throbber

`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-Ifi-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/16Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
`INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., USA,
`
`Defendant.
`
`vvvvvvvv
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`I :12 w—tltlaaRLY-DKL
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), by its attorneys, hereby alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code, that arises out of the filing by defendant Accord
`
`Healthcare Inc., USA (“Accord”) of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) with the
`
`US. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seeking approval to manufacture and sell generic
`
`versions of ALIMTA® prior to the expiration of US. Patent No. 7,772,209.
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Lilly is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Indiana, having its corporate offices and principal place of business at Lilly Corporate Center,
`
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46285.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Accord is a wholly owned
`
`subsidiary of Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
`
`ACCORD EX 1000
`
`ACCORD EX 1000
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 2
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-la-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/16Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 2
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Accord is a corporation organized
`
`and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, having a place of business at 1009
`
`Slater Road, Suite 210»B, Durham, NC, 27703.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,
`
`1338(a), 2201, and 2202.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord is subject to personal jurisdiction in
`
`this District because, among other things, Accord markets, sells, and distributes generic drugs
`
`throughout the United States, including within the State of Indiana and the Southern District of
`
`Indiana. Upon information and belief, Accord has engaged in and maintained systematic and
`
`continuous business contacts within the State of Indiana and the Southern District of Indiana, and
`
`has purposefully availed itself of the benefits and protections of the laws of Indiana.
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, and consistent with its practice with respect
`
`to other generic products, following any FDA approval of Accord’s ANDA No. 203485 for
`
`generic versions of ALIMTA®, Accord will market, distribute, and sell its generic products
`
`throughout the United States and within Indiana and the Southern District of Indiana, and knows
`
`that Lilly will be injured by such actions in Indiana and the Southern District of Indiana. Upon
`
`information and belief, following any FDA approval of ANDA No. 203485, Accord knows and
`
`intends that its generic products will be marketed, distributed, and sold in the United States and
`
`within the State of Indiana and the Southern District of Indiana, and knows that Lilly will be
`
`injured by such actions in Indiana and the Southern District of Indiana.
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 3
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-W-DKL Document 1 Filed Ol/20/tPage 3 of 7 PageID #: 3
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`9.
`
`ALIMTA® is a chemotherapy agent used for the treatment of various types
`
`of cancer. ALIMTA® is indicated (in combination with cisplatin) (a) for the treatment of patients
`
`with malignant pleural mesothelioma, or (b) for the initial treatment of locally advanced or
`
`metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. ALIMTA® also is indicated as a single-
`
`agent for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small
`
`cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy. ALIMTA® also is indicated for maintenance
`
`treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung
`
`cancer whose disease has not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based first-line
`
`chemotherapy.
`
`10.
`
`Lilly sells ALIMTA® in the United States pursuant to a New Drug
`
`Application that has been approved by the FDA.
`
`11.
`
`United States Patent No. 7,772,209 (“the ’209 patent”), entitled “Novel
`
`Antifolate Combination Therapies,” was duly and legally issued on August 10, 2010. The ’209
`
`patent is attached as Exhibit A hereto.
`
`12.
`
`Lilly is the assignee of the ’209 patent. As set forth in greater detail in the
`
`’209 patent, one or more claims of the ’209 patent, incorporated by reference herein, cover a
`
`method of administering pemetrexed disodium to a patient in need thereof that also involves
`
`administration of folic acid and vitamin B12.
`
`13.
`
`An actual case or controversy exists between Lilly and Accord with
`
`respect to infringement of the ’209 patent.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-W-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/16Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4
`
`
`COUNT
`
`(Infringement of US. Patent No. 7,772,209)
`
`14.
`
`Lilly incorporates each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`15.
`
`By letter dated December 8, 2011 (“Accord’s Notice Letter”), Accord
`
`notified Lilly that it had submitted to the FDA ANDA No. 203485 for Accord’s Pemetrexed
`
`Disodium for Injection, 100 rug/vial and 500 mg/vial products (“Accord’s ANDA Products”).
`
`16.
`
`Accord’s ANDA Products are generic versions of ALIMTA®.
`
`17.
`
`Accord’s ANDA Products contain pemetrexed disodium.
`
`18.
`
`Upon information and belief, the use of Accord’s ANDA Products in
`
`accordance with Accord’s proposed labeling for Accord’s ANDA Products involves
`
`administration of folic acid and vitamin B12.
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, the use of Accord’s ANDA Products in
`
`accordance with and as directed by Accord’s proposed labeling for those products will infringe
`
`one or more claims of the ’209 patent.
`
`20.
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord filed as a part of ANDA No. 203485
`
`a certification of the type described in Section 505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) of the Food, Drug, and
`
`Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 3550)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), with respect to the ’209 patent,
`
`asserting that the claims of the ’209 patent are invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed by the
`
`manufacture, use, offer for sale, or sale of Accord’s ANDA Products.
`
`21.
`
`The purpose of ANDA No. 203485 was to obtain approval under the
`
`FDCA to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale of Accord’s
`
`ANDA Products prior to the expiration of the ’209 patent.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 5
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-la-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/16Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 5
`
`22.
`
`Accord’s submission of ANDA No. 203485 for the purpose of obtaining
`
`approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale of Accord’s
`
`ANDA Products prior to the expiration of the ’209 patent is an act of infringement of the ’209
`
`patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`23.
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord intends to engage in the
`
`manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution, and/or importation of Accord’s
`
`ANDA Products and the proposed labeling therefor immediately and imminently upon approval
`
`of ANDA No. 203485, 1'. e. , prior to the expiration of the ’209 patent.
`
`24.
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord has knowledge of the claims of the
`
`’209 patent. Notwithstanding this knowledge, Accord has continued to assert its intent to engage
`
`in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution, and/or importation of
`
`Accord’s ANDA Products and the proposed labeling therefor immediately and imminently upon
`
`approval of ANDA No. 203485.
`
`25.
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord plans and intends to, and will,
`
`actively induce infringement of the ’209 patent when its ANDA is approved, and plans and
`
`intends to, and will, do so immediately and imminently upon approval.
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord knows that Accord’s ANDA
`
`Products are especially made or adapted for use in infringing the ’209 patent, and that Accord’s
`
`ANDA Products are not suitable for substantial noninfringing use. Upon information and belief,
`
`Accord plans and intends to, and will, contribute to infringement of the ’209 patent immediately
`
`and imminently upon approval of ANDA No. 203485.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 6
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-li-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/16Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 6
`
`27.
`
`The foregoing actions by Accord constitute and/or will constitute
`
`infringement of the ’209 patent, active inducement of infringement of the ”209 patent, and
`
`contribution to the infringement by others of the ’209 patent.
`
`28.
`
`Upon information and belief, Accord is without a reasonable basis for
`
`believing that it will not be liable for infringing the ’209 patent, actively inducing infringement
`
`of the ’209 patent, and/or contributing to the infringement by others of the ’209 patent.
`
`29.
`
`Unless Accord is enjoined from infringing the ’209 patent, actively
`
`inducing infringement of the ’209 patent, and contributing to the infringement by others of the
`
`’209 patent, Lilly will suffer irreparable injury. Lilly has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`WHEREFORE, Lilly requests the following relief:
`
`(a)
`
`A judgment that Accord has infringed the ’209 patent and/or will infringe,
`
`actively induce infringement of, and/or contribute to infringement by others of the ’209 patent;
`
`(b)
`
`A judgment ordering that the effective date of any FDA approval for
`
`Accord to make, use, offer for sale, sell, market, distribute, or import Accord’s ANDA Products,
`
`or any product the use of which infringes the ’209 patent, be not earlier than the expiration date
`
`of the ’209 patent, inclusive of any extensi0n(s) and additional period(s) of exclusivity;
`
`(c)
`
`A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Accord, and all persons
`
`acting in concert with Accord, from making, using, selling, offering for sale, marketing,
`
`distributing, or importing Accord’s ANDA Products, or any product the use of which infringes
`
`the ’209 patent, or the inducement of or contribution to any of the foregoing, prior to the
`
`expiration date of the ’209 patent, inclusive of any extension(s) and additional period(s) of
`
`exclusivity;
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 7
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-li-DKL Document 1 Filed 01/20/16Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 7
`
`(d)
`
`A judgment declaring that making, using, selling, offering for sale,
`
`marketing, distributing, or importing of Accord’s ANDA Products, or any product the use of
`
`which infringes the ’209 patent, prior to the expiration date of the ’209 patent, infringes, will
`
`infringe, will actively induce infringement of, and/or will contribute to the infringement by other
`
`of the ’209 patent;
`
`(e)
`
`A declaration that this is an exceptional case and an award of attorneys’
`
`fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
`
`(f)
`
`An award of Lilly’s costs and expenses in this action; and
`
`(g)
`
`Such further and other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
`
`Dated: January 20, 2012
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`M. ’71 Chi/MUD!
`
`J
`B
`
`Carroll, No. 4187-49
`ES & THORNBURG LLP
`
`11 South Meridian Street
`
`Indianapolis, IN 46204
`(317) 236-1313
`jan.carroll@btlaw.com
`Attorneyfor Plaintiff
`Eli Lilly and Company
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Bruce R. Genderson
`
`Adam L. Perlman
`
`Ellen E. Oberwetter
`Dov P. Grossman
`David M. Krinsky
`Megan A. Hughes
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, NW.
`Washington, DC 2005
`(202) 434-5000
`
`INDSOZ J'MC 1202829vl
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 8
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-Ifi-DKL Document 1—1 Filed 01/20/
`Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 8
`
`USOO7772209B2
`
`(12)
`
`United States Patent
`Niyikiza
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 7,772,209 B2
`Aug. 10, 2010
`
`ANTIFOLATE COMBINATION THERAPIES
`
`W0
`
`WO 95/27723
`
`10/1995
`
`Inventor: Clot lelkiza, Indianapolis, IN (US)
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`(54)
`
`(75)
`
`(73)
`
`(*)
`
`(21)
`
`(22)
`
`(65)
`
`(62)
`
`(50)
`
`(51)
`
`(52)
`
`(58)
`
`(56)
`
`
`
`C
`
`,
`
`,
`'
`l'
`L'
`ompany Indianapo ls
`IEblIi(Ullsl)y and
`-
`-
`-
`-
`subjw. to any madame“. the term 0m“
`patent IS extended or adjusted under 35
`U'S'C' 1540)) by 162 days.
`
`:
`
`'
`Asstgnee
`-
`_
`N'mce'
`
`.
`Appl. No" 11/776,329
`.
`Filed:
`
`Jul. 11’ 2007
`
`Prior Publlcation Data
`US 2mg/0032948 A1
`Feb. 7, 2008
`.
`.
`Relamd U'S' Amman” Data
`Division of application No. 11/288,807, filed on Nov.
`29, 2005, now abandoned, which is a division ofappli-
`cation No. 10/297,821, filed as application No. PC'I'I
`USOlll486O on Jun. 15, 2001 , now Pat. No. 7,053,065.
`
`Provisional application No. 60/215,310, filed on Jun.
`30, 2000, provisional application No. 60/235,859,
`filed on Sep. 27, 2000, provisional application No.
`60/284,448, filed on App 18, 2001 ,
`
`Int. Cl.
`(200601)
`A61K 31/70
`(2006.01)
`A61K 31/685
`(2006.01)
`A61K 31/50
`(2006.01)
`A61K 31/525
`(2006.01)
`A61K 31/519
`U.S. c1.
`........................... 514/52; 514/77; 514/249;
`514,251; 514/265‘1
`Field of Classification Search ................... 514/52,
`514/77, 249, 251, 265.1
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`References Cit“.
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2,920,015 A
`4,140,707 A *
`5344932 A
`5,405,839 A
`5,431,925 A
`5,563,126 A
`5,736,402 A
`6,207,651 Bl
`6,297,224 B1
`6,528,496 B1
`7,053,065 BZ
`2003/0216350 A1
`2003/0225030 A1
`2004/0005311 A1
`
`................ 556/137
`
`1/1960 Thompson
`2/1979 Clem et a1.
`9/1994 Taylor
`4/1995 Toraya et a1.
`.
`7/1995 Ohmorl et a1.
`10/1996 Allen et 31.
`4/ 1998 Francis et a1.
`3/2001 Allen et :11.
`10/2001 Allen et a1.
`3/2003 Allen et 3.1.
`5/2006 Niyikiza et al.
`11/2003 Allen et a1.
`12/2003 Allen et a1.
`1/2004 Pitman
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`EP
`
`0 546 870
`
`6/1993
`
`Calvert11.: “Folate statusand the safetyprofileofantifolates”, Semi-
`nars in Oncology, 2002, 29/2 Suppl. 5, pp. 3-7, XP008005755.
`Calvert 11.: “Future directions in the development 01' pemettexed",
`Seminars
`in Oncology, 2002,
`29/2 Suppl.
`5,
`pp.
`54-51,
`XP008005744.
`Westerhof, et a1: “Carrier-and receptor-mediated transport of folate
`antagonists
`targeting folate—dependent enzymes: correlates of
`molecularstructure and biological activity", Mol. Pharmacology,
`1995, 48(3), pp. 459-471, XP008005762.
`Worzalla, et a]: “Role of folic acid in modulating the toxicity and
`efficacy of the multitargeted antifolate, LY231514“, Anticancer
`Reseaieh (1998). 18(5A), pp. 3235-3239, XP008005757.
`Hanauske, Ct 111: “PEIIIBU‘EXGd disodium: A novel antifolate clinically
`active against multiple solid tumors”, Oncologist, Alphamed Press,
`US, vol. 4, No. 6, 2001, pp. 363-373, XP008005751.
`Bunn, et 111; “Vitamin B 12 and folate reduce toxicity of Alimta
`(pernelrexed djsodium. LY 231514, MTA). a novel antifolate/
`antimetabolite", Program/Proceedings—American Society ofClini-
`“31 OBCOIOSY) the 506M)?- US. V01. 75A. N0- 20, 2001. P; 300.
`Xm°8°°5885
`Dierkes, et al., Supplementation with Vitamin B 12 Decreases
`Homocystein and Methylmalonic Acid but Also Serum Folate in
`Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease. Metabolism. May 1999. vol.
`43, N0~ 5,1211 531-635 See: abstract-
`Arsenyan et a1. (Abstract: Onkol. Nauchn., (1973) 12(10):49-54.
`John, et a]. (Cancer 2000, 88: 1807- 13).
`Poydock et al., "Growth-inhibiting efl'ect of hydroxocohaltniin and
`L-ascorbic acid on two solid tumors in mce”, IRCS Medical_ Sci-
`ence. V01) 12' No. 9~PPi 813 (1984)-
`The Cecil Reference, Textbook of Medicine, let Edition (2000).
`Chapter 193- PP- 1060-10751
`.
`,
`.
`Poydoelc M. Effect ofcombmedascorblc acid andB-IZ on survrval of
`2113132): gflflflggfigfmmm “d “2 1° ”mm“ A’" J
`Poydock M, et til. Mitogenic inhibition and effect on survival ofmice
`bearing L 1210 leukemia using a combination of dehydroascorbic
`acid and hydroxycobalamin. Am JClin Oncol 1985; 8: 2666-269.
`Poydock M, et al. Influence ofVitamins C and 1312 on the Survival
`Rate of Mice Bearing Ascites Tumor. Exp! Cell Biol 1982; 50:88-91.
`Toohey J. Dehydroascorbic acid as an anti-cancer agent. Cancer
`Letters 2008; 263:164-169.
`Salish S, et a]. Intrathecal methotrexate-induced megaloblastic ane-
`mia in patients with acute leukemia. Archives ofPathology & Laba-
`ratcry Medicine 1999; 123(9): 774-777-
`Nishi‘zawaY, et al. Effects ofmethylcobalamin on the proliferation of
`androgen-sensuwe or estrogen-sensitive malignant cells in culture
`and in Vivo. InternationalJournalfor Vitamin andNutrition Research
`1997; 67(3):l54-170.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner—Kevin Weddington
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Elizabeth A. McGraw
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A method ofadministering an antifolate to a manunal in need
`thereof, comprising administering an effective amount ofsaid
`antifolate in combination with a methylmalonic acid lower-
`ing agent.
`
`22 Claims, No Drawings
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 9
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-R6-DKL Document 1—1 Filed 01/20/‘ Page 2 of 9 PagelD #: 9
`
`US 7,772,209 B2
`
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Tsao C. et al. Influence of cobalamin on the survival ofmice bearing
`ascites tumor. Pathobiology 1993; 61(2): 104-3.
`Kamei T, et a1. Experimental study ofthe therapeutic effects offolate,
`vitamin A, and vitamin BIZ on squamous metaplasia 01'the bronchial
`epithelium. Cancer 1993; 71(8): 2477-83.
`Shimim N, et a1. Experimental study of antinimor effect of methyl-
`B12. Oncology 1987; 44(3): 169-73.
`Herbert, V. The role of vitamin B12 and folate in carcinogenesis.
`Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1986; 206 (Essent.
`NulI. Carcinog.), 293-311.
`Kroes A, et al. Effects ofSvfluorouracil treatment ofrat leukemia with
`concomitant inactivation of cobalamin. Anticancer Research 1986;
`6(4): 737-42.
`Kroes A. et a]. Enhanced therapeutic effect ofmethotrexate in experi-
`mental rat leukemia afier inactivation ofcobalamin (vitamin B12) by
`nitrous oxide. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1986;
`17(2): 114.20.
`in prevention of
`Barak A. Vitamin 1312 as a possible adjunct
`methotrexate hepatotoxicity. Biochemical Archives 1985; 1(3): 139-
`42.
`Herbert V. The inhibition and promotion of cancers by folic acid.
`vitamin B12, and their antagonists. ACS Symposium Series (1985);
`277(Xenobiot. Metab.: Nutr. Eff.), 31-6.
`Alimta, NDA 021462. Approved Label of Jul. 2, 2009.
`“Clinical Chemistry: principle, procedures, correlations," 3rd edi-
`tion, 1996, published by Lippincott: pp. 618-627.
`Fluorouracil, Physicians Desk References. (c) 1998, pp. 2463-2464.
`Hammond, I... et al., "A phase I and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of
`the multitarget antifol (MTA) LY231514 with folic acid, " American
`Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting Abstract No. 866
`(1998).
`Kisliuk, RL., 1984. "The Biochemistry ofFolatcs.” In Sirotnak (Ed),
`Folate Antagonists as 'l'herapeutic Agents. pp. 2-68. Harcourt Brace
`Jovanovich, Publishers.
`
`Kisliuk, R1... 1999. "Folate Biochemistry in REiation to Antifolate
`Selectivity." In Jackson (Ed.), Antifolate Drugs in Cancer Therapy.
`pp. 13-36. Humana Press, New Jersey.
`Lcucovorin, Physicians Desk Reference, (c) 1999. pp. 1389-1391.
`Methotrexate, Physicians Desk Reference, (c) 1999. pp. 1397-1413.
`Morgan, et al., "Folic acid supplementation prevent deficient blood
`folate levels and hyperhomocysteinemia during long-term, low dose
`methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: implications for car-
`diovascular disease prevent,” J. Rheumatoi. 25 :44 1 A46. (1998).
`Niyikiza, C., et al., “LY231514 (MI'A): relationship of vitamin
`metabolite profile to toxicity," American Society of Clinical Oncol-
`ogy (ASCO) Meeting Abstract No. 2139 (1998).
`Raltitrexed, The Complete Drug Reference, Martindale, 32nd Ed.,
`Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp. 560, 1990.
`Shih, C., et al., “LY231514, a Pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-based
`Antifolate that Inhibits Multiple Folate-requiring Enzymes," Cancer
`Research. 57:1116-1123. 1997.
`Shih, C., et al., “Preclinical Pharmacology Studies and the Clinical
`Development of a Novel Multitargeted Antifolate, MTA
`(LY2315 14)," In Jackson (Ed.), Antifolate Drugs in Cancer Therapy.
`pp. 13-36 llumana Press, New Jersey, 1998.
`Volkov, 1., “The master key effect of vitamin B12 in treatment of
`malignancy—A potential therapy?", Medical Hypotheses. 70:324-
`328. 2008.
`Maysishecheva, N.V., et al.:"AntitlnnorActivity of Methotiexate
`When Used in Combination with Cobalamine Derivatives",
`Eksperimentalnaya Onkologija (1982), vol. 4, No. 52963.
`McDonald, A.C.. et a].: “Clinical Phase I Study of LY231514, a
`Multitargeted Antifolate, Administered by Dailyx 5 q 21 Schedule",
`Annals of Oncology (1996), vol. 7:85, Abstract No. 291.
`Sofyina, Z.P., et al.: “Possibility of Potentialing the Antineoplaslic
`Action of Folic Acid Antagonist by Methylcobalamine Analogs",
`Vestnik Akademii Medicinskich Nauk SSSR (1979), vol. 1: 72-78.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 10
`‘ Case 1:12-cv-00086-R‘DKL Document 1-1 Filed 01/20/6 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 10
`
`US 7,772,209 B2
`
`1
`ANTIFOLATE COMBINATION THERAPIES
`
`This application is a divisional of application Ser. No.
`11/288,807, filed 29 Nov., 2005 now abandoned, which is a
`divisional of application Ser. No. 10/297,821 filed 12 May,
`2002, now US. Pat. No. 7,053,065, which claims priority
`under 35 USC 371, for PCT/USOl/l 4860, filed 15 Jun., 2001,
`which claims the priority ofU.S. provisional applications No.
`60/215,310, filed 30 Jun., 2000, No. 60/235,859, filed 27
`Sep., 2000, and No. 60/284,448, filed 18 Apr., 2001.
`Potentially, life-threatening toxicity remains a major limi-
`tation to the optimal administration of antifolatcs. (sec, gen-
`erally, Antifolate Drugs in Cancer Therapy, edited by Jack-
`man, Ann 1..., Humana Press, Totowa, N.J., 1999.) In some
`cases, a supportive intervention is routinely used to permit
`safe, maximal dosing. For example, steroids, such as dexam-
`ethone, can be used to prevent the formation of skin rashes
`caused by the antifolate. (Antifalate, pg 197.)
`Antifolates represent one of the most thoroughly studied
`classes of antineoplastic agents, with aminopterin initially
`demonstrating clinical activity approximately 50 years ago.
`Methotrexate was developed shortly thereafter, and today is a
`standard component of effective chemotherapeutic regimens
`for malignancies such as lymphoma, breast cancer, and head
`and neck cancer. (Bonnadonna G, Zambetti M, Valagussa P.
`Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in
`breast cancer with more than three positive nodes: Ten year
`results. JAMA 1995;273(7):542-547; Bonnadonna G, Vala-
`gnssa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Brambilla C. Adjuvant
`cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-
`positive breast cancer: The results of20 years offollow-up. N
`Engl J Med 1995; 332(14):901-906; and Hong W K, Schaefer
`S, Issell B, et al. A prospective randomized trial of methotr-
`exate versus cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent squamous
`cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 1983; 52:206-
`210.) Antifolates inhibit one or several key folate-requiring
`enzymes ofthe thymidine and purine biosynthetic pathways,
`in particular, thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reduc-
`tase (DHFR), and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltrans-
`ferase (GARFT), by competing with reduced folates for bind-
`ing sites ofthese enzymes. (Shih C, l-Iabeck L L, Mendel sohn
`L G, ChenV J, Schultz R M. Multiple folate enzyme inhibi-
`tion: Mechanism of a novel pyrrolopyrimidine-based anti-
`folate LY231514 (MTA). Advan Enzyme Regul, 1998;
`38:135~152 and Shih C, Chen V J, Gossett L S, et a].
`LY231514, a pyrrolo[2,3—d]pyrimidine-based antifolate that
`inhibits multiple folate-requiring enzymes. Cancer Res 1997;
`57:1116-1123.) Several antifolate drugs are currently in
`development. Examples of antifolates that have thymidylate
`synthase inhibiting (“TSI”) characteristics include 5-fluorou-
`racil and Tomudex®. An example of an antifolate that has
`dihydrofolate reductase inhibiting (“DHFRI”) characteristic
`is Methotrexate®. An example of an antifolate that has gly-
`cinamide
`ribonucleotide
`formyltransferase
`inhibiting
`(“GARFTI”) characteristics is Lometrexol. Many of these
`antifolate drugs inhibit more than one biosynthetic pathway.
`For example Lometrexol is also an inhibitor of dihydrofolate
`reductase and pemetrexed disodium (Alimta®, Eli Lilly and
`Company, Indianapolis, Ind.) has demonstrated thymidylate
`synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamidc ribo-
`nucleotide formyltransferase inhibition.
`A limitation to the development of these drugs is that the
`cytotoxic activity and subsequent effectiveness of anti folates
`may be associated with substantial toxicity for some patients.
`Additionally antifolates as a class are associated with spo-
`radic severe mylosuppression with gastrointestinal toxicity
`which, though infrequent, canies a high risk ofmortality. The
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4s
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`inability to connol these toxicities led to the abandonment of
`clinical development of some antifolates and has complicated
`the clinical development of others, such as Lornetrexol and
`raltitrexed.
`(Jackman A L, Calvert A H FolateoBased
`”thymidylate Synthase Inhibitors as Anticancer Drugs. Ann
`Oncol 1995; 6(9):871-881; Laohavinij S, Wedge S R, Lind M
`J, et al. A phase I clinical study of the antipurine antifolate
`Lornetrexol (DDATHF) given with oral folic acid. Invest New
`Drugs 1996; 14:325-335; and MaughanT S, James R D, Kerr
`D, et al., on behalf of the British MRC Colorectal Cancer
`Working Party. Preliminary results of a multicenter random—
`ized trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (deGramont,
`Lokich, and raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer. Proc
`ASCO 1999; 18:Abst 1007.) Initially, folic acid was used as
`a treatment for toxicities associated with GARF‘Tl see, e.g.
`US. Pat. No. 5,217,974. Folic acid has been shown to lower
`homocysteine levels (see e.g. Homocysteine Lowering Trial-
`ist’s Collaboration. Lowering blood homocysteine with folic
`acid based supplements: meta-analysis of randomized trials.
`BMJ 1998; 316:894-898 and Naurath H J, Joosten E, Riezler
`R, Stabler S P, Allen R H, Lindenbaum J. Effects ofvitamin B
`12, folate and vitamin BG supplements in elderly people with
`normal serum vitamin concentrations. Lancet 1995; 346:85-
`89), and homocysteine levels have been shown to be a pre-
`dictor ofcytotoxic events related to the use ofGARFT inhibi-
`tors, seee.g. US. Pat. No. 5,217,974. However, evenwith this
`treatment, cytotoxic activity of GARFT inhibitors and anti-
`folates as a class remains a serious concern in the develop-
`ment of antifolates as pharmaceutical drugs. The ability to
`lower cytotoxic activity would represent an important
`advance in the use of these agents.
`Surprisingly and unexpectedly, we have now discovered
`that certain toxic effects such as mortality and nonhemato-
`logic events, such as skin rashes and fatigue, caused by anti-
`folates, as a class, can be significantly reduced by the pres-
`ence of a methylmalonic acid lowering agent, without
`adversely afl'ecting therapeutic eflicacy. The present inven-
`tion thus provides a method for improving the therapeutic
`utility of antifolate drugs by administering to the host under-
`going treatment with a methylmalonic acid IOWering agent.
`We have discovered that increased levels of methylmalonic
`acid is a predictor of toxic events in patients that receive an
`antifolate drug and that treatment for the increased methyl-
`malonic acid, such as treatment with vitamin B12, reduces
`mortality and nonhematologic events, suchas skin rashes and
`fatigue events previously associated with the antifolate drugs.
`Additionally, we have discovered that the combination ofa
`methylmalonic acid lowering agent and folic acid synergisti—
`cally reduces the toxic events associated with the administra-
`tion of antifolate drugs. Although, the treatment and preven-
`tion of cardiovascular disease with folic acid in combination
`with vitamin B12 is knOWn, the use ofthe combination for the
`treatment of toxicity associated with the administration of
`antifolate drugs was unknown heretofore.
`The pres-t invention relates to a method of administering
`an antifolate to a mammal in need thereof, comprising admin-
`istering an effective amount of said antifolate in combination
`with a methylmalonic acid lowering agent.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method of
`reducing the toxicity associated with the administration of an
`antifolate to a mammal comprising administering to said
`mammal an effective amount of said antifolate in combina-
`tion with a methylmalonic acid lowering agent.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method of
`inhibiting tumor growth in mammals comprising administer~
`ing to said mammals an effective amount of an antifolate in
`combination with a methylmalonic acid lowering agent.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RLY-DKL Document 1-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 11
`Case 1:12-cv-00086-RI‘DKL Document 1-1 Filed 01/20/% Page 4 of 9 PagelD #: 11
`
`US 7,772,209 B2
`
`3
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method of
`administering an antifolate to a mammal in need thereof,
`comprising administering an effective amount of said anti~
`folate in combination with a methylmalonic acid lowering
`agent and a FBP binding agent. A preferred FBP binding
`agent is folic acid.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method of
`reducing the toxicity associated with the administration of an
`antifolate to a mammal comprising administering to said
`mammal an effective amount of said antifolate in combina-
`tion with a methylmalonic acid lowering agent and a FBP
`binding agent. A preferred FBP binding agent is folic acid.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method of
`inhibiting tumor growth in mammals comprising administer-
`ing to said mammals an effective amount of an antifolate in
`combination with a methylmalonic acid lowering agent and a
`FBP binding agent. A preferred FBP binding agent is folic
`acid.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to the use of a
`methylmalonic acid lowering agent, alone or in combination
`with a FBP binding agent, in the preparation ofa medicament
`useful in lowering the mammalian toxicity of an antifolate. A
`preferred FBP binding agent is folic acid.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to the use of a
`methylmalonic acid lowering agent in the preparation of a
`medicament useful in lowering the mammalian toxicity asso-
`ciated with an antifolate, and the medicament is administered
`in combination with an antifolate.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to the use of a
`methylmalonic acid lowering agent in the preparation of a
`medicament useful in lowering the mammalian toxicity asso-
`ciated with an antifolate, and the medicament is administered
`in combination with an antifolate and a FBP binding agent.
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to the use of a
`methylmalonic acid lowering agent in the manufacture of a
`medicament foruse in a method of inhibiting tumor growth in
`mammals, which method comprises administering said meth-
`ylmalonic acid lowering agent in combination with an anti-
`folate.
`
`Furthermore, the present invention relates to a product
`containing a methylmalonic acid lowering agent, an anti-
`folate and optionally a FBP binding agent as a combined
`preparation for the simultaneous, separate or sequential use in
`inhibiting tumour growth.
`The current invention concerns the discovery that admin-
`istration of a methylmalonic acid lowering agent in combi-
`nation with an antifolate drug reduces the toxicity ofthe said
`antifolate drug.
`The term “inhibit" as it relates to antifolate drugs refers to
`prohibiting, alleviating, ameliorating, halting, restraining,
`slowing or reversing the progression of, or reducing tumor
`growth.
`As used herein, the term “effective amount" refers to an
`amount ofa compound or drug, which is capable ofperform-
`ing the intended result. For example, an effective amount of
`an antifolate drug that is administered in an effort to reduce
`tumor growth is that amount which is required to reduce
`tumor growth.
`As used herein, the term “toxicity" refers to a toxic event
`associated with the administration on an antifolate. Such
`events include, but are not limited to, neutropenia, throm-
`bopenia, toxic death, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, skin rash,
`infection, diarrhea, mucositis, and anemia. For firrther expla-
`nation of the types of toxicity experienced by patients receiv-
`ing antifolates, see, generally, Antifolate Drugs in Cancer
`Therapy. Preferably, toxicity refers to toxic death, fatigue,
`neutropcnia, thrombopenia, and mucositis.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket