`
` Paper ____
`Filed on behalf of: The Board of Trustees of the
`
`
`
` Leland Stanford Junior University
`
`
`
`By: R. Danny Huntington, Lead Counsel
`
`Sharon E. Crane, Ph.D., Backup Counsel
`
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Telephone: 202-783-6040
`
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`E-mail: dhuntington@rfem.com
`
`
` scrane@rfem.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`SEQUENOM, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
`THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2013-00390
`Patent 8,195,415
`_______________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER STANFORD’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`(37 C.F.R. § 42.70)
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, dated December 9, 2013 (Paper 8), Patent
`
`Case IPR2013-00390
`Patent 8,195,415
`
`
`Owner The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
`
`(“Stanford”) respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled to
`
`be held on August 5, 2014.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Stanford identifies the following issues as
`
`among those to be argued:
`
`(1) Whether Petitioner has met its burden on the instituted grounds;
`
`(2) Whether Patent Owner has shown that the Lo reference is not prior art to
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,195,415;
`
`(3) Any issues raised in Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument, or otherwise
`
`raised by the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 30, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ R. Danny Huntington
`R. Danny Huntington, Reg. No. 27,903
`Sharon E. Crane, Ph.D., Reg. No. 36,113
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`The Board of Trustees of the Leland
`Stanford Junior University
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00390
`Patent 8,195,415
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 30th day of June, 2014, a true and correct copy
`
`
`
`
`
`of the foregoing PATENT OWNER STANFORD’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT was served by electronic mail, upon the following lead and backup
`
`counsel of record for Petitioner Sequenom, Inc.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Wise – Lead Counsel
`Patrick D. Morris, Ph.D. – Backup Counsel
`Perkins Coie LLP
`1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700
`Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721
`Ph: 310-788-3210
`Fx: 310-788-3399
`mwise@perkinscoie.com
`pmorris@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`Michael J. Malecek – Backup Counsel
`Kaye Scholer LLP
`Two Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
`Ph: 650-319-4508
`Fx: 650-319-4700
`Service E-mail:
`michael.malecek@kayescholer.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Erik van Leeuwen
`Erik van Leeuwen
`Litigation Operations Coordinator
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`