throbber
Paper ____
`Filed on behalf of: The Board of Trustees of the
`
`
`
`Leland Stanford Junior University
`
`
`
`By: R. Danny Huntington, Lead Counsel
`
`Sharon E. Crane, Ph.D., Backup Counsel
`
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Telephone: 202-783-6040
`
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`E-mail: dhuntington@rfem.com
`
`
` scrane@rfem.com
`
` Filed: March 6, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`SEQUENOM, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
`THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2013-00390
`Patent 8,195,415
`_______________
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DUE DATES 1-3
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-00390
`Patent 8,195,415
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`In accordance with the Order, dated February 27, 2014 (Paper 21), Patent
`
`Owner, The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
`
`(“Stanford”), and Petitioner, Sequenom, Inc. (“Sequenom”), jointly stipulate to
`
`move Due Dates 1-3. These Due Dates were originally set by the Scheduling
`
`Order, dated December 9, 2013 (Paper 8). Due Date 1 is being moved from
`
`February 24, 2014, to May 7, 2014. Due Date 2 is being moved from May 7,
`
`2014, to June 20, 2014. Due Date 3 is being moved from June 9, 2014, to June
`
`25, 2014. This paper is being filed by Patent Holder Stanford with the approval of
`
`counsel for Petitioner Sequenom.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ R. Danny Huntington
`R. Danny Huntington, Reg. No. 27,903
`Sharon E. Crane, Ph.D., Reg. No. 36,113
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Holder
`The Board of Trustees of the Leland
`Stanford Junior University
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 6, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-00390
`Patent 8,195,415
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 6th day of March, 2014, a true and correct copy
`
`
`
`
`
`of the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DUE DATES 1-3 was
`
`served by electronic mail, upon the following lead and backup counsel of record
`
`for Petitioner Sequenom, Inc.:
`
`Steven P. O’Connor – Lead Counsel
`Michele C. Bosch – Backup Counsel
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Ph: 202-408-4000
`Fx: 202-408-4400
`Service E-mails:
`steven.oconnor@finnegan.com
`Michele.bosch@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`Michael J. Malecek – Backup Counsel
`Kaye Scholer LLP
`Two Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
`Ph: 650-319-4508
`Fx: 650-319-4700
`Service E-mail:
`michael.malecek@kayescholer.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Erik van Leeuwen
`Erik van Leeuwen
`Litigation Operations Coordinator
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket