IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
`
`JOHN STEPHENSON
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`Case No. 09-CV—698-TCK-FHM
`
`MVP NETWORK ONLINE GAMES, INC., and
`MVP NETWORK, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff, John Stephenson, files this complaint against Defendants, MVP Network
`
`Online Games, Inc. and MVP Network, Inc. and alleges as follows:
`
`SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
`
`1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Law of the
`
`United States, 35 US. C 101 et. seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this
`
`patent infringement action under 28 USC 1331, 1332 and 1338(a).
`
`PARTIES
`
`2. Plaintiff John Stephenson (“Plaintiff’) is an individual and is a resident of the
`
`State of Oklahoma.
`
`3. Defendants, MVP Network Online Games,
`
`Inc.
`
`and MVP Network,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Defendants”), are corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Nevada and has a principle place of business at 110 N. Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, MO
`
`63102.
`
`Stephenson v. MVP Network
`Complaint for Patent Infringement
`
`Game Show Network Ex. 1012
`Game Show Network EX. 1012
`IPR2013-00289
`IPR2013-00289
`
`

`

`PERSONAL JURISDICTION
`
`S. Defendants regularly conduct business in this judicial district.
`
`6. Defendants have sold, offer to sell and continue to sell through their websites,
`
`www.mvpnetwork.com and www.goldenfairway.com,
`
`infringing products
`
`andfor
`
`services,
`
`including products ands’or services relating to the “Golden Fairway” line of
`
`games, in this judicial district.
`
`THE PATENT-IN-SUIT
`
`7. On January 16, 2001, US. Patent No. 6,174,237 (the “’23? Patent”), entitled
`
`“Method for a Game of Skill Tournament” was duly and legally issued to Plaintiff. A
`
`copy of the ‘23? Patent is attached as Exhibit A and is made part of this Complaint.
`
`8. The ‘23? Patent relates to a method for a game of skill tournament played over an
`
`interactive computer network.
`
`9. Plaintiff is the owner of all right, title and interest in, and has full rights to sue,
`
`enforce and recover damages for all
`
`infringements,
`
`including damages for all past
`
`infringements, of the ‘23? Patent.
`
`CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
`
`10. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations stated in
`
`paragraphs 1-9 of this Complaint.
`
`11. Defendants use, sell, have sold, andfor offer to sell a variety of infringing products
`
`andfor services that incorporate a method of play as described in ‘237 patent, namely,
`
`having a qualification round of game play and a playoff round of game play, all
`
`performed over an interactive computer system, including, but not limited to, Defendants”
`
`Stephenson v. MVP Network
`Complaint for Patent Infringement
`
`

`

`game entitled “GOLDEN FAIRWAY”, which is an online game having a golf theme, in
`
`this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States.
`
`12. According to Defendants’ website, the instructions for play for the GOLDEN
`
`FAIRWAY indicate that a player must first obtain a qualification level prior to entry into
`
`a tournament.
`
`13. Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the ‘23? Patent.
`
`14. Defendants are continuing such infringements of one or more claims of the ‘23?
`
`Patent by using, selling, andr'or offering for sale the Infringing Products (including, but
`
`not limited to GOLDEN FAIRWAY).
`
`15. Plaintiff has suffered damages as a result of Defendants’ infringement and will
`
`continue to suffer damages as a result of Defendants“ infringement.
`
`16. Defendants’ infringement of one or more claims of the ‘23? Patent has caused and
`
`will continue to cause irreparable injury to Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy
`
`at law.
`
`17. Trial by jury is demanded.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as follows:
`
`a)
`
`that Defendants have infringed claims of the ‘237 Patent;
`
`b)
`
`for Plaintiff and against Defendants for an award of damages in an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty to compensate for Defendants” infringement of claims
`
`of the ‘23? Patent;
`
`c)
`
`that an injunction be issued against further infringement of claims of the
`
`‘23? Patent by Defendants and their directors, officers, agents, servants, employees,
`
`Stephenson v, MVP Network
`Complaint for Patent Infringement
`
`3
`
`

`

`attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with them, or in alternative,
`
`that a reasonable royalty going forward be awarded for Defendants’ filture infringement;
`
`d)
`
`that Defendants pay all attorneys” fees, all costs of this action, and interest
`
`On those fees and costs to Plaintiff;
`
`e)
`
`that Plaintiff be granted such other and further relief, in law or equity, as
`
`the Court deems just and equitable.
`
`Dated this flay of October, 2009.
`
`
`
`rent A. Capeh
`Bowers Law Firm
`
`OK Bar No. 17847)
`
`
`
`PO. Box 1797
`
`Harrison, AR 72602-1797
`
`(870) 741-6166
`bcapehart@ozarklawyer.com
`
`John J. Tanner (OK Bar No. 8841)
`3315 East 39th Street
`
`Tulsa, OK 74135
`
`(918) 749-8823
`
`Attorneysfor Plaintg’tf
`John Stephenson
`
`Stephenson v. MVP Network
`Complaint for Patent Infringement
`
`

`

`O
`US 6,174,237 B1
`(10) Patent No.:
`(12) United States Patent
`Stephenson
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Jan. 16, 2001
`
`
`U8006174237Bl
`
`(54) METHOD FOR A GAME OF SKILL
`TOURNAMENT
`
`(76)
`
`Inventor:
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`John H. Stephenson, 4608 S.
`1
`1
`Km’mlle’ Tulsa’ UK (US) 74135
`Under 35 U.s.c. 154(b), the term of this
`at
`t
`l] Ilbe
`1
`El
`(l f
`0d
`P a“ 5 3
`‘3" '3“ e
`0’
`3115-
`
`71199? Vaughn et al.
`5,643,083 “
`..................... 463140 X
`111997 String ..
`5,649,105
`2131292
`811997 Klasee
`5,660,391
`2731292
`$133;
`flagse"
`g’gig’gg
`ggggg
`arty
`,
`,
`511998 Mark}; et at.
`5,255,621
`463142
`5"1998 scmele‘ 5‘ ‘1'
`5353382 '
`380’.” x_
`5,816,918 ' 1011998 Kelly etal.
`.....
`463116
`5,836,586
`1111998 Marks eta].
`2131292
`5,902,983 ‘
`511999 Crevelt et a].
`. 2351380 X
`5,944,316 .
`811999 Hernandez
`..... 2131292
`5,970,143 ‘ 1011999 Schneier et al.
`.. 380123 X
`
`. 2231292 x
`6,019,374 ,
`212000 Breedin
`.....
`B
`‘
`A63F 13100; A63F 9124;
`694831
`4‘20”“ 3mm“
`463”“
`GOéF 17100; GOfiF 19100
`‘ cited by examiner
`463142; 463125; 463140; WWW Examiner—Michael 0mm
`(52) U.b. (.1. I463.....
`1322, 4341332; 700190; 700191; 700192
`As .
`t‘
`1. Ex
`- er——B'nh An N
`(53) Field of Search
`463142, 40 43
`(7:53:
`”A”
`,
`11"- _Hg"ff§' h
`46319, 10, II, 12, 14, 25, 29, 30, 4341322,
`) me" gm or m”
`ea ’ 0 m”
`323, 324, 332, 350; 700190, 91, 92, 93
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`
`..
`
`
`
`-
`3, K, h.
`C lgm
`
`(21) App]. No.: 091316,840
`_
`(22) Wed:
`(51)
`Int. C17
`
`May 21, 1999
`
`
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`
`
`US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4 593 904 .
`611986 Graves .,. 27311 E x
`
`’
`511987 Hamilton" .
`4:666:160 4
`2731242
`
`. 3113;138 A x
`4,669,730 ~
`611987 5m"
`4,926,327 *
`511990 Sidley ..
`..... 3541412 x
`.
`5,038,022 *
`81'! 991 IJJcero
`. 2351380 x
`5,083,271 *
`111992 Thacher el al.
`3641411 x
`5,114,155 :
`511992 Tiller! 9181-
`273F371 X
`1333: :2": et a1.
`:jgiggé
`2731'1389
`
`"363L376?
`5’$13,11., .
`411996 8min
`511996 Sines et a].
`5318‘249
`273504
`
`5,544,892 at
`811996 Breeding “
`’ 23,292 x
`5,546,523 * B11996 Gatto
`_ 395,155 x
`5,549,300
`811996 Sardarian ,,
`273,992
`
`5,566,946
`1011996 Parker
`2131292
`
`5,593,349 *
`111991t Miguel et a1.
`4153130 X
`
`
`
`A method for a game of skill tournament that is challenging
`and provides the player a reliable gauge of his skill level as
`compared to other players. The tournament has a qualifying
`mund ““1 a PlaYOfl “mud, and i5 Played 0"” 3“ imme‘iw’
`computer system, In the qualifying round, a player competes
`against a host computer. The 0033431 of this round is to score
`a sufficient number of points to qualify for the highest level
`P0
`Y
`of performance
`ssible. Once a pla er obtaim a level of
`performance, he is recognized for his accomplishment and
`given a reward. This allows the player to gauge his skill
`level. In the playolf round, those players reaching a prede-
`termined level of performance, play the same game simul-
`taneously against the host computer under the same rules
`and conditions for a set amount of time. At the end of this
`time frame, the results are analyzed. Those players with the
`highest point totals will be recognized and given a reward.
`
`19 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`
`
`Ekmstr- A
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 16,2001
`
`US 6,174,237 B1
`
`|=IC3. 1
`
`,0
`
`\
`
`22
`
`2O ’
`
`'
`
`PLAYER PLAYS
`GOS vs. HOST
`COMPUTER
`
`24
`
`ANALYZE
`RESULTS
`
`26
`
`42
`
`
`PLAYER PLAYS
`GOS vs. HOST
`COMPUTER
`SIMULTANEOUS
`WITH OTHER PLAYERS
`
`
`
`
`
`60
`
`
`
`N0 3T5?” .
`@ CRITERIA
`LOP
`
`YES
`
`30
`
`23
`
`CLASSIFY
`PLAYERS 1N
`APPROPRIATE LOP
`
`32
`
`'
`
`DISTRIBUTE
`LOP AWARD
`
`8
`
`34
`
`
`
`
`NO
`SATISFY
`@ QUALIFYING
`
`
`_
`
`.
`
`
`
`43
`
`50
`
`
`
`DISTRIBUTE
`AWARDS PER
`RANK
`
`
`

`

`US 6,174,237 B1
`
`1
`METHOD FOR A GAME OF SKILL
`TOURNAMENT
`
`REFERENCE TO PENDING APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is not related to any pending applica-
`lions.
`
`REFERENCE TO MICROFICHE APPENDIX
`
`This application is not referenced in any microfiche
`appendix.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention is directed to a game of skill
`The present
`tournament. Specifically, the present invention is directed to
`a tournament having a qualifying round and a playoff round,
`and played on an interactive computer system. The quali-
`fying round is played between a player through a computer
`terminal and a host computer. The playoff round is played
`between those players which have obtained a predetermined
`level of performance and the host computer. 'l‘his round is
`played under the same rules and conditions as in the quali-
`fying round except all
`the players are playing simulta-
`neously within a specific time frame on a specific date.
`Interactive video computer software, the Internet and the
`public’s fascination with the challenge, competitiveness and
`gratification of computer based video games has increased
`the need for new games and gaming formats. There exists
`the need for a gaming format which allows a player to gauge
`the level of skill he possess as compared to other players,
`without traveling long distances and incurring the expenses
`of meeting at a central contest site.
`For many years, games of skill, such as chess, bridge,
`poker and blackjack, have attracted tournaments. Various
`types of tournaments have been created and attempted to
`satisfy the above mentioned needs. These tournaments
`involve games such as poker and blackjack. Typically,
`various rules have been placed upon the individual game.
`Examples of such attempts are described:
`US. Pat. No. 5,660,392 to Hansen involves a method for
`playing a blackjack type card game having specific rules
`regarding the play of the game; U.S. Pat, No. 5,660,391 10
`Klasse involves a method for playing blackjack where a
`player wagers whether a hand will be a Blackjack, 21, 20, 1 9
`or 18; US. Pat. No. 5,566,946 to Parker involves a method
`to play blackjack where different bets are placed on the Ante
`and the Play with different odds being placed on same.
`US. Pat, No. 5,755,621 to Marks involves a poker card
`tournament where a player creates a poker hand by first
`receiving a pair of cards, discarding one of the card and
`repeating the process until the hand has been completed.
`This tournament is played solely between the player and the
`house computer system or between other players.
`The prior art game of skill games or tournaments have not
`been successful. These references do not allow a player to
`gauge his level of performance by allowing the player to test
`his skill and ability against the tournament sponsor and other
`players during the same tournament. There is a need for a
`tournament which allow for a player to compete and obtain
`a reliable index as to his 5an1 as compared to other com-
`petitors competing under the same game conditions while
`simultaneously enjoying the game.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the present invention a game of skill
`tournament having a qualifying round and a playoll‘ round,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`being played over an interactive computer system, is dis—
`closed. Generally, the qualifying round is played between a
`single player and a host computer. The playoff round is
`played between those players that have obtained a prede-
`termined level of performance during the qualifying round.
`Awards are distributed to those players who reach specific
`levels of performance during the qualifying round and to the
`top scorers of the playolf round.
`For purposes of the present invention, a game of skill is
`defined as any game where a player’s lnrowledge and
`experience influences the outcome of the game. Examples of
`games of skill include but are not limited chess, poker,
`bridge, hearts, blackjack and questionfanswcr trivia games.
`The game of skill tournament is divided into two distinct
`portions: the qualifying round and the playoif round. The
`qualifying round is played between a single player through
`a computer terminal and a host computer. The host computer
`has the ability to act as a game sponsor by keeping score,
`operating the game, monitoring the player’s progress and to
`distribute awards when appropriate, Also, the host computer
`has the ability to act as another player if the game requires
`more than a single player. The object of the qualifying round
`is to obtain a level of performance that will allow a player
`to participate in the playoff round. Awards are given to those
`players reaching various levels of performance during the
`qualifying round and to the top scorers during the playoff
`round.
`
`With respect to the levels of performance, there are a
`plurality of levels ranging from low-performance to high-
`performance. Typically, there would be a low-performance
`level, one or more mid-performance levels and a high-
`performance level.
`If a player obtains a result while playing a game of skill
`during the qualifying round which satisfies a predetermined
`criteria specific to a level of performance, the player would
`then be classified a player of that level and would be given
`an award specific to that level.
`If a player obtains a result that qualifies him to be classed
`into a level of performance that qualifies him to be able to
`participate in the playolf round, he would be eligible to play
`the game of skill against the host computer in the playolf
`round. During the playoff round, all players which obtained
`a specific level of performance would simultaneously play
`the game of skill against the host computer under the same
`rules and conditions as during the qualifying round, except
`for a specific time limit. Typically, the levels of performance
`which qualify a player for the playofi round are the highest
`most levels.
`
`After the time limit for the playoff round ends, the results
`are evaluated, with the players being ranked according to the
`number of point each obtained during the playoff round.
`Awards are distributed to those players reaching a predeter-
`mined ranking. For example, the winner, second place and
`third place players will each receive difierenl awards.
`The game of skill
`tournament can be played over an
`electronic system, such as a local area network (LAN), wide
`area network (WAN), campus-wide network, fixed based
`unit network, Intranet or Internet.
`The primary object of the present invention is to create a
`game of skill tournament which improves upon the prior art
`tournaments.
`
`Another object of the present invention is to create a game
`of skill tournament which challenges the participants and
`reward those participants who obtain a certain level of
`perfiormance.
`Other objects and a further scope of the applicability of
`the present invention will become apparent from the detailed
`
`

`

`US 6,174,237 B1
`
`3
`description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accom-
`panying drawings wherein like parts are designated by like
`reference numerals.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the preferred embodiment of the
`present invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the
`present invention as shown in FIG. 1, a method directed
`toward a game of skill tournament 10 having a qualifying
`round 20 and a playoff round 40 is generally disclosed. A
`least one player participates in the qualifying round 20
`against a host computer. The playoff round 40 is played by
`those players that have obtained a predetermined level of
`performance during the qualifying round 20 against the host
`computer. Awards are distributed to those players who reach
`specific levels of performance during the qualifying round
`and to those players in the playoff round who obtain a
`predetermined rank. The awards can be distributed either
`instantaneous or can be made available to be received by the
`recipient at some time in future.
`The game of skill tournament first begins with at least one
`player playing a game of skill against the host computer in
`the qualifying round 20 as shown in box 22. The maximum
`number of participants during the qualifying round 20 is
`open-ended. The only restriction on the number of partici-
`pants would be specific to the particular game of skill being
`played. The game of skill can be any game of skill that
`requires the player to utilize his knowledge and experience
`to aEect the outcome of the game. Examples of games of
`skill include but are not limited to games, card games and
`strategy games. Card games can include:
`rummy, gin
`rummy, poker, bridge, pinoehle, bezique, piquet, klaberjass,
`julepe, boure, cabbage, casino, euchre, napoleon, two hand
`five hundred, spoil five, ecarte, hearts, cans, seven-up, draw
`seven, auction pitch, blackjack, pontoon, fifteen, van john,
`seven and a half, ten and half, pong, maco, chemin dc fer,
`baccarat, skin game, horse race, sights, sharnery, shamey
`gin, doctor videtti, tableanette, and solitaire. Trivia games
`can include games relating to: geography, history, motion
`pictures, science,
`the Bible,
`literature, fictional writings,
`nonfictional writings, musicians, writers, composers, actors,
`statesmen, military battles, military leaders, mathematical
`problems, mathematical formulas,
`fine arts, horticulture,
`agriculture, medicine,
`television shows spelling, phrase
`origins, word origins, science-fiction, sporting events,
`athletiCs, anatomy and astronomy. Strategy games can
`include: crossword puzzles, word search, word scramble,
`Word match, chess, maze games, computer-generated spon-
`ing games, player participation sports including but not
`limited to virtual sporting events, video sporting events and
`computer-based sporting events, player participation virtual
`reality games, player participation action games, dominos,
`checkers, pinball and foosball trivia.
`The object of die qualifying round 20 is to obtain a
`sufficient number of points during the course of play which
`satisfies a predetermined criteria for a level of performance.
`Qualifying round 20 can be only a single game or a series of
`games. Once a player has obtained sufficient points which
`Would classify him in the top most level of performance, the
`player would not have to continue with the game or games.
`Once the player completes his play against
`the host
`computer, the results are analyzed, as shown in box 24. The
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`results are compared to a predetermined list of levels of
`performance 60, as shown in box 26. If the results satisfy
`predetermined criteria, the player will be classified into the
`level of performance that matches his results, as shown in
`box 28. If the player‘s results do not meet a minimum level
`of performance,
`the player will be eliminated from the
`tournament will be terminated, as shown in box 30. If a
`player is classified into a level of performance, an award
`specific to the specific level of performance is distributed to
`the player, as shown in box 32.
`
`If a player is eliminated from the tournament, he has the
`ability to begin a new qualifying round. The reasons for
`beginning a new qualifying round include attempting to
`qualify for the minimum level of performance, qualifying
`for a higher level of performance and to receive additional
`rewards.
`
`If a player is classified into a level of performance that
`would qualify him to participate in the playoff round 40, the
`player will advance, as shown in box 34. Typically, these
`qualifying levels of performance are reserved for the highest
`most levels of performance. If the player's level of perfor-
`mance does not meet the predetermined qualifying level of
`performance,
`the player will be eliminated from the
`toumament, as shown in box 38. As mentioned above, the
`player would be able to begin a new qualifying round in
`order to attempt to reach a level of performance that would
`allow him to participate in the playotf round 40.
`
`Typically the qualifying round is played in a continuous
`manner. By this it is meant that the player selects the day and
`time in which to participate. The only limitations to this time
`frame is if the qualifying round is not active. An example of
`this is illustrated as follows: The tournament is open for
`qualifying round play from Monday at noon to Saturday at
`midnight. Any player would have the ability to participate in
`the qualifying round at the time of his choice as long as it
`was between the pre-established time flame.
`
`The playoff round 40 will begin at a preset time with those
`player who have qualified by a specific cut-off date and time
`playing the game of skill against the host computer, as
`shown in box 42. The playoif round will continue for a
`preset amount of time, as shown in step 43. After the playoff
`round has concluded, the results are analyzed, as shown in
`strip 46. The results are analyzed to determine the each
`player’s rank. The players are ranked according to
`performance, as shown in step 48. An award is then distrib-
`uted to those players which have reached a predetermined
`rank, as shown in step 50. The tournament then end as
`shown in step 52.
`
`EXAMPLE OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`
`An example of the preferred embodiment of the present
`invention is set forth below. The parameters of the example
`are for illustrative purposes only. They are not intended to
`limit the scope of the invention. The game of skill will be set
`as Hearts. The tournament will be played over die Internet,
`where the host computer and participants‘ terminals are each
`in different locations. The qualifying round is open for play
`seven days a week, tWenty-four hours per day. The playoff
`round is to played on each Saturday from I5 p.rn. to 8 pm.
`GMT. The playofi qualifying cutoif date and time is Satur-
`day at noon, GMT.
`
`The predetermined levels of performance are set out
`below in Table 1.
`
`

`

`US 6,174,237 B1
`
`5
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Level
`Minimum Points
`Award
`
`Bron no
`200
`K
`Silver
`300
`2X
`Gold
`400
`3X
`
`500Platinum 4):
`
`
`Points are earned based on winning rounds of play. The
`qualifying levels of performance include the Gold and
`Platinum levels.
`lH'our players start
`the qualifying round
`against the host computer. Since the tournament is played
`over the Internet, each player is able to participate at a
`variety of locations at the time of their choosing prior to
`noon on Saturday.
`The host computer is represented by a computer system
`having compatible hardware and software. The location of
`the host computer system can be a different location than
`those locations of each player. Through a series of two-way
`communications, the game of skill is conducted between the
`players and the host computer system.
`After each player has completed the qualifying round, the
`results are analyzed. The results are listed in Table 2.
`
`TABLE 2
`
`Player
`Score
`Classification
`Award
`Advance
`
`A
`T5
`None
`None
`No
`B
`251’]
`Bronze
`x
`No
`C
`400
`Gold
`3X
`Yes
`
`Platinum 4X52.5D Yea
`
`
`
`
`The results show PlaycrAhad 75 points, Player B had 250
`points, Player C had 450 points and Player 1) had 525 points.
`Player A does not satisfy the minimum level of perfor-
`mance. Thus, Player A is eliminated from the tournament.
`Player B meets the criteria for the Bronze level of perfor-
`mance. Player C meets the criteria for the Gold level of
`performance. Player D meets the criteria for the Platinum
`level of performance. Host computer system distributes
`level of performance specific awards to Players B, C and D.
`However, only players C and D advance to the playoff round
`against other qualified players of equal level.
`At the predetermined time on Saturday, Player C then
`plays the game of skill in the playoff round against the host
`computer simultaneously with other Gold level players.
`Player D plays the game of skill in the playoff round against
`the host computer simultaneously with other Platinum level
`players, Host computer system analyzes the results the Gold
`and Platinum level playofl‘ rounds. The players are then
`ranked according to their specific performance during the
`playoff round.
`Assume Players C and D are ranked first and third in their
`respective divisions. Host computer would then distribute an
`award to Player C specific to his first place ranking in the
`Gold playoff round and an award to Player D specific to his
`third place ranking in the Platinum playoff round.
`While the foregoing detailed description has described
`several embodiments of the method in accordance with the
`present
`invention,
`it
`is to be understood that
`the above
`description is illustrative only and not limiting of the dis-
`closed invention. Thus, the invention is to be limited only by
`the claims as set forth below.
`What is claimed:
`
`1. Amethod of playing a game of skill tournament having
`a qualifying round and a playoff round, and played over an
`
`b.
`
`6
`interactive computer system, said interactive computer sys-
`tem having a host computer system, a plurality of terminals
`computers and compatible software, said method compris-
`ing the following steps:
`a. playing a game of skill in a qualifying round betWeen
`a single player and the host computer;
`evaluating the results of said qualifying round to
`determine if said player qualifies to be classified within
`a specific performance level from a plurality of perfor-
`mance levels ranging from a low performance level to
`a high performance level;
`c. evaluating the results of said qualifying round to
`determine ifsaid player qualifies to be classified within
`a qualifying performance level taken from said plural~
`ity of performance levels;
`(1. distributing to said player a performance level award,
`said performance level award being dependent upon the
`specific performance level obtained;
`e. playing said game of skill in a playoff round between
`said player and the host computer simultaneously along
`with other players, wherein each player has been clas-
`sified within a qualifying performance level;
`f. evaluating the results of said playofi round to determine
`a tournament winner and subsequent ranking of play—
`ers; and
`g. distributing tournament awards to tournament partici-
`pans.
`2. The method of claim 1 wherein said interactive com-
`puter system is selected from the group consisting of a local
`area network (LAN), wide area network (“’AN}, campus-
`wide network, fixed based unit network, Intranet or lntemet.
`3. The method of claim 1 wherein said qualifying round
`is defined as a plurality of individual games and the results
`of said qualifying round is an aggregate of the results of each
`individual game.
`4. The method of claim 1 wherein said performance level
`award increases as a player qualifies for higher performance
`level classifications.
`5. The method of claim 1 wherein said qualifying perfor-
`mance level as recited in subparagraph (d) is further defined
`as being the highest performance level.
`6. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of
`performance levels is further defined as having four perfor-
`mance levels ranging from a low performance level to a
`medium-low performance level to a medium—high perfor~
`mance low! to a high performance level.
`7. The method of claim 6 wherein said qualifying perfor-
`mance level is further defined as being the medium-high and
`highest performance levels.
`8. The method of claim 1 wherein said step (b) and step
`(c) are performed simultaneously.
`9. The method of claim 1 wherein said game of skill is
`further defined as a card game requiring skill and knowl-
`edge.
`10. The method of claim 9 wherein said card game is
`selected from the group consisting of rummy, gin tummy,
`poker. bridge, pinochle, bezique, piquet, klaberjass, julepe,
`boure, cribbage, casino, euchrc, napoleon, two hand five
`hundred, spoil five, ecarte, hearts, cans, seven-up, draw
`seven, auction pitch, blackjack, pontoon, fifteen, van john.
`seven and a half, ten and a half, pong, maco, chemin de fer,
`baccarat, skin game, horse race, eights, shamery, sharney
`gin, doctor videtli, tableanelle, and solitaire.
`11. The method of claim 1 wherein said game of skill is
`further defined as a question and answer game requiring skill
`and knowledge.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2|]
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`7
`
`US 6,174,237 B1
`
`12. The method of claim 11 wherein said trivia game is
`selected from the group consisting of geography, history,
`motion picture, science, bible, literature, fictional writings,
`nonfictional writings, musicians, writers, composers, actors,
`statesmen, military battles, military leaders, mathematical
`problems, mathematical formulas, fine arts, horticulture,
`agriculture, medicine,
`television shows, spelling, phrase
`origins, word origins, science-fiction, sporting events,
`athletics, anatomy and astronomy.
`[3. The method of claim 1 wherein said game of skill is
`further defined as a strategy game requiring skill and knowl-
`edge.
`14. The method of claim 13 wherein said strategy game is
`selected from the group consisting of crosswords, word
`search, word scramble, word match, chess, maze games,
`computer generated sporting games, player participation
`sports including virtual sporting events, video sporting
`
`evenL-s and computer based sporting events, player partici-
`pation Vimlil] reality games, player participation action
`games, dominos, checkers, pinball and foosball.
`15. The method of claim 1 wherein said game of skill is
`5 based on the memory reaction of the player.
`16. The method of claim 1 wherein said game of skill is
`based on the manual dexterity and reaction time of the
`player.
`17, The method of claim 1 wherein said playoll: round is
`ID played at a predetermined time and date.
`18. The method of claim 1 wherein said playofi" round is
`played for a predetermined amount of time.
`19. The method of claim 1 wherein said player can
`participate in said qualifying round during a predetermined
`IS time frame.
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO.
`DATED
`INVENTOMS)
`
`: 6,174,237 Bl
`: January 16.200]
`: Stephenson
`
`Page 1 of l
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is
`hereby corrected as shown beIOw:
`
`Acting Dir-error ofthe United States Patent and Trademark 035cc
`
`Claims, page 5, column 6,
`Line 2, after “terminals" insm —, -:
`
`Line 63, change “shamy” to -- skamey --;
`Line 63, change “shamcy” to -- skamey —.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Second Day of October, 2001
`
`WM PM;
`
`NICHOLAS P. GODICI
`
`Aflefling Officer
`
`