throbber
 
`
` 

`
`Page 1 of 1 1
`
`RAY-1005
`
`Aug- 11, 1964
`
`7
`
`H. E. LUSTIG ETALV
`RADIATION MAPPING SYSTEM
`
`‘
`
`3,144,631
`
`Filed Jan. 9, 1962
`
`.
`
`4 Sheets—Sheet 1
`
`
`
`DIJPZA Y A IVA [.06
`
`FIG. 7
`
`i
`
`V Peril wzve- ARE/1y
`
`
`
`. WV! neon/r
`0/? C0177!”?fo
`REFERENCI UN:
`
`BY
`
`- INVENTORS
`,yafllea E Aasr/cs
`mer”we 4; 3055066
`«€902. p. #34541er
`(1/1;vo K. ggee
`Cm 47%471'affifKY
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Page 2 of 11
`
`RAY-1005
`
`Aug. 11, 1964
`'
`
`Filed Jan. 9, 1962
`
`H. 5. LUSTIG ETAL
`RADIATION MAPPING SYSTEM
`
`'
`
`3,144,631
`
`‘
`
`4 Sheets-Sheet 2
`
`ro Milt/17:7?
`
`
` [ENE/V7
`
`/0a
`
`A F
`
`V15?”IC'AL
`
`55
`
`
`
`/uarr/AmmoAREA
`
`
`
`
`IND/V/DufllRECEIVINGJ7fl/P5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"' "\
`.-\.\\‘ll
`
`mm\\'—
`
`-W
`
`§ Q
`‘i
`t
`| a
`
`I
`as
`
`I
`'°
`Q‘m
`f
`2g
`4
`“E“
`E
`
`
`
`INVENTORJS
`[Von/A420 5. 40-9776
`Arrive 4. £0.33on
`BY PA”; 0. teat/ell
`#46540 4’. £422
`
`(«M/W
`197'7'd/F/VEK5
`
`
`
`

`

` !""#
`
`$%&'()(*+(!!
`
`
`
`INVENTORS
`#0144460 5 4108776
`yen/«e (. fiaSJ’OF'F‘
`BY P404 0. #:654/4‘49
`#43040 K Haze
`
`Maw/FMAfro/FIVE”
`
`Aug. 11, 1954
`
`H. E. LUSTIG ETAL
`RADIATION MAPPING SYSTEM
`
`Filed Jan. 9. 1962
`
`'
`
`3,144,631
`'
`
`4 Sheets—Sheet 3
`
`
`Sill/=5mu1.
`
`
`
`”Pl/K5”!7727?
`
`F/G.4
`
`‘*\\
`
`FIG.5
`
`
`
`RAY-1005
`
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`

`,-./0112
`34567879:700
`
`
`“WRxwfikxwocexa24ew§m<ukxxxkvwk
`flfl/W/4%°\o
`.m.yr”;
`
`BY
`
` ”mewmMite.MMpg/Mfg,7”£05x/fl
`
`4W4/“
`
`p
`y
`
`RAY-1005
`
`Page 4 of 11
`
`Aug. 11, 1964
`
`H. E. LUSTIG ETAL
`P.A
`s
`
`3,144,631
`
`
`
`4nfifikkfifiha.
`
`.Vt
`
`
`
`
` §th<9swEmexE‘tkkkuxflvwwmqht§‘ukxfix‘t3%§\‘kT$55.3“
`939ka%b\k\N\$9,§V.mitwfiwk\.
`
`t
`
`hS
`
`_.utkoszwks$5th§
`
`
`
`tI..w935‘Qukfik9w
`
`xSx§x.
`
`.§Mw,h«$3.Swfitxh¥§8thfith4b§xx§s¢a
`
`
`
`3
`
`.
`
`
`
`hhxukX\%P39$qu
`
`GQ\§.W%‘m383$»
`
` MbkWthkmiihkMkhk“9:5..9“.
`
`tqu3quA‘R.
`.m.5339.?»ka
`
`l.1
`
`a
`
`JhxxxhthvhwQEEQVVREon:'9...th
`
`.
`
`V‘KK\>\.$<9¢R.2..%xwkktm6.atv.
`
`9II»?.n.lIE3ak
`
`1mzkttmsxwkk.3.“Mn“.
`,
`IgE.§§\.
`2&3..quWW.
`
`
`
`P‘QkRVxQx<xL‘nflmQKKVN
`
`m.%\I.\
`
`6.4%
`
`k3.
`
`uhb
`
`h
`
`NthxkkkW§SQ‘”xu‘k
`
`Qhk‘0.fixV!»
`
`dWxQ
`
`NVQZ§QM1Ls
`
`
`
`NV).NQGQV
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`;<=>?@@A
`BCDEFAFGHF??
`
`RAY-1005
`
`Page 5 of 11
`
`3,144,631
`Patented Aug. 11, 1964
`
`United States Patent Office
`
`1
`
`3,144,631
`RADIATION MAPPING SYSTEM
`Howard E. Lustig, Flushing, and Arthur L. Rossofi, Hunt-
`ington Station, N.Y., and Paul D. Frelich, Wellesley,
`and Harold K. Farr, Westwood, Mass, assignors to
`General Instrument Corporation, Newark, N.J., a cor-
`poration of New Jersey
`Filed Jan. 9, 1962, Ser. No. 165,173
`22 Claims.
`(Cl. 340—3)
`
`The present invention relates to a system for mapping
`an area from a mapping station moving thereover, the
`mapping station emitting radiations which are reflected
`from the area to be mapped and which are then detected
`by appropriate equipment carried by the mapping sta-
`tion. The invention is here specifically disclosed in con-
`junction with a shipborne system for mapping the contour
`of the sea bottom by means of sonar radiations, but the
`invention is not specifically limited thereto. Purely by
`way of example, it is equally applicable in many respects
`to an airborne radar ranging method for mapping the
`terrain over which the aircraft flies.
`Mapping of the ocean bottom through the use of sonar
`is not a new concept. However, the systems which have
`heretofore been employed for that purpose have inher-
`ently limited the use of such a method, either because of
`lack of accuracy and definition, because of extreme
`limitations on the speed at which the mapping vessel
`could move, or both.
`In addition, the nature of such
`systems has made it
`impractical
`to provide accurate
`compensation for such aberrational movements of the
`mapping station as changes in speed, changes in depth
`(in the case of submarines), roll, pitch and the like.
`to
`One proposal which has been made in the past
`solve at least some of these problems is to utilize a single
`relatively narrow sonar beam emanating from the map-
`ping station, that beam scanning from side to side over
`a given strip area of the sea bottom and being employed
`both for transmission of radiations and for reception of
`reflections from the sea bottom. Because of the rela-
`tively slow speed with which sound moves through water,
`this use of a single beam for transmission and reception
`of the appropriate radiations necessitates a relatively slow
`scan, the necessary scanning time increasing as the depth
`of the sea increases, and thus places prohibitive restric-
`tions on the speed at which the vessel can move in
`mapping an area of the sea bottom.
`By way of contrast the system of the present invention
`utilizes separate beams for transmission and reception
`respectively,
`thus dividing the burden of directivity be-
`tween the two beams and hence greatly simplifying design.
`Moreover,
`the construction and arrangement of these
`beams are such as to permit the vessel to move at reason-
`able cruising speed without any loss in map coverage.
`In addition,
`the arrangement of
`the individual trans
`mitting and receiving beams in the system of the present
`invention permits the ready compensation of the system
`for roll and pitch of the vessel.
`In the proposed system the transmitted beam is in
`the shape of a thin fan lying in a downwardly extending
`plane preferably perpendicular to the heading of the ship,
`the angular width of that fan beam being sufficiently
`greater than the area of the bottom which is to be mapped
`so as to take into account roll of the ship. Thus, there
`is no need to compensate the transmitted beam for ship
`roll. Means are provided, however, for compensating
`the transmitted beam for ship pitch,
`thereby ensuring
`that the transmitted beam is always directed in its desired
`direction, generally vertically oriented. This fan shaped
`beam, which may be 90° wide and 1" thick, illuminates
`a long narrow area of the ocean floor lying perpendicular
`to the ship’s heading, and as the ship progresses, suc-
`
`CI
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`7O
`
`2
`cessively narrow areas of the ocean floor are illuminated
`thereby, thus producing a substantially continuous map-
`ping coverage of a strip of the sea bottom.
`Reflected radiations are received by the mapping sta—
`tion in a plurality of closely spaced narrow downwardly
`extending fan-shaped beams the planes of which are
`preferably oriented substantially perpendicular
`to the
`transmitting beam, and hence substantially parallel to the
`fore-and-aft direction of the ship. Thus, each of the
`individual receiving beams will cover a thin narrow area
`of the ocean floor, the areas corresponding to adjacent
`receiving beams lying side by side on the ocean bottom
`and collectively being intersected by the transmitting
`beam. Since the receiving beams each cover areas which
`are longer in the fore—and-aft direction of the vessel than
`the thickness of the transmitting beam, forward move-
`ment of the ship does not interfere with reception, and
`in addition there is no need to compensate the receiving
`beams for pitch of the ship. Roll of the ship will, how-
`ever, move the areas sighted by each of the receiving
`beams laterally over the sea bottom, so that roll com-
`pensation is desirable.
`In the instant system this is
`accomplished by utilizing receiving beams which,
`in
`number and placement, cover a lateral distance on the
`ocean floor greater than that to be mapped. As the ship
`rolls only those beams are selected which cover
`the
`specific area of the ocean floor which is to be mapped;
`the other beams are unused insofar as the instantaneous
`production of the signal representing the contour of the
`ocean floor is concerned.
`the transmitting beam
`As here specifically disclosed,
`emanates from a transmitter comprising a plurality of
`individual transmitting elements arranged longitudinally
`on the ship’s hull, and the reflected radiation receiver
`comprises a plurality of
`individual
`receiver elements
`arranged laterally on the ship’s hull. Pitch control for
`the transmitting means is accomplished by controlling the
`phasing of the radiations emanating from each of the
`individual projector elements. As has been mentioned,
`roll compensation for the receiving means is accom-
`plished by selecting those of the individual receiver ele-
`ments which are associated with the appropriate receiv-
`ing beams corresponding to the area to be mapped.
`Since the ship's hull is usually curved, the laterally ar-
`ranged individual receiver elements, if they conform to
`the hull, would not be in a common plane.
`In order to
`compensate for such departure from a planar configura-
`tion, when it exists, the individual signals produced by
`the individual receiver elements have their relative phases
`adjusted so that,
`insofar as the display means is con-
`cerned, they are all at the same effective distance from a
`reference plane perpendicular to the direction of the
`desired receiving beam.
`Through the use of the present system an accurate
`representation of an appreciably wide area of the sea
`bottom can be produced and complete coverage of the
`sea bottom over
`that
`longitudinally projected area is
`possible with the ship moving at cruising speed or even
`at high speed, thus permitting extensive areas of the sea
`bottom to be continuously mapped in an accurate and
`effective manner.
`To the accomplishment of the above, and to such other
`objects as may hereinafter appear, the present invention
`relates to a system for mapping through the use of trans-
`mitted and reflected radiation as defined in the appended
`claims, and as described in this specification, taken to-
`gether with the accompanying drawings in which:
`FIG. 1 is a schematic View illustrating the scanning of
`a single narrow laterally oriented strip of the sea bottom;
`FIG. 2 is an idealized representation of one way in
`which the profile of the scanned strip of the sea bottom
`
`

`

`IJKLMNNO
`PQRSTUTVWTMM
`
`3,144,631
`
`3
`could be reproduced on the face of a cathode ray tube;
`FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic perspective View of the ori—
`entation of
`the respective transmitting and receiving
`beams;
`FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic plan View illustrating a typical
`location of the transmitting and receiving means on the
`ship’s hull, and also showing the location relative thereto
`of the areas on the sea bottom covered by the trans—
`mitted beam and a selected few of the receiving beams;
`FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic cross sectional view showing
`one location of the receiving means on the ship’s hull;
`FIG. 6 is a schematic View indicating the manner in
`which the projecting beam may be stabilized for pitch;
`FIG. 7 is a schematic View indicating the problem
`involved in the reception of reflected radiations by indi-
`vidual
`receiving elements located at different vertical
`heights; and
`FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the electronic systems
`ma
`involved in transmission and reception of the radiation.
`
`General Description
`
`This invention will be here specifically disclosed as
`embodied in a mapping system carried by a surface ves-
`sel 2, designed to map the bottom of the sea, generally
`represented at 4, and using sonar radiations to accom-
`plish that result.
`It will be understood that the vessel 2
`could be a submarine (in which case computation of the
`depth of the floor 4 below sea level, generally designated
`6, would have to take into account the depth of the sub-
`marine at the time that the mapping operation is per-
`formed), and that in its broader aspects, a comparable
`type of mapping operation could be carried out utilizing
`other types of radiated energy, for the mapping of other
`types of areas, and with other types of movable map-
`ping stations (e.g. airborne radar mapping of the exposed
`surface of the earth).
`As schematically represented in FIGS. 1 and 2, a dis-
`play representation of the profile of a narrow area of
`the sea bed can be produced on the screen 8 of a cathode
`ray tube or the like. Taking the situation shown in FIG.
`1, Where the ship 2 is shown at position 0 and is assumed
`to be moving out of the plane of the paper, the ship 0
`scans the sea bottom 4 by means of transmitted radia—
`tions (usually sonar radiations for undersea work), and
`detects radiations reflected therefrom,
`identifying those
`radiations in terms of range r (time delay between trans-
`mission and reception) and lateral location (angular rela-
`tionship a of the reflected radiation relative to a fixed
`standard, usually the vertical). Thus radiation reflected
`from the point P in FIG. 1 will be detected by the sonar
`equipment on the ship 2 and the location of the point
`P can be accurately determined by trigonometric com-
`putations. An analog of the actual situation as repre-
`Sented in FIG.
`1 can be created in known manner on
`the cathode ray tube screen 8, as indicated in FIG. 2,
`thus producing on the face of that screen a visible trace
`4’ which will correspond to the profile of the area 4
`of the sea bottom then being scanned.
`It is assumed that the area of the sea bottom 4 to
`be mapped extends laterally between points A and B,
`subtending an angle of 60" at point 0.
`If only that 60°
`angle is scanned,
`then roll of the ship will cause the
`points A and B tomove laterally over the sea bottom,
`thus mapping an area different from that which should
`be mapped. Accordingly, the profile actually illuminated
`by the transmitted radiation is shown as extending between
`points C and D, subtending an angle of 90° at point 0.
`In this manner the 60° portion centered on the vertical
`3 is always illuminated as long as the ship’s roll does
`not exceed 15° in either direction.
`In accordance with the present invention as here spe-
`cifically disclosed, and as shown particularly in FIGS. 3
`and 4, the sonar energy emanating from the ship 2 is
`transmitted in the form of a thin fan beam 5A lying in a
`substantially vertical plane perpendicular to the heading
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`4O
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`4
`of the ship. This beam, which is 90" wide (for reasons
`indicated above and illustrated in FIG. 1) and which may
`be approximately 1°
`thick,
`illuminates a long narrow
`area of the ocean floor, as indicated at 5B in FIGS. 3
`and 4, this area 5B extending perpendicular to the ship’s
`heading. As the ship progresses,
`this illuminated strip
`SB sweeps out into an area determined by the speed
`and direction of movement of the ship 2. To form the
`transmitting beam,
`the transmitter 10 may be located
`on the ship’s hull at a position such as is illustrated in
`FIG. 4, and may be composed of a plurality of individual
`transmitter elements 10a arranged longitudinally on the
`hull as indicated.
`For receiving transmitted radiations which are reflected
`from the sea bottom or other terrain being mapped, a
`plurality of individual fan-shaped receiving beams, gen-
`erally designated 12, are employed. The planes of these
`beams are oriented substantially perpendicular to the
`transmitted beam 5A, that is to say,
`they are narrow
`(approximately 1°) widthwise of the ship 2 and are long
`(extending 7° to either side of the nominal vertical axis
`3 of the ship 2) in the fore-and-aft direction of the ship
`2. The beams 12 sight adjacent areas 14 on the sea
`bottom, the areas 14 intersecting the area SE at 16.
`If, as indicated in FIG. 1, a 60° width in scanning
`may be desired, sixty receiving beams 12, each of 1"
`Width, would then be required. However, if this were
`‘ all
`that were done, roll of the ship 2 would laterally
`translate the beams 12, so that not all of them would
`30
`intersect with the strip SB at the proper points 16.
`In
`order to eliminate this disadvantage, the beams 12 should
`collectively subtend at point 0 a lateral angle greater
`than 60°, such as 90° (thus involving the use of ninety
`receiving beams 12 each 1° wide). This will permit a
`roll of the ship 15° in either direction, as indicated in
`FIG. 1, while at the same time providing the desired
`number
`(e.g. 60) of individual receiving beams 12 to
`intersect the illuminated area 5B.
`Means 48 are provided to select those sixty receiving
`beams 12 which intersect the area 5B between the points
`A and B at any given moment, and to use the energy
`derived from those selected beams 12 to produce the dis-
`play analog 4’.
`The receiver array, generally designated 18, may be
`located on the ship 2 in a manner indicated in FIG. 4,
`arranged laterally relative to the length of the ship.
`Because the length of the beams 12 (measured in the
`fore-and-aft direction of the ship 2) is greater than the
`corresponding dimension of the transmitted beam 5A,
`pitch of the ship 2, within limits, will not have any ad-
`verse effect upon the operation of the system insofar as
`reception is concerned, since, as may clearly be seen from
`FIG. 3, considerable longitudinal movement of the areas
`14 is permissible without destroying their intersection with
`the area 5B.
`
`The manner in which the analog display 4’ is used may
`be varied widely. A series of such display analogs may
`be photographed or otherwise reproduced, and appropri-
`ate maps synthesized therefrom. Alternatively, and as is
`preferred, the display analogs 4’ may be used to produce
`a contour map representation directly, in a manner such
`as is.disclosed, in the copending application of Howard E.
`Lustig and Arthur L. Rossofl, Serial Number 165,064,
`entitled, “Contour Mapping System,” filed on January
`14, 1962, now abandoned, and assigned to the assignee
`of this invention. However, the precise manner in which
`the display analog 4’ is used forms no part of the present
`invention.
`Transmitter
`
`The physically fixed transmitter 10 is formed of a
`plurality of individual transmitting elements 10a which
`may be placed on the bottom of the hull 2 and aligned
`parallel to the longitudinal axis of the ship. One hundred
`and eight individual elements 10a may be employed, each
`having a radiating area ,2” wide and 2%” long in the
`RAY-1005
`
`Page 6 of 11
`
`
`
`

`

`XYZ[\]]^
`_`abcdcefc\\
`
`Hence, the rotation angle of the output shaft 34 of a
`pitch servo 36 can be represented as ¢1=(27ra/>\)
`0,
`which is just proportional to the pitch angle 0, therefore
`the pitch servo 36 can drive the first resolver 32 directly
`and successive resolvers 32 through gear ratios having
`simple integral values 2, 3,
`.
`.
`. 18 (corresponding to 11)
`(see FIG. 6). As a practical matter it is preferable to
`use the higher speed shaft,
`(p18, rather than oi, as the
`input pitch signal and then to gear down to all the other
`channels. The number 18 is one—half the total number
`of channels. The remaining 18 channels (numbered 0,
`—1, —2,
`.
`.
`. —17) can be driven from the same shafts
`by reversing the leads on one of the quadrature com-
`ponent inputs to the resolvers. The number zero chan—
`nel is electrically energized without phasing.
`Receiver
`
`The receiver array 18 which is used to sense the re-
`turn echo determines the directivity of the sonar system
`in the athwartship direction.
`It is capable of defining a
`thin fan beam 12 which is about 1° wide in this direction
`and 14° wide in the fore-and-aft direction. Phasing net—
`works simultaneously generate 90 such (preformed)
`beams, spaced at intervals of 1" along the length of the
`strip 5B illuminated by each transmitted pulse.
`The location of the array is determined by the require-
`ment, on the one hand, that it be near enough to the cen-
`ter of the ship to permit the use of a large array and, on
`the other hand, that it be far enough forward to avoid
`excessive engine noise. FIG. 5 shows a suggested in-
`stallation.
`It consists of a narrow belt of individual re-
`ceiving elements 18a disposed across the underside of the
`hull. The belt is 18 inches wide in the fore-and-aft direc-
`
`RAY-1 005
`
`Page7of11
`
`3,144,631;
`
`6
`fathoms, and further, that the bottom is flat and is 3000
`fathoms down. Ship’s speeds up to
`22.1 X 3000/4000:l6.5 knots
`
`can then be used for full coverage of the bottom area.
`If the bottom were 1500 fathoms down, the ship could
`proceed either at up to 8.25 knots, or change the repeti-
`tion rate to correspond to 2000 fathom maximum depth
`and then proceed once more at 16.5 knots.
`In the limit-
`ing case, where the desired maximum depth coincides
`with the actual depth, a speed of 22.1 knots still yields
`100% coverage.
`In other words, with prior knowledge
`of the bottom, a pulse repetition rate can be selected
`which will allow the vessel to cruise at normal and even
`high speeds.
`The transmitted beam 5A is stabilized electronically
`so as to remain in the true vertical plane regardless of
`pitching of the ship. The beam steering necessary for
`stabilization is accomplished by the phasing scheme in-‘
`dicated in FIGS. 6 and 8. As here specifically disclosed,
`the 108 elements 10a in the transmitter array are divided
`into 36 groups of three elements each. Each group is
`powered by a separate driver 26. The actual phasing is
`accomplished with resolvers 32 operating at low power
`levels’. This method provides precise and smooth control
`of phase, and eliminates the problems associated with
`complex compensator plates and delay lines.
`If 0 is the angle of pitch, then the beam should be
`steered by an amount 9, and transmitter group number n
`(where It
`is counted from the center of the array 10)
`should introduce a phase shift
`(fin: (27rn‘a/A) Sin 9
`where a is the spacing between groups of elements (which
`may in practice amount to 8”) and )\. is the wave length
`of the radiations in water. The pitch in sea-state 3 or 4
`is about 135°. Hence, within the practical range of 0
`values, We can replace sin 0 by 0 with an error of less
`than 8 seconds of arc. The angle of rotation of resolver
`32 for transmitter group n is then
`gun: (271mm) 9=n¢1
`
`5
`direction of the axis of the array. The total length of
`the array may be 24 feet. For an operative frequency
`of 12 kc. this will produce a fan-shaped transmitting beam
`4A that subtends an angle (measured at the —3 db points)
`of approximately 1°
`in the fore—and-aft direction and
`90° in a direction perpendicular to the ship’s heading.
`Each of the transmitting units 10a may be actuated by
`circuitry (see FIG. 8) including an oscillator 20, ampli-
`fier 22, phasing circuits 24 and drivers 26.
`. The oscillator 20 is of the variable frequency type, and
`may be adjusted, as indicated at 28, to modify the fre-
`quency of the transmitted indications.
`It is desirable
`that this be done to compensate for variations in the speed
`of propagation of those radiations through the water as
`the temperature of the water varies, thereby maintaining
`the wavelength of the radiations in the water constant.
`A keying pulse 30 is used to initiate pulse transmission
`from the elements 10a at the proper repetition frequency
`and power level.
`The repetition frequency, and its relationship to the
`depth of the sea and the forward speed of the ship 2,
`may be appreciated from the following analysis:
`For any desired maximum depth, the interval between
`pulses will be determined by the maximum slant range
`involved, which occurs for the beam looking farthest to
`the side. Here,
`
`where
`
`Rmax=Dmax/COS 1i’max
`
`Dmax is the specified maximum depth to be mapped (ref-
`erence depth)
`311mm; is the maximum side looking angle to be used, and
`Rmax is the resulting maximum slant range.
`
`The resulting ping interval, which sets the pulse repetition
`rate, is:
`.
`Tp=2DmEx/c cos wmax=2Rmax/c
`where c is the velocity of sound.
`This time, within which all possible returns will come
`back from the bottom, affects the permissible forward
`speed of the ship. Consider the distance along the bot-
`tom subtended by the transmitted fan beam in the fore-
`and-aft direction. This distance is D6/cos 1//, where D
`is the actual depth, 0 is the fore-and-aft beam width (in
`radians), and 5b
`is the side looking angle. Note that
`D/cos tb=R is the slant range to the bottom. There
`exists some point at the bottom for which this slant range
`is a minimum.
`The time required for the ship to travel the forward
`distance subtended by the beam at this minimum slant
`range is given by
`
`[=0Rmin/V
`
`where v is the speed of the ship expressed in the same
`linear dimensions as Rmm.
`If the speed of the ship is
`such that t is equal to T1,, then 100% coverage of the bot—
`tom will result: that is, successive pings will illuminate
`areas that are adjacent.
`If the speed is such that t is
`greater than or less than TD, then overlapping or else less
`than 100% coverage of the bottom respectively, will re-
`sult.
`,
`-.
`.
`,
`f Therefore, at least 100% coverage will be guaranteed
`if the following conditions hold:
`
`i HRmin/ YZZDmax/C COS lz’rnax
`13y rearrangement, the following limitations on ship’s
`speed apply for 100% (or greater coverage).
`
`> VgceRtnin COS Wmax/ZDmax
`For 6=1°=.0174‘5 ‘radian,
`\l/maxz3002
`'
`knots,
`'
`-
`v<22.1 (Rmm/Dmax) knots
`
`and c=2922
`‘
`
`‘ This can be interpreted as follows: suppose the system
`repetition rate is set to cover a maximum depth of 4000
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`(i5
`
`

`

`ghijkllm
`nopqrsrturkk
`
`

`

`vwxyz{{|
`}~€‚ƒ„zz
`
`3,144,631
`
`10
`58 are fed, Via matching transformers 62, to receivers 64.
`The receivers 64 amplify and detect the beam signals
`(usually the received pulse in each beam with the greatest
`amplitude) and pass them on to the scanning commutator
`66. The scanning commutator 66 periodically and rapid-
`ly samples in sequence the output of each receiver.
`Whenever a signal has been detected in any one re-
`ceiver the scanning commutator 65 transmits an impulse
`to video amplifier 68.
`Impulses from the video ampli-
`fier go to the grid of the cathode ray display tube, whose
`deflection system is in synchronism with the scanning
`commutator 66 to form the display analog 4’.
`Corrections
`
`In addition to corrections for pitch and roll as already
`described corrections may be made in any appropriate
`manner to compensate for such aberrational movements
`of the ship 2 as changes in speed, yaw, drift, heading
`and course changes, rapid lateral displacements, and in-
`correct navigational data. A preferred manner of ac-
`complishing some of these corrections, particularly when
`strip mapping and/or direct contour map generation is
`involved, are disclosed in the aforementioned copending
`patent application, Ser. No. 165,064, of Lustig and Ross-
`off. Compensation for changes in the depth of the arrays
`10 and 18 (such as accompany pitching of the ship 2,
`changes in its depth if it is a submarine, or changes in
`its altitude if it is an aircraft), and for variations in sound
`velocity in accordance with the depth of the water through
`which it passes can also be made.
`Conclusion
`
`9
`coming wave front can be used as a reference. Thus
`knowing d1, the relative phase delay in the water, (#1 can
`be determined.
`It will be a function of frequency and
`sound velocity and is given by
`(15,1411fo 360/c (degrees)
`
`is the element number, d, is measured in feet,
`where z'
`0 in feet per second, and f in cycles per second.
`Now let us define the phase shift made possible by the
`bridging resistors 40 at the output of the four phase
`preamplifier as 0,.
`For each element in the array, 0, is adjusted so that
`(#1 plus 01 is equal to a whole number of cycles. That is,
`¢,+o,=n360°
`
`where n is an integer. All the bridging resistors 40 are
`tied to a common summation point, at which a beam be-
`comes available, pointing in the particular direction for
`which the various 4:, were computed. Other bridging
`resistor sets can be computed for other angles of arrival
`and connected to the multiphase preamplifier outputs.
`From the equation given for 43,, it can be seen that the
`phase shift will vary when the local sound velocity varies.
`This could amount to :3.5% from the polar regions
`to the equatorial regions and, if left uncompensated, could
`seriously reduce and broaden the main lobe and bring
`up the side lobes. Fortunately, a corresponding percent-
`age change in the operating frequency compensates for
`the velocity change. Therefore, the outgoing frequency
`will be controlled by a calibrated variable frequency os-
`cillator 20. The frequency control dial indicator 28 will
`be calibrated directly in local sound velocity. A recessed
`trimmer 42, a 12 kc. crystal oscillator 44, and a zero beat
`indicator 46 will be used to check calibration.
`Ninety preformed beams 12 will be formed for a total
`look of 45 ° to either side. A uniform beam spacing of
`1° from beam center to beam center will be employed.
`The first beam 12 that looks to the left will be depressed
`895° relative to the deck plane as will be the first beam
`12 that looks to the right. The second beam 1‘2, either
`right or left, will be depressed 885°,
`the third 87.5 °
`etc., until the 45th beam 12, which will be depressed
`45.5 °
`Signals from all 90 beams 12 are applied to the roll
`compensator 48 via matching transformers 50. The pur-
`pose of the roll compensator 48 is to select from the 90
`available preformed beams 12, those 60 beams 12 which,
`at any instant, are closest to the vertical.
`The roll compensator 48 may comprise a capacitor
`switch having a stator 52 and a rotor 54. The stator
`may comprise an insulating flat plate about 10 inches in
`diameter with 90 individual printed circuit sectors 56,
`each 3 degrees wide, distributed evenly over an arc of
`270 degrees. The rotor 54 will be similar, but will have
`60 printed sectors 53, each 3 degrees wide, covering a
`total arc of 180 degrees. The remaining 90 degrees of
`the stator and 180 degrees of the rotor surface will be at
`ground potential. The rotor may be mounted parallel
`to the stator at a separation of 001 inch.
`The angular scale factor of the compensator has been
`multiplied by 3 to utilize the available capacitance more
`fully. A given roll angle is thus compensated by turning
`the rotor 54 just 3 times as much. Rolls of :15 degrees
`will be compensated for in the present design by turning
`the compensator rotor 54 :45 degrees. Since the com~
`pensator rotor 54 never makes a complete revolution,
`slip rings will not be necessary. Sixty flexible leads are
`used to bring the rotor signals out. The rotor 54 is posi-
`tioned by a servo mechanism 60 driven by synchro sig-
`nals from the ship’s gyro system representing the ship’s
`roll. The capacitive commutator 48 is capable of con-
`necting an output proportionally to two adjacent beam
`inputs. This makes it possible to obtain continuous and
`smooth roll compensation.
`The beam signals applied to each of the rotor sectors
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`The system of the present invention can be used for
`continuous, effective and accurate mapping of terrain
`from a mapping station moving over that terrain at an
`appreciable speed. The design and manner of coopera-
`tion of the various parts greatly facilitates their con-
`struction and use, minimizes the power requirements of
`the system, simplifies some of
`the corrections which
`should be applied for the attainment of a proper degree
`of accuracy, and eliminates the need for certain correc-
`tions.
`The specific construction of the various elements in-
`volved, and the specific design of the several electrical
`circuit components, may be varied widely, and may take
`known forms. Accordingly they have been here disclosed
`schematically or in block diagram form.
`Although only a single embodiment of the present in-
`vention has been here specifically disclosed,
`it will be
`apparent that many variations may be made therein, all
`within the scope of the invention as defined in the fol-
`lowing claims.
`We claim:
`1. A system for mapping an area from a mapping sta-
`tion moving over said area which comprises means for
`transmitting a beam of energy from said station, said
`beam being wide in a first direction and narrow in a
`second direction at right angles to said first direction,
`means for receiving transmitted radiation reflected from
`said area in a plurality of adjacent individual receiving
`beams, said receiving beams being wide in said second
`direction, narrow in said first direction and arranged
`relative to one another in said second direction, and
`means for recording signals received in each receiving
`beam, said receiving means comprising an array of a
`plurality of individual
`transducing elements of greater
`number than the number of said beams, more than one of
`said elements being operatively associated with one an-
`other to produce reception in a given beam.
`2. The system of claim 1,
`in which said receiving
`means comprises a plurality of individual receiving ele-
`ments located in a non-planar array, and means opera-
`tively connected between said receiving elements and said
`recording means for compensating for the departure in
`positions of said receiving elements from a planar array.
`
`RAY-1005
`
`Page 9 of 11
`
`

`

`…†‡ˆ‰ŠŠ‹
`ŒŽ‰Š‘’‰‰
`
`Page 10 of 11
`
`40
`
`45
`
`5O
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`5
`
`10
`
`1'5
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`11
`in which said receiving
`' 3. The system of claim 1,
`means comprises a plurality of individual receiving ele-
`ments located in a non-planar array, and means opera—
`tively connected between said receiving elements and said
`recording means for compensating for the departure in
`positions of said receiving elements from a planar array

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket