throbber
(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:24)
`
`Page 1 of 34
`
`

`

`WW.
`.
`‘t
`
`f {( DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH&HUMANSERVICES
`PublicHealthService
`a,“ C ————————~————-———m
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Washington. DC 20204
`
`AUG 2 4 [999
`
`John C. Young
`Director, Regulatory Affairs — Nutritionals
`McNeil Consumer Healthcare
`
`7050 Camp Hill Road
`Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034—2299
`
`Dear Mr. Young:
`
`This is to notify you that your submission pursuant to section 413(a)(2) of the Federal Food,
`Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) dated August 19, 1999, concerning the marketing of a
`substance that you assert is a new dietary ingredient (i.e., plant stanol esters) was received by
`the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on August 20, 1999. Your submission will be kept
`confidential for 90 days from the date of receipt, and after November 2, 1999, your
`submission will be placed on public display at Dockets Management Branch (Docket No.
`953-0316). Commercial and confidential information in the notification will not be made
`available to the public.
`'
`
`Please contact us if you have questions concerning this matter.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`WWbert J. Moore, Ph.D.
`
`Senior Regulatory Scientist
`Division of Programs and Enforcement Policy
`Office of Special Nutritionals
`
`Page 2 of 34
`
`Page 2 of 34
`
`

`

`
`
`Mt'Nt’H Consumer Ht’trfihr‘m‘t'. .7050 Camp Hm R Had. For! litti'i’irrligi‘nrr‘ PA {9034—3399 (2 .15) 273-7000
`
`0930 '99 SEP-? A9229
`
`Office of Special Nutritionals {HFS-450]
`Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
`
`”F l 9 1993
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`200 C Street, SW
`
`Washington, DC 20204
`
`RE:
`
`New Dietary Ingredient Notification
`
`Dear Sir or Madam:
`
`
`
`McNeil Consumer Healthcare l"McNeil”l submits the attached information to the
`
`Food and Drug Administration, pursuant to the provisions of Section 413(a} of
`Federal Food. Drug and Cosmetic Act,
`in anticipation of its marketing of a dietary
`supplement form which contains the new dietary ingredient plant stanol esters.
`McNeil
`intends to incorporate the ingredient plant stanol esters into a dietary
`supplement form by encapsulating it into a gelatin capsule.
`
`in a format provided in
`On February 18, 1999, McNeil submitted to the Agency,
`proposed regulation 21 CFR 170.36 [62 FR 18938, Substances Generally
`Recognized as Safe {GRASiL a summary of plant stanol ester information for use
`as an ingredient
`in food. That submission, now included in Food Master File
`000626, informed the Agency of McNeil’s conclusion that plant stanol esters are
`generally recognized as safe {GRAS} for use in food at a level of 1.79 of plant
`stanol esters per serving of food.
`
`The Food and Drug Administration responded to the summary on May 17, 1999
`that, at that time and based upon their evaluation of the submission and other
`available data, there were no questions regarding McNeil's conclusion that plant
`stanol esters are GRAS under the intended conditions of use. That finding, together
`with the scientific information relied upon and cited in that submission, forms the
`scientific basis on which McNeil has concluded that
`the stanol esters dietary
`
`supplement is safe. This conclusion meets and exceeds the statutory requirement
`established under section 413iall2l of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
`that the dietary supplement will "...reasonably be expected to be safe.”
`
`Page 3 of 34
`
`Page 3 of 34
`
`

`

`(F‘s
`
`McNeil Consumer Healthcare
`
`Dietary Ingredient Notification
`
`Page 2
`
`This submission is made under section 413 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
`Act; therefore, we request that it be accorded the 90 day confidentiality provisions
`relating to public notice. McNeil
`further considers
`some of
`the information
`
`contained in this notification relating unpublished studies to be trade secret or
`
`protected from public
`therefore,
`and,
`information
`commercial
`confidential
`disclosure. Such information has been stamped "CONFIDENTIAL."
`
`If you have any questions. please do not hesitate to call me at 215/273-7695.
`
`Sincerely
`MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE
`
`a5?
`
`Joh C. Young
`ir ctor, Regulatory Affairs — Nutritionals
`
`attach.
`
`Page 4 of 34
`
`Page 4 of 34
`
`

`

`LNOILOQS
`
`_h_.__.__._.__+-—————--
`
`Page 5 of 34
`
`Page 5 of 34
`
`

`

`SECTION 1
`
`The name and complete address of the manufacturer or distributor of the dietary
`supplement that contains the dietary ingredient. or the dietary ingredient.
`
`The distributor of the dietary supplement will be:
`
`McNeil Consumer Healthcare
`
`7050 Camp Hill Road
`
`Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034
`
`Page 6 of 34
`
`Page 6 of 34
`
`

`

`ZNOILOES
`
`”\
`
`Page 7 of 34
`
`Page 7 of 34
`
`

`

`SECTION 2
`
`The name of the dietary ingredient.
`
`The dietary ingredient is plant stanol esters (”plant stanol fatty acid esters," ”stanol
`esters," “phytostanol fatty acid esters,” or “phytostanol esters”).
`
`Plant stanol esters are made from a variety of plant sterol sources, including wood-
`
`derived oils and vegetable oils. The principal plant stanol esters are mixed fatty acid
`esters of
`the Soc-phytostanols,
`sitostanol and campestanol. Sitostanol” (24-
`
`ethylcholestan-SB—ol, CAS No. 19486-47-8) is formed by the hydrogenation of the
`A5-mono-unsaturated plant sterol, sitosterol l24-ethylcholestan-S-en-3B—ol, CAS No.
`83-46-51 and also by the complete hydrogenation of the As'zz—di-unsaturated plant
`sterol. sigmasterol l24—ethylcholest-5,22-dien-3B—ol, CAS No. 83-483}, hence the
`
`alternative name “sigmastanoi.” Campestanol (24-methycholestan-SB-oll is formed
`by the hydrogenation of the A5-mono-unsaturated plant sterol, campesterol
`{24—
`
`methychoiest-5-en-36—ol, CAS No. 474-62-4}. Sitostanol and campestanol,
`
`in the
`
`free form and as their fatty acid esters, also occur naturally in cereal grains such as
`
`wheat, rye, corn and other foods that have for many years been part of the human
`diet in the United States.
`
`are
`After the hydrogenation process has been completed, the mixed plant sterols
`converted to the corresponding fully saturated plant
`stanols
`lsitosterol and
`sigmasterol
`to sitostanol, campesterol
`to campestanol). The plant stanols are
`thereafter converted to their fatty acid esters by an interesterification process using
`
`food grade esters from vegetabie oils.
`
`” Synonyms for sitostanoi are B-sitostantol, 5,6-dihydro-fl-sitosterol, 24~u-ethylcholestanol,
`dihydrositosterin, fucostanol, spinastanol, stigmastanoi. Sitosteroi is often referred to in the
`scientific literature as B-sitostertol.
`
`Page 8 of 34
`
`Page 8 of 34
`
`

`

`Page 9 of 34
`
`Page 9 of 34
`
`

`

`SECTION 3
`
`Description of the dietary supplement or dietary supplements that contain the
`dietary ingredient
`including {ii the level of the dietary ingredient
`in the dietary
`supplement, and iii} the conditions of use recommended or suggested in the
`labeling of the dietary supplement, or if no conditions of use are recommended or
`
`suggested in the labeling of the dietary supplement. the ordinary conditions of use
`of the supplement.
`
`The dietary supplement containing the plant stanol esters dietary ingredient will be
`in an encapsulated gelatin form. This plant stanol esters softgel product form will
`be clearly labeled and promoted as a dietary supplement intended for use to reduce
`the absorption of cholesterol from the gastrointestinal tract. The number of gelatin
`capsules per serving size will be described on the label and each serving of the
`dietary supplement will contain 1.79 of plant stanol esters. Label directions will
`suggest or recommend consumption of up to 3 servings per day,
`resulting in
`maximum daily consumption of up to 59 of plant stanol esters. That
`level of
`consumption is within the level of dietary exposure considered as safe for use in
`food.
`
`T)
`
`Page 10 of 34
`
`Page 10 of 34
`
`

`

`VNOLLOES
`
`Page 11 of 34
`
`Page 11 of 34
`
`

`

`SECTION 4
`
`the dietary
`The history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that
`ingredient. when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the
`labeling of the dietary supplement, will
`reasonably be expected to be safe,
`including any citation to published articles or other evidence that is the basis on
`
`which the distributor or manufacturer has concluded that the dietary supplement
`will reasonably be expected to be safe.
`
`On February 18, 1999, McNeil submitted a summary of plant stanol esters
`information for use as an ingredient in food. This information formed the basis for
`McNeil‘s conclusion that plant stanol esters are safe lGRAS] for use in food when
`
`intended for use to reduce the absorption of cholesterol from the gastrointestinal
`tract.
`
`The Agency responded on May 17, 1999 that, after evaluating the materials, there
`were no further questions regarding McNeil‘s conclusion that stanol esters are
`
`GRAS for use in food at a level of 1.79 of plant stanol esters per serving of food.
`
`The materials and information submitted in support of the GRAS issue, which have
`
`been updated to include information that has become available since the February
`18, 1999 submission, together with the response from FDA, form the basis for the
`
`opinion that plant stanol esters meet land exceed} the statutory requirement under
`section 413(ali2} that they are “..reasonably expected to be safe...” for use as a
`dietary supplement.
`
`The information provided in support of McNeil's conclusion of safety are:
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Attachment 1 — The Agency's May 17, 1999 response to McNeil's GRAS
`submission.
`
`Attachment 2 - The updated list of scientific articles which form the basis
`
`for the opinion of safety. The references listed in bold have become
`
`available since the February 18, 1999 submission, or have been updated
`
`with their current publication status.
`
`Copies of the listed references are attached and, where appropriate, are
`stamped ”CONFIDENTIAL."
`
`Page 12 of 34
`
`Page 12 of 34
`
`

`

`Page 13 of 34
`
`Page 13 of 34
`
`

`

`Public Health Service
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8: HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Washington. DC 20204
`
`M.M.B.
`
`"Av 2 ~ m
`
`May [7, 1999
`
`Vivian A. Chester
`Edward B. Nelson, MD, PhD.
`McNeil Consumer Healthcare
`
`T050 Camp Hill Road
`Fort Washington, PA 19034-2299
`
`Re: Food Master File 000626
`
`Dear Ms. Chester and Dr. Nelson:
`
`The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responding to the summary of information, dated
`February 18, 1999, that you submitted to FDA. FDA received this summary ofinforrnation on
`February 19, 1999, and designated it as Food Master File 000626.
`
`The subject of year submission is plant stanol esters. Your submission informs FDA of McNeil’s
`view that plant stanol esters are generally recognized as safe (GRAB) for use as a nutrient in
`spread at a level of 1.7 grams of plant stariol esters per serving of spread. According to your
`submission, plant stanol esters are intended for use as nutrients in food to reduce the absorption of
`cholesterol from the gastrointestinal tract. The basis for McNeii’s view that this use of plant stanol
`esters is GRAS is through scientific procedures (21 CFR 170.30(b)). The submission states that
`the determination that plant stanoi esters are GRAS has been made through the deliberations of a
`panel ofindividuals (Raisio’s GRAS panel) who were convened by Raisio Benecol Ltd. McNeil
`considers the members of Raisio’s GRAS panel to be qualified by scientific training and
`experience to evaluate the safety of substances added to food.
`
`McNeil’s submission describes the manufacturing process for plant stanol esters and proposes
`food grade specifications. According to McNeil, sitostanol and campestanol are the main stanol
`components of plant sranol esters. These stanols are prepared by the hydrogenation of
`commercially available plant sterol blends, which are obtained as distillates from vegetable oils
`and as byproducts of the krafi paper pulping industry. These stanols are transesterified with fatty
`acid esters that are obtained from food-grade refined, bleached and deodorized vegetable oils, fats,
`or their blends (e.g., canola oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, or corn oil). The transesterification of
`plant stanols improves their solubility in fat and allows them to be properly distributed in the fat
`phase in the gut prior to digestion.
`
`Page 14 of 34
`
`Page 14 of 34
`
`

`

`Page 2 - Ms. Chester and Dr. Nelson
`
`Based on the use of plant stanol esters in regular and reduced fat spreads at a level of 1.? gram per
`8 gram spread (packaged in single-serving units) or at a level of l .7 gram per 15 gram spread
`(packaged in a tub), and the consumption of three servings per day, McNeil estimates that
`consumer exposure to plant stanol esters would be approximately 5.] g/persom‘day, which
`corresponds to an estimated dietary exposure to plant stanols of approximately 3 g/personlday (i.e.
`approximately 43 mg’kg body weight/’day for a 70 kg adult). McNeil estimates that the current
`dietary exposure to plant stanols from naturally occurring sources is in the range of 20 to 30
`mgfpersonfday.
`
`McNeil describes published and unpublished absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
`studies in animals and humans. Based on these studies, which show that 97% or more of stanol
`esters that are administered to humans is excreted quantitatively and unchanged in feces, McNeil
`concludes that plant stanol esters are hydrolyzed to free stanols in the gastrointestinal tract, that
`there is no evidence of further metabolism ofthe plant stanols that are absorbed, and that plant
`stanols from the blood and liver are excreted in the bile and eliminated in the feces intact.
`
`McNeil describes published and unpublished human studies that were conducted in support ofthe
`safety and efficacy of plant stanols or plant stanol esters in reducing serum cholesterol levels. The
`populations described in these studies include adults with elevated serum cholesterol levels, adults
`with normal cholesterol levels, adults with coronary heart disease, adults consuming cholesterol
`lowering drugs, adults with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, children with elevated
`cholesterol, and children with normal cholesterol. According to McNeil, approximately 2000
`people have consumed plant stanol or plant stanol ester-containing products for periods of up to
`one year in human studies at ingestion rates that range from 1.2 to 17 grams of plant stanol esters
`per day, with most studies using an ingestion rate in the range of 3.4 to 5.] grams of plant stanol
`esters per day.
`
`McNeil states that no serious adverse events have been reported in either the published or the
`unpublished human studies and that stanol ester containing products have been well tolerated by
`the study populations. According to McNeil, extensive clinical laboratory mouitoring in subjects
`fed stanol ester spreads demonstrated no systemic abnormalities related to glycernic control, liver
`enzymes, or kidney function. McNeil conducted an in-depth follow-up with the clinical
`investigators to determine the nature and extent of safety data collections and to corroborate the
`safety conclusions reported in the publications. In addition, McNeil reports that a survey
`conducted by the government of Finland provides information that almost 140,000 adults in
`Finland consume commercially available plant stanol ester—containing spread on a daily basis.
`According to McNeil, the Finnish survey does not identify any association between consumption
`of plant stanol esters and any health conditions.
`
`The minimal absorption of plant stanol esters, coupled with their lipophilic nature, raises the
`question of the potential effect of plant stanol esters on the uptake of fat-soluble vitamins
`(Vitamins A, D, E, and K). McNeil’s submission separately addresses the potential effect of plant
`stanol esters on each ofthese vitamins. For Vitamins A, D, and E, McNeil describes (l) the
`results of published and unpublished human studies that included measurements or observations
`bearing on the potential effect of plant stanol esters on vitamin status; and (2) scientific symposia
`and other scientific meetings where the results of these human studies were discussed by the
`scientific community. For Vitamin K, McNeil (1) describes the results of human studies, which
`
`Page 15 of 34
`
`Page 15 of 34
`
`

`

`Page 3 - Ms. Chester and Dr. Nelson
`
`have been discussed at scientific symposia and other scientific meetings, that included
`measurements or observations bearing on the potential effect of plant stanol esters on Vitamin K
`status; and (2) reasons that any serious impairment of Vitamin K function would result in readily
`observable side effects, such as bruising or bleeding, that would have been noticed during studies
`of the quality and duration of the published human studies. For each of the fat-solubie vitamins,
`McNeil notes that widespread use of plant stanol esters in Finland for more than three years, with
`follow-up in the form of a public health survey conducted by the Finnish government, revealed no
`issues related to vitamin deficiency. Finally, for each of the fat-soluble vitamins, McNeil states
`that Raisio’s GRAS panel assessed the available published and unpublished data and concluded
`that ingestion of plant stanol esters does not affect vitamin status. McNeil concludes that ingestion
`of plant stanol esters has not been accompanied by clinically significant changes in fat soluble
`nutrient status.
`
`McNeil describes a series of recently published animal toxicity tests, including tests for oral
`toxicity, genotoxicty, developmental toxicity, reproductive toxicity, and potential for estrogenic
`effects. According to McNeil, the test articles used in these studies included wood-derived
`mixtures of plant stanol esters and vegetable oil-derived mixtures of plant stanol esters that cover
`the range of composition of the commercial product. Based on these studies, McNeil draws the
`following conclusions: (1) Based on a 13-week oral toxicity study in the rat, the no-observed-
`adverse~effect-level (NOAEL) for plant stanol esters derived either from wood or from vegetable
`oil corresponds to a daily intake of about 370 mg plant stanol esters per kg body weight in the rat
`(or approximately 61 grams per day for a 70 kg human); (2) plant stanol esters are not genotoxic;
`{3) plant stanol esters produced no indication of embryotoxic or teratogenic effects, and had no
`adverse effects on reproductive performance, at levels corresponding to a daily intake of about
`4500 mg plant stanol esters per kg body weight in the rat (or approximately 320 grams per day for
`a T0 kg human); and (4) plant stanol esters demonstrated no estrogenic effects in a uterotrophic
`assay in the rat. McNeil also concludes that a carcinogenicity study is not needed for plant stanol
`esters because of their low absorption, their lack of systemic toxicity, their lack of genotoxicity,
`and the absence of structural features that are predictive of carcinogenic activity.
`
`FDA has evaluated the information in McNeil’s submission as well as other available data and
`
`information, inctuding the Cyrea’lin file that is available at FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and
`Research.
`In addition, FDA went to the office of ENVIRON Corporation and evaluated certain
`data and information that were reviewed by Raisio's GRAS panel. Based on its evaluation, the
`agency has no questions at this time regarding McNeil‘s conclusion that plant stanol esters are
`GRAS under the intended conditions of use. Furthermore, FDA is not aware of any scientific
`evidence that plant stanol esters would be harmful. The agency has not, however, made its own
`determination regarding the GRAS status of the subject use of plant stanol esters. As always, it is
`McNeil’s continuing responsibility to ensure that food ingredients that the firm markets are safe,
`and are otherwise in compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
`
`Page 16 of 34
`
`Page 16 of 34
`
`

`

`Page 4 - Ms. Chester and Dr. Nelson
`
`An evaluation that a use ofa food ingredient is safe is a time-dependentjudgment that is based
`on general scientific knowledge as well specific data and information about the ingredient. The
`intended use of plant stanol esters to reduce the absorption of cholesterol from the gastrointestinal
`tract exemplifies a recent trend in the food industry to develop food ingredients that have a
`nontraditional function. The evolving scientific knowledge about such ingredients in the context
`of changing dietary patterns, including long~term nutritional implications, amplifies the time-
`dependent nature of any safety evaluation. Accordingly, the agency believes that it would be both
`prudent and responsible for McNeil to continue to monitor, through scientific studies or otherwise,
`c0nsumers’ dietary exposure to plant stanol esters and the long-term nutritional implications for
`individuals in all age-groups who routinely consume the ingredient.
`In this regard, we were
`pleased to receive McNeil’s letter dated May 12, 1999, which (1) describes McNeil’s intent to
`continue its clinical evaluation of plant stanol esters; (2) describes initiatives to ensure that plant
`stanol esters are well understood by consumers and healthcare professionals and to evaluate
`consumer use and understanding regarding plant stanol esters; and (3) states McNeil's
`commitment to provide FDA with updates on the outcome of these activities, including summaries
`of safety findings from McNeil‘s clinical program.
`
`Finally, we have been advised by the Office of Food Labeling (OFL) in the Center for Food Safety
`and Applied Nutrition that the proposed claim, “Helps promote healthy cholesterol levels,” falls
`within the purview of structureffunction claims. However, as McNeil discussed with OFL on
`May 2, 1999, the label of Benecol® must include the percentage and type of fat, e. g., "_%
`vegetable oil" as part of the term "spread" where that term appears on the label, and the agency
`expects you to bring this aspect of your label into compliance with the applicable regulations.
`OFL will be sending you a separate letter discussing this issue. OFL has no other objection to
`your label in light of your letter dated May 3, 1999, and the commitments made therein.
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`AlaJ’l/LM
`
`Alan M. Rulis, Ph.D.
`Director
`
`Office of Premarket Approval
`Center for Food Safety
`and Applied Nutrition
`
`Page 17 of 34
`
`Page 17 of 34
`
`

`

`>44)OIZ.MZ._.M
`
`__/_
`
`Page 18 of 34
`
`Page 18 of 34
`
`

`

`SAFETY OF PLANT STANOL ESTERS
`
`REFERENCES {Updated}
`
`Agricultural Research Service IARS). Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by
`Individuals 1989-1992. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Computer tapes.
`1994.
`
`3--
`
`Ansari, G.A.S.; Walker, R.D.; Smart, V.B.; Smith, LL. Further investigations
`of mutagenic cholesterol preparations. Food Chem. Toxic. 1982, 20, 35-41.
`
`Barnes, P.J.
`
`Non-saponifiable lipids
`
`in cereals.
`
`In Lipids
`
`in Ceres!
`
`TechnologY: Academic: London, 1983; pp 33-55.
`
`Becker, M.: Staab, 0.; von Bergmann, K.
`
`Treatment of severe familial
`
`hypercholesterolemia in childhood with sitosterol and sitostanol.
`1993. 1'22, 292-296.
`
`J. Pediatr.
`
`Blair, 8.: et al. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of a
`
`combination of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitor and spread containing plant
`stanol esters versus HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and placebo spread to help
`reduce LDL and total-cholesterol
`levels. McNeii Protocoi 97-035.
`Fort
`
`Washington, PA 19034. Unpublished. CONFIDENTIAL
`
`I.;
`Blomqvist, S.M.; Jauhiainen, M.; van Tol, A.; Hyvonen, M.; Torstila,
`Vanhanen, H.T.: Miettinen, T.A.: Ehnholm, C. Effect of sitostanol ester on
`
`composition and size distribution of low- and high-density lipoprotein. Nutr.
`Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 1993, 3, 158-164.
`
`Booth, S.L.; Suttie, J.W. Dietary intake and adequacy of Vitamin K. J. Nutr.
`1998, 728, 785-788.
`
`Borzelleca, J.F. Macronutrient substitutes: safety evaluation. Regui. Toxicoi.
`Pharmacoi. 1992, 16, 253-264.
`
`In Oiive Oilr Chemistry and Technology:
`Boskou, D. Olive oil composition.
`Boskou, 0., Ed.: AOCS: Champaign, Illinois, 1996: p. 52-83.
`'
`
`Brown, E.E.; Fudge,
`
`J.F.; Richardson, LR.
`
`Diet of mother and brain
`
`hemorrhages in infant rats. J. Nutr. 1947, 34, 141-151.
`
`Burck, P.J.; Thakkar, A.L.; Zimmermann, R.E. Antifertility action of a sterol
`
`sutphate in the rabbit. J. Reprod. Fen. 1982, 66, 109-112.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`Page 19 of 34
`
`Page 19 of 34
`
`

`

`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`Cater N.B.; Grundy, S.M. Lowering serum cholesterol with plant sterols and
`stanols: historical perspectives. Postgraduate Medicine Special Report: New
`Developments in the Dietary Management of High Cholesterol, Nguyen, TT,
`Ed.,' McGraw-Hill: Minneapolis, Minnesota, November 1998; pp 6-14.
`
`Lycopene: Chemistry, biology, and implications for human
`Clinton, S.K.
`health and diseases. Nutr. Rev. 1999, 56(2), 35-51.
`
`and
`Lipoproteins
`Cullen, P.; Funke, H.: Schulte, H.: Assmann, G.
`cardiovascular risk -from genetics to CH0 prevention. Eur. Heart J. 1998, 79
`Supp. C, C5-11.
`
`Curran, G.L.: Costello, R.L. Effect of dihydrocholesterol and soybean sterols
`
`on cholesterol metabolism in rabbit and rat. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1956,
`91', 52-56.
`
`Customs Laboratory. Test Report 1999 0118 003. February 2, 1999.
`
`Czubayko, F.; Beumers, B.: Lammsfuss, 8.; Lutjohann, D.; van Bergmann, K.
`A simplified micro-method for quantification of fecal excretion of neutral and
`
`acidic sterols for outpatient studies in humans. J. Lipid Res. 1991, 32, 1861-
`1867.
`
`Dale, L.C. A clinical use extension study of a spread containing plant stanol
`esters to help reduce cholesterol. McNeii Protocoi 98-043. Unpublished.
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Dutta, P.C.; Appelqvist, L.-A.. Saturated sterols [stanoisi in unhydrogenated
`and hydrogenated edible vegetable oils and in cereal
`lipids.
`J. Sci. Food
`Agric. 1996, 71'. 383-391.
`
`Dutta, P.C. Phytosterol oxides in some samples of pure phytosterols mixture
`and in a few tablet supplement preparations in Finland. Second international
`Conference on Natural Antioxidants and Anticarcinogens in Nutrition, Health
`and Disease, Helsinki, Finland, June 1998. Abstract.
`
`Farquhar, J.W.; Sokolow, M. Response to serum lipids and lipoproteins of
`man to beta-sitosterol and safflower oil. Circulation 1958, X Vii, 890-899.
`
`4‘" edition. Committee on Food Chemical Codex,
`Food Chemicals Codex.
`Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National
`Academy Press, 1996.
`
`Food and Drug Administration {FDA}. Twirii:oiogicair Prinicipies for the Safety
`Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Coior Additives Used in Food,
`Redbook ii. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 1993.
`
`Page 20 of 34
`
`Page 20 of 34
`
`

`

`Ibrahim, H.A..; El
`24. Ghannudi, S.A.; Shareha, A.M.;, El Samannoudy, F.A.;
`l. Histological and
`Mougy, S.A..
`Adverse effects of phytoestrogens:
`histochemical effects of beta-sitosterol on the immature male rabbit. Libyan
`J. Sci. 1978, 88(0), 17-24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`El Samannoudy, F.A.:
`lbrahim, H.A.:
`Ghannudi, S.A.; Shareha, A.M.;
`El-Mougv. S.A.
`Adverse effects of phytoestrogens:
`Ill. The effect of
`beta-sitosterol on the ovarian structures of immature rabbits. Libyan J. Sci.
`1979. 9A (0), 1-12.
`
`Gordon, M.H.; Mursi, E. A comparison of oil stability based on the Metrohm
`Rancimat with storage at 20°C.
`J. Am. Oi! Chem.Soc. 1994, 71(6), 649-
`651.
`
`Grundy, S.M.; Mok, H.Y.|. Effects of low dose phytosterols on cholesterol
`absorption in man.
`In Lrboproter'n Metabolism: Greten, H., Ed.: Springer-
`Verlay: Berlin, 1976; pp 112-118.
`
`Grundy, SM.
`[Veterans Affairs Medical Center at Dallas}.
`The effect of
`sitostanol ester margarine on cholesterol absorption in subjects with moderate
`hypercholesterolemia. Unpublished. CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Guyton, A.C.; Hall, J.E. Textbook of Medical Physioiogy. 9th ed. W.B.
`Saunders Company: Philadelphia, 1996.
`
`Gylling, H. Studies of plant stanol esters in different patient populations. New
`Approaches to Dietary Management of Elevated Cholesterol Symposium,
`January 29-30, 1999 Dublin, Ireland.
`
`Gylling, H.; Miettinen, T.A. Serum cholesterol lowering by dietary sitostanol
`is associated with reduced absorption and synthesis of cholesterol and
`decreased transport of LDL apoprotein B in men with Type II diabetes.
`In,
`Treatment of Severe Dysfriooproteinemia in the Prevention of Coronary Heart
`Disease 4. Gotta, A.M., Jr.; Mancini, M.; Richter, WC. and Schwandt, P.,
`Eds.: Karger: Basel, 1993; pp 57-59.
`
`Gylling, H.; Miettinen, T.A. The effect of cholesterol absorption inhibition on
`low density lipoprotein cholesterol
`level. Arheroscierosr's 1995,
`1 1'7, 305-
`308.
`
`Gylling, H.; Miettinen, T.A. Effects of inhibiting cholesterol absorption and
`synthesis on cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism in hypercholesterolemic
`non-insulin-dependent diabetic men. J. Lipid Res. 1996, 37, 1776-1735.
`
`Page 21 of 34
`
`Page 21 of 34
`
`

`

`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`Gylling. H.: Miettinen, T.A. Stitostanol ester added to long-term simvastatin
`treatment of coronary patients with low and high basal cholesterol absorption.
`JACC 1998. 31(2), SuppA, Abstract 1116-6.
`
`Gylling. H.: Miettinen. T.A. Cholesterol reduction by different plant stenol
`mixtures and with variable fat intake. Metabolism 1999. 48 (5). 575-580.
`
`{Previously listed as "in press”!
`
`Gylling. H., et al. Supplemental fax information for, "Cholesterol reduction by
`different plant stanol mixtures and with variable fat
`intake." Unpublished.
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Gylling, H.: Miettinen, T.A. Retinal. vitamin D. carotenes and a-tocopherol in
`
`serum of a mildly hypercholesterolemic population treated with sitostanol
`ester margarine. A-klubi, 14. 45.3. 1997, Kuopio; Abstract.
`
`Gylling. H.: Miettinen. T.A. Sitostanol ester margarines lower serum total and
`
`LDL—cholesterol level in humans. Am. Oil Chem Soc Annual Meeting. Seattle,
`May 11-14, 1997; Abstract & Poster.
`
`lowering
`in
`stanol ester
`Gylling. H.: Miettinen, T.A. Efficacy of plant
`cholesterol
`in post menopausal women and patients with diabetes. Post—
`
`the Dietary
`in
`graduate Medicine Special Report: New Developments
`Management
`of High Cholesterol, Nguyen, T.T..
`Ed.; McGraw-Hiil:
`Minneapolis, Minnesota, November 1998.
`
`Gyiling, H. ; Miettinen. T.A. Serum cholesterol and cholesterol and lipoprotein
`metabolism in hyperoholesterolaemic NIDDM patients before and during
`
`sitostanol ester-margarine treatment. Drabetolagrb 1994; 37:773-780.
`
`and
`”Serum cholesterol
`fax information for.
`Gylling. H. Supplemental
`cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism in hypercholesterolaemic NIDDM
`
`patients before and during sitostanol ester spread treatment.” Unpublished.
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Gylling. H.: Puska. P.: Vartiainen. E.: Miettinen. T.A. Serum retinol, a-
`
`tocopherol, carotenes and lipid peroxide production during serum cholesterol
`
`lowering by sitostanol ester margarine in a mildly hypercholesterolemic
`population. Circulatrbrr. 1996; 94(8. Suppl1i:l—578.
`
`Gylling. H.: Puska. P.; Vartiainen, E.; Miettinen. T.A. Retinal, vitamin D,
`
`carotenes and a-tocopherol
`
`in serum of a moderately hypercholesterolemic
`
`population consuming sitostanol ester margarine. Atherosclerosis 1999,
`press.
`
`in
`
`Page 22 of 34
`
`Page 22 of 34
`
`

`

`44.
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`Gylling} H.: Puska, P.; Vartiainen. E.: Miettinen. T.A. Serum sterols during
`stanoi ester feeding in a mildly hypercholesterolemic population. J. Lipid. Res.
`1999;40:593-600.
`
`Gylling, H.; Radhakrishnan, R.: Miettinen. T.A.
`
`Reduction of
`
`serum
`
`cholesterol in postmenopausal women with previous myocardial infarction and
`cholesterol malabsorption induced by dietary sitostanol ester margarine:
`women
`and
`dietary sitostanol.
`Circulation
`1997,
`96,
`4226-4231.
`
`Gylling, H. Supplemental fax information for, "Reduction of serum cholesterol
`in postmenopausal women with previous myocardial infarction and cholesterol
`malabsorption induced by dietary sitostanol ester margarine: women and
`dietary sitostanol." Unpublished. CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Gylling, H.; Siimes. M.A.; Miettinen, T. Sitostanol ester margarine in dietary
`treatment of children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Lrbr'd Res. 1995.
`36, 1807-1812.
`
`Hallikainen. M.A.: Uusitupa, M.|..J. Study Report and amendment: Effects of
`
`two low-fat stanoi ester margarines on serum cholesterol levels as part of low
`
`fat diet in subjects with elevated serum cholesterol levels - comparison with
`
`the effect of low fat diet alone. March 1998. Unpublished. CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Hallikainen. M.A.: Uusitupa. M.|.J.
`
`Effects of 2 low—fat stanoi ester-
`
`containing margarines on serum cholesterol concentrations as part of a low—
`fet diet in hypercholesterolemlc subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nam. 1999, 6.9. 403-
`410.
`{Previously listed as ”in press”)
`
`Halliltainen, M.A.; Sarkkinen. E.S.: Uusitupa. M.I.J. Dose-response effect of
`plant stanol ester on serum cholesterol concentrations

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket