`
`
`
`
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2001
`New Bay Capital v. Virnetx
`Case IPR2013-00377
`
`
`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 598 Filed 11/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20585
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 598
`Filed 11/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20585
`
`2. Did Apple prove by clear and convincing evidence that the following listed claims of the
`following patents are invalid?
`
`If you find the claim invalid, answer “Yes;” otherwise, answer “No.”
`
`’ 135 Patent
`
`Claiml
`Claim 3
`Claim 7
`Claim 8
`
`’504 Patent
`
`‘
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 2
`Claim 5
`Claim 1.6
`Claim 21
`Claim 27
`
`N0
`N0
`v0
`no
`
`v 0
`V0
`1V0
`NO
`M0
`NO
`
`’ 151 Patent
`
`,
`
`Claiml
`Claim 13
`
`’211 Patent
`
`Claim 36
`Claim 37
`Claim 47
`Claim 51
`
`N 0
`p0
`
`m)
`1:0
`U0
`U8
`
`3. What sum of money, if paid now in cash, do you find from a preponderance of the
`evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate VirnetX for Apple’s infringement, if
`any, of the patents up to the time of trial?
`
`'Answerwith the amount: $ 35g; ‘190 l (206‘ 00
`
`
`
`