`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACUETICIALS
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,206,740
`_____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. Unassigned
`_____________________
`
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`Overview ......................................................................................................... 3
`I.
`II. My Background and Qualifications ................................................................ 7
`III. List of Documents I Considered in Formulating My Opinion ..................... 10
`IV. Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art ............................................................... 12
`V.
`The '740 Patent Specification ....................................................................... 13
`VI. The Claims of the '740 patent ....................................................................... 15
`VII. State of the Art as of April 7, 2003............................................................... 18
`VIII. Summary Chart of My Opinion in View of the Art ..................................... 30
`IX. Basis of My Opinion with Respect to Obviousness ..................................... 30
`X. Ground 1: the '932 publication (claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 19-22) .................... 32
`XI. Ground 2: the '932 publication and the '748 patent (claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 19-
`22) ................................................................................................................. 86
`XII. Ground 3: the '106 publication and the '748 patent (claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 22)
` .................................................................................................................... 181
`XIII. Ground 4: the '106 publication, the '748 patent, and Webster (claims 19-21)
` .................................................................................................................... 255
`XIV. Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness .......................................... 278
`XV. Conclusion .................................................................................................. 286
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`I, Glenn Van Buskirk, hereby declare as follows.
`
`Overview
`I am over the age of eighteen (18) and otherwise competent to make
`1.
`
`this declaration.
`
`2.
`
`I have been retained as an expert witness on behalf of AMNEAL
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS, L.L.C and AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY PVT. LTD.
`
`(together "AMNEAL") for the above-captioned inter partes review (IPR). I am
`
`being compensated for my time in connection with this IPR at my standard
`
`consulting rate, which is $400 per hour. I understand that the petition for inter
`
`partes review involves U.S. Patent No. 8,206,740 ("the '740 patent"), Exhibit
`
`1001, which resulted from U.S. Application No. 12/155,676 ("the
`
`'676
`
`application"), filed on June 6, 2008, naming Rong-Kun Chang, Arash Raoufinia,
`
`and Niraj Shah as inventors. The '740 patent issued on June 26, 2012, from the
`
`'676 application. I further understand that, according to the USPTO records, the
`
`'740 patent is currently assigned to Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("the
`
`patentee").
`
`3.
`
`In preparing this Declaration, I have reviewed the '740 patent and
`
`considered each of the documents cited herein, in light of general knowledge in the
`
`art. In formulating my opinions, I have relied upon my experience in the relevant
`
`art. In formulating my opinions, I have also considered the viewpoint of a person
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of ordinary skill in the art (i.e., a person of ordinary skill in the field of drug
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`delivery and formulation, defined further below in Section IV) as of April 7, 2003.
`
`4.
`
`The independent claims (claims 1 and 19) of the '740 patent are
`
`directed to a pharmaceutical composition of doxycycline that, when given at a
`
`once-daily dosage, will give a steady-state blood level of doxycycline of a
`
`minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of 1.0 µg/ml. Claim 1 is directed to the
`
`pharmaceutical composition itself; claim 19 is directed to a method of treating
`
`rosacea with the pharmaceutical composition. The pharmaceutical composition
`
`claimed in the '740 patent comprises an immediate release (IR) portion comprising
`
`30 mg doxycycline and a delayed release (DR) portion comprising 10 mg
`
`doxycycline. The pharmaceutical composition of the '740 patent also comprises
`
`one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. Additional dependent claims
`
`recite various excipients and a process for preparing the pharmaceutical
`
`composition.
`
`5.
`
`Prior art references disclose oral pharmaceutical compositions of
`
`doxycycline with the same features as claimed in the '740 patent. For example, the
`
`prior art reference “the '932 publication” (Exhibit 1002; Exhibit 1003) discloses
`
`oral pharmaceutical compositions of doxycycline that, when given in a daily
`
`dosage, give steady-state blood levels of a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum
`
`of 1.0 µg/ml. The '932 publication further discloses compositions of doxycycline
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a 40 mg dose that comprise IR and DR portions with a range of IR:DR ratios,
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`including 30 mg doxycycline in the IR portion and 10 mg doxycycline in the DR
`
`portion (i.e., a 75:25 IR:DR ratio of doxycycline). The compositions of the '932
`
`publication also include one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. The
`
`'932 publication discloses that the pharmaceutical compositions are useful for the
`
`treatment of rosacea.
`
`6.
`
`Prior art reference "the '106 publication" (Exhibit 1004) discloses
`
`controlled release formulations of doxycycline that, when given in a daily dosage,
`
`give steady-state blood levels of a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of 1.0
`
`µg/ml. The '106 publication further discloses compositions of doxycycline that
`
`comprise IR and DR portions with a range of IR:DR ratios, including 75:25. The
`
`compositions of the '106 publication also include one or more pharmaceutically
`
`acceptable excipients.
`
`7.
`
`Prior art reference "the '748 patent” (Exhibit 1005) discloses oral
`
`pharmaceutical compositions of the tetracycline known as minocycline in a once-
`
`daily formulation that contains IR and DR portions and has an improvedimproved
`
`controlled release profile. The '748 patent discloses that the controlled release
`
`formulation is improved by increasing the ratio of IR to DR portions in the
`
`formulation, with a range of ratios that includes 75:25.
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`8.
`
`Prior art reference "Webster" (Exhibit 1018) discloses the use of low
`
`dose doxycycline (as low as 50 mg) for the treatment of rosacea. Webster
`
`discloses that the efficacy of tetracyclines in rosacea treatment is likely due to the
`
`anti-inflammatory properties of the drugs, rather than the antibacterial activity.
`
`9.
`
`The subject matter of multiple claims of the '740 patent is disclosed by
`
`the '932 publication, the '106 publication, the '748 patent, and Webster, alone or in
`
`various combinations.
`
`10. Even if one were to find that no single cited reference discloses all of
`
`the elements of a claim, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a
`
`reason to arrive at the claimed invention with a reasonable expectation of success
`
`in view of a combination of references.
`
`a) A person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reason to, and
`
`would have had a reasonable expectation of success to, arrive at an
`
`embodiment within the scope of claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 19-22 of the
`
`'740 patent by reading the disclosure of the '932 publication.
`
`b) A person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reason to, and
`
`would have had a reasonable expectation of success to, arrive at an
`
`embodiment within the scope of claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 19-22 of the
`
`'740 patent by combining the disclosure of the '932 publication with
`
`the disclosure of the '748 patent.
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`c) A person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reason to, and
`
`would have had a reasonable expectation of success to, arrive at an
`
`embodiment within the scope of claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 22 of the '740
`
`patent by combining the disclosure of the '106 publication with the
`
`disclosure of the '748 patent.
`
`d) A person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reason to, and
`
`would have had a reasonable expectation of success to, arrive at an
`
`embodiment within the scope of claims 19-21 of the '740 patent by
`
`combining the disclosure of the '106 publication with the disclosures
`
`of the '748 patent and Webster.
`
`II. My Background and Qualifications
`I am an expert in the field of drug development and formulation, and I
`11.
`
`have been an expert in this field since prior to 2003. I am presently the managing
`
`member of Nonclinical Drug Development Consulting Services (NDDCS), LLC. I
`
`obtained a Bachelor of Science degree in Pharmacy, a Master of Science degree in
`
`Pharmaceutical Science, and a Ph.D. in Pharmaceutical Science from Rutgers
`
`University in 1969, 1973, and 1979, respectively.
`
`12.
`
`I held the position of Scientist in the Dosage Form Design Group of
`
`Ciba-Geigy Corporation from 1970-1976. I subsequently held the positions of
`
`Scientist, Senior Scientist, and Group Leader in the Process Development Group at
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute (RWJPRI), a division of
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Corporation (1976-1980). I later served as Group
`
`Leader, Section Head, Assistant Director, and Director of the Formulations Group
`
`at RWJPRI (1980-1986). I also served as Director of Technical Development at
`
`RWJPRI (1986-1989) and as Senior Director of Pharmaceutical Development –
`
`Worldwide (1989-1995).
`
`13.
`
`I held the position of Vice President of Pharmaceuticals and
`
`Analytical Development at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (1995-1997). I
`
`subsequently served as Vice President of External Technology Development and
`
`Liaisons at Novartis Pharmaceuticals (1997-1998).
`
`14. After my time at Novartis, I held the position of Vice President of
`
`Nonclinical Drug Development at Purdue Pharma LP (1998-2004). This role later
`
`expanded to Vice President of Nonclinical Drug Development and Technology at
`
`Purdue Pharma (2004-2005).
`
`15.
`
`In 2005,
`
`I established
`
`the
`
`independent consulting company
`
`Nonclinical Drug Development Consulting Services, LLC. I currently serve as
`
`Managing Member to provide expertise in product development, scale-up and
`
`launch, and Scale-up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidance to the
`
`pharmaceutical industry.
`
`16. My curriculum vitae is provided as Exhibit 1021.
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`17.
`
`I have contributed to over 30 New Product Registrations in the
`
`capacity of project leader (one who oversees a drug development team) or
`
`development team member (direct, hands-on contributions to drug development).
`
`These products include capsules, tablets, suspensions, transdermal systems, topical
`
`solutions, nasal sprays, suppositories, and creams. I was significantly responsible
`
`as a team member in the New Product Registrations of: TEGRETOL® Chewable
`
`(anti-seizure medication); IMODIUM® Capsules (anti-diarrhea medication);
`
`SUPROFEN® Capsules
`
`(non-steroidal
`
`anti-inflammatory medication);
`
`Thymopentin Injection (immune stimulant); ORTHO NOVUM 1/35® (oral
`
`contraceptive); TERAZOL® Vaginal Cream
`
`(antifungal medication);
`
`LUTREPULSE® Injection (ovulation stimulant); EPREX®/PROCRIT® Injection
`
`(anemia medication); LEUSTATIN® Injection (anti-cancer medication); and
`
`PalladoneTM Capsules (analgesic).
`
`18.
`
`I have received several honors in my career, including four Johnson &
`
`Johnson achievement awards in recognition of extraordinary accomplishments in
`
`(i) design of the Ortho Pharmaceutical Pilot Plant to improve personnel safety
`
`(e.g., building design, air filtration, safety showers for decontamination); (ii)
`
`leadership of the LUTREPULSE® Project Team; (iii) leadership of the EPREX®
`
`C,M&C Team; and (iv) developed an improved formulation of an oral
`
`contraceptive product line that no longer required hazardous materials for
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`production (this improvement increased personnel safety). In 2005, I was elected
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`as an American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Fellow. I was
`
`also elected as an American Association of Indian Pharmaceutical Scientists
`
`(AAiPS) Fellow in 2005. In 1998, I was awarded the Special Presidential Citation
`
`by AAPS for my work on development of the Scale-up and Post-Approval
`
`Changes (SUPAC) Guidance Documents.
`
`19. During my nearly 35 years of experience in international product
`
`development and management, I have authored or co-authored many scientific
`
`articles or published abstracts and given numerous technical presentations in the
`
`areas of drug formulation, manufacturing and scale up, FDA approval, SUPAC
`
`principles and guidance, and pharmaceutical consulting. I am also an inventor on
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,299,501, U.S. Patent Application No. 10/057,301 (US
`
`2003/0152637 A1) and two EP patent applications. Each publication and
`
`presentation is listed in my curriculum vitae, Exhibit 1021.
`
`20.
`
`In view of my experiences and expertise outlined above, I am an
`
`expert in the field of drug development and formulation.
`
`III. List of Documents I Considered in Formulating My Opinion
`In formulating my opinion, I considered the following documents:
`21.
`
`Amneal
`Exhibit No.
`("AMN")
`1001
`
`Document
`
`Chang et al., U.S. Patent No. 8,206,740, “Once daily
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`1007
`
`1008
`1009
`
`1010
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`formulations of tetracyclines” (filed June 6, 2008;
`issued June 26, 2012) ("the '740 patent")
`Ashley, WO 2002/080932, “Method of treating acne”
`(filed April 5, 2002; issued October 17, 2002) ("the '932
`publication")
`Ashley, U.S. Prov. Appl. No. 60/281,854 (filed April 5,
`2001) ("the '854 application")
`Ashley, WO 2002/083106, “Controlled delivery of
`tetracycline compounds and tetracycline derivatives”
`(filed April 5, 2002; issued October 24, 2002) ("the
`'106 publication")
`Sheth et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,348,748, “Pulsatile once-
`a-day delivery system for minocycline” (filed June
`23,1993; issued September 20, 1994) ("the '748 patent")
`File history of the '740 patent
`Chang et al., U.S. Patent No. 8,394,405, “Once daily
`formulations of tetracyclines” (filed December 17,
`2010; issued March 12, 2013) ("the '405 patent")
`File history of the '405 patent
`Chang et al., U.S. Patent No. 8,394,406, “Once daily
`formulations of tetracyclines” (filed December 17,
`2010; issued March 12, 2013) ("the '406 patent")
`File history of the '406 patent
`Physician’s Desk Reference pp. 1208-1210, 2442-2444,
`2735-2736 and 3357-3358, 56th ed. (2002)
`Skidmore et al., "Effects of Subantimicrobial-Dose
`Doxycycline in the Treatment of Moderate Acne," Arch.
`Dermatol. 139:439-464 (2003)
`Opinion, August 26, 2011, Mylan Pharm., Inc. v.
`Galderma Labs., Inc., No. 10-892-LPS (D. Del. 2011)
`Transcript of Bench Trial, July 5, 2011, Mylan Pharm.,
`Inc. v. Galderma Labs., Inc., No. 10-892-LPS (D. Del.
`2011, Vol. A, pp. 66-259 )
`Cole et al., "Enteric coated HPMC capsules designed to
`achieve intestinal targeting," Int. J. Pharmaceutics
`231:83–95 (2002)
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`Chang et al., US Patent No. 7,749,532, “Once daily
`formulations of tetracycline” (filed April 7, 2004; issued
`July 6, 2010) ("the '532 patent")
`Chambers, "Antimicrobial Agents: Protein Synthesis
`Inhibitors and Miscellaneous Antibacterial Agents," in
`Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of
`Therapeutics, Chapter 47, pp. 1239-1271 (2001)
`Webster, "Treatment of Rosacea," Seminars in
`Cutaneous Medicine & Surgery 20(3): 207-208 (2001)
`Joshi et al., US Patent No. 5,030,447, "Pharmaceutical
`compositions having good stability" (filed March 31,
`1988; issued July 9, 1991)
`Amendment in Response to September 9, 2010 Final
`Office Action and Substance of Interview in U.S. Appl.
`No. 10/474,240 (filed October 3, 2003)
`
`
`IV. Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art
`I understand that a person of ordinary skill in the art is one who is
`22.
`
`presumed to be aware of all pertinent art, thinks along conventional wisdom in the
`
`art, and is a person of ordinary creativity. A person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`("POSA") would have had education and experience in drug delivery and
`
`formulation as of 2003. The education and experience levels may vary between
`
`persons of ordinary skill, with some persons holding a Bachelor's degree with
`
`many years of experience and others holding higher degrees but having less work
`
`experience. A POSA would have knowledge and skill relating to the use, function,
`
`and formulation of pharmaceutical excipients; knowledge and training regarding
`
`the equipment, processes and techniques used to analyze and test formulation
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`materials; and an understanding of pharmacokinetic principles and how they relate
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`to drug development. Such a person would have specific experience with modified
`
`release drug systems.
`
`23. A person of ordinary skill typically would work as part of a multi-
`
`disciplinary team and draw upon not only his or her own skills, but also take
`
`advantage of certain specialized skills of others in the team, to solve a given
`
`problem. For example, a clinician may be part of the team.
`
`V.
`
`The '740 Patent Specification
`I understand that this declaration is being submitted together with a
`24.
`
`petition for inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 5-15, and 19-22 of the '740 patent.
`
`25.
`
`I have considered the disclosure of the '740 patent in light of general
`
`knowledge in the art as of the earliest possible priority date of the '740 patent,
`
`which I understand to be April 7, 2003.
`
`26. The '740 patent specification is directed to oral pharmaceutical
`
`compositions containing tetracyclines such as doxycycline for the treatment of
`
`collagenase destructive enzyme-dependent diseases, such as periodontal disease
`
`and acne, and acute and chronic inflammatory disease states, such as rosacea and
`
`arthritis. [Exhibit 1001, col. 1, ll. 1-53.] The '740 patent specification is further
`
`directed to a method of treating rosacea with oral pharmaceutical compositions
`
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`containing doxycycline and a process for preparing
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`the pharmaceutical
`
`compositions. [Exhibit 1001, col. 2, ll. 64-67; col. 3, ll. 1-3.]
`
`27. The doxycycline formulations disclosed in the '740 patent purportedly
`
`solve certain problems associated with doxycycline administration, such as patient
`
`compliance and unwanted side-effects of long-term administration. The '740
`
`patent describes doxycycline formulations intended as once-daily doses, rather
`
`than two or more doses per day. [Exhibit 1001, col. 3, ll. 49-51.] And, the '740
`
`patent recites that the doxycycline formulations and dosages are able to retain the
`
`beneficial effects of the drug (e.g., inhibitory activity against collagen destructive
`
`enzymes) while avoiding unwanted antimicrobial drug activity that harms normal
`
`microbial flora. [Exhibit 1001, col. 5, ll. 36-40.]
`
`28. The '740 patent recites that when administered once-daily, the claimed
`
`oral pharmaceutical compositions of doxycycline achieve steady-state blood levels
`
`of doxycycline of a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of 1.0 µg/ml, more
`
`preferably between about 0.3 and about 0.8 µg/ml. [Exhibit 1001, col. 3, ll. 52-
`
`58.] The '740 patent recites that these steady-state blood levels of doxycycline are
`
`desirable because
`
`they allow for
`
`the desired anti-collagenase and anti-
`
`inflammatory activity of doxycycline, without being accompanied by undesirable
`
`antibiotic activity. [Exhibit 1001, col. 3, ll. 59-61.]
`
`
`
`- 14 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`29. The '740 patent recites that mixing immediate-release (IR) and
`
`delayed-release (DR) doxycycline formulations in a single unit dosage provides the
`
`desired steady-state blood levels of the drug when given at once-daily dosage, and
`
`that the preferred ratio of IR to DR is 75:25. [Exhibit 1001, col. 8, ll. 9-14.] The
`
`'740 patent also recites that one aspect of the drug formulation is an immediate
`
`release formulation containing less than 50 mg but more than 25, preferably about
`
`40 mg, doxycycline base. [Exhibit 1001, col. 2, ll. 43-45.]
`
`VI. The Claims of the '740 patent
`Independent claims 1 and 19 of the '740 patent are directed to:
`30.
`
`1. An oral pharmaceutical composition of
`doxycycline, which at a once-daily dosage will
`give steady state blood levels of doxycycline of
`a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of 1.0
`µg/ml, the composition consisting of (i) an
`immediate release (IR) portion comprising 30
`mg doxycycline; (ii) a delayed release (DR)
`portion comprising 10 mg doxycycline; and
`optionally, (iii) one or more pharmaceutically
`acceptable excipients.
`
`19. A method for treating rosacea in a mammal
`in need thereof, comprising administering an
`oral pharmaceutical composition of doxycycline
`comprising, which at a once-daily dosage will
`give steady state blood levels of doxycycline of
`a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of 1.0
`µg/ml, the composition consisting of (i) an
`immediate release (IR) portion comprising 30
`mg doxycycline; (ii) a delayed release (DR)
`portion comprising 10 mg doxycycline; and
`
`
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`optionally, (iii) one or more pharmaceutically
`acceptable excipients.
`
`
`31. The claims recited above contain the following common elements:
`
`• steady-state blood levels of doxycycline of a minimum of 0.1
`
`μg/ml and a maximum of 1.0 μg/ml;
`
`• an IR portion comprising 30 mg doxycycline;
`
`• a DR portion comprising 10 mg doxycycline, and
`
`• one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
`
`32. Doxycycline belongs to the tetracycline family of broad-spectrum
`
`antibiotics. [Exhibit 1017, p. 1240.] Tetracycline family members have similar
`
`structure, function, and utility [Exhibit 1017, pp. 1240-1243.] Tetracycline family
`
`members are so closely related in terms of structure, function, and utility that they
`
`are generally referred to as "tetracyclines." [Exhibit 1017, pp. 1240-1243.]
`
`However, the tetracycline family members are not necessarily identical in
`
`pharmacokinetic profiles. For example, the absorption efficiency of tetracycline
`
`family members ranges from as low as 30% for chlortetracycline to 95% for
`
`doxycycline or 100% for minocycline. [Exhibit 1017, p. 1242.]
`
`33. Doxycycline is a well-known active pharmaceutical ingredient that
`
`has been commercially available for decades. Doxycycline was first approved as
`
`an antibiotic by the FDA in 1967 and marketed by Pfizer Inc. under the brand
`
`
`
`- 16 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`name Vibramycin®. Vibramycin® was an immediate release (IR) capsule
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`formulation comprising doxycycline hyclate1 (equivalent to 50 mg doxycycline).
`
`Other dosage forms of doxycycline that were commercially available prior to April
`
`7, 2003, include Monodox® (IR capsule formulation of doxycycline monohydrate
`
`in amounts equivalent to 100 and 50 mg doxycycline), Periostat®2 (IR tablet
`
`formulation of doxycycline hyclate
`
`in an amount equivalent to 20 mg
`
`doxycycline), Vibra-Tabs® (IR tablet formulation of doxycycline hydrochloride
`
`hemi-ethanolate hemihydrate equivalent to 100 mg doxycycline), and Doryx® (DR
`
`pellet formulation of doxycycline hyclate equivalent to 100 mg of DR coated
`
`pellets in capsules). [Exhibit 1011, pp. 1208-1210, 1208-1210, 2442-2444, 2735-
`
`2746, 3357-3358.]
`
`34. As of April 7, 2003, a person of ordinary skill in the art reading the
`
`publicly accessible references of the time would have recognized that a once-daily
`
`40 mg dose of doxycycline comprising an IR portion with 30 mg doxycycline and
`
`a DR portion with 10 mg doxycycline provides steady-state blood levels of
`
`
`1 Doxycycline is clinically available in the form of several different salts, such as
`doxycycline hydrochloride (hyclate), doxycycline monohydrate, and doxycycline calcium.
`[Exhibit 1011, pp. 1208-1210, 1208-1210, 2442-2444, 2735-2746, 3357-3358.]
`2 I understand that Periostat® was approved by the FDA in 1998. I also understand that
`when administered orally as a twice–daily dosage (two 20 mg doses, 40 mg total doxycycline),
`Periostat® consistently achieved steady-state blood levels of doxycycline below those required
`for an antimicrobial effect. Specifically, the data in Exhibit 1012 indicate that Periostat®
`achieves an average steady-state blood level of 0.48 µg/ml. [Exhibit 1012, p. 460, column 1 and
`Figure 1.]
`
`
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`doxycycline of a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of 1.0 µg/ml because the
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`references, alone or in various combinations, disclose such compositions of
`
`doxycycline with these characteristics. A person of ordinary skill in the art reading
`
`the publicly accessible references of the time would have also recognized that the
`
`ratio of doxycycline in the IR and DR portions is not critical for achieving steady-
`
`state blood levels of doxycycline of a minimum of 0.1 µg/ml and a maximum of
`
`1.0 µg/ml, as long as the total amount of doxycycline in the dose was below the
`
`threshold required for antimicrobial activity.
`
`VII. State of the Art as of April 7, 2003
`35. As of April 7, 2003, oral pharmaceutical compositions of doxycycline
`
`that achieve steady-state blood levels between 0.1 µg/ml and 1.0 µg/ml were
`
`known in the art. The medical benefits of achieving these steady-state blood levels
`
`of doxycycline, such as anti-inflammatory or anti-collagenase activities, were also
`
`known in the art. Furthermore, formulating pharmaceutical compositions of
`
`doxycycline to include IR and DR portions with 30 mg and 10 mg doxycycline
`
`(respectively) was known in the art.
`
`36. The '932 publication (Exhibit 1002). PCT Patent Application No.
`
`PCT/US02/10747, "Methods of Treating Acne," was published as WO
`
`2002/080932 ("the '932 publication) on October 17, 2002. Thus, the '932
`
`publication was published and publicly accessible prior to April 7, 2003. The '932
`
`
`
`- 18 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`publication was filed by CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and names Robert A.
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`Ashley as the sole inventor.
`
`37. The '932 publication is directed to methods of treating acne using oral
`
`pharmaceutical compositions of doxycycline. The '932 publication discloses that
`
`"acne," for the purposes of the specification, includes acne rosacea. [Exhibit 1002,
`
`p. 6, l. 34 – p. 7, l. 4.]
`
`38. The doxycycline formulations disclosed in the '932 publication
`
`include once-daily formulations that can achieve serum concentrations of
`
`doxycycline between about 0.1 and 0.8 µg/ml. [Exhibit 1002, p. 9, ll. 17-18; p.
`
`10, ll. 25-29. The '932 publication also discloses a 40 mg dose of doxycycline and
`
`formulations that can include one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients
`
`[Exhibit 1002, p. 16, ll. 1-2; p. 14, ll. 25-29.]
`
`39. The '932 publication disclosed suspensions, tablets, pills, capsules,
`
`and other embodiments for the compositions of doxycycline. [Exhibit 1002, p. 14,
`
`ll. 14-14.] The '932 publication also discloses doxycycline formulations in
`
`immediate release or sustained release formulations. [Exhibit 1002, p. 15, ll. 19-
`
`30.]
`
`40.
`
`It is my understanding that the '854 application is incorporated in
`
`the '932 publication by reference in its entirety. U.S. Provisional Patent
`
`Application No. 60/281,854, "Controlled Delivery of Tetracycline and Tetracycline
`
`
`
`- 19 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Derivatives," (the '854 application; Exhibit 1003) was filed on April 5, 2001. The
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`'854 application lists Robert A. Ashley as the sole inventor. There are two
`
`subsequent patent applications that claim priority to the '854 application's filing
`
`date of April 5, 2001: PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US02/10748 (described in
`
`more detail below) and U.S. Patent Application No. 10/474,240 ("the '240
`
`application").
`
`41.
`
`It is my understanding that the '932 publication incorporates the '854
`
`application by reference in its entirety, which I understand to mean that the '932
`
`publication is generally treated as though the full text of the ‘854 application were
`
`included within the '932 publication. [Exhibit 1002, p. 15, ll. 23-30.]3
`
`42. Disclosures in the '932 publication via the '854 application. The
`
`'932 publication is directed to tetracycline formulations. The '932 publication
`
`discloses that doxycycline is a preferred tetracycline. [Exhibit 1003, p. 5, line 21.]
`
`The '932 publication discloses that doxycycline formulations may be useful for
`
`treating skin diseases or inflammatory disorders. [Exhibit 1003, p. 4., ll. 10-17.]
`
`43. The pharmaceutical compositions of doxycycline
`
`in
`
`the
`
`'932
`
`publication include at least one controlled-release agent. The '932 publication
`
`
`3 "Further description of methods of delivering tetracycline compounds by sustained
`release can be found in the patent application, "Controlled Delivery of Tetracycline and
`Tetracycline Derivatives," filed on April 5, 2001 and assigned to CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. of Newtown, Pennsylvania. The aforementioned application is incorporated herein by
`reference in its entirety." [Exhibit 1002, p. 15, ll. 26-30.]
`
`
`
`- 20 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`discloses that the purpose of these controlled release formulations is to deliver a
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,206,740
`Declaration of Glenn A. Van Buskirk, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1022)
`
`dose of doxycycline below the level required for antimicrobial activity, such that
`
`the host is treated with the drug substantially without any antimicrobial activity.
`
`[Exhibit 1003, p.5, ll. 8-13.] The controlled-release agents disclosed in the '932
`
`publication can include an instantaneous release agent, a sustained-release agent, a
`
`delayed-release agent, and combinations thereof. [Exhibit 1003, p. 5, ll. 24-26.]
`
`The '932 publication further discloses that the preferred formulation has properties
`
`resulting in at least 50%, more preferably greater than 80% of the tetracycline in
`
`the composition being released in the upper GI tract. [Exhibit 1003, p. 16, ll. 12-
`
`14.] In other words, the proporti