 and testifying
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 22
`
` today about what you think of them, right?
`
` A That sounds -- I'm looking at the
`
` documents that were generated from the data that was
`
` generated in 2008.
`
` Q Right. And testifying today about what
`
` they mean to you as opposed to confirming what
`
` happened in 2008 because you weren't there.
`
` MR. HUNTINGTON: Objection.
`
` A I was not there in 2008, nor have I tried
`
` to replicate in the wet lab these experiments.
`
` Q Fair enough.
`
` When does an actual reduction to practice
`
` occur?
`
` A I don't -- I don't understand exactly your
`
` question.
`
` Q Well, referring back to your answer, let
`
` me read it to you? "So as far as a legal
`
` definition, I won't probably give you that, but my
`
` nonlegal definition, reduction to practice is when a
`
` previous set of work actually generates the
`
` experiments, data necessary to carry out a set of
`
` experiments that have -- are also done in the
`
` future, so to speak, for a set of claims or
`
` something like that. The legal definition here is,
`
` it's essentially stating that a previous set of
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 23
`
` documents, work and protocols and processes actually
`
` are -- generate the data necessary to develop the
`
` claims of, for instance, the '415 patent."
`
` So my question is really kind of directed
`
` to some of this discussion you have about the future
`
` work. So when does it occur?
`
` MR. HUNTINGTON: Objection.
`
` Q When do we have an actual reduction to
`
` practice?
`
` MR. HUNTINGTON: Objection, irrelevant.
`
` (Exhibit 2112 and Exhibit 2113 were previously
`
` marked and referred to.)
`
` A So, yes, once again, without understanding
`
` all the legal definitions, my understanding is, and
`
` common sense, the work was done initially in the
`
` documents that we discussed and the draft 2113 and
`
` 2112, that's when the work was actually done.
`
` That's when the experiments were done. That's when
`
` the protocols and processes were done. So that
`
` would be -- that would be the date set for the type
`
` of work that was done.
`
` Q Is there -- is there -- so if we look at
`
` claim 1, for example, and you say here in paragraph
`
` 5 that the series of experiments described by Fan is
`
` an actual reduction to practice of each and every
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 24
`
` claim of the '415 patent, is there a particular date
`
` when that occurred?
`
` A The date the experiments occurred are the
`
` dates that that was set, and that was -- that was
`
` the date for me, is the date that it was set. That
`
` was the date that reduction to practice --
`
` Q When the experiments begin or when the
`
` experiments are completed?
`
` A That's probably a nuance that I can't
`
` answer.
`
` I don't --
`
` (Exhibit 2110 was previously marked and
`
` referred to.)
`
` Q Now, can you turn to your copy of Exhibit
`
` 2110. And my question for you is, what page of the
`
` notebook of 2110 does Dr. Fan record her actual
`
` reduction to practice?
`
` MR. HUNTINGTON: Objection, outside the
`
` scope of direct testimony.
`
` A The experiments that I was asked to review
`
` and that set the date for me is -- starts on page
`
` 18. So at least as early as April 21st, 2008. I
`
` have not been asked to review any documents any
`
` earlier than that date in her experiment book. So
`
` those are the first set of experiments that I was
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 25
`
` asked to review that do result in a reduction to
`
` practice for the claims of '415.
`
` Q Let me get with you. What page is that?
`
` A 18. They're kind of hard to see. They're
`
` on the top left.
`
` Q There we go.
`
` What is Dr. Fan doing here?
`
` A She's extracting DNA from plasma patients
`
` that are normal male fetuses.
`
` Q Okay. And how does extracting DNA from
`
` normal male fetuses constitute an actual reduction
`
` to practice of a claim that's testing or looking for
`
` an aneuploidy?
`
` A It's setting off a set of experiments, and
`
` those would be the controls since they're normal
`
` male fetuses.
`
` Q So in your definition of actual reduction
`
` to practice, the establishment of a control for the
`
` experiment is an actual reduction to practice?
`
` MR. HUNTINGTON: Objection.
`
` A You would have to put a lot of context
`
` behind -- with it. This is a beginning of a set of
`
` experiments that result in reduction to practice.
`
` Q When did that reduction to practice occur?
`
` A I don't know all the legal nuances and
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 26
`
` definitions. All I know is the experiments began
`
` April 21st, 2008, that I was made aware of, to
`
` review to see if they began the process of the
`
` reduction to practice for every claim of '415.
`
` Q Well, if there's a beginning to a
`
` reduction to practice, there must be an end. So
`
` when would the end be for a reduction to practice?
`
` A Without guessing, I couldn't tell you.
`
` Q I'm not asking the specific end for the
`
` particular Fan reduction to practice, but in your
`
` definition of a reduction to practice, you have a
`
` beginning and an end, and we note that the beginning
`
` is at least the establishment of a control. When's
`
` the end, under your definition, of a reduction to
`
` practice?
`
` A In my definition, the experiments that
`
` result in data generated to show that the process
`
` works would be the time period that one would use to
`
` confirm that the process actually reduces -- is a
`
` reduction to practice.
`
` Q So that be would the end, when the data
`
` confirms the claims?
`
` A I can't say that for sure. It would have
`
` to be in context. You would have to take that
`
` experiment into play with process.
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 27
`
` Q Is it fair to say you don't know?
`
` A You asked me my opinion, and that's my
`
` opinion of when I would say -- you would start the
`
` experiments, and when the experiments result in data
`
` that reduces the claims, that's the time period that
`
` we would be looking at. To my knowledge, the
`
` date -- let me see. Let's see here.
`
` So the draft -- the draft publication,
`
` which is generally the dates that people say that
`
` they completed the experiments and everything checks
`
` off, was June 19th, 2008, was the first draft
`
` publication.
`
` Q Okay.
`
` A And so that, for me, would set the date of
`
` the reduction to practice.
`
` Q Okay. Now, do you keep a lab notebook?
`
` A When I was working in a laboratory, I did
`
` keep a lab notebook, yes.
`
` Q Do the people who work for you keep a lab
`
` notebook?
`
` A Yes, they keep a lab notebook.
`
` Q Are there any requirements for keeping a
`
` lab notebook?
`
` A There are a lot of requirements for
`
` keeping a lab notebook.
`
`VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 28
`
` Q Fair enough.
`
` Is it required that you sign them?
`
` A At my institution it's not a requirement.
`
` Q What if it's something really important
`
` like you think you've really discovered something?
`
` A You asked me if there was a requirement.
`
` At my institution there's not a requirement to sign
`
` the lab notebook. You're dating the lab notebook,
`
` and you keep a chronological date from begi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket