throbber
To:
`From:
`Sent:
`Subject:
`
`'Stephen Quake'[quake@stanford.edu]; chfan[chfan@stanford.edu]
`Clement Chu
`Sat 4/5/2008 12:33:01 AM
`RE: 454 sequencing
`
`Hi Steve and Christina,
`
`Sounds great. I can definitely get you guys on around that time frame. In
`terms of reagent availability here, I would ask Joe. We don't have any
`stocked in the CAT but I know Joe and Jonathan have been buying multiple
`kits at once and are probably the best people to ask. The lead time on
`reagents direct from Ilium ina seems to be about 2 weeks or so.
`
`Best,
`Clement
`
`-----Original Message-----
`From: srquake@gmail.com [mailto:srquake@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
`Quake
`Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 5:20 PM
`To: Clement Chu
`Cc: Christina H. Fan
`Subject: Re: 454 sequencing
`
`ok, we have our act together now and are interested in making a full
`run on may 1, plus or minus a few days. how is the sign up, reagenet
`availablility etc looking?
`
`best,
`
`steve
`
`On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 1 :38 PM, Clement Chu <Ciement.Chu@ucsf.edu> wrote:
`>Hi Steve,
`>
`>Good to hear from you. Joe certainly did mention your interest. We don't
`> stock any reagents in the facility itself but if you need reagents on a
`> quick timetable, Joe might be able to help you there. We are still
`> restricting the user base so we could probably work you in within a week
`or
`> so of when you have a library prepared. Let me know if you need any more
`> info or if you have a timetable in mind.
`>
`>Best,
`>Clement
`>
`>
`> -----Original Message-----
`> From: srquake@gmail.com [mailto:srquake@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
`>Quake
`> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:49AM
`>To: Clement.Chu@ucsf.edu
`> Cc: Christina Fan
`> Subject: Fwd: 454 sequencing
`>
`>Clement
`
`STANFORD EXHIBIT 2123
`SEQUENOM v. STANFORD
`CASE IPR2013-00390
`
`

`

`>>
`
` Joe Derisi might have told you we are interested in running a few
`> samples on your Solexa. How long is the queue to get something on the
`> machine and do you guys stock the sequencing reagents?
`
` best,
`
` Steve
`
`>>
`
`>>
`
`>>>
`
` ---------- Forwarded message ----------
`> From: Joe DeRisi <joe@derisilab.ucsf.edu>
`> Date: Jan 9, 2008 9:31 PM
`> Subject: Re: 454 sequencing
`> To: Stephen Quake <quake@stanford.edu>
`
`>>>
`
`>>
`
`>>
`
`>>>
`
` Hi Steve,
`> Great. The Solexa guy here is Clement Chu. His email is
`> Clement.Chu@ucsf.edu. I will let him know that you or someone from
`> your lab will contact him.
`
`>>
`
` Our machine is currently configured for 8 lanes/flowcell, with 330
`> tiles per lane. For a good library, you should get 20-30k clusters per
`> tile, which, in an ideal world, would give you about 9 million reads
`> per lane, each 36nt. In reality, folks are getting 2-4 million, and
`> the 8th lane is usually reserved for a control. It is clear the read
`> length can be extended, if you are willing to tolerate some additional
`> errors.
`> Depending on your application, we can advise on library construction
`> strategies.
`
` thanks for dropping by the other day - it was a big help.
`
` -joe
`
` On Jan 9, 2008 3:06 PM, Stephen Quake <quake@stanford.edu> wrote:
`> > joe,
`> >
`> > the person in my lab to contact about a 454 run is rick white. each
`> > full run is 400,000 reads of ~ 250 bp each. the configuration is two
`> > large chambers, which are independently loaded (ie can be different
`> > samples). there are other configurations (up to 16 independent
`> > samples) and it is possible to do runs of shorter reads (100bp), which
`> > are slightly cheaper.
`> >
`> > best
`> >
`> > steve
`> >
`> > --
`> > -----------------------
`> > Stephen Quake
`> > Professor of Bioengineering
`> > Stanford University
`
`

`

`> >
`> > PLEASE REPLY TO: quake@stanford.edu
`> >
`
`>>>>
`
` --
`> -----------------------
`> Stephen Quake
`> Professor of Bioengineering
`> Stanford University
`
` PLEASE REPLY TO: quake@stanford.edu
`
`>>
`
`>>
`
` No virus found in this incoming message.
`> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
`> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.15/1249 - Release Date:
`1/29/2008
`> 9:51 AM
`
`>>>
`
` No virus found in this outgoing message.
`> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
`> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.15/1249 - Release Date:
`1/29/2008
`> 9:51 AM
`
`>>>>
`
`--
`-----------------------
`Stephen Quake
`Professor of Bioengineering
`Stanford University
`
`PLEASE REPLY TO: quake@stanford.edu
`
`No virus found in this incoming message.
`Checked by AVG.
`Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1359 - Release Date: 4/4/2008
`8:23 AM
`
`
`No virus found in this outgoing message.
`Checked by AVG.
`Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1359 - Release Date: 4/4/2008
`8:23 AM
`
`
`<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
`<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN"
`
`

`

`"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
`<plist version="1.0">
`<dict>
` <key>date-sent</key>
` <real>1207355581</real>
` <key>flags</key>
` <integer>8590195713</integer>
` <key>original-mailbox</key>
` <string>imap://h.christina.fan@imap.gmail.com/%5BGmail%5D/All%20Mail</string>
` <key>remote-id</key>
` <string>3849</string>
` <key>subject</key>
` <string>RE: 454 sequencing</string>
`</dict>
`</plist>
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket