throbber
An Open'Label, CommunityaBased,
`IZ'Week Assessment of the Effectiveness
`and Safety of Monotherapy With
`Doxycycline 40 mg (30am Immediate
`Release and 10mg Delaye 'Release Beads)
`
`Guy F.W. MD. F'I‘D
`
`were clear or near clear by week 12, according to
`iGA scores. Furthennore, approximately 76% of
`participants had CEA scores reflecting none or mild
`erythema alter 12 weeks. in the safety population
`of 1195 participants,
`treatment-related AEs were
`reported in 6. 79$ of participants that were mainly
`mild or moderate in severity. Adverse events that
`occurred in more than 196 at the safety popula-
`tion included diarrhea (1.2%), nausea {1.396). and
`headache (1.0%). The incidence of fungal and yeast
`infections was 0.496. The results of the ORCA trial
`support the effectiveness and safety of the 40-mg
`formulation of doxycycllne in patients with papuiov
`pustular rosacea.
`
`Cutis. 2010:86lsuppl 5[I]):7-15.
`
`Posacea is a common inflammatory disorder of
`the skin of middle-aged and older adults. A
`unique 40-mg formulation of doxycyciine (SO-mg
`immediate-release and tO-mg delayed-release
`heads) developed for its anti-inflammatory proper-
`ties is the only US Food and Drug Administration»
`approved oral medication for the disorder: This
`report describes the results of the Oracea' for
`Rosacea: A Community-Based Assessment (090A)
`trial. a phase 4 trial of the 40-mg formulation as
`monotherapy in adults with mild to severe populo-
`pustuiar rosacea. A total of "97 participants were
`enrolled in the ril'ionoti‘ierapjir arm of the t2~week
`open~label study at 271 community-based inves-
`“national sites. The primary outct'ime measure
`was a change in the 5-point investigator global
`assessment (lGA) score from baseline to end point
`(week 12}. Secondary outcome measures included
`change in the 5-point clinician erythema assess-
`ment [CEAJ score from baseline to end point, lGA
`success. and adverse events iAEs}. The mono+
`therapyr per-protocol (PP) population was selected
`a priori as the primary analysis population and satiety
`assessments were performed on all participants
`who received at least 1 dose of the study dmg. in
`the PP population of 826 monotherapy participants
`who compteted the trial. approximately ?596 of
`participants with mild to severe rosacea at baseline
`
`osacea isachmnic demd‘middle-aged
`and older adults that infect: anamimately
`16 million individtala in the United States. a
`prevalence that is awruxiuntdv 4'an greater than
`pamiasis.‘*'Afamilyhistorvnflhediseaseistepatted
`in approximately 30% of patients.“ Rosana is char
`mnmdbydilationofbkmdveeaelsofdnoenual
`facemdismrecommon hpatientswhoexperienoe
`frecnmt flusl'ling or blushing.s The etiology ofmsacn
`umfimn;however.itisaseociaaedwithfacmdtat
`trigger the skin's irmate hmmne response.‘ Rosacea is
`histological]? characterized by inflammation and vas-
`cular changes.1r Patients with mecca have increased
`expmion of epidermal eatl‘lelieidtns.’1 Time peptides
`have been demonsu'atod to have antimicrobial. (he
`Eutectic, and angiagenic activities?” It has been
`enmeshed [Int increased expression of cadlelicidin
`“WHENJTISBUH
`VCLUREBG.W ZOIO I
`wmmiammdmmmum m.ummummmdhm.
`
`mmwmmmm
`hmmnmmmmmmm
`mowebsiarammmmnm.“
`mummmmamumm
`
`
`
`Amneal 1037
`
`Amneal v. Supernus
`|PR2013-00368, 2013-00371 and
`|PR2013-00372
`
`

`

`
`
`and its trvpsinhke proteolytic processing enzyme.
`stratumcmreumtrvptic erirrmelSClTS). arecentral
`elements in the patlwgenosis of the disease. This
`hypothesisis unsalted by imlrlrmohistocl'mical
`evidence ofllincreased cadielr'cidin and SCTE in
`“wellhead-1m. In a more model, subcutane-
`ous iijactltlia d SCTE prurhced armiems changes
`and antimicrobial peptide prtiiles similar to mesoea
`in hutrlalis.‘I
`Doxycyclinehas been shown to have both anti-
`bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. Pro-
`uiflammatory mediators oscillated by tetracyclines
`include pl'iospholipase Ag. endogenous nitric oxide.
`“/6. and serine protease: such as SCTE'L" In
`addition. the drug damnregulates matrix menllov
`Iiaseactivity, inhibits cherriotaxis and gnnw
`formation. and acts as a scavenger to protect
`cells against reactive oxygen speciesu“I Olacea"
`is a low-dose 40am capsule ofdoxycycline limin-
`hydrate containing 30-rng immediate-release and
`lO-rng delayed-release beads (hereinafter referred to
`as doxycycline lo Incl.“ Its {amulation and phan
`macokineticpmfilearemiiqueindntplmacon-
`centrations do not reach levels prorhcing antibiotic
`activity that would encourage the development of
`resistant organisms.”
`Tetracyclines have been important elements
`olrosaceadierapyformoretliansoirearsfi’nie
`US Food and Drug Administration approved
`the «ll-mg formulation of doxvcycline in m for
`the treatment olinflammatorv papules and pustules
`in adultswith mi‘l'heapproval was basedon
`the results of 2 randomized. multicenter. 16-week.
`placebomnuolled. phase 3 trials of participants
`with m” Although the drug has been avail«
`able for decades and this formulation for almost
`
`Smdwmhvebeennophaseltrialsofitsuse
`as moriodierapy in routine clinical practice.“ This
`reportdescribathephase‘lGaceafor Rosacea:
`A Commuiity-Basecl Amman (CIRCA)
`trial.
`which was designed to evaluate the elloctivaieu
`andsaferyafdoxycyclinewmgina largenmcea
`populationusedaeidiermnotherapvoradd-on
`therapy. This
`report describes
`the doxvcy-
`cline 40 ragmy am if this large community-
`lnsed population.
`
`muons
`
`I
`
`|
`
`IEE'I E
`
`l'
`
`Good Clinical Practice guidelines. US Food and
`Drug Achiinistration Code of Federal Regulations.
`and local regulatory requirements. The protocol
`was approved by a central
`institutional review
`board or
`the investigator's local
`institutional
`review board. All participants were fully informed
`about the studyr and provided written consent prior
`to participation.
`
`MW
`AchltslSyeasandoHerweleeligiHefcrdiesofly
`ifllieyhadadiagnosisofmildtomelepapllopus—
`mlarromeawidruuderatetoseverepenlesional
`erythema. Chlididateswereenclidediftheywere
`[swaplmningmheimiepregnantdmfligdie
`smdy:medauopicalorsystemicacnedrerap7(ie.
`retinoidsjsotretinoinlwilhinlnmrlisofthelnseo
`
`‘lweeksofdielnselirievisinhadlaserorinuense
`pulsedlifiitmtlmntswithinJmonthsoldie
`hueline visit or anticipated this interventionin'ing
`dietimeot'theoial:usedaninvestigationaldrugor
`devicewithinmdaysdbmelilieiusedatrmicalor
`svsterniccortioosteroidwithinlweehor4weeks.
`respectively. cf the baseline visit and during the
`midnhadalmownhypersemilivirymterracyclinex;
`were receiving treatment It: cammitant condi-
`tionsandwerenotoriastabledoseofrnedicaflori
`foratleast3rrionllis:orlia:lanyooridil:iolithatdie
`investigatordeemedmphcetliepaticipantatrisk
`orintelferewididrestildvoutomne.miermnes
`foreitcliniori included kidneydimase. achlorhydria.
`monitestinaltractprohlemsincludrrgsmgervthat
`bypameddiedinderimactivesmemicfimgalmfic
`fioquinalyeastinfectiatooncmrentdiseases or
`a-adrelielgicblodterdierapyinwliichdosingwasnot
`stableorwasanticipatedtodimge.
`Participants were iruuilcted to take I capsule
`ofdoxycyclinelflmgdailyinthemomingcnan
`emptystomachforthedurationoldielZ-weekm‘al.
`Participmtswerecautionednottoalte
`that
`mayinterferewldiahsorptionoi'diesnslymediv
`cation leg. aluminum, calcium. trapezium. iron)
`uptol.5hoursheforeandupto3hclrrsafterthe
`surdv medication. lnwau'ystors evaluated egalitar-
`ticipant’srosaceaseverity and erirdiernaat
`ilie
`andatweelrsl,4.8.and12 (studyend).Severityol
`rosaceawasanessedonaS-pointinvestigatorglobal
`assessment (lGAlscaletTable l}. Attherimeol
`This 12-week, open-label. multicenter. community-
`dielGAassessrnenLdieinves-tisator alsodiaracter-
`based trial evaluated doitycycline 40 mg in par»
`izeddisease-anociatedemhemaonaS-point clini-
`ticipants with mild to severe rosacea (participants
`who otherwise would have been treated with
`cian erythena assessment (CEA) scale (Table 2).
`Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse
`antibiotic-dose doxycycline) with the drug admin-
`events (Ali's) that were descriptively summarised
`istered as monotherapv. This study was condoned
`in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
`widiincidenceratestabulamdusingtheMedical
`WUJTBCCM
`31111:?
`wows 201i]. lion-1dr.“mum “.m'mmhpinr'hp-Wdhw.
`
`
`
`

`

`Tablet
`
`InvestigatorGlobalAssessmentScale
`
`
`Score
`Milan
`m
`
`
`Older!)
`
`Noaignsorsymptmlspmsem
`
`Cmfleidydeaofhhmutoryiaskms
`
`1mm 1a2pq3des
`
`14mm“
`
`2m
`
`Smepapdesandpusues
`
`3—10pmflesflidpus’ala
`
`ail-manure) mmdmmm ”Aswan-am
`
`4W) Nmmflmmm flmhsmmmmodlfi
`
`Dictionary for Regulatorv Activities“ system organ
`class and preferred tenn.
`
`m2.
`
`Endpoints
`
`TheprirnarywtcomememirewastherhangeianA
`sure from baseline to end point (week 12). Second.
`aryoulcornemeulnss includedchangeinCEAscore
`from baseline to end point. success. and safety. For
`purposesofanalvses,mccessoouldbedefinedasthe
`'on cf treatment
`at end point with
`an IGA scoreofo (clear) or I (near clear}.
`
`CihioianEryihama
`AssessnmrtScalo
`
`
`some
`
`Dinars}
`
`Hrnldl
`
`Definition
`
`Nored'leeeprmfl
`
`56119th
`
`2lmoduuto)
`
`Deirl'torod'leas
`
`3W Mai'lrederylherra
`
`Stalillicd Andynis
`This study was not pourered. A large number of
`investigators participated in the trial to obtain a
`substantial body of evidence regarding the effec'
`tiveness and safety ofdoxvcycline 40 mg when used
`in normal dermatologic practice. As discontinu-
`ation rates in a large openJabeI trial were antici-
`pared to be relatively high compared with smaller
`controlled trials. the per-protocol (PP) population
`was selected a priori for all effectiveness analyses.
`The PP population consisted of all participants
`who completed the 12-week trial without major
`maximum]. Baseline 102‘ stores were compared
`protocol deviations. The safety population was
`with subsequent IGA scores using the Cochran-
`defined as all participants who received at least
`Mantel-l-laenszel (CMl-l) test. Similarly, baseline
`1 dose of the study drug. Discrete variables such as
`CEA scores were compared with subsequent CEA
`certain demographics, ABS. and categorical effec-
`tiveness were summarized by frequencies (number
`scores using the CMH test. The baseline dichoto-
`mized lGA scores were compared with subsequent
`and percentage). Continuous categorical effective-
`ness variables were summarized by mean, median,
`visits using the CMH test. Significance for all
`standard deviation. number. and range (minimum.
`hypotheses testing. except normal distribution, was
`W.UJTIS.OCM
`HUI-E 36. WP 2010 9
`wot-15min Nopl‘tdtiisnfloflimmqhem maammnmmmdum.
`
`Alsatian)
`
`Hawaiians
`
`
`
`

`

`Tables.
`
`PuticipantDemog'aphics
`Per-PlotooolPopulalim)
`
`
`Romy
`
`man-am
`
`Mean
`
`Ila-m
`Miwm
`
`503nm
`
`50.0
`
`mm 130.870
`
`Senna“
`
`Fannie
`
`We
`
`Mum
`
`591 (715
`
`2351285)
`
`I-Ispaicorlflho
`
`72m]
`
`Nell-Worm
`
`7541913;
`
`mum
`
`While
`
`763831)
`
`Mamm 610.?)
`
`Asian
`
`11:13
`
`WWW“ 15.1]
`
`Name Woe-er
`Panicm
`
`0310!
`
`WWW *1 (953
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`N
`
`V
`
`VI
`
`a (0.4)
`
`37 I45}
`
`a? an
`
`321 (sea
`
`275 (335)
`
`130 (15.7)
`
`30 5-6!
`
`3 [0-4)
`
`at «=95. For normal distribution testing, signifi-
`cance was III—‘1”.
`
`HEWLTS
`mm
`A total of 142.1 panicipanu from 271 investigation-l
`sites were mulled in the study with "97 partici-
`paminlhemorndaerapyarm.1hemnod1erapy
`Merv pawl-lion was composed of 1196 participants
`became a single enrollee withchew withoul receiving
`adaseofthemld'ydrug.0fd1e ll97ennoiled parv
`tieipanta. 826 (69.0%) completed the trial without a
`majorpmmeoldeviationandwereimhldedindlefi’
`analyse: {Table 3). The mean age of participant- in
`duispupdatinanOJ mmpanieipamwere
`women (71.5%). More than 90% afparticipam were
`whitearrdweremtainqaanicorlmjmedmic'
`iry. Mutparticipanuhad *in dutwasclauified as
`mnnalorcombimria'l type In thisgruip. the mean
`duration ddiaeme was 5.0 yearn.
`
`mmW
`Investigate»- Global ARM—Must PP partici-
`pants {74.6%} treated with mhrapy had clear
`(35.5%} or near clear (39.1%) [GA scores at week 12
`(Figure ILTI'Iere was asignificant difference between
`[he dint-Inner: of baseline ISA and week 12 [GA
`
`scores in the grown (P400011
`Clinicim Erythana AsusmmD—At week 12.
`74.5% (1‘ PP participant: fluted with modicum
`had CEA scores of none (17.7%) or mild (56.8%)
`(Fimre 2 I‘ There was a significant difference between
`the distriution afbaseline CEA and week 12 CEA
`
`more: in the group (P<.OOOI ).
`Pruponim of Tm! Responders—Winn sue-
`cela was defined as an [GA Ito": J clear, 35.5% of
`the momd'uetapy P? participants were mes-fill at
`week 12. When mee- was defined as an IGA more
`
`of clear or near clear. 74.6% of the PP pupuluinn
`was smfirl at week 12 (Figure 3).
`
`81mm
`Safety assessments were performed on “96 plaid-
`pantaurl‘nreeeivedat least I doledthe luxlydmg. In
`duemcmwtheupyufetypupalnticm.dnetewfletepom
`of 221 AB; in 143 participants (110%)an 4).
`TheAanu-e mainlylnildarlnoderateh'lsewrity.
`Of all AB in the monm‘l'herapy safety population,
`mpulkipannhad AB: hvalved withthegasunintes-
`tinal trad; afthae, 3.6% were maiden-d to be pos-
`sibly (n: 23), probably (n=10}, or definitely [11:10)
`mktedmdaemdydrugmereeruqumnafvul-
`vovaginal candidiasil {0.1%} and 1 report of oral
`candidial'a (01%}: 5 reporu acid as fungi infec'
`lion (andfin‘tl'fldauifiedasyean infectiona)(0.4%);
`W.Q.II'|SOCIJ
`
`100.1119.
`mmmiumumdmmmyummmmmagi-mamas: Hm.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`matmdmmmmmamwmmnmmm-
`mwmflvnnmmmmmmmmmmmm
`“mmmmmdm128Amasm'mmawmtpemn
`
`prmryfealmecfrouaeea,almwaamlulted intl'le
`
`and I report of a pl'notnlerm'tiviq reaction (0.1%)
`in dieufety population. Eighty participants (6.7%)
`diaemdnmdthenudyuutmembeunxdmfi
`finnhmhfilnwfiehlmtbnmbuhhm
`pinliminnfnrpulihle
`accident anewdraguuofhmcarceronmline
`
`noun: of the trul dam-natal: reduction of this
`disease midterm time; CEA semen of moderate
`mmmumhhaddeuenmdmmor
`mild in approximately 1'5““: of participanu by d'le end
`oldie study.
`lzarildr an the existing evi-
`trial
`The present
`dence of the efledivemu and safety all once-
`daily minim-tier: of dnxycycliue 10 mg in
`participants with men. The 40—01; once-daily
`TheORCAuiali-d‘clargmmuhlflcd
`formulation was approved laced on two 1M.
`madamltdemomtratudutdueflmgformulldon
`dduxchlhwewaaell'ectiveumomhenpyinpur—
`randomized. phase 3 clinical trials.“ Puticipuntr in
`both studies (14:53?” had moderate to severe
`ridpann with mild msevere rm. lnvertlwon
`meaeddieaeverityafdiieaaeinamrdntflu
`mllfl—Wmlummlfisz rindules)and
`were treated with either the surly dag (“=269)
`well in clinical practice by clarifying it by overall
`or placebo {IF—'26”. Cunpled with placebo, the
`neverilyateachviriLDmingtbecmal'dieuial,
`”Nations in both undies had tignificmt reduc—
`BAmimprovedmddmchmge-melhflully
`tinnl in mean lesion 0mm (P4901). The dillero
`and statistically significant (fl-(”WU By the end
`encelwetweenllleefl'lcacyolmldydngandplaeebo
`ol'thetrial. Wv7s%dwtidwflbhld
`anmnnlesiuummldheoheweduurlyu
`uchievcdelenturneatcleulGA mu.Etyd1ema.a
`WWWWTBIW
`WH.WMO 11
`Cami-tannin.mmdmmmhmmmmmuwmmdnm.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`MZWMMWWMMHMMMthmw-
`mmmeMmmmmwmmmmam
`“mammmmdmmmmnmmammpenmu.
`
`week 3andoontinuedtodivergeford1eremainderol
`themrdy. Tl'teoverallhenefilaoftrearmcntpeuhted
`throughweel: 20inperticipmmwhowereevalmted
`4 week: after treatment had been discontinued.“
`A I'm-tam of the 2 trielr demon-traced that
`the efficacy oidtuycycline 40 In; confers elinitally
`Iignificant anti-inflammatory ellitzacyr in meet"
`A rarflomined, double-blind, parallel-pulp, nul-
`ticenta'mrdyalrohasoonpared theemcacyand
`Iafety of once thily mhantilnicrohialddore doxy-
`eydine 40 ms “1:44) with eonverttiunal :10:er-
`eiiru: 100 mg (11:47) in participant: with moderate
`to severe tomcat.m Raul:- ol the trial deunnunted
`that the end-inflammatory client of treatment with
`ruhantirnicrohial-dme dmycycline in the 40ml; for-
`mulation produced eqtivalent decreanen in inflam-
`matory lesion counla and CEA scores. Fmthermore,
`penicilnnu treated with the unique formulxion
`lad a 540“ lower incidence of mime-tine]
`tnet Alia,“
`
`setting. Large-scale, randomized, controlled tri-
`alr have provided evidence to guide clinician: in
`thetrentmentofanrietyofdiwtdenofdte-kin
`andathctorgnneyuemazlmmetnhuehuhem
`a recent tecognitim thet mmmiwvbued clini-
`cian- Ihculd help guide and participate in clinical
`trials.” These studies mayr include large number!
`of patients seen and treated in continuity settings,
`enabling investigators to confirm the effectiveness
`of various interventions, answer questioru about uti-
`lization. end help identify uncommon a' new AF...
`ThemdtxoltheORCAtti-nlptovideaddifimal
`upper-t on the benefit: and ufety at this treatment
`that were first reported in the phase 3 trials.“ Poten-
`tial limitations of this trial include choice of the
`specific mrconu: meanlres and decision to nae the
`PP population for the primary analylea. Aim
`medthePPparticilnnuwouldexclulethem
`serioupeotoenlviolatiutthwulectetluthe
`primary outcome me dining delign ofthe study
`because larger number: of participant dropout:
`”allot protocol deviations were expected in this
`W.Qfl|fi.€(fl
`
`Key fcuutu ofthe elm-mt trill include the large
`uieeoftheuudypowlatiunanditeemmity-heed
`reams-
`mmmtnmmdfismmum med. Immahwmmafl Pt”.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`mzmdmmmamwwmmmmmwhm
`Wmmmmxmfimmawmmmmum
`inmfl’cMWmMWMaflJMMwmmmbmmmm
`mummmmmrwmmmmmmzm.
`
`nun.
`
`Sui-nary of Admm (AB)-
`
`
`WWWflnm
`Hanndfl':
`
`mmmmm
`Mum
`Minimum
`ammmmmmmum
`
`mm
`[II-1193!
`
`143(1213
`221
`
`5014.2)
`18(13
`«(12)
`32127}
`
`mmmmm
`23".?)
`Mum
`12w)
`
`
`MmWWthhflMfiMhyfidumM
`all-um
`
`W as. mm 2010 13
`manna-m
`”Himmlflnwldliism'qhM“.ahfliflfluflhpflufllpfifldflm.
`
`
`
`

`

`WM
`
`qpcofuisl.0vanll,lhcmltsdfl1hhillnllc
`I MM mmfilmtinn to the evidence bale
`that his Incumhtcd than the candivmm and
`safetyofdaxycyclineQOmginpnniciplmwith
`niHmmmuwln-mumadwidnhechg
`nmhcrqny.
`
`mum
`
`Themlud'lhismdyindicatcfiat lZwoch
`of treatment will domyclinc 40 mg i: cflectivc
`Ind that in nlhntimicmb‘ill Extradition exam I
`clinically significant antivinfllmuoq effect. In
`MMhh-Imendemonmueddntdmlmdy
`«In; an I): and u maul-crap? in the mine
`mmdpuicuuwithmludy.dmmlu
`prwidc-dditiuul confirm-tinndd'lcflfctyptfilc
`ofdmdmg.
`
`Mam—T}: ORCA netting committcc
`
`hhmfiWJWQ.WRm.m;HM
`E.&Hflin.mfiuyEWchflctMD.H\D:]de.
`
`“mm-dyducribcdindiismpartwfindcd
`byflaldcmuhbanlmiu.LP.Thc-fi1mflnnk
`Jodie Mm PhD, d Evincl: Communication:
`for her upper: in the marina of flak article.
`Her wot-k wan fimdcd by Calcium- Labunuics.
`LRThnimaI-omldlikcmuhmldgelm
`ECOInnuu‘chquWIiru-Winmfwdidrfiyfifi-
`camcfi'ortinthcoordxtofdfiumdymndNom
`]. menn,PhD.faranistlncc with statistical unl-
`ynes. Minn: cf the mmtncript for important
`huelkcmlmmpufmmndbvadldflw
`listadlmtlm.
`
`BEFEENOES
`l. Its-nu til-Ia nun them an: dual [6 mum
`mmm.m.mwnm
`Society: Apt-l
`l, 20"). hllflhnmuglpuu
`{mlmlm. Ame-ad Apil 27, ZOIO.
`2. mm.mhm,mnj.wuw1w.
`MJSIflOG-SOD.
`3. mmmmwuad;mm
`a! Human” Ant-6min; Swim In: W
`Unmann'l'luhadmduhniu-u Martin:
`[reject cf the Ana-inn Auteur of Dar-ulna:
`
`JMMM.MSSMD-5m.
`4.RebulA.fllmdfn:mCilD¢rm.
`[993:11125-2H.
`5. MEWW.MNWJM¢
`ZCOSSSLNWJ.
`6. Ymufikahfl'lhenululumgfm
`on. I Dan-ml Sci. 2019;55:7'3-8].
`
`7. WIMG.RmcHficflm-flm.
`113$ch lmmlfl-ISO.
`8. YnfliK.fiNIdoA,BudI1A.eti.lmeuedIa-im
`
`“in inn-Inn. Nu Md zomnmssm.
`9. mumtmxadmm
`Wmhflfimhfiwwm
`Nun. zmlfiHMSHS'L
`10. MMThtdethduh-uhm
`mammmmmmaan-tm
`ll. mmmmmdm
`inn-mmu Lush: m.m;155m
`12. MW,GMMSmmudHflifiond
`m antiwar ({de A; byW
`dmflufiaw IMMllfis-IITO
`13. Chi-I'll BuilQGwG aimlfim
`WWW“
`[in 'n m an! 2: than hill-1 who‘s Hard
`mijaw manna-17m.
`I4. mtmumtfliifiamdmflbfl.
`in an hm palm leniency! chamomi-
`inv‘lrn. BrJOrdWx Song. 1994529639.
`IS. lull. MIGJ-hrhnllILetnL W
`dmmdmmMIhh-m
`Ina qfllufinlulh. Elfil-‘h. ZMZJS-ZG.
`16. Hmnmuh'],N|-nniI-L¢ti Dunndint
`
`I'll! talk] haunt. 2M:l?&567-57L
`l7. MHMMMI.KILBE¢JM‘
`cyd‘ne n th: m d mu m model: n
`MWfimd-aufiamvfllm‘
`crdile.AcInDauVmanl. [99231178471
`[8. [MILE—hutlhninLuilflflnvfitdu-i
`(tunneling m Mil-Him ‘n I manned fl
`hnnufldwmfiefla. 2115;33553-660.
`l9. TWIN. ammunim. dalDutycydine
`Milan calm mm by W and:
`WMDINM. [WRIZfl-GT
`20. mmthaflRMNEuiExm
`
`hmmmmmm.mm
`umzmmam.
`21. MEETMMWLWIII
`wdmmmmhm
`“mmmdmmmcm
`Danni. IdeOflllfl-i'sz.
`12. Gina {pm hurl. Rn Wuth. TX: Gulduru
`Mmmmwflmmw
`WMMZ? 2010.
`23. mmhd'niullfifldmlqdhehuflr
`IMIM'FWSZ.
`24. mmwdwm
`«flannel. 1m. Swiuu'llnd: Gllthnu Hm
`SA;Ap-i ll mmdm-wum-m
`WSmMMH ZOIO.
`”H.035.“
`
`11am
`mmmn fipfldlflmmhm mad. UWWflw-hwfldflfim.
`
`
`
`

`

`Wine
`
`25. DdllmulQ.Hecmu1-nflfiqd'dmmdhuflwg 27. WKMUMWLMi-hflmy
`(“WMIMMH)
`dmdmmzyclhe l40nigcnntnfled4tleue)mdu mul-
`nln Inn-{m efficacy in m. m.
`mmaflmeMWW
`Nisan-226.
`hhmdmfiqxflhmmm-
`mun-Ind ml. Cut. 201w 51:»:sz
`Dd Rom IQ. Sd'lkllnw I, Waldlkr l’. Cnmpnrhnn
`[HRmon'deGEMmMuiTnmdtm-
`Jam-inhuman tilled-11mm: “WEI
`lmthwdmjww.
`bdflI—Iflcflnkdufllwm-fi-‘nflmmy
`2M3715'fl-576.
`the W1“ man. U5" til-ll",
`Mmhflyhmdm‘lm
`Kuhn 1M. Baum dink-l u-ul main In anal
`MMJmkssu'rm-soz.
`we. CmCaa Med. 2:109:37“qu 135147.515].
`
`Z9.
`
`26.
`
`WW.W
`”ammo 15
`wannamwaummuwmamumnmmnnmndnnm:
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket