`
`From:
`on behalf of
`Sent:
`To:
`CC:
`Subject:
`
`srquake@gmail.com [srquake@gmail.com]
`Stephen Quake [quake@stanford.edu]
`1/29/2008 11:14:57 PM
`Joe DeRisi Uoe@derisilab.ucsf.edu]
`Christina Fan [chfan@stanford.edu]
`Re: 454 sequencing
`
`thanks, we are just getting organized. for the first few runs do you
`want to arrange some kind of reagent barter? (ie i will float you here
`for 454 runs if you do the same; if it doesn't balance out in a half
`year or so we find a way to move cash back and forth).
`
`steve
`
`thanks for dropping by the other day - it was a big help.
`
`on 1/9/08, Joe DeRisi <joe@derisilab.ucsf.edu> wrote:
`> Hi Steve,
`> Great. The solexa guy here is clement chu. His email is
`> clement.chu@ucsf.edu. I will let him know that you or someone from
`> your lab will contact him.
`>
`> our machine is currently configured for 8 lanes/flowcell, with 330
`> tiles per lane. For a good library, you should get 20-30k clusters per
`> tile, which, in an ideal world, would give you about 9 million reads
`>per lane, each 36nt. In reality, folks are getting 2-4 million, and
`>the 8th lane is usually reserved for a control. It is clear the read
`> length can be extended, if you are willing to tolerate some additional
`> errors.
`>Depending on your application, we can advise on library construction strategies.
`>
`>
`>
`> -joe
`>
`>on Jan 9, 2008 3:06 PM, Stephen Quake <quake@stanford.edu> wrote:
`> > joe,
`> >
`> > the person in my lab to contact about a 454 run is rick white. each
`> > full run is 400,000 reads of - 250 bp each.
`the configuration is two
`> > large chambers, which are independently loaded (ie can be different
`> > samples).
`there are other configurations (up to 16 independent
`> > samples) and it is possible to do runs of shorter reads (100bp), which
`> > are slightly cheaper.
`> >
`> > best
`> >
`> > steve
`> >
`> >
`> >
`> > stephen Quake
`> > Professor of Bioengineering
`> > Stanford University
`> >
`> > PLEASE REPLY TO: quake@stanford.edu
`> >
`>
`
`stephen Quake
`Professor of Bioengineering
`stanford University
`
`PLEASE REPLY TO: quake@stanford.edu
`
`STANFORD EXHIBIT 2119
`SEQUENOM v. STANFORD
`CASE IPR2013-00390