`
`for
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Exhibit-2001 Declaration of Steven G Hill
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`
`Date Filed: December 23, 2013
`
`Filed on behalf of: MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC
`
`By: Scott A. Horstemeyer
`
`scott.horstemeyer@thomashorstemeyer.com
`
`(770) 933—9500
`
`Vivek Ganti
`
`Vivek.ganti@thomashorstemeyer.com
`
`(770) 933-9500
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION AND XEROX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioners,
`
`V.
`
`MPHJ TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR20 1 3-003 02
`
`U.S. Patent 7,986,426
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF STEVEN G. HILL IN
`
`SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION
`
`PRO HAC VICE OF STEVEN G. HILL PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.10
`
`I, Steven G. Hill, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an experienced litigating attorney with more than nineteen (19)
`
`years of experience.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`I have been litigating patent cases for at least fifteen (15) years.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Georgia State Bar and am
`
`admitted to practice in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
`
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
`
`Circuit and the United States District Courts for the Northern and Middle Districts
`
`of Georgia, among others.
`
`4.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`
`
`6.
`
`I have had no sanctions or contempt citations imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding,
`
`including the patent-at-issue. I served as lead counsel in the following district court
`
`cases:
`
`Project Paperless, LLC v. UAVCommunicatz'ons, Inc. and Bosh Global Systems,
`Case No. 3 : 12-cv-39 filed January 18, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the
`Eastern District of Virginia.
`
`Project Paperless, LLC v. BlueWave Computing, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-
`00995—SCJ filed March 23, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
`District of Georgia.
`
`These cases involved the same patent at issue in this proceeding.
`
`8.
`
`I was actively involved in all aspects of these district court cases,
`
`including the issue of validity of the patents-in-suit, which included the patent at
`
`issue in this proceeding.
`
`9.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`10.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional
`
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§10.20 et seq., and to disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §1l.19(a).
`
`
`
`11.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any proceeding before the
`
`Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`12.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with the knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code
`
`and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of US. Patent
`
`No. 7,986,426.
`
`Dated: December 23, 2013
`
`By: /Steven G. Hill/
`
`Steven G. Hill
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
