`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 26
`
`
` Entered: July 7, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`NIKON CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00362
`Patent 7,348,575 B2
`
`
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00362
`Patent 7,348,575 B2
`
`
`A conference call was held on July 7, 2014, involving respective
`counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner, and Judges Blankenship, Medley,
`and Clements.1 The purpose of the call was for Petitioner to seek guidance
`as to how it may move to exclude evidence Patent Owner indicated it will
`file with its Motion for Observations, when the date for filing motions to
`exclude is the same as the date for filing motions for observations.
`We proposed, and counsel for the respective parties agreed, to extend
`the time for filing motions to exclude to July 11, 2014. Accordingly, DUE
`DATE 4, regarding motions to exclude only, is extended to July 11, 2014.
`No other changes to DUE DATE 4, or any other remaining DUE DATE, is
`made.
`It is
`ORDERED that motions to exclude are due July 11, 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 A court reporter was present. A copy of the transcript shall be filed as an
`exhibit when it becomes available.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00362
`Patent 7,348,575 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Marc M. Wefers, Esq.
`Chris C. Bowley, Esq.
`Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`wefers@fr.com
`bowley@fr.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`John S. Kern, Esq.
`Robert C. Mattson, Esq.
`Oblon Spivak
`CPdocketKern@oblon.com
`CPdocketMattson@oblon.com
`
`
`3
`
`