throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 26
`
`Date: May 30, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`HANDI QUILTER, INC. and TACONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BERNINA INTERNATIONAL AG,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00364
`Patent 6,883,446 B2
`
`
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FITZPATRICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00364
`Patent 6,883,446 B2
`
`The Scheduling Order in this proceeding set the date for oral argument to
`June 25, 2014, if requested by the parties and granted by the Board. Paper 13.
`Both parties request oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). Papers 24,
`25.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. 42.70(a), each party’s request for oral argument must
`specify the issues to be argued. Petitioner’s request extends beyond specification
`of issues and contains argument. Paper 25. Accordingly, it will be expunged with
`leave to file a replacement request within three business days of this Order.
`Patent Owner’s request for oral argument is granted.
`Petitioner will proceed first. Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond.
`Petitioner may reserve rebuttal time. Each party will have sixty (60) minutes of
`total time to present arguments.
`The hearing will commence at 2:00 PM Eastern Time, on June 25, 2014, and
`it will be open to the public for in-person attendance, on the ninth floor of Madison
`Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-person attendance will
`be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), the parties shall serve any demonstrative
`exhibits upon each other at least five business days prior to the hearing. The
`parties also shall provide the demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least five
`business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov. The
`parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding without prior
`authorization from the Board. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical,
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00364
`Patent 6,883,446 B2
`
`Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan,
`IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65) for guidance regarding the
`appropriate content of demonstratives.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at hearing,
`although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part.
`If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the Board should be
`notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than two days prior to the
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Parrish Freeman
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`pfreeman@wnlaw.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Anthony Volpe
`Volpe and Koenig, P.C.
`avolpe@vklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket