throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`RAYMARINE, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`NAVICO HOLDING AS
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013-00355
`
`Patent 8,305,840
`
`JOINT STIPULATION T0 EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`LEGAL02/34712S38v1
`
`

`
`Further to the December 12, 2014 Scheduling Order (Paper 14) and based on
`
`a settlement in principle reached by the parties at a mediation on March 10, 2014,
`
`Patent Owner Navico Holdings AS and Petitioner Raymarine Inc. have agreed to
`
`extend Due Date 1 from March 12, 2014, to March 24, 2014, and extend Due Date
`
`2 from June 12, 2014, to July 7, 2014 for the purposes of filing a joint motion to
`
`dismiss the proceeding. The parties do not wish to alter the schedule any further at
`
`this time.
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner jointly request entry of the following revised
`
`schedule:
`
`DUE DATE 1 ............... . 2 .................................
`
`March 24 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 .................................................. ..
`July 7, 2014
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ................................................. ..Julyl1, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner opposition to motion to amend
`
`LEGALO2/34712538v1
`
`

`
`DUE DATE 4 ................................................... ..August 1, 2014
`
`Petitioner’s motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply
`
`witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ................................................... ..August 14, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ................................................. . .August 21, 2014
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ................................................. . .September 4, 2014
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`March 11 2014
`
`
`
`Date
`
`1
`
`B§(
`
` ;;__
`
`Christopher TL Douglas
`Reg. No. 56,950
`
`LEGAL02/34712538v1
`
`

`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,305,840 — IPR2013—00355
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies service on
`
`the Petitioner of a copy of this Joint Stipulation to Extension of Time Via electronic
`
`delivery directed to david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com as submitted in the
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review:
`
`David L. McCombs
`
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`
`2323 Victory Ave.
`
`Suite 700
`
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`Dated: March 1 1, 2014 ”
`
`Christopher TL Douglas
`Reg. No. 56,950
`
`LEGALO2/34712538V1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket