throbber

`
`Patrick Lee
`Attorney
`202.362.3510 • Direct
`Patrick.Lee@FischLLP.com
`Fisch Hoffman Sigler LLP
`Attorneys at Law
`5335 Wisconsin Avenue NW
`Eighth Floor
`Washington DC 20015
`202.362.3500 • Main
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`June 11, 2013
`
`VIA EMAIL
`
`Paul C. Haughey, Esq.
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-3834
`
`
`Re:
`
`
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704
`
`
`Dear Mr. Haughey:
`
`I represent Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc. (“SPIP”) formerly known as
`Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc., with respect to the above-captioned Petition for
`Inter Parties Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704 (“the Petition”).1 As you know, the Petition
`identifies Sipnet EU S.R.O. (“Petitioner”) as the real party in interest. I am writing on behalf of
`SPIP to inquire about any other individuals or entities directly or indirectly involved in the
`preparation and/or filing of the Petition.
`
`
`Specifically, please identify anyone2 other than counsel at Kilpatrick Townsend &
`Stockton LLP, who contributed to, participated in, or were otherwise involved in the preparation
`and/or filing of the Petition in any way, including but not limited to any of the following
`activities:
`
` 
`
` Providing payment, funding, financial assistance, or other monetary contributions to
`Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s counsel in connection with the Petition;
`
`
`1 A new power of attorney was filed today with the PTAB in the above-captioned case and is
`attached for service.
`
`2 “anyone” shall mean, for purposes of this inquiry, individuals, trusts, corporations,
`partnerships, joint ventures, limited liability companies, associations, unincorporated
`organizations or other legal entities.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
` Exercising direction and/or control or otherwise providing input to Petitioner or Petitioner’s
`counsel in connection with the Petition, including but not limited to providing or suggesting
`any patents; printed publications; legal arguments; facts; claim constructions; claim charts;
`exhibits or documents, or any other technical and/or legal input in support of the Petition;
`
` Providing a partial or complete draft of the Petition to Petitioner or Petitioner’s counsel for
`filing with the Patent Office, or otherwise requesting that Petitioner and/or its counsel file the
`Petition;
`
` Participation in any litigation, and/or membership in any joint defense group (past or present)
`involving U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704, including but not limited to the Skype litigation (Case
`No. 06-2469, D.N.J. 2006) and Stalker litigation (Case No. 2:12-cv-00007, E.D. Va. 2012)
`referenced in the Petition;
`
` Entering or executing any settlement or licensing agreement(s) involving U.S. Patent No.
`6,108,704;
`
`Identifying or suggesting counsel to represent Petitioner in connection with the Petition;
`
` Communicating with Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s counsel in connection with the Petition.
`
`
`
`
`Please respond by June 18, 2013 with the requested information. Thank you in advance
`for your attention and cooperation with this matter.
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Patrick J. Lee
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket