Paper No. 19
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATION INTERNATIONAL
`CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 7,490,151
`Issued: Feb. 10, 2009
`Filed: Sep. 30, 2002
`Inventors: Edmund C. Munger, et al
`Title: Establishment of a Secure Communication Link Based Domain Name
`Service (DNS) Request
`____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2013-00354
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATE REGARDING THE CO-PENDING
`REEXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATION INTERNATIONAL
`CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 7,490,151
`Issued: Feb. 10, 2009
`Filed: Sep. 30, 2002
`Inventors: Edmund C. Munger, et al
`Title: Establishment of a Secure Communication Link Based Domain Name
`Service (DNS) Request
`____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2013-00354
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATE REGARDING THE CO-PENDING
`REEXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00354 – Update re: Reexamination Proceedings
`
`Pursuant to the Order issued by the Panel on August 14, 2013 in Paper No.
`
`11, Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Petitioner”) files this update regarding the status of co-
`
`pending reexamination proceedings concerning the patents that are the subject of
`
`IPR petitions filed by Apple.1
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135 (IPR2013-00348 & -00349)
`
`• Related Proceedings: The ’135 patent is the subject of merged inter
`partes reexamination control Nos. 95/001,682 (filed by Petitioner) and
`95/001,679 (filed by Cisco).
`• Status of the claims: All claims presently stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 102 or § 103.
`• Last Office Action: March 11, 2013: Non-Final Action.
`• Status of Proceeding: Patent Owner and Requestor each have filed
`comments on the March 11, 2013 Non-Final Action. The case is
`awaiting further action by the Examiner.
`• Changes Since Petitioner’s October 23, 2013 Status Report:
`o No change in the reexamination.
`o On December 2, 2013, Patent Owner filed its responsive brief with
`the Federal Circuit in appeal no. 2013-1489, which is an appeal of
`the decision of the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:10-cv-00417-
`LED. Petitioner’s reply brief is due December 19, 2013.
`
`1 Petitioner is filing a substantively identical document in each of the seven IPR
`
`proceedings: IPR2013-00348, IPR2013-00349, IPR2013-00354, IPR2013-00393,
`
`IPR2013-00394, IPR2013-00397, and IPR2013-00398.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00354 – Update re: Reexamination Proceedings
`
`o On November 12, 2013, the Board terminated IPR2013-00375 at
`the request of the petitioner in that proceeding.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151 (IPR2013-00354)
`
`• Related Proceedings: The ’151 patent is the subject of merged inter
`partes reexamination control Nos.: 95/001,714 (filed by Petitioner)
`and 95/001,697 (filed by Cisco).
`• Status of the Claims: All claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`or § 103.
`• Last Office Action: April 20, 2012: Non-Final Action.
`• Status of Proceeding: Patent Owner and Requestor each have filed
`comments on the April 20, 2012 Non-Final Action. The case is
`awaiting further action by the Examiner.
`• Changes Since Petitioner’s October 23, 2013 Status Report:
`o No change in the reexamination.
`o On December 2, 2013, Patent Owner filed its responsive brief
`with the Federal Circuit in appeal no. 2013-1489, which is an
`appeal of the decision of the Eastern District of Texas in No.
`6:10-cv-00417-LED. Petitioner’s reply brief is due December
`19, 2013.
`o On November 12, 2013, the Board terminated IPR2013-00376
`at the request of the petitioner in that proceeding.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504 (IPR2013-00393 & -00394)
`
`• Related Proceeding: The ’504 patent is the subject of inter partes
`reexamination control No. 95/001,788 (filed by Petitioner).
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00354 – Update re: Reexamination Proceedings
`
`• Status of the Claims: All claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`or § 103.
`• Last Office Action: June 25, 2013: Right of Appeal Notice.
`• Status of Proceeding: Patent Owner filed a notice of appeal on July
`25, 2013. Patent Owner has requested, and the Office has granted,
`three extensions of time for filing its appeal brief. Patent Owner’s
`appeal brief presently is due on December 25, 2013.
`• Changes Since Petitioner’s October 23, 2013 Status Report:
`o On October 23, 2013, the Office granted Patent Owner’s
`request for a second extension of time to file an appeal brief in
`the reexamination, extending the deadline to November 25,
`2013.
`o On November 4, 2013, the Director denied Patent Owner’s
`April 12, 2013 petition to the Director requesting review of the
`Examiner’s decision denying a petition to reopen prosecution.
`o On November 8, 2013, Patent Owner filed a petition for a third
`extension of time to file its appeal brief.
`o On November 12, 2013, the Board terminated IPR2013-00377
`at the request of the petitioner in that proceeding.
`o On November 22, 2013, the Office granted Patent Owner’s
`request for a third extension of time to file an appeal brief,
`extending the deadline to December 25, 2013.
`o On December 2, 2013, Patent Owner filed its responsive brief
`with the Federal Circuit in appeal no. 2013-1489, which is an
`appeal of the decision of the Eastern District of Texas in No.
`6:10-cv-00417-LED. Petitioner’s reply brief is due December
`19, 2013.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00354 – Update re: Reexamination Proceedings
`
`o On December 6, 2013, Patent Owner filed a petition for a fourth
`extension of time to file its appeal brief in the reexamination,
`asserting the extension was necessary to allow the Director to
`enter a decision on Patent Owner’s July 25, 2013 petition to
`enter into the record a supplemental declaration the Examiner
`already excluded as untimely.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211 (IPR2013-00397 & -00398)
`
`• Related Proceeding: The ’211 patent is the subject of inter partes
`reexamination control No. 95/001,789 (filed by Petitioner).
`• Status of the Claims: All claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`or § 103.
`• Last Office Action: June 26, 2013: Right of Appeal Notice.
`• Status of Proceeding: Patent Owner filed a notice of appeal on July
`25, 2013. Patent Owner has requested, and the Office has granted,
`three extensions of time for filing its appeal brief. Patent Owner’s
`appeal brief presently is due on December 25, 2013.
`• Changes Since Petitioner’s October 23, 2013 Status Report:
`o On October 25, 2013, the Office granted Patent Owner’s
`request for a second extension of time to file an appeal brief in
`the reexamination, extending the deadline to November 25,
`2013.
`o On November 4, 2013, the Director denied Patent Owner’s
`April 12, 2013 petition to the Director requesting review of the
`Examiner’s decision denying a petition to reopen prosecution.
`o On November 8, 2013, Patent Owner filed a petition for a third
`extension of time to file its appeal brief.
`4
`
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00354 – Update re: Reexamination Proceedings
`
`o On November 12, 2013, the Board terminated IPR2013-00378
`at the request of the petitioner in that proceeding.
`o On November 25, 2013, the Office granted Patent Owner’s
`request for a third extension of time to file an appeal brief,
`extending the deadline to December 25, 2013.
`o On December 2, 2013, Patent Owner filed its responsive brief
`with the Federal Circuit in appeal no. 2013-1489, which is an
`appeal of the decision of the Eastern District of Texas in No.
`6:10-cv-00417-LED. Petitioner’s reply brief is due December
`19, 2013.
`o On December 6, 2013, Patent Owner filed a petition for a fourth
`extension of time to file its appeal brief in the reexamination,
`asserting the extension was necessary to allow the Director to
`enter a decision on Patent Owner’s July 25, 2013 petition to
`enter into the record a supplemental declaration the Examiner
`already excluded as untimely.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 11, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan (Reg No. 43,401)
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00354 – Update re: Reexamination Proceedings
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 11th day of December 2013, a copy of this
`
`Update Regarding the Reexamination Proceedings, has been served in its entirety
`
`by e-mail on the following counsel of record for patent owner:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`Phone: (571) 203-2700
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`E-mail: joseph.palys@finnegan.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone: 202-408-4065
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`E-mail: naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`Dated: December 11, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
