`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SONY CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`YISSUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE HEBREW
`UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00327
`Patent 7,477,284 B2
`____________
`
`Mailed: July 10, 2013
`
`Before PATRICK E. BAKER, Trial Paralegal
`
`NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION
`AND
`TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`
`The petition for inter partes review in the above proceeding has been
`accorded the filing date of July 3, 2013.
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 8
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00327
`Patent 7,477,284
`
`
`Administrative Patent Judge Sally C. Medley has been designated to
`manage the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.5.
`A review of the petition identified the following defect:
`
` •
`
` The petition does not contain an exhibit list referencing
`the exhibit numbers. 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e).
`
`Petitioner must correct the defect within FIVE BUSINESS DAYS
`from this notice. Failure to correct the defect may result in an order to show
`cause as to why the Board should institute the trial. No substantive changes
`(e.g., new grounds) may be made to the petition.
`Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition. The
`time for filing a preliminary response is set forth in a separate order filed
`concurrently herewith. The preliminary response is limited to setting forth
`the reasons why the requested review should not be instituted. Patent Owner
`may also file an election to waive the preliminary response to expedite the
`proceeding. For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on
`the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory
`notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of
`the petition.
`The parties are encouraged to use the heading on the first page of this
`Notice for all future filings in the proceeding.
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties are
`authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00327
`Patent 7,477,284
`
`42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order --
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00010
`(MPT), a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under
`“Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” Any motion for pro hac
`vice admission filed by the parties shall also indicate that the person sought
`to be admitted will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct.
`See Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013) (effective
`May 3, 2013).
`The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the
`Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web
`site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`If there are any questions pertaining to this notice, please contact
`Patrick E. Baker at 571-272-6192 or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at
`571-272-7822.
`
`PETITIONER:
`Walter Hanley
`Michelle Carniaux
`Sony-HumanEyes@kenyon.com
`whanley@kenyon.com
`mcarniaux@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David L. McCombs
`David O’Dell
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00327
`Patent 7,477,284
`
`David.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`David.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`
`
`