throbber
Oral Microbiology Immunology 2008: 23: 148–157
`Printed in Singapore. All rights reserved
`
`Ó 2008 The Authors.
`Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard
`
`Microbiological changes
`associated with four different
`periodontal therapies for the
`treatment of chronic periodontitis
`
`Haffajee AD, Patel M, Socransky SS. Microbiological changes associated with four
`different periodontal therapies for the treatment of chronic periodontitis.
`Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008: 23: 148–157. Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation
`Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard.
`
`Background/aims: To examine subgingival microbiological changes in chronic peri-
`odontitis subjects receiving scaling and root planing (SRP) alone or with systemically
`administered azithromycin, metronidazole or a sub-antimicrobial dose of doxycycline.
`Methods: Ninety-two periodontitis subjects were randomly assigned to receive SRP
`alone or combined with azithromycin, metronidazole or sub-antimicrobial dose
`doxycycline. Subgingival plaque samples taken at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and
`12 months were analyzed for 40 bacterial species using checkerboard DNA–DNA
`hybridization. Percentage of resistant species and percentage of sites harboring species
`resistant to the test antibiotics were determined at each time-point.
`Results: All treatments reduced counts of red complex species at 12 months, although no
`significant differences were detected among treatment groups for most species at all time-
`points. Both antibiotics significantly reduced counts of red complex species by 2 weeks.
`Percentage of resistant isolates increased in plaque samples in all adjunctive treatment
`groups, peaking at the end of administration, but returned to pretreatment levels by
`12 months.
`Conclusion: The significant reduction of red and orange complex species at 2 weeks in
`the subjects receiving SRP plus azithromycin or metronidazole may have contributed
`to a better clinical response in these treatment groups. Therapy did not appear to create
`lasting changes in the percentage of resistant isolates or sites harboring resistant species.
`
`A. D. Haffajee, M. Patel,
`S. S. Socransky
`Department of Periodontology, The Forsyth
`Institute, Boston, MA, USA
`
`Key words: antibiotics; antibiotic resistance;
`azithromycin; chronic periodontitis; metroni-
`dazole; periodontal pathogens; periodontal
`therapy; scaling and root planing; sub-anti-
`microbial dose doxycycline
`
`Anne D. Haffajee, Department of
`Periodontology, The Forsyth Institute, 140
`The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA
`Tel: +(617) 892 8243;
`fax: +(617) 262 4021;
`e-mail: ahaffajee@forsyth.org
`Accepted for publication June 5, 2007
`
`In an earlier paper, the clinical effects of
`systemically administered azithromycin,
`metronidazole or sub-antibacterial dose
`doxycycline (SDD) as adjuncts to scaling
`and root planing (SRP) were examined
`(10). It was found that subjects receiving
`the systemically administered antibiotics,
`azithromycin or metronidazole, showed
`greater clinical improvement at 12 months
`post-therapy
`compared with
`subjects
`receiving SRP only and that the difference
`among groups was more marked at sites
`with initially deeper pockets. The dosage,
`
`duration, and mechanism of action of the
`three adjunctive agents are quite different
`and thus, the effects on the subgingival
`microbiota were examined. To date, there
`are few studies examining the changes in
`the subgingival microbiota in subjects
`receiving these adjunctive agents and no
`‘head to head’ comparison.
`Although it has been shown that bacterial
`species residing in biofilms are much more
`resistant to antibiotics than the same species
`in a planktonic state (1, 2, 11, 20), antibi-
`otics have been used frequently in the
`
`treatment of periodontal infections. Of the
`single antibiotics that have been evaluated,
`systemically administered metronidazole
`appeared to have the most consistent ben-
`eficial effect on clinical parameters of
`periodontal diseases and on subgingival
`plaque composition (29). Metronidazole is
`attractive for the treatment of patients with
`chronic periodontitis because the narrow
`spectrum of this agent is thought to work
`specifically on the anaerobic microbiota
`associated with periodontal diseases. In-
`deed, several investigations suggested that
`
`

`

`Microbial effects of antibiotic therapy
`
`149
`
`systemically administered metronidazole
`used as an adjunct to SRP in the treatment
`of chronic periodontitis offers a clinical
`benefit over SRP alone (8). Few studies
`have documented the microbiological
`changes associated with the systemic
`administration of metronidazole. Lindhe
`et al. (13) demonstrated that systemically
`administered metronidazole in combination
`with mechanical therapy was more effective
`in reducing spirochetes than SRP alone.
`Other investigators have shown that peri-
`odontal therapy that included systemically
`administered metronidazole led to clinical
`improvements and a reduction in the pro-
`portions or levels of several periodontal
`pathogens including Porphyromonas gin-
`givalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema
`denticola, Prevotella intermedia, members
`of the genera Campylobacter, Fusobacteri-
`um, Eubacterium nodatum, Peptostrepto-
`coccus
`micros
`Streptococcus
`and
`constellatus (5, 14–16, 31). Feres et al. (4)
`examined the changes in metronidazole
`resistance over time. The percentage of
`isolates resistant to metronidazole increased
`at 2 weeks, the end of antibiotic adminis-
`tration, but at 6 months post-therapy the
`levels were similar to pretreatment values.
`The effects of azithromycin on the oral
`microbiota have been examined in a limited
`number of studies. Smith et al. (23), in a
`randomized double-blind, placebo-con-
`trolled study of 46 chronic periodontitis
`subjects, demonstrated that subjects receiv-
`ing azithromycin as an adjunct
`to SRP
`showed a better clinical
`response than
`subjects not receiving this agent. In addi-
`tion, they found that compared with the
`placebo group, counts of spirochetes and
`‘pigmented anaerobes’ in subgingival pla-
`que
`samples were
`significantly more
`reduced in subjects receiving azithromycin
`at 22 weeks post-therapy (22).
`The effect of long-term SDD on the
`subgingival microbiota was examined by
`Thomas et al. (28). Subgingival plaque
`samples were taken before and after ther-
`
`apy that consisted of SRP or not, and
`20 mg twice daily (bid) doxycycline or
`placebo for 9 months and were evaluated
`using dark-field microscopy and culture.
`The E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden)
`and minimum inhibitory concentrations
`(MICs) were used to determine doxycy-
`cline resistance. Morphotype distribution
`was somewhat similar among treatment
`groups at each time-point; there was no
`marked decrease in species recovery and
`no overgrowth of opportunistic species.
`Furthermore,
`the administration of SDD
`was not associated with the development
`of doxycycline-resistant species. Walker
`et al.
`(30) examined the effect of a
`9-month administration of SDD on the
`intestinal and vaginal microbiota in 69
`periodontally
`diseased
`subjects. No
`changes in the level of resistant species
`in either fecal or vaginal samples from
`these subjects were detected after long-
`term SDD administration.
`The purpose of the current study was to
`examine microbiological changes associ-
`ated with treatment groups receiving SRP
`alone or
`in combination with one of
`systemically administered azithromycin,
`metronidazole, or SDD. In addition, the
`effect of the different
`therapies on the
`proportion of antibiotic-resistant species
`post-therapy and the identity of
`these
`species was also examined.
`
`Material and methods
`Subject population
`
`Ninety-two subjects were recruited into the
`study. Subjects were >20 years of age, in
`good general health, had at least 20 natural
`teeth, including at least one molar tooth in
`each quadrant, and at least eight sites with
`pocket depth >4 mm. The subjects did not
`have a history of unsuccessful periodontal
`therapy that may have indicated ‘refrac-
`tory’ periodontitis and the history of the
`subjects precluded a diagnosis of aggres-
`sive periodontitis. Subjects were excluded
`
`if they had any known allergies to the test
`antimicrobial agents, had received peri-
`odontal therapy in the previous 3 months,
`were pregnant or nursing, or had systemic
`conditions that required antibiotic preme-
`dication or could influence the outcome of
`periodontal
`therapy. The subjects had a
`mean age of 46 years (range 22–77 years),
`36% were female, 63% were White, 26%
`were African American, 7% were Hispanic
`and 4% were Asian. The baseline clinical
`characteristics of the subjects are presented
`in Table 1. The study was approved by the
`Forsyth
`Institute
`Institutional Review
`Board. The nature of
`the study was
`described thoroughly to all subjects and
`each provided signed informed consent
`before entry into the study.
`
`Experimental design and treatment
`
`This was a randomized, single-blind study.
`Subjects were randomized to one of four
`treatment groups receiving either SRP
`alone or combined with systemically
`administered azithromycin at the dosage
`of 500 mg once daily for 3 days, system-
`ically administered metronidazole at
`the
`dosage of 250 mg thrice daily (tid) for
`14 days, or 20 mg doxycycline (SDD,
`PeriostatÒ; CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals,
`Newtown, PA) bid for 12 weeks. SRP was
`performed a quadrant at a time under local
`anesthesia at approximately weekly inter-
`vals. The adjunctive agents were started at
`the first SRP visit. Subjects were clinically
`monitored at baseline (before therapy) and
`at 3, 6, and 12 months post-therapy. In
`addition, all subjects received maintenance
`SRP at the three post-therapy monitoring
`visits.
`
`Microbiological assessments
`
`At each monitoring visit clinical measure-
`ments were taken as described in a com-
`panion paper
`(10). Subgingival plaque
`samples were taken from the mesial aspect
`
`Table 1. Mean (±SD) clinical and demographic features of subjects with data for the four monitoring visits in the four treatment groups at baseline
`
`Treatment group
`
`Azithromycin
`
`Metronidazole
`
`Periostat
`
`n
`Age
`No. missing teeth
`No. males
`No. current smokers
`% of sites with
`Plaque accumulation
`Gingival redness
`Bleeding on probing
`Suppuration
`Mean pocket depth (mm)
`Mean attachment level (mm)
`
`25
`
`47 ± 14
`2.40 ± 2.50
`15
`3
`
`62.49 ± 23.49
`64.32 ± 29.14
`34.29 ± 26.04
`0.94 ± 1.45
`3.11 ± 0.64
`3.42 ± 0.88
`
`24
`
`44 ± 11
`2.58 ± 2.12
`18
`3
`
`65.98 ± 20.90
`73.90 ± 21.38
`39.37 ± 28.02
`0.85 ± 2.05
`3.00 ± 0.45
`3.21 ± 0.78
`
`20
`
`47 ± 11
`2.35 ± 2.62
`10
`1
`
`66.52 ± 25.61
`66.09 ± 24.57
`41.11 ± 24.78
`2.52 ± 4.16
`3.33 ± 0.92
`3.47 ± 0.93
`
`SRP
`
`23
`
`43 ± 15
`1.83 ± 2.44
`16
`2
`
`64.26 ± 22.27
`63.95 ± 27.04
`32.62 ± 26.20
`0.21 ± 0.68
`2.92 ± 0.37
`3.03 ± 0.56
`
`Kruskal–Wallis
`P-value
`
`0.51086
`0.50788
`0.33237
`0.66845
`
`0.86874
`0.62136
`0.61425
`0.00246
`0.52465
`0.34108
`
`

`

`150
`
`Haffajee et al.
`
`Fig. 1. Mean counts (·105) of 40 test species at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months in subjects in each of the four treatment groups. The species
`were ordered according to the complexes described by Socransky et al. (24). Counts for individual species from up to 28 sites in each subject were
`averaged within a subject and then across subjects in the four treatment groups for each time-point separately. Significance of differences over time was
`sought using the Friedman test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and adjusted for 40 comparisons (25).
`
`of each tooth (excluding the third molars)
`for a maximum of 28 teeth in each subject at
`baseline, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months.
`After
`removal of supragingival plaque,
`subgingival biofilm samples were taken
`using individual sterile Gracey curettes
`from the mesial surface of each tooth and
`placed into separate Eppendorf tubes con-
`taining 0.15 ml Tris EDTA buffer (10 mm
`Tris–HCl, 1 mm ethylenediaminetetraace-
`tic acid, pH 7.6). Immediately after, 0.10 ml
`of 0.5 m NaOH was added to each sample.
`Each sample was evaluated for its content of
`40 bacterial species using checkerboard
`DNA–DNA hybridization (26, 27). In brief,
`the samples were lysed and the DNA was
`placed in lanes on a nylon membrane using a
`Minislot device (Immunetics, Cambridge,
`MA). After fixation of the DNA to the
`membrane, the membrane was placed in a
`Miniblotter 45 (Immunetics), with the lanes
`of DNA at 90° to the lanes of the device.
`Digoxigenin-labeled whole genomic DNA
`probes to 40 subgingival species were
`hybridized in individual lanes of the Minib-
`lotter. After hybridization, the membranes
`were washed at high stringency and the
`DNA probes were detected using antibody
`
`to digoxigenin, conjugated with alkaline
`phosphatase and chemifluorescence detec-
`tion. Signals were detected using AttoPhos
`substrate (Amersham Life Sciences, Arling-
`ton Heights, IL) and were read using a
`Storm FluorImager (Molecular Dynamics,
`Sunnyvale, CA), a computer-linked instru-
`ment that reads the intensity of the fluores-
`cence signals resulting from the probe-
`target hybridization. Two lanes in each run
`contained standards at the concentration of
`105 and 106 cells of each species. The
`sensitivity of the assay was adjusted to
`permit the detection of 104 cells of a given
`species by adjusting the concentration of
`each DNA probe. Signals were evaluated
`using the Storm FluorImager and converted
`to absolute counts by comparison with the
`regression line determined from data from
`the standards on the same membrane.
`Failure to detect a signal was recorded as
`zero. A total of 10,913 subgingival samples
`were evaluated for the 92 subjects.
`
`Determination of antibiotic resistance
`
`from the
`Subgingival biofilm samples
`distal site of four selected teeth were taken
`
`at baseline and 12 months, and from two
`of the four selected teeth at 2 weeks (the
`third SRP visit) and 3 and 6 months in
`each subject. These samples were placed
`in separate tubes each containing 0.15 ml
`of Mycoplasma broth (BBL, Cockeysville,
`MD) supplemented with 1% glucose. One
`milliliter of whole saliva was collected into
`an empty tube at each time-point from
`each subject.
`The plaque and saliva samples were
`vortexed and serially diluted 10-fold.
`Then, 100 ll of each dilution was plated
`in duplicate on antibiotic-containing and
`non-selective agar plates. All plates were
`made with 2% trypticase soy agar and
`2.6% brain–heart infusion agar enriched
`with 5% sheep blood, 1% yeast extract,
`5 lg/ml hemin, 0.3 lg/ml menadione, and
`10 lg/ml N-acetylmuramic acid. Antibi-
`otic-containing plates were made up with
`the same basal medium supplemented with
`one of 4 lg/ml doxycycline, 2 lg/ml
`metronidazole or 2 lg/ml azithromycin.
`These values were chosen based on data
`for a wide range of species presented in
`NCCLS publications (18, 19). Samples
`taken from subjects in the SRP-only group
`
`

`

`Microbial effects of antibiotic therapy
`
`151
`
`Fig. 2. Mean counts (·105) of 40 test species at baseline and 2 weeks in subjects in each of the four treatment groups. The species were ordered
`according to the complexes described by Socransky et al. (24). Counts for individual species at each sampled site were averaged within a subject, and
`across subjects in the four treatment groups at baseline and 2 weeks separately. Significance of differences between baseline and 2 weeks was determined
`using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. The black asterisks represent significant differences between time-points
`without adjusting for 40 comparisons and the red asterisks represent significant differences between time-points after adjusting for 40 comparisons (25).
`
`the antibiotic-
`were plated on each of
`containing plates. Samples taken from
`subjects receiving an adjunctive agent
`were plated on plates containing that
`agent. The inoculated plates were then
`placed into an anaerobic chamber and
`incubated in an atmosphere of 80% N2,
`10% CO2 and 10% H2 at 35°C. After
`7 days of
`incubation,
`the plates were
`removed from the chamber, the colonies
`on the antibiotic and non-selective plates
`were counted, and the proportion of anti-
`biotic-resistant species was determined.
`For each sampled site that was plated on
`an antibiotic plate, the dilution with the
`number of colonies closest
`to 300 was
`washed off with 1 ml TE buffer into a
`tube. The optical density was adjusted to
`1.0 (approximately 109 cells); 0.01 ml of
`this suspension (about 107 cells) was put
`into a tube containing 140 ll TE buffer
`
`and 100 ll of 0.5 m NaOH was added.
`The samples were then analyzed for their
`content of 40 bacterial
`species using
`checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization.
`
`Data analysis
`
`Data from a total of 92 subjects were
`available for analysis and included the
`counts of 40 bacterial species in up to 28
`subgingival biofilm samples at baseline,
`2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. The
`change in mean counts of bacterial species
`over time was the primary microbiological
`outcome evaluated. Data were averaged
`across sites within each subject and then
`averaged across subjects in each treatment
`group at each time-point separately. Since
`mean baseline values for individual spe-
`cies differed among treatment groups, the
`microbial changes among the four treat-
`
`ment groups were examined using AN-
`COVA adjusting for baseline microbial
`counts. The subject was the unit of anal-
`ysis. Significance of differences over time
`in the counts of the 40 individual species
`was determined using the Friedman test
`and adjusted for 40 comparisons (25).
`The proportion of resistant isolates was
`determined in saliva samples and in four
`subgingival plaque samples at baseline and
`12 months and in two of these samples at
`2 weeks and 3 and 6 months in subjects in
`the four treatment groups. Proportions of
`resistant isolates for the plaque samples
`were averaged across sites in each subject
`and then across
`subjects
`in the four
`treatment groups and at each time-point
`separately. The significance of differences
`over time in each group was sought using
`the Friedman test. Significance of differ-
`ences between test and control samples at
`
`

`

`152
`
`Haffajee et al.
`
`Fig. 3. Percentage of isolates resistant to 2 lg/ml azithromycin, 2 lg/ml metronidazole, or 4 lg/ml doxycycline in subgingival plaque samples (upper
`panels) and saliva samples (lower panels) taken at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months from subjects in the four treatment groups. Antibiotic
`resistance in the SRP group was measured for all three systemic agents. Data were averaged within a subject at each time point and then across subjects in
`the four groups separately. The circles represent the mean and the whiskers the standard error of the mean. The shaded area represents the period of
`antibiotic administration in the test subjects. Significance of differences over time for each group separately was sought using the Friedman test,
`*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and between test and control subjects using the Mann–Whitney test as indicated by the P-values at individual
`time-points.
`
`tested using the
`each time-point was
`Mann–Whitney test for each adjunctive
`agent separately. The mean percentage of
`sites colonized by resistant species in
`subgingival plaque samples was deter-
`mined by averaging the site data for each
`species across subjects in the four treat-
`ment groups at each time-point separately.
`Significance of differences over time was
`determined using the Friedman test and
`between test and control samples at each
`time-point using the Mann–Whitney test.
`
`Results
`
`Subject retention, patient compliance and
`adverse events were discussed in Haffajee
`et al. (10).
`
`Microbial changes in different treatment
`groups
`
`At baseline, virtually all subjects harbored
`each of the test species at some level in at
`
`least one sampled site. At levels >105, fewer
`subjects were positive for the test species,
`although the red complex species were, on
`average, still quite prevalent in subjects in
`each treatment group (Table 2). There were
`no significant differences among treatment
`groups in the prevalence of the individual
`test species at baseline. Figure 1 presents
`the mean counts of the 40 test species at each
`visit
`in the four
`treatment groups. On
`average, all treatment groups showed reduc-
`tions in counts of red complex species,
`which were maintained to 12 months.
`These changes were significant for T. for-
`sythia in all
`treatment groups and for
`P. gingivalis in the metronidazole and
`SRP-only groups. Other
`species were
`reduced markedly at the initial post-therapy
`visits, particularly members of the orange
`complex, although an increase in counts of
`many species had occurred by 12 months.
`Indeed, several orange complex species
`approached or exceeded baseline values at
`the 12-month monitoring visit, a finding
`
`particularly noticeable in the SDD group.
`The data in this figure indicated that the
`major decrease in bacterial counts occurred
`between baseline and 2 weeks. Figure 2
`highlights the data at these two visits for
`subjects who were subset
`into the four
`treatment groups. The data indicated that
`subjects receiving systemically adminis-
`tered azithromycin or metronidazole dem-
`onstrated significant reductions in red and
`many orange complex species at 2 weeks.
`There were no statistically significant dif-
`ferences among treatment groups for any of
`the test species examined at any time-point
`with the exception of Actinomyces israelii,
`Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus in-
`termedius, and P. gingivalis at the 6 months
`post-therapy visit.
`
`Percentage of the microbiota resistant to
`the test antibiotics
`
`Figure 3 presents the percentage of the
`cultivable microbiota that was resistant to
`
`

`

`Microbial effects of antibiotic therapy
`
`153
`
`Table 2. Proportion (%) of subjects positive for the 40 test species at mean levels> 105 at baseline
`
`Treatment
`
`AZ
`
`Species
`A. gerencseriae
`A. israelii
`A. naeslundii 1
`A. naeslundii 2
`A. odontolyticus
`V. parvula
`S. gordonii
`S. intermedius
`S. mitis
`S. oralis
`S. sanguinis
`A. actinomycetemcomitans
`C. gingivalis
`C. ochracea
`C. sputigena
`E. corrodens
`C. gracilis
`C. rectus
`C. showae
`E. nodatum
`F. nucleatum ss nucleatum
`F. nucleatum ss polymorphum
`F. nucleatum ss vincentii
`F. periodonticum.
`P. micros
`P. intermedia
`P. nigrescens
`S. constellatus
`T. forsythia
`P. gingivalis
`T. denticola
`E. saburreum
`G. morbillorum
`L. buccalis
`N. mucosa
`P. acnes
`P. melaninogenica
`S. anginosus
`S. noxia
`T. socranskii
`
`20
`24
`24
`68
`4
`48
`0
`0
`0
`0
`4
`4
`12
`24
`12
`4
`16
`28
`16
`16
`48
`4
`68
`20
`12
`44
`48
`0
`64
`40
`24
`4
`8
`12
`72
`0
`16
`0
`32
`4
`
`MET
`
`25
`25
`17
`63
`0
`46
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`4
`8
`17
`8
`4
`8
`42
`13
`4.17
`46
`17
`58
`29
`13
`33
`42
`0
`63
`58
`25
`8
`8
`8
`71
`4
`17
`0
`17
`13
`
`SDD
`
`SRP
`
`55
`45
`45
`70
`30
`60
`15
`0
`15
`15
`15
`25
`20
`55
`30
`10
`45
`50
`35
`25
`50
`22
`65
`45
`25
`45
`60
`5
`70
`60
`35
`15
`10
`30
`55
`10
`35
`10
`40
`20
`
`26
`26
`30
`61
`4
`39
`9
`0
`0
`4
`13
`9
`4
`26
`0
`0
`22
`30
`13
`26
`48
`9
`65
`30
`30
`55
`52
`4
`61
`57
`30
`9
`0
`22
`57
`0
`26
`4
`30
`13
`
`azithromycin, metronidazole, or doxycy-
`cline before antibiotic therapy and at
`2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after
`initial therapy in subgingival plaque and
`saliva samples from subjects in the four
`treatment groups. Before therapy, the per-
`centage of species resistant to azithromy-
`cin was about 22% in both the test and
`control samples. Forty-six and 37% were
`resistant to metronidazole and 8 and 9%
`were resistant to doxycycline in the test
`and control samples, respectively. In all
`samples from subjects receiving systemic
`agents, antibiotic resistance increased at
`2 weeks with significant differences be-
`tween the test and control samples for
`azithromycin and doxycycline. For both of
`these antibiotics, the significant difference
`between test and control samples remained
`to 6 months, but by 12 months the per-
`centage of resistant species were reduced
`in the test samples and levels approached
`those detected before therapy. At no time-
`point was there a significant difference
`
`between test and control subjects in the
`percentage of species resistant to metroni-
`dazole. The data for the saliva samples
`were similar to those observed for the
`plaque samples except that the pretherapy
`proportions of resistant species were high-
`er in the saliva samples (Fig. 3). Further-
`more,
`there was an increase in the
`percentage of resistant species in the 12-
`month samples in subjects in the SDD
`group so that
`levels were significantly
`higher
`than those observed in control
`saliva samples.
`
`Percentage of sites harboring resistant
`species
`
`Figures 4–6 present the percentage of sites
`colonized by the 40 test species that were
`resistant
`to azithromycin, metronidazole,
`and doxycycline. Irrespective of treatment
`group, there were no significant differences
`over time in the percentage of sites harbor-
`ing resistant species. The most commonly
`
`detected resistant species in each treatment
`group were the streptococci. Resistant
`strains of Veillonella parvula were detected
`in over 50% and 80% of sites in subjects in
`the SDD and azithromycin groups respec-
`tively. In general, a wider range of species
`was found to be resistant in the azithromy-
`cin and SDD groups.
`Resistant isolates of many of the test
`species were found in a very small percent-
`age of sampled sites including periodontal
`pathogens such as T. forsythia, P. gingiva-
`lis, E. nodatum, and Campylobacter spe-
`cies. The percentage of sites harboring
`resistant strains of Fusobacterium was also
`very low in the metronidazole group. There
`were a small number of significant differ-
`ences between test and control samples at
`various time-points for each of the test
`antibiotics. However, when adjustments
`were made for multiple comparisons, these
`differences were no longer significant.
`
`Discussion
`
`The goal of the present investigation was
`to describe the subgingival microbial
`changes that took place as a result of four
`different treatment modalities, SRP alone
`or
`in conjunction with the antibiotics,
`azithromycin or metronidazole or SDD.
`The choice of adjunctive agents was based
`on their different modes of action and the
`different dosage regimens required, which
`ranged from 3 days for azithromycin to
`3 months for SDD. As described in Haf-
`fajee et al. (10),
`there were differences
`among treatment groups in the clinical
`changes at 1 year post-therapy.
`Irrespective of the treatment modality
`employed, there was a significant decrease
`in mean counts of many of the test species,
`particularly members of the red and orange
`complexes, species associated with the
`etiology of periodontal infections. It has
`been shown that a decrease in the counts of
`this segment of the subgingival microbiota
`is associated with clinical improvements
`(9). This was confirmed in the current
`investigation because a decrease in mean
`counts of many of the test species was
`significantly associated with an improve-
`ment in attachment level and a reduction in
`probing pocket depth (10). The most
`marked decrease in counts occurred be-
`tween the pretreatment visit and the
`2-week sampling. At this time-point, two
`quadrants of SRP had been completed, as
`well as administration of both azithromy-
`cin and metronidazole. This is in accord
`with data in the literature suggesting that
`treatment of part of
`the mouth has a
`beneficial effect on ‘untreated’ segments
`
`

`

`154
`
`Haffajee et al.
`
`Fig. 4. Mean (±SEM) percentage of sites colonized by species resistant to 2 lg/ml azithromycin at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months in
`subjects who received systemically administered azithromycin as part of their therapy. Samples were taken from two to four sites at each time-point and
`resistant species were averaged across subjects for each time-point separately. The pink lines represent the resistance profiles for samples tested for
`azithromycin resistance from subjects receiving SRP only (control group). Significance of differences over time was sought using the Friedman test. There
`were no statistically significant differences over time in either the test or control samples. Significance of differences between test and control samples at
`each time-point was tested using the Mann–Whitney test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, without adjusting for 40 comparisons. After adjustment
`there were no significant differences between test and control samples for any of the species at any time-point.
`
`(12, 21). It may also suggest that system-
`ically administered antibiotics have a
`marked effect on the subgingival microbi-
`ota either in the presence or absence of
`SRP, as suggested by Lopez et al. (17).
`For many species there was a continued
`decrease in levels to 3 or even 6 months,
`with a slight
`rebound detected at
`the
`12-month visit. It
`is interesting that at
`12 months, mean pocket depth and attach-
`ment level measurements were still show-
`ing improvement overall
`in subjects in
`each of the four treatment groups, with the
`exception of the SDD group (10). One
`may speculate that the rebound in micro-
`bial counts might continue and be associ-
`ated with a subsequent worsening of
`the clinical condition. Unfortunately, the
`present study was not of sufficient duration
`to answer this question.
`This study was in accord with the
`findings described by Haffajee et al. (7)
`and Cugini et al. (3), who found that red
`complex species were significantly re-
`duced by SRP. The current study extended
`
`these findings and indicated that subjects
`in the three treatment groups receiving
`adjunctive agents also showed a reduction
`in red complex species and that
`these
`reductions, over time, were significant for
`T. forsythia in the azithromycin group and
`for T. forsythia and P. gingivalis in the
`metronidazole group. The findings for the
`adjunctive groups were consistent with
`those in the literature. Sefton et al. (22)
`described reductions in spirochetes and
`anaerobic ‘black-pigmented’ species at
`22 weeks
`after
`azithromycin
`therapy,
`while Feres et al. (4) described significant
`reductions in counts and proportions of red
`complex species at 12 months after initial
`therapy consisting of SRP and 2 weeks of
`systemically administered metronidazole.
`The antibiotic-treated subjects in the cur-
`rent investigation exhibited a better clinical
`response, suggesting that a rapid decrease
`in subgingival counts of periodontal patho-
`gens may be crucial for successful peri-
`odontal therapy and long-term periodontal
`stability. However, there were few signif-
`
`icant differences in the subgingival micro-
`biota
`at 12 months
`among treatment
`groups.
`It has been suggested that SDD does not
`act as an antibiotic and thus microbial
`changes would be limited, as suggested by
`the findings of Thomas et al. (28). In the
`current
`investigation there were reduc-
`tions, some significant, in the mean counts
`of several species at 2 weeks post-therapy
`in the SDD group, a pattern of change
`similar
`to that observed in the other
`treatment groups. However, there was an
`increase in counts of many species in the
`SDD group at 6 months, the first monitor-
`ing visit after cessation of the medication.
`Indeed,
`the only statistically significant
`differences among groups, after adjusting
`for multiple comparisons, was observed at
`the 6-month visit
`for mean counts of
`A. israelii, S. gordonii, S. intermedia, and
`P. gingivalis primarily the result of the
`much higher levels of these species in the
`SDD group at
`this time-point. Further,
`counts of several orange complex species
`
`

`

`Microbial effects of antibiotic therapy
`
`155
`
`Fig. 5. Mean (±SEM) percentage of sites colonized by species resistant to 2 lg/ml metronidazole at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months in
`subjects who received systemically administered metronidazole as part of their therapy. Samples were taken from two to four sites at each time-point and
`resistant species were averaged across subjects for each time-point separately. The pink lines represent the resistance profiles for samples tested for
`metronidazole resistance from subjects receiving SRP only. Significance testing was as described in Fig 4.
`
`exceeded baseline values at 12 months in
`the SDD group.
`the percentage of
`Not
`surprisingly,
`resistant
`isolates
`increased in subjects
`receiving adjunctive agents immediately
`after taking these agents, primarily because
`of a decrease in susceptible species. Levels
`had returned to baseline or close to
`baseline values at 12 months, with the
`exception of the high levels of species
`resistant to doxycycline observed in the
`saliva samples of subjects in the SDD
`group. The pretherapy levels, the rise in
`resistant species during antibiotic admin-
`istration and the subsequent post-therapy
`decline in resistance levels were similar to
`the findings of Feres et al. (4, 6). The data
`from the present investigation indicated a
`similar percentage of
`resistant
`isolates
`pretherapy and at 12 months post-therapy
`but the nature of the resistant species could
`not be determined. The question as to
`whether the same strains of a given species
`were resistant pre- and post-therapy to the
`administered agents or whether new, resis-
`tant strains or strains resistant to multiple
`antibiotics had emerged could not be
`answered.
`
`A large percentage of sites harbored
`strains of V. parv

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket